Random 2

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		15	0.04	20	0.01	16	0.07	17	0.38	63	0.03	21	0.11
Ashkenazy 1981		37	0.02	56	0.00	42	0.06	35	0.06	62	0.03	42	0.04
Beliavsky 2004		60	-0.01	64	0.00	45	0.05	43	0.05	63	0.03	37	0.04
BenOr 1989		58	0.00	59	0.00	57	0.02	62	0.02	63	0.03	63	0.02
Biret 1990		38	0.02	32	0.00	50	0.03	55	0.03	63	0.03	54	0.03
Blet 2003		10	0.04	31	0.00	18	0.07	12	0.43	60	0.04	6	0.13
Block 1995		17	0.03	11	0.02	13	0.08	10	0.43	63	0.04	7	0.13
Brailowsky 1960		61	-0.01	49	0.00	63	0.02	64	0.02	63	0.02	56	0.02
Chiu 1999		32	0.02	9	0.03	10	0.08	24	0.31	63	0.02	30	0.08
Clidat 1994		56	0.00	40	0.00	54	0.03	54	0.03	64	0.02	60	0.02
Cohen 1997		4	0.05	1	0.16	1	0.16	2	0.53	63	0.03	8	0.13
Coop 1987		36	0.02	47	0.00	41	0.05	36	0.05	63	0.03	38	0.04
Cortot 1951		53	0.00	12	0.01	48	0.03	53	0.03	64	0.02	64	0.02
Czerny 1949		59	0.00	45	0.00	43	0.05	41	0.05	63	0.03	40	0.04
Czerny 1949b		52	0.00	55	0.00	49	0.03	52	0.03	63	0.03	49	0.03
Ezaki 2006		54	0.00	62	0.00	60	0.02	61	0.02	63	0.03	55	0.02
Falvay 1989		30	0.02	51	0.00	40	0.04	45	0.04	63	0.03	46	0.03
Ferenczy 1958		62	-0.01	42	0.00	64	0.02	57	0.02	63	0.02	59	0.02
Fiorentino 1962		6	0.05	58	0.00	15	0.08	4	0.47	63	0.03	16	0.12
Fliere 1977		39	0.01	60	0.00	44	0.05	39	0.05	63	0.03	35	0.04
Fou 1978		50	0.00	63	0.00	62	0.03	56	0.03	62	0.03	50	0.03
Francois 1956		65	-0.02	57	0.00	55	0.02	58	0.02	64	0.02	65	0.02
Hatto 1997		13	0.04	25	0.01	20	0.08	3	0.47	63	0.03	12	0.12
Horowitz 1971		5	0.05	10	0.02	9	0.11	14	0.40	56	0.04	9	0.13
Horowitz 1985		2	0.06	2	0.14	3	0.16	13	0.41	63	0.04	4	0.13
Indjic 2001		22	0.03	39	0.00	21	0.09	7	0.45	63	0.03	14	0.12
Kapell 1951		47	0.01	43	0.00	56	0.02	63	0.02	63	0.03	57	0.02
Kiepura 1999		46	0.01	18	0.01	22	0.07	26	0.28	63	0.03	27	0.09
Kilenyi 1937		34	0.02	30	0.00	33	0.06	33	0.06	62	0.04	33	0.05
Kissin 1993		8	0.04	21	0.01	30	0.08	28	0.25	61	0.04	23	0.10
Kitain 1937		12	0.04	8	0.03	8	0.10	15	0.39	52	0.04	15	0.12
Kushner 1990		24	0.03	19	0.01	31	0.10	31	0.21	62	0.03	31	0.08
Levy 1951		43	0.01	37	0.00	47	0.03	46	0.03	63	0.03	45	0.03
Luisada 1990		14	0.04	4	0.10	4	0.13	5	0.47	62	0.04	3	0.14
Lushtak 2004		27	0.02	15	0.01	23	0.08	20	0.35	62	0.03	25	0.10
Lympany 1968		42	0.01	34	0.00	38	0.05	37	0.05	63	0.03	34	0.04
Magaloff 1977		44	0.01	29	0.00	39	0.04	44	0.04	63	0.03	52	0.03
Magaloff 1977b		41	0.01	35	0.00	34	0.06	34	0.06	63	0.03	41	0.04
Magin 1975		29	0.02	52	0.00	37	0.05	38	0.05	63	0.04	36	0.04
Milkina 1970		16	0.03	24	0.01	14	0.07	6	0.45	62	0.04	5	0.13
Mohovich 1999		23	0.03	7	0.05	7	0.09	9	0.43	62	0.03	22	0.11
Nadelmann 1956		33	0.02	23	0.01	24	0.06	21	0.32	63	0.03	24	0.10
Ohlsson 1999		3	0.05	3	0.11	2	0.15	1	0.58	59	0.04	2	0.15
Olejniczac 1990		7	0.05	54	0.00	19	0.07	11	0.43	63	0.03	20	0.11
Olejniczak 1991		20	0.03	38	0.00	25	0.07	18	0.38	63	0.04	11	0.12
Osinska 1989		48	0.01	27	0.00	52	0.03	49	0.03	64	0.03	43	0.03
Paderewski 1912		51	0.00	50	0.00	53	0.03	48	0.03	62	0.03	53	0.03
Perahia 1994		45	0.01	33	0.00	26	0.07	30	0.21	63	0.04	28	0.09
Perlemuter 1986		35	0.02	6	0.06	5	0.13	8	0.44	63	0.03	19	0.11
Poblocka 1999		57	0.00	65	0.00	61	0.03	51	0.03	63	0.03	44	0.03
Rangell 2001		18	0.03	44	0.00	28	0.09	27	0.27	62	0.04	26	0.10
Risler 1920		26	0.03	13	0.01	27	0.07	29	0.23	63	0.03	29	0.08
Rosen 1989		40	0.01	28	0.00	46	0.03	47	0.03	63	0.02	62	0.02
Rubinstein 1939		28	0.02	48	0.00	36	0.05	42	0.05	63	0.02	48	0.03
Rubinstein 1952		19	0.03	36	0.00	32	0.10	32	0.20	63	0.03	32	0.08
Rubinstein 1966		25	0.03	53	0.00	35	0.05	40	0.05	63	0.03	39	0.04
Rummel 1943		64	-0.01	46	0.00	59	0.02	60	0.02	64	0.03	61	0.02
Shebanova 2002		11	0.04	17	0.01	11	0.07	16	0.39	63	0.04	13	0.12
Smith 1975		49	0.00	41	0.00	51	0.03	50	0.03	63	0.03	47	0.03
Szpilman 1948		9	0.04	14	0.01	12	0.07	25	0.28	63	0.04	17	0.11
Uninsky 1971		55	0.00	61	0.00	58	0.02	59	0.02	64	0.02	58	0.02
Wasowski 1980		31	0.02	22	0.01	17	0.08	19	0.37	63	0.04	10	0.12
Weissenberg 1971		21	0.03	26	0.00	29	0.09	23	0.31	62	0.04	18	0.11
Random 1		63	-0.01	16	0.01	65	0.02	65	0.02	41	0.04	51	0.03
Random 2		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Random 3		1	0.08	5	0.07	6	0.10	22	0.32	1	0.74	1	0.49

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).