Shebanova 2002

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		36	0.69	17	0.01	45	0.07	42	0.07	16	0.38	34	0.16
Ashkenazy 1981		17	0.72	55	0.00	34	0.09	33	0.09	35	0.09	48	0.09
Beliavsky 2004		52	0.63	34	0.00	53	0.08	35	0.08	47	0.05	54	0.06
BenOr 1989		5	0.76	18	0.01	5	0.20	6	0.65	21	0.38	10	0.50
Biret 1990		26	0.70	49	0.00	24	0.11	23	0.29	33	0.10	32	0.17
Blet 2003		42	0.67	38	0.00	49	0.07	46	0.07	26	0.22	40	0.12
Block 1995		32	0.69	40	0.00	43	0.06	50	0.06	27	0.24	43	0.12
Brailowsky 1960		56	0.60	58	0.00	58	0.06	52	0.06	41	0.08	50	0.07
Chiu 1999		12	0.73	5	0.03	9	0.14	9	0.52	21	0.48	9	0.50
Clidat 1994		50	0.63	43	0.00	52	0.05	57	0.05	57	0.04	65	0.04
Cohen 1997		59	0.58	56	0.00	59	0.04	62	0.04	31	0.17	49	0.08
Coop 1987		4	0.76	3	0.07	4	0.43	4	0.68	17	0.50	4	0.58
Cortot 1951		51	0.63	39	0.00	57	0.05	60	0.05	41	0.07	58	0.06
Czerny 1949		34	0.69	16	0.01	21	0.09	24	0.27	31	0.22	22	0.24
Czerny 1949b		37	0.68	47	0.00	25	0.07	31	0.14	33	0.13	38	0.13
Ezaki 2006		1	0.80	1	0.39	1	0.38	1	0.79	7	0.66	2	0.72
Falvay 1989		9	0.74	23	0.00	11	0.16	14	0.46	22	0.43	13	0.44
Ferenczy 1958		48	0.64	27	0.00	48	0.06	48	0.06	10	0.53	29	0.18
Fiorentino 1962		23	0.71	35	0.00	20	0.12	18	0.39	36	0.11	25	0.21
Fliere 1977		16	0.72	36	0.00	16	0.15	12	0.49	28	0.26	17	0.36
Fou 1978		14	0.72	19	0.01	15	0.10	11	0.49	27	0.32	15	0.40
Francois 1956		57	0.59	20	0.01	56	0.07	43	0.07	11	0.54	27	0.19
Hatto 1997		21	0.72	22	0.00	19	0.13	22	0.29	10	0.56	16	0.40
Horowitz 1971		54	0.62	26	0.00	55	0.08	38	0.08	45	0.05	57	0.06
Horowitz 1985		61	0.47	57	0.00	61	0.06	49	0.06	61	0.04	59	0.05
Indjic 2001		10	0.74	8	0.01	12	0.15	15	0.46	4	0.63	5	0.54
Kapell 1951		13	0.72	50	0.00	14	0.10	20	0.30	41	0.07	37	0.14
Kiepura 1999		35	0.69	9	0.01	42	0.05	58	0.05	18	0.50	33	0.16
Kilenyi 1937		28	0.70	52	0.00	18	0.11	16	0.43	30	0.30	18	0.36
Kissin 1993		6	0.76	48	0.00	7	0.16	8	0.58	31	0.15	19	0.29
Kitain 1937		62	0.37	59	0.00	62	0.06	54	0.06	43	0.06	56	0.06
Kushner 1990		39	0.67	11	0.01	30	0.07	28	0.17	20	0.42	21	0.27
Levy 1951		45	0.66	61	0.00	47	0.08	40	0.08	31	0.12	45	0.10
Luisada 1990		22	0.71	33	0.00	35	0.09	34	0.09	29	0.25	35	0.15
Lushtak 2004		7	0.74	7	0.02	6	0.14	5	0.66	1	0.73	3	0.69
Lympany 1968		33	0.69	31	0.00	39	0.06	51	0.06	12	0.46	31	0.17
Magaloff 1977		30	0.70	42	0.00	28	0.06	26	0.17	38	0.09	41	0.12
Magaloff 1977b		31	0.70	53	0.00	29	0.07	29	0.17	38	0.08	44	0.12
Magin 1975		11	0.74	24	0.00	13	0.11	13	0.48	25	0.50	11	0.49
Milkina 1970		15	0.72	13	0.01	32	0.08	30	0.15	13	0.51	20	0.28
Mohovich 1999		19	0.72	10	0.01	10	0.12	10	0.50	10	0.57	8	0.53
Nadelmann 1956		46	0.65	44	0.00	46	0.07	44	0.07	46	0.06	55	0.06
Ohlsson 1999		20	0.72	25	0.00	17	0.11	17	0.42	7	0.54	12	0.48
Olejniczac 1990		24	0.71	51	0.00	23	0.08	21	0.30	33	0.14	26	0.20
Olejniczak 1991		38	0.68	63	0.00	40	0.06	55	0.06	33	0.15	47	0.09
Osinska 1989		3	0.77	6	0.02	3	0.29	3	0.69	26	0.40	6	0.53
Paderewski 1912		49	0.64	32	0.00	41	0.04	61	0.04	41	0.07	61	0.05
Perahia 1994		55	0.61	4	0.04	26	0.07	32	0.11	8	0.54	23	0.24
Perlemuter 1986		29	0.70	12	0.01	33	0.08	37	0.08	5	0.67	24	0.23
Poblocka 1999		2	0.80	2	0.27	2	0.51	2	0.79	6	0.71	1	0.75
Rangell 2001		25	0.71	54	0.00	31	0.08	27	0.17	31	0.14	36	0.15
Risler 1920		53	0.62	60	0.00	50	0.08	36	0.08	32	0.18	39	0.12
Rosen 1989		47	0.65	30	0.00	51	0.07	41	0.07	14	0.48	30	0.18
Rubinstein 1939		58	0.58	45	0.00	54	0.05	59	0.05	34	0.08	53	0.06
Rubinstein 1952		40	0.67	29	0.00	44	0.06	53	0.06	43	0.05	64	0.05
Rubinstein 1966		27	0.70	41	0.00	37	0.07	45	0.07	13	0.44	28	0.18
Rummel 1943		60	0.53	46	0.00	60	0.07	47	0.07	57	0.04	62	0.05
Shebanova 2002		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Smith 1975		41	0.67	37	0.00	36	0.08	39	0.08	50	0.05	52	0.06
Szpilman 1948		43	0.67	14	0.01	38	0.06	56	0.06	45	0.06	51	0.06
Uninsky 1971		44	0.67	28	0.00	27	0.06	25	0.19	53	0.05	46	0.10
Wasowski 1980		18	0.72	15	0.01	22	0.09	19	0.33	9	0.51	14	0.41
Weissenberg 1971		8	0.74	21	0.00	8	0.28	7	0.59	19	0.48	7	0.53
Random 1		65	-0.02	64	0.00	64	0.02	64	0.02	32	0.11	60	0.05
Random 2		63	0.04	65	0.00	63	0.04	63	0.04	16	0.39	42	0.12
Random 3		64	-0.01	62	0.00	65	0.02	65	0.02	27	0.15	63	0.05

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).