Wasowski 1980

Performance0-Rank  0-Score1-Rank  1-Score2-Rank  2-Score3-Rank  3-Score3R-Rank  3R-Score4-Rank  4-Score  NED
Afanassiev 2001   46  0.6537  0.0040  0.0651  0.0650  0.0560  0.05
Ashkenazy 1981   5  0.756  0.055  0.196  0.6029  0.2711  0.40
Beliavsky 2004   47  0.6522  0.0051  0.0553  0.0532  0.1246  0.08
BenOr 1989   4  0.757  0.044  0.153  0.6533  0.1018  0.25
Biret 1990   32  0.6957  0.0027  0.0928  0.3452  0.0636  0.14
Blet 2003   53  0.6335  0.0052  0.0641  0.0655  0.0458  0.05
Block 1995   38  0.6726  0.0043  0.0739  0.0743  0.0750  0.07
Brailowsky 1960   56  0.6145  0.0058  0.0462  0.0450  0.0563  0.04
Chiu 1999   24  0.7033  0.0029  0.1127  0.3435  0.1323  0.21
Clidat 1994   45  0.6544  0.0047  0.0555  0.0555  0.0464  0.04
Cohen 1997   60  0.5661  0.0060  0.0459  0.0418  0.3241  0.11
Coop 1987   8  0.7412  0.028  0.138  0.5340  0.0922  0.22
Cortot 1951   39  0.6725  0.0046  0.0648  0.0614  0.4730  0.17
Czerny 1949   14  0.7224  0.0014  0.0711  0.4928  0.2714  0.36
Czerny 1949b   18  0.7132  0.0024  0.1025  0.3932  0.2416  0.31
Ezaki 2006   3  0.761  0.201  0.202  0.6620  0.461  0.55
Falvay 1989   37  0.6838  0.0048  0.0554  0.0540  0.0947  0.07
Ferenczy 1958   57  0.6055  0.0053  0.0557  0.0534  0.0949  0.07
Fiorentino 1962   30  0.6949  0.0023  0.0924  0.3940  0.0829  0.18
Fliere 1977   16  0.7116  0.0119  0.0726  0.3644  0.0632  0.15
Fou 1978   7  0.7410  0.026  0.275  0.6128  0.326  0.44
Francois 1956   59  0.5854  0.0062  0.0649  0.0628  0.1843  0.10
Hatto 1997   20  0.7119  0.0126  0.0923  0.3914  0.515  0.45
Horowitz 1971   48  0.6441  0.0045  0.0646  0.0624  0.3038  0.13
Horowitz 1985   58  0.5958  0.0055  0.0556  0.0514  0.4333  0.15
Indjic 2001   19  0.7136  0.0025  0.0822  0.3916  0.467  0.42
Kapell 1951   15  0.7234  0.0017  0.0816  0.4336  0.0926  0.20
Kiepura 1999   41  0.6728  0.0049  0.0552  0.0533  0.0751  0.06
Kilenyi 1937   29  0.6947  0.0022  0.0914  0.4541  0.0927  0.20
Kissin 1993   22  0.7023  0.0028  0.0929  0.3445  0.0734  0.15
Kitain 1937   62  0.4751  0.0061  0.0460  0.0431  0.2144  0.09
Kushner 1990   31  0.6911  0.0221  0.0715  0.449  0.584  0.51
Levy 1951   27  0.7013  0.0112  0.1210  0.5111  0.592  0.55
Luisada 1990   6  0.745  0.109  0.1420  0.4126  0.3712  0.39
Lushtak 2004   17  0.7118  0.0130  0.1131  0.2916  0.4315  0.35
Lympany 1968   51  0.6456  0.0050  0.0650  0.0654  0.0554  0.05
Magaloff 1977   10  0.7214  0.0113  0.0813  0.4627  0.3410  0.40
Magaloff 1977b   12  0.7220  0.0018  0.0921  0.4126  0.3413  0.37
Magin 1975   9  0.739  0.0210  0.1119  0.4235  0.1124  0.21
Milkina 1970   35  0.6821  0.0041  0.0645  0.0633  0.1045  0.08
Mohovich 1999   36  0.6843  0.0039  0.0737  0.0756  0.0462  0.05
Nadelmann 1956   40  0.6730  0.0033  0.1333  0.1334  0.0842  0.10
Ohlsson 1999   28  0.7050  0.0036  0.0934  0.0931  0.2135  0.14
Olejniczac 1990   25  0.7059  0.0020  0.1017  0.4335  0.1025  0.21
Olejniczak 1991   23  0.7046  0.0015  0.0812  0.4835  0.1121  0.23
Osinska 1989   1  0.764  0.122  0.194  0.6438  0.0919  0.24
Paderewski 1912   44  0.6627  0.0038  0.0836  0.0828  0.2137  0.13
Perahia 1994   49  0.648  0.0334  0.0835  0.0811  0.5128  0.20
Perlemuter 1986   55  0.6260  0.0057  0.0643  0.0658  0.0457  0.05
Poblocka 1999   2  0.763  0.123  0.231  0.6827  0.423  0.53
Rangell 2001   21  0.7129  0.0016  0.0918  0.4229  0.1917  0.28
Risler 1920   61  0.5662  0.0059  0.0461  0.0450  0.0655  0.05
Rosen 1989   52  0.6353  0.0056  0.0558  0.0542  0.0661  0.05
Rubinstein 1939   54  0.6331  0.0044  0.0740  0.0720  0.3631  0.16
Rubinstein 1952   33  0.6939  0.0037  0.0738  0.0750  0.0553  0.06
Rubinstein 1966   43  0.6642  0.0042  0.0642  0.0641  0.0559  0.05
Rummel 1943   50  0.6440  0.0054  0.0644  0.0639  0.0652  0.06
Shebanova 2002   13  0.7217  0.0111  0.119  0.5119  0.338  0.41
Smith 1975   11  0.722  0.137  0.277  0.5427  0.299  0.40
Szpilman 1948   42  0.6648  0.0032  0.1132  0.2044  0.0640  0.11
Uninsky 1971   26  0.7015  0.0131  0.1530  0.3331  0.1720  0.24
Wasowski 1980   target  targettarget  targettarget  targettarget  targettarget  targettarget  target
Weissenberg 1971   34  0.6852  0.0035  0.0647  0.0640  0.0848  0.07
Random 1    64  -0.0365  0.0064  0.0264  0.0229  0.1356  0.05
Random 2   63  0.0264  0.0063  0.0463  0.0419  0.3739  0.12
Random 3   65  -0.0463  0.0065  0.0265  0.0233  0.0565  0.03

Note: To load data table give above into Excel, copy and paste the data into a text editor (such as WordPad) first, then copy the text in the editor and past into Excel. You should remove the "target" line from the data before pasting into Excel so that plotting graphs of the data is done properly.

Column descriptions

  • Performance:
  • 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
  • 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
  • 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
  • 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
  • 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
  • 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
  • NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

  • red = strongly similar performance to target
  • orange = moderately similar performance
  • yellow = weakly similar performance
  • green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
  • white = dissimilar to target
  • blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).