Kitain 1937

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		41	0.43	47	0.00	11	0.11	12	0.46	40	0.06	6	0.17
Ashkenazy 1981		10	0.49	16	0.01	16	0.10	14	0.42	53	0.06	8	0.16
Beliavsky 2004		30	0.46	33	0.00	26	0.08	21	0.33	62	0.03	31	0.10
BenOr 1989		11	0.49	26	0.00	18	0.07	17	0.37	60	0.04	23	0.12
Biret 1990		28	0.46	60	0.00	31	0.08	30	0.23	48	0.06	24	0.12
Blet 2003		31	0.46	42	0.00	20	0.09	23	0.30	62	0.04	27	0.11
Block 1995		45	0.42	12	0.01	39	0.06	41	0.06	46	0.06	42	0.06
Brailowsky 1960		16	0.48	19	0.01	22	0.08	18	0.35	51	0.05	17	0.13
Chiu 1999		48	0.41	31	0.00	51	0.03	63	0.03	52	0.06	56	0.04
Clidat 1994		5	0.51	5	0.03	2	0.21	3	0.57	61	0.03	18	0.13
Cohen 1997		62	0.35	65	0.00	47	0.05	46	0.05	48	0.05	52	0.05
Coop 1987		47	0.41	52	0.00	53	0.03	61	0.03	50	0.06	60	0.04
Cortot 1951		39	0.44	45	0.00	27	0.08	26	0.25	62	0.04	32	0.10
Czerny 1949		20	0.47	4	0.03	34	0.09	35	0.09	60	0.04	39	0.06
Czerny 1949b		36	0.45	40	0.00	36	0.09	36	0.09	62	0.04	37	0.06
Ezaki 2006		49	0.40	51	0.00	54	0.03	57	0.03	54	0.06	53	0.04
Falvay 1989		54	0.39	25	0.00	55	0.03	56	0.03	53	0.06	57	0.04
Ferenczy 1958		60	0.37	63	0.00	59	0.04	49	0.04	61	0.04	61	0.04
Fiorentino 1962		38	0.44	38	0.00	44	0.06	44	0.06	51	0.06	43	0.06
Fliere 1977		15	0.48	8	0.01	33	0.09	34	0.09	59	0.04	36	0.06
Fou 1978		22	0.46	32	0.00	21	0.10	19	0.35	63	0.03	29	0.10
Francois 1956		57	0.39	59	0.00	48	0.04	50	0.04	53	0.05	63	0.04
Hatto 1997		55	0.39	54	0.00	46	0.04	48	0.04	46	0.06	46	0.05
Horowitz 1971		1	0.54	1	0.59	1	0.58	1	0.73	22	0.32	1	0.48
Horowitz 1985		6	0.51	11	0.01	7	0.18	6	0.55	17	0.36	2	0.44
Indjic 2001		53	0.39	57	0.00	45	0.05	45	0.05	51	0.06	50	0.05
Kapell 1951		34	0.45	35	0.00	25	0.07	27	0.24	58	0.04	30	0.10
Kiepura 1999		52	0.40	49	0.00	56	0.03	62	0.03	43	0.06	54	0.04
Kilenyi 1937		23	0.46	9	0.01	37	0.07	37	0.07	63	0.03	47	0.05
Kissin 1993		9	0.49	13	0.01	10	0.12	10	0.48	58	0.05	11	0.15
Kitain 1937		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Kushner 1990		12	0.49	41	0.00	12	0.13	13	0.44	50	0.05	10	0.15
Levy 1951		18	0.47	29	0.00	35	0.14	33	0.14	59	0.05	34	0.08
Luisada 1990		40	0.43	21	0.01	40	0.07	39	0.07	60	0.05	41	0.06
Lushtak 2004		24	0.46	24	0.00	28	0.08	29	0.23	50	0.06	22	0.12
Lympany 1968		29	0.46	23	0.00	19	0.08	22	0.31	61	0.04	25	0.11
Magaloff 1977		44	0.42	64	0.00	49	0.04	53	0.04	52	0.06	48	0.05
Magaloff 1977b		42	0.43	61	0.00	42	0.05	47	0.05	53	0.06	51	0.05
Magin 1975		50	0.40	22	0.01	52	0.04	54	0.04	62	0.04	59	0.04
Milkina 1970		26	0.46	36	0.00	15	0.09	15	0.40	50	0.06	9	0.15
Mohovich 1999		33	0.45	28	0.00	14	0.08	16	0.39	40	0.06	14	0.15
Nadelmann 1956		13	0.48	7	0.02	8	0.21	8	0.53	55	0.05	7	0.16
Ohlsson 1999		61	0.36	53	0.00	61	0.04	51	0.04	50	0.06	45	0.05
Olejniczac 1990		37	0.44	37	0.00	43	0.06	42	0.06	52	0.06	40	0.06
Olejniczak 1991		56	0.39	48	0.00	57	0.03	58	0.03	50	0.06	58	0.04
Osinska 1989		21	0.47	46	0.00	29	0.06	28	0.23	53	0.06	20	0.12
Paderewski 1912		25	0.46	27	0.00	13	0.13	11	0.46	56	0.05	12	0.15
Perahia 1994		58	0.38	50	0.00	58	0.04	55	0.04	40	0.06	49	0.05
Perlemuter 1986		4	0.52	2	0.08	6	0.19	4	0.57	55	0.05	5	0.17
Poblocka 1999		43	0.42	39	0.00	50	0.03	60	0.03	46	0.06	55	0.04
Rangell 2001		46	0.41	34	0.00	41	0.07	38	0.07	55	0.06	44	0.06
Risler 1920		51	0.40	30	0.00	60	0.03	59	0.03	57	0.04	64	0.03
Rosen 1989		32	0.45	17	0.01	38	0.06	40	0.06	62	0.03	62	0.04
Rubinstein 1939		2	0.53	3	0.05	3	0.14	5	0.55	43	0.06	3	0.18
Rubinstein 1952		14	0.48	44	0.00	24	0.08	24	0.29	37	0.06	19	0.13
Rubinstein 1966		27	0.46	55	0.00	32	0.10	32	0.19	35	0.06	28	0.11
Rummel 1943		8	0.49	20	0.01	5	0.18	7	0.54	52	0.04	13	0.15
Shebanova 2002		59	0.37	18	0.01	62	0.06	43	0.06	54	0.06	38	0.06
Smith 1975		3	0.52	15	0.01	4	0.17	2	0.59	51	0.05	4	0.17
Szpilman 1948		7	0.50	14	0.01	9	0.13	9	0.49	60	0.04	15	0.14
Uninsky 1971		17	0.47	10	0.01	23	0.08	20	0.33	39	0.06	16	0.14
Wasowski 1980		19	0.47	43	0.00	30	0.06	31	0.21	60	0.04	33	0.09
Weissenberg 1971		35	0.45	6	0.02	17	0.08	25	0.28	60	0.04	26	0.11
Random 1		65	-0.03	62	0.00	64	0.02	64	0.02	56	0.03	65	0.02
Random 2		63	0.04	56	0.00	63	0.04	52	0.04	15	0.39	21	0.12
Random 3		64	-0.01	58	0.00	65	0.02	65	0.02	18	0.30	35	0.08

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).