Kilenyi 1937

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		43	0.65	10	0.02	40	0.11	36	0.11	13	0.42	36	0.21
Ashkenazy 1981		14	0.77	6	0.02	13	0.12	16	0.55	5	0.63	13	0.59
Beliavsky 2004		44	0.64	53	0.00	45	0.08	44	0.08	24	0.23	45	0.14
BenOr 1989		7	0.79	5	0.04	7	0.22	1	0.72	6	0.63	5	0.67
Biret 1990		28	0.71	35	0.00	25	0.17	25	0.46	15	0.49	25	0.47
Blet 2003		39	0.67	14	0.01	38	0.12	33	0.12	12	0.47	34	0.24
Block 1995		29	0.71	36	0.00	32	0.09	32	0.18	17	0.46	32	0.29
Brailowsky 1960		50	0.63	20	0.01	49	0.06	47	0.06	7	0.58	39	0.19
Chiu 1999		9	0.78	38	0.00	8	0.16	18	0.54	6	0.61	15	0.57
Clidat 1994		40	0.67	39	0.00	41	0.10	40	0.10	32	0.09	49	0.09
Cohen 1997		61	0.49	52	0.00	62	0.06	52	0.06	60	0.04	60	0.05
Coop 1987		1	0.82	2	0.27	2	0.37	2	0.70	7	0.68	1	0.69
Cortot 1951		56	0.58	64	0.00	58	0.04	60	0.04	39	0.07	62	0.05
Czerny 1949		21	0.74	41	0.00	14	0.11	17	0.54	7	0.67	11	0.60
Czerny 1949b		23	0.74	32	0.00	21	0.14	20	0.50	8	0.66	16	0.57
Ezaki 2006		2	0.81	1	0.29	1	0.28	8	0.61	14	0.57	12	0.59
Falvay 1989		19	0.75	44	0.00	22	0.14	21	0.49	19	0.54	19	0.51
Ferenczy 1958		54	0.61	46	0.00	52	0.05	56	0.05	15	0.48	44	0.15
Fiorentino 1962		15	0.77	29	0.00	16	0.14	11	0.59	7	0.67	10	0.63
Fliere 1977		13	0.77	15	0.01	17	0.18	6	0.61	5	0.67	6	0.64
Fou 1978		12	0.78	16	0.01	12	0.23	13	0.57	7	0.58	18	0.57
Francois 1956		60	0.50	28	0.00	61	0.04	58	0.04	55	0.04	64	0.04
Hatto 1997		55	0.61	47	0.00	50	0.06	51	0.06	56	0.05	58	0.05
Horowitz 1971		49	0.63	18	0.01	46	0.05	55	0.05	21	0.33	47	0.13
Horowitz 1985		57	0.56	13	0.01	57	0.04	59	0.04	23	0.31	48	0.11
Indjic 2001		51	0.63	42	0.00	44	0.07	46	0.07	39	0.07	52	0.07
Kapell 1951		10	0.78	48	0.00	11	0.20	15	0.56	7	0.61	14	0.58
Kiepura 1999		30	0.70	17	0.01	33	0.12	34	0.12	6	0.60	33	0.27
Kilenyi 1937		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Kissin 1993		3	0.81	3	0.09	5	0.23	3	0.70	3	0.64	4	0.67
Kitain 1937		62	0.46	34	0.00	60	0.03	63	0.03	37	0.07	61	0.05
Kushner 1990		42	0.66	45	0.00	43	0.08	43	0.08	25	0.37	42	0.17
Levy 1951		35	0.69	50	0.00	31	0.11	31	0.20	13	0.57	31	0.34
Luisada 1990		20	0.74	51	0.00	24	0.15	24	0.46	10	0.54	22	0.50
Lushtak 2004		46	0.64	59	0.00	47	0.06	53	0.06	36	0.09	51	0.07
Lympany 1968		47	0.64	31	0.00	48	0.06	48	0.06	44	0.06	54	0.06
Magaloff 1977		22	0.74	55	0.00	20	0.13	19	0.50	7	0.53	20	0.51
Magaloff 1977b		24	0.74	58	0.00	23	0.13	22	0.49	11	0.51	23	0.50
Magin 1975		5	0.81	4	0.08	4	0.23	4	0.66	6	0.69	3	0.67
Milkina 1970		45	0.64	62	0.00	51	0.05	57	0.05	54	0.05	57	0.05
Mohovich 1999		32	0.70	37	0.00	34	0.11	35	0.11	24	0.43	35	0.22
Nadelmann 1956		38	0.67	25	0.00	37	0.10	38	0.10	17	0.36	40	0.19
Ohlsson 1999		27	0.72	23	0.01	28	0.10	29	0.30	11	0.51	29	0.39
Olejniczac 1990		11	0.78	9	0.02	10	0.20	5	0.66	6	0.70	2	0.68
Olejniczak 1991		8	0.79	49	0.00	9	0.20	10	0.59	8	0.68	9	0.63
Osinska 1989		17	0.76	27	0.00	15	0.13	12	0.58	23	0.43	21	0.50
Paderewski 1912		37	0.67	57	0.00	36	0.10	39	0.10	12	0.43	37	0.21
Perahia 1994		59	0.53	22	0.01	56	0.04	61	0.04	56	0.05	63	0.04
Perlemuter 1986		53	0.62	12	0.01	55	0.09	42	0.09	38	0.06	50	0.07
Poblocka 1999		4	0.81	8	0.02	3	0.20	7	0.61	9	0.65	8	0.63
Rangell 2001		16	0.76	65	0.00	18	0.12	23	0.49	14	0.51	24	0.50
Risler 1920		34	0.69	43	0.00	30	0.12	28	0.35	9	0.55	27	0.44
Rosen 1989		48	0.64	26	0.00	53	0.06	54	0.06	22	0.31	46	0.14
Rubinstein 1939		58	0.55	63	0.00	59	0.06	49	0.06	56	0.04	56	0.05
Rubinstein 1952		36	0.69	24	0.00	39	0.11	37	0.11	26	0.24	43	0.16
Rubinstein 1966		52	0.62	30	0.00	54	0.06	50	0.06	33	0.06	55	0.06
Rummel 1943		41	0.66	7	0.02	42	0.07	45	0.07	5	0.49	41	0.19
Shebanova 2002		31	0.70	33	0.00	29	0.10	30	0.30	16	0.43	30	0.36
Smith 1975		25	0.72	60	0.00	26	0.14	27	0.43	13	0.47	26	0.45
Szpilman 1948		18	0.75	21	0.01	19	0.15	14	0.57	2	0.69	7	0.63
Uninsky 1971		26	0.72	19	0.01	27	0.17	26	0.44	15	0.45	28	0.44
Wasowski 1980		33	0.69	40	0.00	35	0.09	41	0.09	14	0.45	38	0.20
Weissenberg 1971		6	0.80	11	0.01	6	0.27	9	0.60	8	0.55	17	0.57
Random 1		65	-0.04	54	0.00	64	0.02	64	0.02	57	0.03	65	0.02
Random 2		63	0.02	56	0.00	63	0.04	62	0.04	33	0.06	59	0.05
Random 3		64	-0.04	61	0.00	65	0.02	65	0.02	19	0.26	53	0.07

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).