Risler 1920

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		47	0.54	17	0.01	43	0.07	44	0.07	58	0.04	56	0.05
Ashkenazy 1981		35	0.60	35	0.00	36	0.13	34	0.13	50	0.06	36	0.09
Beliavsky 2004		29	0.63	9	0.02	31	0.13	28	0.32	20	0.27	12	0.29
BenOr 1989		26	0.64	61	0.00	29	0.10	30	0.26	58	0.04	34	0.10
Biret 1990		21	0.65	11	0.01	22	0.16	19	0.44	42	0.07	23	0.18
Blet 2003		44	0.55	54	0.00	48	0.07	41	0.07	58	0.04	54	0.05
Block 1995		30	0.63	39	0.00	33	0.11	37	0.11	38	0.08	35	0.09
Brailowsky 1960		53	0.51	44	0.00	53	0.05	52	0.05	54	0.05	51	0.05
Chiu 1999		14	0.67	33	0.00	18	0.08	20	0.42	38	0.10	20	0.20
Clidat 1994		24	0.65	27	0.00	30	0.11	26	0.32	34	0.07	27	0.15
Cohen 1997		61	0.42	32	0.00	62	0.06	51	0.06	62	0.04	58	0.05
Coop 1987		2	0.73	10	0.01	2	0.35	2	0.68	26	0.37	2	0.50
Cortot 1951		54	0.50	63	0.00	55	0.05	54	0.05	58	0.04	62	0.04
Czerny 1949		19	0.66	7	0.02	4	0.13	10	0.54	29	0.25	9	0.37
Czerny 1949b		34	0.61	28	0.00	28	0.08	31	0.21	40	0.08	29	0.13
Ezaki 2006		4	0.70	12	0.01	7	0.21	7	0.55	31	0.29	8	0.40
Falvay 1989		25	0.64	8	0.02	24	0.12	21	0.42	51	0.06	26	0.16
Ferenczy 1958		57	0.48	41	0.00	54	0.05	53	0.05	55	0.05	55	0.05
Fiorentino 1962		17	0.67	53	0.00	21	0.18	18	0.45	34	0.12	16	0.23
Fliere 1977		22	0.65	42	0.00	23	0.14	23	0.40	38	0.08	22	0.18
Fou 1978		11	0.67	29	0.00	15	0.15	13	0.49	35	0.10	18	0.22
Francois 1956		60	0.42	20	0.01	60	0.03	62	0.03	59	0.04	65	0.03
Hatto 1997		50	0.53	57	0.00	44	0.07	45	0.07	62	0.05	45	0.06
Horowitz 1971		55	0.49	37	0.00	57	0.04	59	0.04	42	0.06	59	0.05
Horowitz 1985		58	0.45	46	0.00	59	0.04	55	0.04	45	0.06	50	0.05
Indjic 2001		46	0.54	62	0.00	42	0.06	46	0.06	40	0.07	47	0.06
Kapell 1951		6	0.70	19	0.01	9	0.18	6	0.55	35	0.10	15	0.23
Kiepura 1999		41	0.56	38	0.00	47	0.06	47	0.06	59	0.04	48	0.05
Kilenyi 1937		7	0.69	43	0.00	8	0.14	9	0.55	28	0.35	6	0.44
Kissin 1993		3	0.71	4	0.06	3	0.17	3	0.60	35	0.11	14	0.26
Kitain 1937		62	0.40	23	0.00	61	0.04	57	0.04	59	0.03	64	0.03
Kushner 1990		33	0.61	2	0.09	5	0.14	29	0.29	28	0.25	13	0.27
Levy 1951		27	0.64	15	0.01	26	0.09	25	0.35	38	0.07	25	0.16
Luisada 1990		9	0.68	34	0.00	13	0.14	4	0.57	24	0.41	4	0.48
Lushtak 2004		43	0.56	52	0.00	45	0.10	39	0.10	60	0.04	46	0.06
Lympany 1968		52	0.51	65	0.00	52	0.04	58	0.04	62	0.03	63	0.03
Magaloff 1977		8	0.69	22	0.01	10	0.23	8	0.55	20	0.43	3	0.49
Magaloff 1977b		12	0.67	5	0.04	11	0.22	11	0.54	21	0.41	5	0.47
Magin 1975		23	0.65	49	0.00	17	0.08	16	0.45	31	0.27	10	0.35
Milkina 1970		39	0.57	25	0.00	38	0.07	43	0.07	55	0.05	43	0.06
Mohovich 1999		31	0.62	30	0.00	27	0.09	27	0.32	58	0.04	32	0.11
Nadelmann 1956		40	0.57	40	0.00	37	0.13	35	0.13	51	0.05	37	0.08
Ohlsson 1999		28	0.63	6	0.03	34	0.14	33	0.14	34	0.08	31	0.11
Olejniczac 1990		16	0.67	47	0.00	20	0.13	17	0.45	39	0.09	21	0.20
Olejniczak 1991		10	0.68	64	0.00	14	0.12	14	0.47	38	0.10	17	0.22
Osinska 1989		13	0.67	51	0.00	12	0.18	12	0.53	43	0.08	19	0.21
Paderewski 1912		38	0.58	59	0.00	40	0.11	36	0.11	50	0.06	39	0.08
Perahia 1994		59	0.44	48	0.00	58	0.03	61	0.03	50	0.05	60	0.04
Perlemuter 1986		49	0.53	16	0.01	49	0.06	49	0.06	62	0.04	53	0.05
Poblocka 1999		5	0.70	24	0.00	6	0.14	5	0.57	31	0.33	7	0.43
Rangell 2001		15	0.67	58	0.00	19	0.10	24	0.39	48	0.07	24	0.17
Risler 1920		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Rosen 1989		48	0.53	13	0.01	51	0.04	56	0.04	59	0.04	61	0.04
Rubinstein 1939		56	0.49	14	0.01	56	0.04	60	0.04	45	0.06	52	0.05
Rubinstein 1952		37	0.58	31	0.00	39	0.09	40	0.09	49	0.05	42	0.07
Rubinstein 1966		45	0.54	21	0.01	41	0.07	42	0.07	36	0.06	44	0.06
Rummel 1943		51	0.52	36	0.00	50	0.06	48	0.06	56	0.04	57	0.05
Shebanova 2002		32	0.62	26	0.00	32	0.09	32	0.18	36	0.08	30	0.12
Smith 1975		20	0.66	18	0.01	25	0.10	22	0.41	53	0.05	28	0.14
Szpilman 1948		18	0.67	3	0.06	16	0.09	15	0.46	27	0.18	11	0.29
Uninsky 1971		36	0.59	45	0.00	35	0.10	38	0.10	50	0.05	41	0.07
Wasowski 1980		42	0.56	56	0.00	46	0.06	50	0.06	61	0.04	49	0.05
Weissenberg 1971		1	0.73	1	0.52	1	0.51	1	0.72	17	0.49	1	0.59
Random 1		64	0.00	50	0.00	64	0.02	64	0.02	4	0.48	33	0.10
Random 2		63	0.03	60	0.00	63	0.03	63	0.03	29	0.23	38	0.08
Random 3		65	-0.02	55	0.00	65	0.02	65	0.02	17	0.30	40	0.08

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).