Blet 2003

Performance0-Rank  0-Score1-Rank  1-Score2-Rank  2-Score3-Rank  3-Score3R-Rank  3R-Score4-Rank  4-Score  NED
Afanassiev 2001   27  0.6725  0.0023  0.0727  0.1852  0.0543  0.09
Ashkenazy 1981   9  0.7110  0.0114  0.1714  0.4531  0.1813  0.28
Beliavsky 2004   50  0.6147  0.0051  0.0454  0.0443  0.0562  0.04
BenOr 1989   2  0.752  0.123  0.353  0.7525  0.307  0.47
Biret 1990   21  0.6845  0.0040  0.1133  0.1136  0.0845  0.09
Blet 2003   target  targettarget  targettarget  targettarget  targettarget  targettarget  target
Block 1995   12  0.7111  0.0119  0.1016  0.3824  0.3010  0.34
Brailowsky 1960   35  0.6748  0.0039  0.0840  0.0815  0.5016  0.20
Chiu 1999   22  0.6819  0.0028  0.0825  0.2336  0.1125  0.16
Clidat 1994   34  0.6740  0.0041  0.0934  0.0950  0.0552  0.07
Cohen 1997   52  0.6130  0.0062  0.0645  0.0611  0.4032  0.15
Coop 1987   30  0.6743  0.0031  0.0632  0.1244  0.0742  0.09
Cortot 1951   48  0.6155  0.0060  0.0363  0.0345  0.0663  0.04
Czerny 1949   49  0.6165  0.0047  0.0647  0.0639  0.0851  0.07
Czerny 1949b   55  0.5939  0.0048  0.0552  0.0553  0.0661  0.05
Ezaki 2006   19  0.6959  0.0027  0.0724  0.2448  0.0833  0.14
Falvay 1989   3  0.753  0.114  0.354  0.7514  0.583  0.66
Ferenczy 1958   44  0.6441  0.0044  0.0644  0.069  0.5320  0.18
Fiorentino 1962   4  0.7522  0.002  0.272  0.7613  0.554  0.65
Fliere 1977   13  0.7015  0.0112  0.1611  0.4854  0.0528  0.15
Fou 1978   39  0.6634  0.0034  0.0838  0.0850  0.0650  0.07
Francois 1956   56  0.586  0.0353  0.0551  0.055  0.6222  0.18
Hatto 1997   25  0.6852  0.0042  0.0841  0.0833  0.1241  0.10
Horowitz 1971   40  0.665  0.0316  0.0922  0.264  0.579  0.38
Horowitz 1985   60  0.5617  0.0054  0.0456  0.0416  0.4034  0.13
Indjic 2001   17  0.6912  0.0130  0.0928  0.1830  0.1724  0.17
Kapell 1951   10  0.7124  0.0011  0.1413  0.4639  0.0818  0.19
Kiepura 1999   43  0.6435  0.0046  0.0646  0.0631  0.2436  0.12
Kilenyi 1937   32  0.6718  0.0015  0.0912  0.4733  0.1215  0.24
Kissin 1993   7  0.7214  0.018  0.178  0.5753  0.0523  0.17
Kitain 1937   62  0.4658  0.0058  0.0462  0.0423  0.3040  0.11
Kushner 1990   33  0.6736  0.0037  0.0937  0.0922  0.3919  0.19
Levy 1951   51  0.6156  0.0055  0.0457  0.0434  0.0759  0.05
Luisada 1990   14  0.7027  0.0025  0.1119  0.2935  0.1121  0.18
Lushtak 2004   24  0.6849  0.0038  0.0936  0.0940  0.0848  0.08
Lympany 1968   5  0.7416  0.016  0.175  0.682  0.711  0.69
Magaloff 1977   41  0.6560  0.0043  0.0839  0.0837  0.0947  0.08
Magaloff 1977b   45  0.6454  0.0045  0.0550  0.0546  0.0756  0.06
Magin 1975   15  0.708  0.0221  0.0718  0.2940  0.0926  0.16
Milkina 1970   18  0.6946  0.0032  0.0731  0.1329  0.1830  0.15
Mohovich 1999   20  0.6920  0.0017  0.0915  0.3927  0.3011  0.34
Nadelmann 1956   8  0.714  0.065  0.169  0.569  0.456  0.50
Ohlsson 1999   53  0.6061  0.0059  0.0461  0.0461  0.0364  0.03
Olejniczac 1990   1  0.761  0.481  0.471  0.7812  0.592  0.68
Olejniczak 1991   11  0.7129  0.009  0.177  0.6230  0.268  0.40
Osinska 1989   6  0.7321  0.007  0.146  0.6339  0.0914  0.24
Paderewski 1912   59  0.5742  0.0057  0.0549  0.0539  0.0754  0.06
Perahia 1994   58  0.5857  0.0056  0.0459  0.0434  0.0955  0.06
Perlemuter 1986   16  0.697  0.0213  0.1710  0.514  0.685  0.59
Poblocka 1999   28  0.6733  0.0029  0.0730  0.1451  0.0546  0.08
Rangell 2001   37  0.6638  0.0026  0.0729  0.1559  0.0544  0.09
Risler 1920   61  0.5550  0.0061  0.0458  0.0441  0.0758  0.05
Rosen 1989   46  0.6453  0.0052  0.0648  0.0624  0.2339  0.12
Rubinstein 1939   57  0.5837  0.0049  0.0453  0.0437  0.0760  0.05
Rubinstein 1952   36  0.669  0.0110  0.1417  0.3623  0.3112  0.33
Rubinstein 1966   38  0.6623  0.0035  0.0935  0.0922  0.2531  0.15
Rummel 1943   54  0.5951  0.0036  0.0842  0.0815  0.3427  0.16
Shebanova 2002   31  0.6713  0.0122  0.0926  0.2246  0.0738  0.12
Smith 1975   26  0.6826  0.0018  0.0920  0.2836  0.0829  0.15
Szpilman 1948   29  0.6744  0.0024  0.0721  0.2730  0.1417  0.19
Uninsky 1971   42  0.6528  0.0020  0.0923  0.2543  0.0637  0.12
Wasowski 1980   47  0.6332  0.0050  0.0455  0.0441  0.0657  0.05
Weissenberg 1971   23  0.6831  0.0033  0.0743  0.0739  0.0849  0.07
Random 1    64  -0.0163  0.0064  0.0364  0.0330  0.1253  0.06
Random 2   63  0.0462  0.0063  0.0460  0.0412  0.4335  0.13
Random 3   65  -0.0364  0.0065  0.0265  0.0243  0.0465  0.03

Note: To load data table give above into Excel, copy and paste the data into a text editor (such as WordPad) first, then copy the text in the editor and past into Excel. You should remove the "target" line from the data before pasting into Excel so that plotting graphs of the data is done properly.

Column descriptions

  • Performance:
  • 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
  • 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
  • 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
  • 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
  • 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
  • 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
  • NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

  • red = strongly similar performance to target
  • orange = moderately similar performance
  • yellow = weakly similar performance
  • green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
  • white = dissimilar to target
  • blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).