Perlemuter 1992

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		55	0.28	60	0.00	63	0.04	62	0.04	61	0.04	78	0.04
Anderszewski 2003		76	0.16	68	0.00	74	0.06	46	0.06	70	0.04	65	0.05
Ashkenazy 1981		19	0.44	24	0.00	14	0.12	11	0.66	34	0.39	22	0.51
Bacha 2000		79	0.13	61	0.00	79	0.04	70	0.04	70	0.04	73	0.04
Badura 1965		51	0.29	69	0.00	51	0.06	45	0.06	35	0.27	44	0.13
Barbosa 1983		43	0.31	38	0.00	49	0.05	53	0.05	57	0.05	64	0.05
Biret 1990		83	0.08	72	0.00	87	0.02	89	0.02	86	0.02	89	0.02
Blet 2003		29	0.40	52	0.00	36	0.09	34	0.44	37	0.36	32	0.40
Block 1995		2	0.60	2	0.22	2	0.51	2	0.80	5	0.73	3	0.76
Blumental 1952		52	0.29	30	0.00	50	0.05	48	0.05	52	0.06	67	0.05
Boshniakovich 1969		7	0.49	57	0.00	9	0.12	7	0.72	19	0.52	12	0.61
Brailowsky 1960		68	0.23	34	0.00	62	0.04	67	0.04	47	0.08	56	0.06
Bunin 1987		62	0.25	73	0.00	46	0.05	50	0.05	54	0.06	69	0.05
Bunin 1987b		61	0.26	50	0.00	45	0.05	52	0.05	53	0.06	62	0.05
Chiu 1999		46	0.31	76	0.00	58	0.05	55	0.05	46	0.10	53	0.07
Cohen 1997		45	0.31	81	0.00	56	0.04	74	0.04	48	0.07	68	0.05
Cortot 1951		73	0.19	66	0.00	66	0.04	79	0.04	40	0.16	52	0.08
Csalog 1996		44	0.31	49	0.00	43	0.06	43	0.13	38	0.20	42	0.16
Czerny 1949		89	-0.01	77	0.00	89	0.02	88	0.02	80	0.03	88	0.02
Czerny 1990		38	0.34	58	0.00	30	0.09	32	0.47	28	0.51	26	0.49
Duchoud 2007		71	0.20	78	0.00	64	0.04	64	0.04	61	0.05	79	0.04
Ezaki 2006		57	0.27	23	0.00	52	0.04	60	0.04	34	0.27	49	0.10
Falvay 1989		78	0.14	82	0.00	81	0.03	83	0.03	82	0.02	85	0.02
Farrell 1958		85	0.04	62	0.00	84	0.02	84	0.02	72	0.03	86	0.02
Ferenczy 1958		88	0.00	83	0.00	86	0.02	85	0.02	63	0.04	84	0.03
Fliere 1977		1	0.66	1	0.45	1	0.45	1	0.88	5	0.83	1	0.85
Fou 1978		39	0.34	13	0.01	34	0.10	35	0.42	38	0.23	37	0.31
Francois 1956		42	0.32	84	0.00	59	0.04	63	0.04	36	0.31	48	0.11
Friedman 1923		11	0.48	11	0.01	19	0.09	9	0.68	18	0.60	8	0.64
Friedman 1923b		14	0.47	17	0.00	20	0.14	10	0.68	20	0.60	7	0.64
Friedman 1930		24	0.42	37	0.00	32	0.11	27	0.52	38	0.39	28	0.45
Garcia 2007		54	0.28	46	0.00	38	0.10	39	0.31	44	0.16	40	0.22
Garcia 2007b		58	0.26	74	0.00	73	0.05	56	0.05	55	0.06	72	0.05
Gierzod 1998		65	0.25	67	0.00	42	0.13	40	0.27	28	0.40	35	0.33
Gornostaeva 1994		28	0.40	29	0.00	25	0.10	29	0.50	10	0.66	15	0.57
Groot 1988		4	0.52	26	0.00	7	0.12	4	0.76	16	0.53	9	0.63
Harasiewicz 1955		12	0.48	53	0.00	15	0.11	12	0.66	21	0.42	19	0.53
Hatto 1993		56	0.27	59	0.00	53	0.04	69	0.04	57	0.07	71	0.05
