Francois 1956

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		17	0.57	18	0.00	7	0.12	9	0.56	39	0.06	11	0.18
Ashkenazy 1981		22	0.57	17	0.00	27	0.10	22	0.31	58	0.05	24	0.12
Beliavsky 2004		28	0.54	54	0.00	36	0.06	40	0.06	51	0.05	47	0.05
BenOr 1989		4	0.62	4	0.04	5	0.15	3	0.69	55	0.05	6	0.19
Biret 1990		59	0.46	36	0.00	59	0.05	49	0.05	54	0.06	55	0.05
Blet 2003		13	0.58	3	0.07	4	0.12	5	0.62	51	0.05	9	0.18
Block 1995		55	0.49	22	0.00	44	0.07	37	0.07	54	0.04	53	0.05
Brailowsky 1960		25	0.55	52	0.00	26	0.08	20	0.35	61	0.04	19	0.12
Chiu 1999		48	0.51	26	0.00	42	0.06	39	0.06	57	0.04	45	0.05
Clidat 1994		26	0.55	62	0.00	17	0.12	18	0.43	51	0.05	17	0.15
Cohen 1997		58	0.46	41	0.00	57	0.03	61	0.03	44	0.05	60	0.04
Coop 1987		51	0.51	24	0.00	43	0.07	38	0.07	60	0.05	40	0.06
Cortot 1951		43	0.52	57	0.00	50	0.05	54	0.05	59	0.04	62	0.04
Czerny 1949		52	0.50	53	0.00	56	0.04	57	0.04	53	0.06	49	0.05
Czerny 1949b		35	0.54	31	0.00	49	0.06	42	0.06	58	0.06	39	0.06
Ezaki 2006		37	0.53	55	0.00	47	0.06	46	0.06	60	0.05	42	0.05
Falvay 1989		7	0.61	2	0.09	3	0.23	2	0.70	46	0.07	4	0.22
Ferenczy 1958		36	0.53	56	0.00	37	0.08	33	0.08	50	0.06	34	0.07
Fiorentino 1962		30	0.54	28	0.00	31	0.06	31	0.13	52	0.06	32	0.09
Fliere 1977		10	0.59	35	0.00	14	0.12	14	0.52	49	0.06	7	0.18
Fou 1978		38	0.53	42	0.00	25	0.07	26	0.21	61	0.04	29	0.09
Francois 1956		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Hatto 1997		8	0.60	5	0.04	6	0.16	4	0.65	59	0.05	10	0.18
Horowitz 1971		23	0.57	34	0.00	16	0.12	16	0.49	58	0.03	25	0.12
Horowitz 1985		60	0.43	60	0.00	62	0.06	48	0.06	62	0.04	44	0.05
Indjic 2001		9	0.60	10	0.01	11	0.13	6	0.61	62	0.04	14	0.16
Kapell 1951		40	0.52	15	0.01	39	0.06	41	0.06	62	0.03	58	0.04
Kiepura 1999		34	0.54	59	0.00	55	0.05	52	0.05	40	0.06	43	0.05
Kilenyi 1937		53	0.50	32	0.00	54	0.04	55	0.04	58	0.04	59	0.04
Kissin 1993		47	0.51	29	0.00	23	0.08	27	0.20	47	0.06	27	0.11
Kitain 1937		62	0.39	61	0.00	61	0.05	53	0.05	50	0.04	61	0.04
Kushner 1990		42	0.52	50	0.00	30	0.07	30	0.15	44	0.06	30	0.09
Levy 1951		46	0.51	44	0.00	34	0.06	44	0.06	53	0.06	38	0.06
Luisada 1990		49	0.51	37	0.00	58	0.04	56	0.04	54	0.06	52	0.05
Lushtak 2004		14	0.58	39	0.00	18	0.12	17	0.46	53	0.05	18	0.15
Lympany 1968		21	0.57	25	0.00	22	0.08	21	0.32	59	0.04	26	0.11
Magaloff 1977		27	0.55	46	0.00	28	0.07	29	0.17	56	0.05	31	0.09
Magaloff 1977b		31	0.54	43	0.00	41	0.06	45	0.06	56	0.04	54	0.05
Magin 1975		41	0.52	27	0.00	52	0.04	58	0.04	60	0.04	57	0.04
Milkina 1970		3	0.62	13	0.01	2	0.24	7	0.59	32	0.14	2	0.29
Mohovich 1999		2	0.62	16	0.01	9	0.13	12	0.54	47	0.05	15	0.16
Nadelmann 1956		24	0.56	45	0.00	24	0.09	24	0.26	45	0.06	21	0.12
Ohlsson 1999		45	0.51	11	0.01	33	0.05	50	0.05	55	0.05	48	0.05
Olejniczac 1990		32	0.54	58	0.00	40	0.06	43	0.06	56	0.05	50	0.05
Olejniczak 1991		57	0.48	30	0.00	53	0.04	60	0.04	59	0.05	56	0.04
Osinska 1989		5	0.61	8	0.02	12	0.11	10	0.56	51	0.06	8	0.18
Paderewski 1912		39	0.52	23	0.00	35	0.05	51	0.05	54	0.05	51	0.05
Perahia 1994		20	0.57	7	0.03	21	0.13	25	0.23	32	0.14	12	0.18
Perlemuter 1986		1	0.66	1	0.56	1	0.55	1	0.79	12	0.53	1	0.65
Poblocka 1999		29	0.54	38	0.00	48	0.07	35	0.07	47	0.06	37	0.06
Rangell 2001		54	0.49	48	0.00	51	0.03	62	0.03	60	0.04	64	0.03
Risler 1920		61	0.42	19	0.00	60	0.04	59	0.04	62	0.03	63	0.03
Rosen 1989		16	0.58	9	0.01	10	0.12	13	0.53	30	0.15	3	0.28
Rubinstein 1939		44	0.51	51	0.00	38	0.06	47	0.06	48	0.04	46	0.05
Rubinstein 1952		33	0.54	49	0.00	32	0.06	32	0.11	62	0.04	35	0.07
Rubinstein 1966		18	0.57	33	0.00	15	0.12	15	0.49	45	0.05	13	0.16
Rummel 1943		12	0.59	20	0.00	20	0.09	23	0.29	47	0.05	23	0.12
Shebanova 2002		11	0.59	6	0.03	13	0.11	11	0.54	43	0.07	5	0.19
Smith 1975		6	0.61	21	0.00	8	0.15	8	0.58	62	0.04	16	0.15
Szpilman 1948		50	0.51	14	0.01	46	0.07	36	0.07	51	0.06	36	0.06
Uninsky 1971		19	0.57	47	0.00	19	0.11	19	0.38	59	0.04	22	0.12
Wasowski 1980		15	0.58	40	0.00	29	0.07	28	0.18	49	0.06	28	0.10
Weissenberg 1971		56	0.49	12	0.01	45	0.08	34	0.08	50	0.06	33	0.07
Random 1		63	0.00	63	0.00	63	0.03	63	0.03	2	0.50	20	0.12
Random 2		64	-0.02	64	0.00	64	0.02	64	0.02	58	0.02	65	0.02
Random 3		65	-0.04	65	0.00	65	0.02	65	0.02	24	0.20	41	0.06

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).