Rummel 1943

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		58	0.53	52	0.00	48	0.04	59	0.04	61	0.04	60	0.04
Ashkenazy 1981		22	0.62	30	0.00	28	0.07	29	0.23	52	0.06	28	0.12
Beliavsky 2004		48	0.56	51	0.00	47	0.05	46	0.05	49	0.05	49	0.05
BenOr 1989		1	0.67	8	0.04	8	0.12	10	0.47	43	0.07	11	0.18
Biret 1990		44	0.57	36	0.00	41	0.07	35	0.07	60	0.05	46	0.06
Blet 2003		38	0.59	18	0.01	13	0.09	15	0.34	42	0.08	13	0.16
Block 1995		42	0.58	13	0.02	14	0.08	23	0.28	48	0.06	20	0.13
Brailowsky 1960		5	0.65	5	0.07	4	0.15	3	0.58	9	0.57	1	0.57
Chiu 1999		55	0.55	46	0.00	44	0.04	49	0.04	56	0.05	56	0.04
Clidat 1994		19	0.63	4	0.08	7	0.12	6	0.49	28	0.10	8	0.22
Cohen 1997		62	0.42	60	0.00	62	0.06	43	0.06	37	0.06	44	0.06
Coop 1987		41	0.58	62	0.00	36	0.06	37	0.06	62	0.04	50	0.05
Cortot 1951		52	0.56	41	0.00	50	0.04	55	0.04	44	0.06	54	0.05
Czerny 1949		12	0.64	47	0.00	31	0.10	30	0.22	50	0.06	31	0.11
Czerny 1949b		4	0.65	25	0.00	30	0.08	26	0.26	55	0.06	25	0.12
Ezaki 2006		43	0.57	64	0.00	58	0.05	45	0.05	61	0.05	47	0.05
Falvay 1989		49	0.56	58	0.00	49	0.04	58	0.04	62	0.04	57	0.04
Ferenczy 1958		59	0.52	56	0.00	51	0.04	60	0.04	56	0.05	59	0.04
Fiorentino 1962		31	0.61	32	0.00	35	0.06	41	0.06	43	0.07	45	0.06
Fliere 1977		11	0.64	22	0.01	19	0.07	12	0.39	62	0.04	22	0.12
Fou 1978		10	0.65	2	0.11	3	0.14	9	0.48	49	0.06	12	0.17
Francois 1956		39	0.59	31	0.00	56	0.05	47	0.05	23	0.29	29	0.12
Hatto 1997		54	0.55	54	0.00	45	0.05	48	0.05	58	0.05	52	0.05
Horowitz 1971		8	0.65	3	0.10	2	0.16	4	0.51	14	0.48	2	0.49
Horowitz 1985		51	0.56	33	0.00	54	0.04	54	0.04	24	0.27	32	0.10
Indjic 2001		47	0.57	42	0.00	40	0.06	40	0.06	49	0.06	43	0.06
Kapell 1951		34	0.60	35	0.00	21	0.08	21	0.29	54	0.05	26	0.12
Kiepura 1999		30	0.61	16	0.01	55	0.04	53	0.04	60	0.04	55	0.04
Kilenyi 1937		3	0.66	12	0.02	10	0.15	5	0.49	45	0.07	10	0.19
Kissin 1993		26	0.62	7	0.05	9	0.11	11	0.40	50	0.06	14	0.15
Kitain 1937		61	0.49	10	0.03	43	0.04	52	0.04	7	0.54	16	0.15
Kushner 1990		40	0.58	63	0.00	46	0.04	51	0.04	58	0.04	58	0.04
Levy 1951		37	0.59	11	0.02	12	0.10	14	0.36	27	0.15	7	0.23
Luisada 1990		18	0.63	15	0.01	38	0.06	42	0.06	53	0.06	42	0.06
Lushtak 2004		50	0.56	61	0.00	57	0.04	50	0.04	63	0.03	63	0.03
Lympany 1968		28	0.62	34	0.00	20	0.08	13	0.39	32	0.14	6	0.23
Magaloff 1977		20	0.63	45	0.00	24	0.10	19	0.31	46	0.07	15	0.15
Magaloff 1977b		23	0.62	43	0.00	26	0.07	28	0.25	43	0.07	21	0.13
Magin 1975		24	0.62	9	0.03	39	0.07	36	0.07	55	0.05	41	0.06
Milkina 1970		21	0.62	28	0.00	22	0.06	17	0.32	47	0.06	18	0.14
Mohovich 1999		14	0.64	17	0.01	17	0.07	25	0.26	59	0.04	36	0.10
Nadelmann 1956		6	0.65	1	0.22	1	0.21	1	0.66	28	0.22	3	0.38
Ohlsson 1999		53	0.55	29	0.00	52	0.03	62	0.03	60	0.03	62	0.03
Olejniczac 1990		27	0.62	27	0.00	32	0.10	32	0.19	58	0.05	35	0.10
Olejniczak 1991		36	0.60	44	0.00	42	0.07	34	0.07	57	0.05	40	0.06
Osinska 1989		17	0.63	59	0.00	29	0.08	27	0.26	60	0.04	33	0.10
Paderewski 1912		7	0.65	6	0.06	5	0.16	2	0.59	30	0.21	4	0.35
Perahia 1994		45	0.57	38	0.00	53	0.03	61	0.03	28	0.18	38	0.07
Perlemuter 1986		25	0.62	19	0.01	37	0.06	38	0.06	57	0.05	51	0.05
Poblocka 1999		13	0.64	23	0.01	23	0.08	22	0.28	57	0.05	23	0.12
Rangell 2001		33	0.60	57	0.00	16	0.10	18	0.31	46	0.07	17	0.15
Risler 1920		60	0.52	39	0.00	59	0.04	56	0.04	48	0.06	48	0.05
Rosen 1989		57	0.53	65	0.00	61	0.05	44	0.05	57	0.04	61	0.04
Rubinstein 1939		35	0.60	20	0.01	15	0.08	20	0.30	24	0.32	5	0.31
Rubinstein 1952		2	0.66	24	0.01	11	0.14	8	0.48	56	0.04	19	0.14
Rubinstein 1966		29	0.61	21	0.01	25	0.09	24	0.27	60	0.04	34	0.10
Rummel 1943		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Shebanova 2002		56	0.53	55	0.00	60	0.04	57	0.04	47	0.07	53	0.05
Smith 1975		16	0.63	26	0.00	18	0.07	16	0.34	61	0.04	24	0.12
Szpilman 1948		32	0.61	40	0.00	33	0.10	33	0.10	46	0.06	37	0.08
Uninsky 1971		9	0.65	14	0.02	6	0.11	7	0.48	33	0.08	9	0.20
Wasowski 1980		15	0.64	37	0.00	34	0.06	39	0.06	44	0.06	39	0.06
Weissenberg 1971		46	0.57	49	0.00	27	0.09	31	0.21	52	0.06	30	0.11
Random 1		65	-0.07	53	0.00	65	0.02	65	0.02	65	0.02	64	0.02
Random 2		63	-0.01	48	0.00	63	0.03	64	0.03	60	0.02	65	0.02
Random 3		64	-0.02	50	0.00	64	0.03	63	0.03	10	0.46	27	0.12

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).