Levy 1951

Performance0-Rank  0-Score1-Rank  1-Score2-Rank  2-Score3-Rank  3-Score3R-Rank  3R-Score4-Rank  4-Score  NED
Afanassiev 2001   44  0.635  0.0440  0.0649  0.0643  0.0650  0.06
Ashkenazy 1981   18  0.6821  0.0020  0.1219  0.4137  0.0824  0.18
Beliavsky 2004   51  0.6118  0.0049  0.0562  0.0541  0.0656  0.05
BenOr 1989   8  0.7223  0.009  0.176  0.6841  0.0820  0.23
Biret 1990   21  0.6815  0.0116  0.1118  0.4726  0.2211  0.32
Blet 2003   53  0.6153  0.0058  0.0734  0.0757  0.0458  0.05
Block 1995   24  0.6749  0.0039  0.0735  0.0731  0.1734  0.11
Brailowsky 1960   45  0.6232  0.0046  0.0648  0.0621  0.4227  0.16
Chiu 1999   28  0.6659  0.0037  0.0652  0.0639  0.1039  0.08
Clidat 1994   33  0.6548  0.0030  0.0628  0.1556  0.0441  0.08
Cohen 1997   61  0.4857  0.0062  0.0651  0.0653  0.0462  0.05
Coop 1987   7  0.726  0.047  0.177  0.6641  0.0818  0.23
Cortot 1951   47  0.6252  0.0050  0.0560  0.0522  0.3831  0.14
Czerny 1949   20  0.6819  0.0015  0.1115  0.5227  0.289  0.38
Czerny 1949b   13  0.6910  0.0110  0.178  0.6316  0.524  0.57
Ezaki 2006   11  0.7022  0.0012  0.1414  0.5433  0.1316  0.26
Falvay 1989   12  0.6916  0.0119  0.1617  0.4932  0.1513  0.27
Ferenczy 1958   54  0.6025  0.0053  0.0640  0.0631  0.1737  0.10
Fiorentino 1962   22  0.6741  0.0034  0.0650  0.0650  0.0652  0.06
Fliere 1977   2  0.742  0.152  0.223  0.7221  0.452  0.57
Fou 1978   1  0.741  0.441  0.431  0.7910  0.571  0.67
Francois 1956   60  0.5133  0.0060  0.0653  0.0644  0.0654  0.06
Hatto 1997   39  0.6547  0.0043  0.0641  0.0634  0.0843  0.07
Horowitz 1971   55  0.5951  0.0055  0.0561  0.0562  0.0363  0.04
Horowitz 1985   58  0.5729  0.0054  0.0642  0.0615  0.4126  0.16
Indjic 2001   38  0.6555  0.0042  0.0737  0.0736  0.0745  0.07
Kapell 1951   5  0.7211  0.016  0.299  0.6223  0.358  0.47
Kiepura 1999   57  0.5843  0.0059  0.0654  0.0658  0.0455  0.05
Kilenyi 1937   16  0.6934  0.0017  0.1313  0.5731  0.2010  0.34
Kissin 1993   14  0.6965  0.0018  0.1216  0.5146  0.0625  0.17
Kitain 1937   62  0.4736  0.0061  0.0559  0.0533  0.1442  0.08
Kushner 1990   46  0.6237  0.0051  0.0644  0.0640  0.0749  0.06
Levy 1951   target  targettarget  targettarget  targettarget  targettarget  targettarget  target
Luisada 1990   36  0.6558  0.0038  0.0557  0.0541  0.0944  0.07
Lushtak 2004   30  0.6642  0.0033  0.0558  0.0543  0.0751  0.06
Lympany 1968   49  0.6144  0.0052  0.0639  0.0638  0.0646  0.06
Magaloff 1977   17  0.6838  0.0022  0.1120  0.3935  0.1022  0.20
Magaloff 1977b   19  0.6824  0.0023  0.1223  0.3439  0.0829  0.16
Magin 1975   37  0.6554  0.0031  0.0630  0.1338  0.1033  0.11
Milkina 1970   43  0.6340  0.0048  0.0643  0.0641  0.0747  0.06
Mohovich 1999   40  0.6439  0.0044  0.0555  0.0549  0.0561  0.05
Nadelmann 1956   29  0.6613  0.0114  0.1221  0.3830  0.1817  0.26
Ohlsson 1999   32  0.6631  0.0041  0.0645  0.0646  0.0648  0.06
Olejniczac 1990   23  0.6756  0.0035  0.0933  0.0945  0.0740  0.08
Olejniczak 1991   25  0.6662  0.0029  0.0625  0.2445  0.0830  0.14
Osinska 1989   6  0.723  0.075  0.275  0.6935  0.1112  0.28
Paderewski 1912   34  0.659  0.0121  0.1124  0.3227  0.2315  0.27
Perahia 1994   59  0.5614  0.0126  0.0729  0.1425  0.2423  0.18
Perlemuter 1986   50  0.6128  0.0056  0.0556  0.0552  0.0557  0.05
Poblocka 1999   3  0.738  0.024  0.272  0.7226  0.426  0.55
Rangell 2001   27  0.6660  0.0024  0.1322  0.3632  0.1321  0.22
Risler 1920   41  0.6435  0.0036  0.0738  0.0725  0.3528  0.16
Rosen 1989   48  0.6146  0.0057  0.0646  0.0650  0.0560  0.05
Rubinstein 1939   52  0.6120  0.0027  0.0632  0.1130  0.1332  0.12
Rubinstein 1952   35  0.6526  0.0045  0.0736  0.0746  0.0553  0.06
Rubinstein 1966   42  0.6330  0.0047  0.0647  0.0659  0.0459  0.05
Rummel 1943   56  0.5927  0.0028  0.0727  0.1514  0.3619  0.23
Shebanova 2002   26  0.6650  0.0032  0.0631  0.1240  0.0838  0.10
Smith 1975   4  0.724  0.073  0.204  0.7116  0.453  0.57
Szpilman 1948   15  0.6945  0.0011  0.1710  0.5919  0.477  0.53
Uninsky 1971   31  0.6617  0.0125  0.1126  0.2252  0.0536  0.10
Wasowski 1980   10  0.707  0.038  0.1711  0.5910  0.515  0.55
Weissenberg 1971   9  0.7112  0.0113  0.1312  0.5934  0.1214  0.27
Random 1    65  -0.0464  0.0065  0.0265  0.0255  0.0365  0.02
Random 2   63  0.0163  0.0063  0.0363  0.0346  0.0364  0.03
Random 3   64  0.0061  0.0064  0.0264  0.023  0.6035  0.11
Note: To load data table give above into Excel, copy and paste the data into a text editor (such as WordPad) first, then copy the text in the editor and past into Excel. You should remove the "target" line from the data before pasting into Excel so that plotting graphs of the data is done properly.

Column descriptions

  • Performance:
  • 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
  • 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
  • 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
  • 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
  • 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
  • 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
  • NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

  • red = strongly similar performance to target
  • orange = moderately similar performance
  • yellow = weakly similar performance
  • green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
  • white = dissimilar to target
  • blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).