Hatto 1993

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Ashkenazy 1981		34	0.69	31	0.00	33	0.08	28	0.08	7	0.51	26	0.20
Bacha 1997		9	0.82	15	0.00	9	0.19	12	0.61	3	0.72	4	0.66
Barbosa 1983		26	0.73	22	0.00	23	0.12	23	0.30	14	0.49	22	0.38
Biret 1990		28	0.73	12	0.00	27	0.08	27	0.08	11	0.44	27	0.19
Block 1995		48	0.54	42	0.00	50	0.06	34	0.06	27	0.08	41	0.07
Brailowsky 1960		27	0.73	43	0.00	29	0.05	43	0.05	24	0.28	35	0.12
Chiu 1999		18	0.76	17	0.00	16	0.13	17	0.49	12	0.50	16	0.49
Clidat 1994		23	0.74	32	0.00	26	0.09	26	0.17	27	0.14	33	0.15
Cohen 1997		38	0.67	28	0.00	40	0.06	40	0.06	30	0.09	43	0.07
Cortot 1951		49	0.52	6	0.00	46	0.05	49	0.05	38	0.07	47	0.06
Csalog 1996		21	0.76	33	0.00	19	0.14	20	0.43	19	0.30	23	0.36
Czerny 1990		15	0.78	23	0.00	8	0.18	11	0.62	2	0.62	8	0.62
Ezaki 2006		10	0.82	5	0.00	12	0.16	10	0.62	8	0.59	10	0.60
Ferenczy 1958		7	0.84	20	0.00	10	0.20	7	0.68	11	0.51	12	0.59
Fliere 1977		16	0.78	24	0.00	15	0.16	13	0.57	6	0.51	13	0.54
Fou 1978		8	0.82	7	0.00	7	0.22	8	0.66	9	0.57	9	0.61
Francois 1956		47	0.56	9	0.00	47	0.04	50	0.04	44	0.06	51	0.05
Grinberg 1951		22	0.75	14	0.00	22	0.13	22	0.30	5	0.51	20	0.39
Hatto 1993		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Hatto 1997		2	0.97	2	0.14	2	0.90	2	0.96	2	0.95	2	0.95
Indjic 2001		1	0.98	1	0.82	1	0.80	1	0.97	2	0.97	1	0.97
Jonas 1947		43	0.62	16	0.00	45	0.07	33	0.07	28	0.07	42	0.07
Kapell 1951		6	0.84	35	0.00	6	0.20	4	0.70	7	0.61	6	0.65
Kiepura 1999		50	0.48	44	0.00	42	0.07	31	0.07	18	0.32	32	0.15
Kushner 1989		13	0.81	13	0.00	11	0.28	9	0.65	6	0.56	11	0.60
Luisada 1991		44	0.62	29	0.00	43	0.07	30	0.07	16	0.36	28	0.16
Lushtak 2004		20	0.76	36	0.00	25	0.11	25	0.25	20	0.25	25	0.25
Magaloff 1978		19	0.76	8	0.00	20	0.18	19	0.44	13	0.49	18	0.46
Meguri 1997		14	0.79	11	0.00	17	0.13	15	0.55	15	0.27	21	0.39
Milkina 1970		12	0.81	37	0.00	13	0.16	14	0.56	11	0.46	15	0.51
Mohovich 1999		4	0.85	30	0.00	5	0.22	6	0.68	3	0.65	5	0.66
Niedzielski 1931		45	0.62	38	0.00	37	0.06	35	0.06	28	0.10	40	0.08
Ohlsson 1999		5	0.85	39	0.00	4	0.18	5	0.68	6	0.60	7	0.64
Olejniczak 1990		17	0.78	10	0.00	21	0.10	21	0.39	11	0.44	19	0.41
Osinska 1989		40	0.65	4	0.01	38	0.06	41	0.06	13	0.41	29	0.16
Rangell 2001		25	0.74	45	0.00	24	0.10	24	0.28	20	0.30	24	0.29
Richter 1976		32	0.69	40	0.00	36	0.05	44	0.05	19	0.25	38	0.11
Rubinstein 1938		41	0.64	46	0.00	44	0.06	39	0.06	27	0.09	46	0.07
Rubinstein 1952		29	0.72	18	0.00	39	0.06	42	0.06	11	0.41	31	0.16
Rubinstein 1961		39	0.66	47	0.00	31	0.05	45	0.05	20	0.29	37	0.12
Rubinstein 1966		37	0.67	48	0.00	30	0.05	46	0.05	16	0.33	34	0.13
Shebanova 2002		36	0.68	21	0.00	32	0.06	37	0.06	43	0.05	48	0.05
Smidowicz 1948		31	0.71	49	0.00	35	0.06	38	0.06	27	0.09	45	0.07
Smidowicz 1948b		33	0.69	34	0.00	34	0.07	32	0.07	28	0.08	44	0.07
Smith 1975		24	0.74	50	0.00	18	0.15	18	0.44	8	0.53	17	0.48
Sofronitsky 1949		42	0.63	25	0.00	48	0.05	47	0.05	49	0.05	49	0.05
Sztompka 1959		46	0.57	19	0.00	49	0.05	48	0.05	41	0.06	50	0.05
Tomsic 1995		35	0.68	41	0.00	28	0.08	29	0.08	19	0.32	30	0.16
Uninsky 1971		11	0.82	3	0.01	14	0.16	16	0.52	15	0.52	14	0.52
Wasowski 1980		30	0.71	26	0.00	41	0.06	36	0.06	28	0.12	39	0.08
Average Tempo		3	0.89	51	0.00	3	0.59	3	0.83	13	0.55	3	0.68
Random 1		52	0.03	27	0.00	52	0.03	51	0.03	34	0.05	52	0.04
Random 2		53	-0.01	52	0.00	53	0.02	53	0.02	46	0.04	53	0.03
Random 3		51	0.07	53	0.00	51	0.03	52	0.03	3	0.48	36	0.12

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).