Nadelmann 1956

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		17	0.69	11	0.01	11	0.10	25	0.26	8	0.52	15	0.37
Ashkenazy 1981		14	0.70	56	0.00	23	0.08	24	0.27	39	0.08	36	0.15
Beliavsky 2004		52	0.62	25	0.00	32	0.07	32	0.13	27	0.22	27	0.17
BenOr 1989		2	0.73	12	0.01	5	0.21	4	0.63	35	0.10	18	0.25
Biret 1990		12	0.71	17	0.01	16	0.08	15	0.38	30	0.18	17	0.26
Blet 2003		10	0.71	23	0.00	8	0.12	9	0.45	9	0.56	5	0.50
Block 1995		56	0.60	38	0.00	56	0.04	61	0.04	41	0.07	62	0.05
Brailowsky 1960		29	0.67	35	0.00	46	0.05	52	0.05	5	0.60	25	0.17
Chiu 1999		48	0.64	28	0.00	49	0.06	43	0.06	54	0.05	59	0.05
Clidat 1994		25	0.68	14	0.01	33	0.07	41	0.07	38	0.06	56	0.06
Cohen 1997		59	0.58	46	0.00	61	0.04	60	0.04	16	0.37	40	0.12
Coop 1987		50	0.63	61	0.00	40	0.05	53	0.05	56	0.05	60	0.05
Cortot 1951		53	0.61	58	0.00	58	0.04	62	0.04	54	0.05	65	0.04
Czerny 1949		24	0.68	49	0.00	26	0.07	23	0.29	35	0.10	29	0.17
Czerny 1949b		32	0.67	52	0.00	20	0.09	12	0.40	23	0.42	11	0.41
Ezaki 2006		16	0.69	53	0.00	30	0.09	26	0.22	38	0.10	33	0.15
Falvay 1989		34	0.67	36	0.00	48	0.07	38	0.07	50	0.06	54	0.06
Ferenczy 1958		58	0.59	62	0.00	57	0.04	58	0.04	44	0.07	61	0.05
Fiorentino 1962		6	0.72	22	0.00	7	0.18	7	0.53	29	0.27	14	0.38
Fliere 1977		4	0.73	3	0.10	4	0.28	5	0.59	19	0.47	2	0.53
Fou 1978		22	0.68	13	0.01	21	0.09	16	0.38	39	0.08	26	0.17
Francois 1956		61	0.56	42	0.00	62	0.06	45	0.06	24	0.26	41	0.12
Hatto 1997		38	0.66	43	0.00	43	0.05	57	0.05	28	0.26	42	0.11
Horowitz 1971		41	0.65	44	0.00	41	0.05	54	0.05	13	0.50	32	0.16
Horowitz 1985		55	0.61	50	0.00	52	0.06	48	0.06	2	0.63	21	0.19
Indjic 2001		23	0.68	40	0.00	36	0.08	35	0.08	24	0.29	35	0.15
Kapell 1951		5	0.72	8	0.03	2	0.23	3	0.63	19	0.45	3	0.53
Kiepura 1999		47	0.64	27	0.00	55	0.05	56	0.05	56	0.04	63	0.04
Kilenyi 1937		31	0.67	29	0.00	22	0.12	17	0.36	38	0.10	23	0.19
Kissin 1993		30	0.67	31	0.00	19	0.10	19	0.33	48	0.06	37	0.14
Kitain 1937		62	0.48	39	0.00	60	0.05	55	0.05	8	0.53	31	0.16
Kushner 1990		13	0.70	51	0.00	18	0.08	18	0.36	7	0.63	6	0.48
Levy 1951		39	0.66	30	0.00	28	0.07	30	0.18	21	0.38	16	0.26
Luisada 1990		9	0.71	4	0.05	15	0.09	20	0.32	33	0.14	19	0.21
Lushtak 2004		36	0.66	48	0.00	50	0.08	36	0.08	33	0.11	49	0.09
Lympany 1968		26	0.68	54	0.00	34	0.06	44	0.06	13	0.46	24	0.17
Magaloff 1977		40	0.66	59	0.00	39	0.08	33	0.08	42	0.08	51	0.08
Magaloff 1977b		46	0.65	41	0.00	45	0.05	50	0.05	35	0.09	53	0.07
Magin 1975		7	0.72	6	0.03	9	0.12	8	0.49	30	0.34	10	0.41
Milkina 1970		19	0.68	10	0.01	35	0.07	40	0.07	26	0.26	39	0.13
Mohovich 1999		8	0.72	5	0.04	3	0.20	2	0.65	4	0.71	1	0.68
Nadelmann 1956		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Ohlsson 1999		51	0.62	45	0.00	53	0.07	39	0.07	41	0.07	52	0.07
Olejniczac 1990		3	0.73	2	0.10	6	0.23	6	0.58	30	0.36	7	0.46
Olejniczak 1991		11	0.71	19	0.01	17	0.09	10	0.42	40	0.09	22	0.19
Osinska 1989		1	0.76	1	0.41	1	0.41	1	0.69	28	0.37	4	0.51
Paderewski 1912		57	0.59	9	0.02	51	0.06	49	0.06	37	0.07	57	0.06
Perahia 1994		45	0.65	21	0.00	42	0.06	47	0.06	12	0.51	30	0.17
Perlemuter 1986		37	0.66	16	0.01	47	0.07	42	0.07	17	0.43	28	0.17
Poblocka 1999		15	0.69	47	0.00	29	0.10	27	0.22	39	0.08	38	0.13
Rangell 2001		28	0.68	26	0.00	31	0.09	31	0.17	40	0.07	43	0.11
Risler 1920		60	0.57	60	0.00	54	0.05	51	0.05	35	0.13	50	0.08
Rosen 1989		54	0.61	37	0.00	59	0.04	59	0.04	36	0.08	58	0.06
Rubinstein 1939		33	0.67	33	0.00	24	0.09	22	0.30	4	0.62	8	0.43
Rubinstein 1952		21	0.68	15	0.01	14	0.13	11	0.42	22	0.36	12	0.39
Rubinstein 1966		18	0.69	32	0.00	13	0.10	14	0.38	12	0.49	9	0.43
Rummel 1943		43	0.65	34	0.00	27	0.08	28	0.22	1	0.66	13	0.38
Shebanova 2002		44	0.65	55	0.00	44	0.06	46	0.06	44	0.07	55	0.06
Smith 1975		27	0.68	24	0.00	25	0.10	21	0.30	39	0.08	34	0.15
Szpilman 1948		49	0.64	57	0.00	37	0.07	37	0.07	31	0.13	45	0.10
Uninsky 1971		42	0.65	18	0.01	10	0.10	29	0.21	47	0.05	46	0.10
Wasowski 1980		35	0.67	20	0.00	38	0.08	34	0.08	33	0.13	44	0.10
Weissenberg 1971		20	0.68	7	0.03	12	0.09	13	0.38	35	0.11	20	0.20
Random 1		64	0.00	65	0.00	64	0.03	64	0.03	17	0.28	48	0.09
Random 2		63	0.02	63	0.00	63	0.03	63	0.03	21	0.32	47	0.10
Random 3		65	-0.03	64	0.00	65	0.02	65	0.02	31	0.10	64	0.04

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).