Olejniczak 1991

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		47	0.65	43	0.00	49	0.05	56	0.05	45	0.05	59	0.05
Ashkenazy 1981		19	0.75	8	0.00	20	0.18	21	0.48	22	0.44	22	0.46
Beliavsky 2004		48	0.64	65	0.00	50	0.07	46	0.07	37	0.07	48	0.07
BenOr 1989		9	0.79	5	0.00	8	0.15	6	0.69	12	0.56	8	0.62
Biret 1990		14	0.76	14	0.00	13	0.16	14	0.56	7	0.61	9	0.58
Blet 2003		31	0.71	6	0.00	27	0.10	30	0.26	7	0.62	24	0.40
Block 1995		23	0.73	27	0.00	30	0.12	28	0.30	14	0.51	28	0.39
Brailowsky 1960		54	0.60	46	0.00	56	0.06	49	0.06	39	0.08	47	0.07
Chiu 1999		18	0.76	29	0.00	16	0.21	16	0.51	11	0.58	15	0.54
Clidat 1994		29	0.71	48	0.00	32	0.09	32	0.17	12	0.41	32	0.26
Cohen 1997		59	0.56	59	0.00	60	0.05	61	0.05	35	0.06	60	0.05
Coop 1987		4	0.81	7	0.00	4	0.41	5	0.74	8	0.68	4	0.71
Cortot 1951		56	0.59	64	0.00	59	0.05	58	0.05	53	0.05	61	0.05
Czerny 1949		22	0.74	54	0.00	17	0.12	19	0.50	9	0.61	14	0.55
Czerny 1949b		36	0.70	61	0.00	23	0.10	26	0.32	20	0.47	26	0.39
Ezaki 2006		5	0.81	9	0.00	7	0.26	10	0.60	17	0.53	10	0.56
Falvay 1989		16	0.76	10	0.00	19	0.20	15	0.53	12	0.59	12	0.56
Ferenczy 1958		51	0.62	19	0.00	47	0.05	54	0.05	11	0.52	41	0.16
Fiorentino 1962		2	0.87	3	0.01	2	0.87	2	0.95	2	0.93	2	0.94
Fliere 1977		20	0.74	31	0.00	25	0.11	24	0.41	27	0.34	29	0.37
Fou 1978		17	0.76	18	0.00	18	0.13	18	0.50	17	0.48	20	0.49
Francois 1956		61	0.48	53	0.00	61	0.05	59	0.05	60	0.04	63	0.04
Hatto 1997		49	0.63	60	0.00	51	0.08	44	0.08	55	0.05	52	0.06
Horowitz 1971		52	0.62	62	0.00	53	0.06	51	0.06	40	0.06	55	0.06
Horowitz 1985		60	0.54	50	0.00	58	0.05	62	0.05	39	0.06	56	0.05
Indjic 2001		45	0.65	41	0.00	48	0.07	47	0.07	35	0.07	50	0.07
Kapell 1951		13	0.77	38	0.00	12	0.16	13	0.56	13	0.53	16	0.54
Kiepura 1999		33	0.71	21	0.00	39	0.09	41	0.09	11	0.55	35	0.22
Kilenyi 1937		8	0.79	47	0.00	6	0.22	8	0.68	10	0.59	6	0.63
Kissin 1993		11	0.78	25	0.00	11	0.23	9	0.65	14	0.44	17	0.53
Kitain 1937		62	0.39	44	0.00	62	0.06	50	0.06	58	0.03	62	0.04
Kushner 1990		34	0.70	13	0.00	33	0.09	42	0.09	6	0.64	33	0.24
Levy 1951		41	0.66	49	0.00	38	0.08	45	0.08	25	0.24	43	0.14
Luisada 1990		15	0.76	12	0.00	14	0.14	17	0.50	8	0.55	18	0.52
Lushtak 2004		38	0.69	22	0.00	40	0.13	34	0.13	22	0.34	37	0.21
Lympany 1968		43	0.66	36	0.00	43	0.10	36	0.10	27	0.32	40	0.18
Magaloff 1977		21	0.74	26	0.00	24	0.13	25	0.39	24	0.39	27	0.39
Magaloff 1977b		25	0.73	51	0.00	29	0.11	27	0.31	27	0.34	31	0.32
Magin 1975		3	0.83	4	0.00	3	0.38	3	0.79	1	0.74	3	0.76
Milkina 1970		42	0.66	32	0.00	45	0.06	48	0.06	49	0.06	51	0.06
Mohovich 1999		26	0.73	28	0.00	26	0.10	22	0.44	11	0.56	19	0.50
Nadelmann 1956		30	0.71	11	0.00	35	0.09	40	0.09	10	0.42	39	0.19
Ohlsson 1999		37	0.70	34	0.00	37	0.10	37	0.10	18	0.37	38	0.19
Olejniczac 1990		1	0.89	1	0.92	1	0.91	1	0.96	2	0.93	1	0.94
Olejniczak 1991		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Osinska 1989		6	0.80	2	0.01	5	0.29	4	0.77	9	0.58	5	0.67
Paderewski 1912		46	0.65	57	0.00	42	0.09	39	0.09	26	0.24	42	0.15
Perahia 1994		57	0.57	42	0.00	44	0.05	55	0.05	30	0.16	46	0.09
Perlemuter 1986		53	0.60	20	0.00	54	0.06	52	0.06	51	0.05	58	0.05
Poblocka 1999		10	0.79	23	0.00	10	0.24	11	0.58	16	0.54	11	0.56
Rangell 2001		12	0.78	56	0.00	15	0.17	12	0.57	10	0.56	13	0.56
Risler 1920		39	0.68	63	0.00	34	0.10	38	0.10	14	0.47	36	0.22
Rosen 1989		50	0.63	58	0.00	55	0.05	60	0.05	37	0.08	54	0.06
Rubinstein 1939		58	0.57	37	0.00	57	0.06	53	0.06	47	0.05	57	0.05
Rubinstein 1952		32	0.71	24	0.00	31	0.11	31	0.22	14	0.50	30	0.33
Rubinstein 1966		44	0.65	17	0.00	46	0.09	43	0.09	50	0.05	49	0.07
Rummel 1943		55	0.60	40	0.00	52	0.05	57	0.05	34	0.07	53	0.06
Shebanova 2002		40	0.68	33	0.00	41	0.15	33	0.15	55	0.06	45	0.09
Smith 1975		24	0.73	35	0.00	22	0.09	20	0.48	12	0.48	21	0.48
Szpilman 1948		28	0.72	15	0.00	28	0.09	29	0.30	17	0.50	25	0.39
Uninsky 1971		27	0.72	30	0.00	21	0.10	23	0.44	20	0.42	23	0.43
Wasowski 1980		35	0.70	39	0.00	36	0.11	35	0.11	12	0.48	34	0.23
Weissenberg 1971		7	0.80	16	0.00	9	0.20	7	0.69	10	0.55	7	0.62
Random 1		64	-0.03	52	0.00	64	0.02	64	0.02	51	0.04	64	0.03
Random 2		63	0.03	55	0.00	63	0.04	63	0.04	18	0.38	44	0.12
Random 3		65	-0.04	45	0.00	65	0.02	65	0.02	54	0.03	65	0.02

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).