Afanassiev 2001

Performance0-Rank  0-Score1-Rank  1-Score2-Rank  2-Score3-Rank  3-Score3R-Rank  3R-Score4-Rank  4-Score  NED
Afanassiev 2001   target  targettarget  targettarget  targettarget  targettarget  targettarget  target
Ashkenazy 1981   6  0.728  0.016  0.235  0.6133  0.0912  0.23
Beliavsky 2004   30  0.6655  0.0028  0.0827  0.2123  0.2313  0.22
BenOr 1989   5  0.723  0.015  0.224  0.6236  0.0910  0.24
Biret 1990   15  0.6835  0.0037  0.0549  0.0542  0.0753  0.06
Blet 2003   19  0.6761  0.0035  0.0553  0.0528  0.1839  0.09
Block 1995   41  0.6425  0.0047  0.0552  0.0556  0.0463  0.04
Brailowsky 1960   51  0.6229  0.0062  0.0548  0.0547  0.0655  0.05
Chiu 1999   45  0.6441  0.0038  0.0641  0.0648  0.0647  0.06
Clidat 1994   23  0.6733  0.0020  0.1020  0.3545  0.0532  0.13
Cohen 1997   29  0.6660  0.0040  0.0456  0.045  0.6620  0.16
Coop 1987   27  0.6620  0.0019  0.1119  0.3649  0.0622  0.15
Cortot 1951   49  0.6357  0.0060  0.0555  0.0543  0.0661  0.05
Czerny 1949   42  0.6454  0.0027  0.0728  0.2045  0.0734  0.12
Czerny 1949b   47  0.6338  0.0021  0.0725  0.2543  0.0730  0.13
Ezaki 2006   11  0.699  0.0022  0.0624  0.2652  0.0728  0.13
Falvay 1989   9  0.7010  0.0015  0.1013  0.4338  0.1014  0.21
Ferenczy 1958   46  0.6348  0.0056  0.0463  0.0428  0.2040  0.09
Fiorentino 1962   21  0.6762  0.0023  0.0621  0.3045  0.0727  0.14
Fliere 1977   4  0.732  0.022  0.342  0.7024  0.393  0.52
Fou 1978   37  0.6531  0.0030  0.0730  0.1652  0.0637  0.10
Francois 1956   60  0.5719  0.0049  0.0639  0.0611  0.5518  0.18
Hatto 1997   8  0.7213  0.009  0.148  0.5213  0.542  0.53
Horowitz 1971   55  0.6115  0.0033  0.0551  0.0527  0.2436  0.11
Horowitz 1985   59  0.5930  0.0051  0.0638  0.066  0.5416  0.18
Indjic 2001   3  0.7321  0.007  0.247  0.5711  0.551  0.56
Kapell 1951   44  0.6459  0.0036  0.0546  0.0543  0.0749  0.06
Kiepura 1999   28  0.6612  0.0042  0.0458  0.0450  0.0562  0.04
Kilenyi 1937   40  0.6514  0.0013  0.1114  0.4236  0.1115  0.21
Kissin 1993   10  0.706  0.014  0.316  0.6134  0.119  0.26
Kitain 1937   63  0.4342  0.0063  0.0640  0.0612  0.4521  0.16
Kushner 1990   50  0.6349  0.0034  0.0547  0.0542  0.0750  0.06
Levy 1951   48  0.635  0.0141  0.0643  0.0650  0.0648  0.06
Luisada 1990   43  0.6447  0.0055  0.0637  0.0649  0.0652  0.06
Lushtak 2004   24  0.6624  0.0026  0.0923  0.2741  0.0726  0.14
Lympany 1968   35  0.6539  0.0050  0.0642  0.0642  0.0646  0.06
Magaloff 1977   16  0.6852  0.0014  0.1015  0.4042  0.0817  0.18
Magaloff 1977b   17  0.6850  0.0018  0.1016  0.3952  0.0625  0.15
Magin 1975   20  0.6740  0.0039  0.0735  0.0744  0.0842  0.07
Milkina 1970   7  0.7226  0.0012  0.1512  0.4718  0.425  0.44
Mohovich 1999   31  0.6537  0.0029  0.0729  0.1646  0.0541  0.09
Nadelmann 1956   13  0.6918  0.0011  0.1310  0.5026  0.236  0.34
Ohlsson 1999   52  0.6246  0.0053  0.0733  0.0743  0.0743  0.07
Olejniczac 1990   18  0.6863  0.0024  0.0722  0.2951  0.0631  0.13
Olejniczak 1991   34  0.6558  0.0046  0.0545  0.0557  0.0558  0.05
Osinska 1989   2  0.734  0.013  0.253  0.6942  0.0811  0.23
Paderewski 1912   57  0.6044  0.0032  0.0532  0.0946  0.0644  0.07
Perahia 1994   58  0.5943  0.0054  0.0736  0.0719  0.3424  0.15
Perlemuter 1986   12  0.6916  0.008  0.1711  0.479  0.574  0.52
Poblocka 1999   26  0.6636  0.0045  0.0554  0.0551  0.0556  0.05
Rangell 2001   56  0.6145  0.0057  0.0461  0.0452  0.0660  0.05
Risler 1920   61  0.5434  0.0059  0.0459  0.0445  0.0757  0.05
Rosen 1989   54  0.6128  0.0061  0.0460  0.0450  0.0565  0.04
Rubinstein 1939   53  0.6227  0.0048  0.0544  0.0522  0.3329  0.13
Rubinstein 1952   39  0.6517  0.0043  0.0457  0.0453  0.0566  0.04
Rubinstein 1966   36  0.6553  0.0052  0.0734  0.0742  0.0551  0.06
Rummel 1943   62  0.5356  0.0058  0.0462  0.0460  0.0464  0.04
Shebanova 2002   14  0.6923  0.0016  0.1117  0.3843  0.0719  0.16
Smith 1975   22  0.6711  0.0010  0.149  0.5032  0.167  0.28
Szpilman 1948   33  0.6532  0.0025  0.0726  0.2548  0.0633  0.12
Uninsky 1971   25  0.6651  0.0017  0.0918  0.3638  0.0623  0.15
Wasowski 1980   38  0.6522  0.0044  0.0550  0.0552  0.0654  0.05
Weissenberg 1971   32  0.657  0.0131  0.0731  0.1350  0.0638  0.09
Average   1  0.801  0.851  0.841  0.9243  0.088  0.27
Random 1    66  -0.0166  0.0065  0.0265  0.0225  0.1559  0.05
Random 2   64  0.0465  0.0064  0.0364  0.0317  0.3835  0.11
Random 3   65  0.0064  0.0066  0.0166  0.0111  0.4645  0.07

Note: To load data table give above into Excel, copy and paste the data into a text editor (such as WordPad) first, then copy the text in the editor and past into Excel. You should remove the "target" line from the data before pasting into Excel so that plotting graphs of the data is done properly.

Column descriptions

  • Performance:
  • 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
  • 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
  • 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
  • 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
  • 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
  • 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
  • NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

  • red = strongly similar performance to target
  • orange = moderately similar performance
  • yellow = weakly similar performance
  • green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
  • white = dissimilar to target
  • blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).