Block 1995

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Ashkenazy 1981		11	0.59	20	0.00	16	0.13	15	0.43	27	0.11	7	0.22
Bacha 1997		1	0.68	2	0.14	2	0.23	1	0.69	23	0.19	4	0.36
Barbosa 1983		40	0.44	39	0.00	28	0.06	30	0.06	41	0.06	39	0.06
Biret 1990		13	0.58	35	0.00	17	0.17	21	0.33	38	0.07	18	0.15
Block 1995		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Brailowsky 1960		29	0.50	21	0.00	36	0.05	45	0.05	36	0.06	43	0.05
Chiu 1999		46	0.35	29	0.00	46	0.05	43	0.05	33	0.06	44	0.05
Clidat 1994		28	0.51	40	0.00	33	0.05	36	0.05	35	0.07	35	0.06
Cohen 1997		37	0.45	49	0.00	44	0.06	32	0.06	35	0.07	37	0.06
Cortot 1951		8	0.61	3	0.10	3	0.24	11	0.48	14	0.39	2	0.43
Csalog 1996		20	0.56	32	0.00	10	0.14	12	0.47	33	0.07	10	0.18
Czerny 1990		18	0.57	5	0.07	8	0.11	8	0.48	44	0.05	17	0.15
Ezaki 2006		25	0.52	25	0.00	30	0.05	39	0.05	31	0.07	31	0.06
Ferenczy 1958		41	0.43	27	0.00	24	0.06	25	0.14	36	0.07	26	0.10
Fliere 1977		38	0.44	18	0.01	40	0.05	35	0.05	41	0.06	42	0.05
Fou 1978		14	0.57	28	0.00	19	0.11	19	0.37	49	0.04	23	0.12
Francois 1956		49	0.29	48	0.00	49	0.05	42	0.05	47	0.05	50	0.05
Grinberg 1951		12	0.58	16	0.01	18	0.10	18	0.38	20	0.27	5	0.32
Hatto 1993		23	0.54	50	0.00	27	0.08	26	0.08	33	0.07	30	0.07
Hatto 1997		26	0.52	41	0.00	32	0.06	31	0.06	35	0.07	32	0.06
Indjic 2001		24	0.53	45	0.00	23	0.07	23	0.20	41	0.06	25	0.11
Jonas 1947		9	0.60	8	0.02	14	0.16	13	0.47	34	0.06	11	0.17
Kapell 1951		32	0.47	22	0.00	38	0.04	49	0.04	38	0.07	46	0.05
Kiepura 1999		48	0.33	34	0.00	37	0.05	44	0.05	43	0.06	40	0.05
Kushner 1989		15	0.57	31	0.00	7	0.13	14	0.46	46	0.05	16	0.15
Luisada 1991		47	0.34	38	0.00	29	0.05	34	0.05	44	0.05	41	0.05
Lushtak 2004		5	0.63	7	0.04	11	0.11	6	0.60	27	0.08	6	0.22
Magaloff 1978		44	0.37	43	0.00	41	0.05	46	0.05	41	0.06	45	0.05
Meguri 1997		10	0.59	14	0.01	9	0.13	4	0.62	48	0.04	14	0.16
Milkina 1970		30	0.49	24	0.00	31	0.06	33	0.06	36	0.07	38	0.06
Mohovich 1999		27	0.52	26	0.00	26	0.07	27	0.07	35	0.06	36	0.06
Niedzielski 1931		21	0.55	19	0.01	5	0.15	10	0.48	43	0.05	15	0.15
Ohlsson 1999		19	0.56	6	0.04	6	0.14	7	0.51	43	0.06	12	0.17
Olejniczak 1990		17	0.57	36	0.00	20	0.14	17	0.42	45	0.05	21	0.14
Osinska 1989		36	0.45	42	0.00	45	0.07	29	0.07	34	0.06	34	0.06
Rangell 2001		2	0.66	1	0.34	1	0.33	2	0.66	21	0.26	3	0.41
Richter 1976		42	0.39	37	0.00	42	0.05	37	0.05	43	0.06	47	0.05
Rubinstein 1938		16	0.57	30	0.00	21	0.16	22	0.32	44	0.05	22	0.13
Rubinstein 1952		31	0.49	46	0.00	35	0.04	47	0.04	49	0.04	52	0.04
Rubinstein 1961		45	0.36	13	0.01	48	0.04	48	0.04	43	0.06	48	0.05
Rubinstein 1966		43	0.37	33	0.00	47	0.04	50	0.04	44	0.06	49	0.05
Shebanova 2002		35	0.46	44	0.00	43	0.07	28	0.07	36	0.06	33	0.06
Smidowicz 1948		3	0.64	12	0.01	12	0.15	3	0.64	32	0.06	8	0.20
Smidowicz 1948b		7	0.62	11	0.01	13	0.14	5	0.61	37	0.06	9	0.19
Smith 1975		34	0.46	23	0.00	25	0.10	24	0.18	49	0.04	28	0.08
Sofronitsky 1949		33	0.47	17	0.01	39	0.05	40	0.05	24	0.16	27	0.09
Sztompka 1959		4	0.64	4	0.09	4	0.16	9	0.48	18	0.38	1	0.43
Tomsic 1995		22	0.54	10	0.01	22	0.15	20	0.34	48	0.06	20	0.14
Uninsky 1971		39	0.44	9	0.02	34	0.05	38	0.05	49	0.04	51	0.04
Wasowski 1980		6	0.63	15	0.01	15	0.12	16	0.42	40	0.05	19	0.14
Random 1		50	0.13	47	0.00	50	0.05	41	0.05	4	0.51	13	0.16
Random 2		51	0.03	51	0.00	51	0.03	51	0.03	8	0.39	24	0.11
Random 3		52	0.00	52	0.00	52	0.02	52	0.02	11	0.27	29	0.07

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).