Smidowicz 1948b

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Ashkenazy 1981		46	0.62	28	0.00	46	0.05	46	0.05	27	0.11	38	0.07
Bacha 1997		35	0.68	29	0.00	39	0.06	39	0.06	38	0.07	42	0.06
Barbosa 1983		41	0.65	30	0.00	34	0.06	34	0.06	24	0.15	34	0.09
Biret 1990		33	0.69	11	0.00	27	0.09	27	0.09	22	0.19	27	0.13
Block 1995		45	0.62	3	0.00	29	0.06	38	0.06	6	0.61	19	0.19
Brailowsky 1960		16	0.74	31	0.00	18	0.10	18	0.29	14	0.48	12	0.37
Chiu 1999		39	0.67	12	0.00	43	0.05	48	0.05	29	0.07	46	0.06
Clidat 1994		25	0.71	2	0.00	37	0.07	31	0.07	33	0.07	36	0.07
Cohen 1997		23	0.72	32	0.00	24	0.09	24	0.17	22	0.20	20	0.18
Cortot 1951		40	0.65	8	0.00	26	0.06	26	0.12	12	0.45	17	0.23
Csalog 1996		18	0.73	17	0.00	20	0.12	17	0.31	35	0.07	25	0.15
Czerny 1990		5	0.79	18	0.00	7	0.20	8	0.49	9	0.44	7	0.46
Ezaki 2006		22	0.72	33	0.00	19	0.10	20	0.27	30	0.07	26	0.14
Ferenczy 1958		15	0.74	34	0.00	8	0.17	7	0.51	27	0.10	16	0.23
Fliere 1977		28	0.71	19	0.00	21	0.10	23	0.21	37	0.07	29	0.12
Fou 1978		26	0.71	35	0.00	36	0.05	44	0.05	32	0.10	37	0.07
Francois 1956		50	0.49	36	0.00	50	0.07	30	0.07	36	0.07	41	0.07
Grinberg 1951		47	0.61	37	0.00	45	0.05	47	0.05	39	0.06	51	0.05
Hatto 1993		32	0.69	5	0.00	33	0.08	28	0.08	32	0.07	39	0.07
Hatto 1997		30	0.70	38	0.00	32	0.06	35	0.06	46	0.05	49	0.05
Indjic 2001		31	0.70	6	0.00	31	0.08	29	0.08	45	0.05	47	0.06
Jonas 1947		7	0.77	20	0.00	3	0.19	6	0.58	1	0.75	4	0.66
Kapell 1951		11	0.75	13	0.00	15	0.08	16	0.33	33	0.07	24	0.15
Kiepura 1999		49	0.52	39	0.00	48	0.04	49	0.04	28	0.10	43	0.06
Kushner 1989		27	0.71	40	0.00	25	0.07	25	0.16	38	0.06	32	0.10
Luisada 1991		48	0.55	14	0.00	49	0.06	41	0.06	31	0.07	44	0.06
Lushtak 2004		3	0.82	9	0.00	4	0.24	4	0.72	2	0.70	3	0.71
Magaloff 1978		43	0.63	41	0.00	42	0.06	40	0.06	45	0.05	50	0.05
Meguri 1997		4	0.81	7	0.00	6	0.39	5	0.69	9	0.42	5	0.54
Milkina 1970		12	0.75	42	0.00	17	0.08	13	0.38	31	0.08	22	0.17
Mohovich 1999		10	0.76	43	0.00	13	0.10	12	0.39	23	0.23	14	0.30
Niedzielski 1931		6	0.79	4	0.00	5	0.31	3	0.73	2	0.77	2	0.75
Ohlsson 1999		13	0.74	44	0.00	10	0.12	10	0.43	36	0.07	23	0.17
Olejniczak 1990		29	0.71	45	0.00	30	0.06	33	0.06	28	0.08	40	0.07
Osinska 1989		37	0.68	21	0.00	35	0.05	45	0.05	21	0.27	30	0.12
Rangell 2001		9	0.76	46	0.00	12	0.12	11	0.43	17	0.30	13	0.36
Richter 1976		44	0.63	22	0.00	44	0.05	43	0.05	24	0.13	35	0.08
Rubinstein 1938		34	0.69	23	0.00	38	0.07	32	0.07	21	0.25	28	0.13
Rubinstein 1952		42	0.65	24	0.00	47	0.04	50	0.04	32	0.07	52	0.05
Rubinstein 1961		36	0.68	47	0.00	40	0.06	36	0.06	26	0.17	33	0.10
Rubinstein 1966		38	0.68	15	0.00	41	0.05	42	0.05	36	0.07	48	0.06
Shebanova 2002		14	0.74	48	0.00	22	0.10	21	0.26	17	0.28	15	0.27
Smidowicz 1948		1	0.99	1	1.00	1	0.98	1	1.00	1	1.00	1	1.00
Smidowicz 1948b		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Smith 1975		21	0.72	49	0.00	9	0.15	14	0.37	16	0.42	10	0.39
Sofronitsky 1949		17	0.74	16	0.00	23	0.09	22	0.21	2	0.70	11	0.38
Sztompka 1959		20	0.72	25	0.00	28	0.06	37	0.06	9	0.57	21	0.18
Tomsic 1995		24	0.71	50	0.00	14	0.08	15	0.34	13	0.47	9	0.40
Uninsky 1971		19	0.73	26	0.00	16	0.07	19	0.27	26	0.15	18	0.20
Wasowski 1980		8	0.77	51	0.00	11	0.10	9	0.49	13	0.47	6	0.48
Average Tempo		2	0.86	10	0.00	2	0.54	2	0.83	22	0.24	8	0.45
Random 1		51	0.08	27	0.00	51	0.03	51	0.03	11	0.38	31	0.11
Random 2		52	0.00	52	0.00	52	0.02	52	0.02	18	0.19	45	0.06
Random 3		53	-0.06	53	0.00	53	0.02	53	0.02	51	0.02	53	0.02

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).