Block 1995

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		47	0.64	15	0.00	52	0.04	56	0.04	52	0.05	63	0.04
Ashkenazy 1981		15	0.73	50	0.00	23	0.13	21	0.43	34	0.09	24	0.20
Beliavsky 2004		46	0.65	62	0.00	48	0.06	50	0.06	47	0.05	54	0.05
BenOr 1989		4	0.79	5	0.01	4	0.34	2	0.78	17	0.40	3	0.56
Biret 1990		21	0.72	20	0.00	24	0.12	20	0.43	44	0.07	30	0.17
Blet 2003		26	0.71	6	0.01	15	0.10	25	0.29	16	0.36	16	0.32
Block 1995		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Brailowsky 1960		43	0.65	17	0.00	42	0.06	45	0.06	17	0.48	27	0.17
Chiu 1999		9	0.76	18	0.00	8	0.21	8	0.58	18	0.51	4	0.54
Clidat 1994		29	0.70	59	0.00	29	0.08	27	0.23	32	0.08	31	0.14
Cohen 1997		57	0.58	53	0.00	59	0.05	53	0.05	35	0.07	50	0.06
Coop 1987		2	0.79	2	0.11	2	0.30	3	0.63	23	0.43	7	0.52
Cortot 1951		40	0.66	10	0.01	51	0.07	43	0.07	29	0.22	36	0.12
Czerny 1949		37	0.66	56	0.00	37	0.10	34	0.10	47	0.07	42	0.08
Czerny 1949b		44	0.65	33	0.00	38	0.10	35	0.10	38	0.09	41	0.09
Ezaki 2006		11	0.75	30	0.00	11	0.16	16	0.49	34	0.12	21	0.24
Falvay 1989		5	0.78	7	0.01	5	0.20	5	0.62	17	0.55	2	0.58
Ferenczy 1958		51	0.62	43	0.00	55	0.05	51	0.05	43	0.06	56	0.05
Fiorentino 1962		18	0.73	14	0.00	16	0.11	14	0.51	26	0.29	11	0.38
Fliere 1977		23	0.71	37	0.00	26	0.08	30	0.20	39	0.07	34	0.12
Fou 1978		13	0.74	35	0.00	13	0.12	13	0.52	30	0.27	12	0.37
Francois 1956		62	0.49	36	0.00	62	0.04	55	0.04	37	0.07	60	0.05
Hatto 1997		42	0.66	66	0.00	50	0.05	52	0.05	39	0.07	48	0.06
Horowitz 1971		53	0.61	34	0.00	46	0.04	58	0.04	32	0.12	44	0.07
Horowitz 1985		61	0.51	29	0.00	60	0.04	60	0.04	41	0.06	53	0.05
Indjic 2001		38	0.66	63	0.00	49	0.07	41	0.07	39	0.07	43	0.07
Kapell 1951		17	0.73	58	0.00	19	0.11	19	0.43	33	0.10	22	0.21
Kiepura 1999		28	0.71	28	0.00	27	0.08	31	0.17	20	0.50	19	0.29
Kilenyi 1937		27	0.71	32	0.00	18	0.12	18	0.44	41	0.09	23	0.20
Kissin 1993		8	0.76	12	0.01	10	0.24	7	0.61	30	0.18	15	0.33
Kitain 1937		63	0.42	44	0.00	63	0.06	47	0.06	42	0.06	51	0.06
Kushner 1990		56	0.59	60	0.00	58	0.04	63	0.04	55	0.04	61	0.04
Levy 1951		36	0.67	40	0.00	32	0.08	32	0.15	35	0.07	38	0.10
Luisada 1990		25	0.71	52	0.00	28	0.07	26	0.25	35	0.11	28	0.17
Lushtak 2004		30	0.70	4	0.02	31	0.10	29	0.21	32	0.13	29	0.17
Lympany 1968		32	0.69	9	0.01	33	0.08	39	0.08	20	0.40	25	0.18
Magaloff 1977		19	0.73	61	0.00	21	0.11	22	0.40	29	0.29	14	0.34
Magaloff 1977b		22	0.72	27	0.00	22	0.09	23	0.40	30	0.24	18	0.31
Magin 1975		7	0.78	26	0.00	6	0.21	4	0.63	20	0.58	1	0.60
Milkina 1970		45	0.65	46	0.00	54	0.04	61	0.04	64	0.03	64	0.03
Mohovich 1999		41	0.66	54	0.00	41	0.08	37	0.08	55	0.04	49	0.06
Nadelmann 1956		55	0.60	49	0.00	57	0.07	42	0.07	62	0.04	55	0.05
Ohlsson 1999		24	0.71	38	0.00	25	0.13	24	0.33	23	0.30	17	0.31
Olejniczac 1990		16	0.73	16	0.00	12	0.12	12	0.54	27	0.35	9	0.43
Olejniczak 1991		14	0.73	21	0.00	17	0.14	15	0.50	30	0.26	13	0.36
Osinska 1989		12	0.74	42	0.00	20	0.10	17	0.49	55	0.06	26	0.17
Paderewski 1912		52	0.62	55	0.00	47	0.04	59	0.04	50	0.06	57	0.05
Perahia 1994		60	0.51	45	0.00	61	0.04	57	0.04	42	0.06	58	0.05
Perlemuter 1986		48	0.64	23	0.00	44	0.06	48	0.06	24	0.25	35	0.12
Poblocka 1999		3	0.79	3	0.06	3	0.30	6	0.61	19	0.45	6	0.52
Rangell 2001		10	0.76	24	0.00	9	0.22	11	0.54	20	0.41	8	0.47
Risler 1920		50	0.63	57	0.00	34	0.08	38	0.08	37	0.10	40	0.09
Rosen 1989		49	0.63	51	0.00	53	0.04	62	0.04	39	0.06	59	0.05
Rubinstein 1939		59	0.57	31	0.00	45	0.06	46	0.06	39	0.07	47	0.06
Rubinstein 1952		39	0.66	13	0.00	36	0.08	36	0.08	48	0.05	52	0.06
Rubinstein 1966		54	0.61	41	0.00	56	0.04	54	0.04	44	0.05	62	0.04
Rummel 1943		58	0.58	25	0.00	43	0.06	49	0.06	23	0.27	33	0.13
Shebanova 2002		31	0.69	8	0.01	30	0.08	28	0.22	51	0.06	37	0.11
Smith 1975		35	0.67	39	0.00	39	0.08	40	0.08	57	0.05	46	0.06
Szpilman 1948		33	0.67	22	0.00	35	0.10	33	0.10	34	0.08	39	0.09
Uninsky 1971		20	0.73	11	0.01	14	0.15	9	0.56	10	0.50	5	0.53
Wasowski 1980		34	0.67	47	0.00	40	0.06	44	0.06	40	0.07	45	0.06
Weissenberg 1971		6	0.78	19	0.00	7	0.21	10	0.55	27	0.29	10	0.40
Average		1	0.84	1	0.68	1	0.67	1	0.92	42	0.08	20	0.27
Random 1		65	-0.03	64	0.00	65	0.02	65	0.02	54	0.03	65	0.02
Random 2		64	0.03	65	0.00	64	0.04	64	0.04	12	0.42	32	0.13
Random 3		66	-0.05	48	0.00	66	0.01	66	0.01	60	0.03	66	0.02

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).