Hatto 1997		77	0.14	85	0.00	82	0.03	81	0.03	83	0.03	83	0.03
Horowitz 1949		36	0.35	42	0.00	47	0.06	47	0.06	50	0.07	58	0.06
Indjic 1988		63	0.25	63	0.00	57	0.04	58	0.04	57	0.06	63	0.05
Kapell 1951		75	0.18	70	0.00	78	0.04	72	0.04	65	0.05	76	0.04
Kissin 1993		26	0.41	18	0.00	17	0.10	23	0.57	22	0.55	16	0.56
Kushner 1989		20	0.43	20	0.00	28	0.11	24	0.56	25	0.43	25	0.49
Luisada 1991		32	0.40	16	0.00	39	0.09	37	0.34	47	0.09	41	0.17
Lushtak 2004		59	0.26	79	0.00	60	0.04	76	0.04	52	0.06	66	0.05
Malcuzynski 1961		8	0.49	9	0.01	10	0.16	14	0.64	13	0.58	10	0.61
Magaloff 1978		3	0.60	3	0.10	3	0.43	3	0.79	4	0.73	2	0.76
Magin 1975		21	0.43	27	0.00	31	0.10	28	0.51	23	0.54	20	0.52
Michalowski 1933		22	0.42	21	0.00	33	0.12	30	0.49	25	0.41	27	0.45
Milkina 1970		87	0.01	86	0.00	88	0.02	87	0.02	85	0.02	87	0.02
Mohovich 1999		25	0.42	36	0.00	22	0.11	15	0.63	14	0.55	13	0.59
Moravec 1969		66	0.25	51	0.00	61	0.04	68	0.04	78	0.03	81	0.03
Morozova 2008		35	0.38	4	0.04	13	0.13	21	0.58	26	0.33	30	0.44
Neighaus 1950		31	0.40	6	0.02	24	0.10	25	0.55	46	0.10	39	0.23
Niedzielski 1931		27	0.41	43	0.00	35	0.09	33	0.45	38	0.21	36	0.31
Ohlsson 1999		15	0.46	7	0.01	18	0.08	20	0.60	27	0.32	29	0.44
Osinska 1989		34	0.38	44	0.00	37	0.09	36	0.38	28	0.45	31	0.41
Pachmann 1927		16	0.46	47	0.00	26	0.09	26	0.54	22	0.53	18	0.53
Paderewski 1930		10	0.49	22	0.00	4	0.17	19	0.61	15	0.62	11	0.61
Perlemuter 1992		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Pierdomenico 2008		49	0.30	45	0.00	55	0.04	73	0.04	57	0.05	75	0.04
Poblocka 1999		6	0.49	15	0.00	6	0.12	6	0.73	2	0.70	4	0.71
Rabcewiczowa 1932		60	0.26	55	0.00	72	0.05	49	0.05	38	0.21	50	0.10
Rachmaninoff 1923		37	0.35	5	0.04	16	0.10	31	0.48	22	0.50	24	0.49
Rangell 2001		69	0.23	87	0.00	71	0.04	59	0.04	54	0.05	80	0.04
Richter 1976		13	0.48	31	0.00	11	0.11	16	0.62	32	0.55	14	0.58
Rosen 1989		17	0.46	10	0.01	5	0.13	8	0.70	16	0.58	6	0.64
Rosenthal 1930		48	0.30	28	0.00	40	0.10	42	0.20	28	0.41	38	0.29
Rosenthal 1931		82	0.10	64	0.00	75	0.04	77	0.04	48	0.08	59	0.06
Rosenthal 1931b		80	0.11	56	0.00	77	0.05	54	0.05	46	0.10	55	0.07
Rosenthal 1931c		72	0.20	88	0.00	54	0.04	65	0.04	38	0.25	51	0.10
Rosenthal 1931d		81	0.11	65	0.00	76	0.03	80	0.03	47	0.07	70	0.05
Rossi 2007		70	0.22	35	0.00	65	0.04	71	0.04	9	0.55	43	0.15
Rubinstein 1939		74	0.18	48	0.00	80	0.04	66	0.04	79	0.03	82	0.03
Rubinstein 1952		18	0.44	54	0.00	27	0.11	18	0.61	17	0.51	17	0.56
Rubinstein 1966		40	0.33	40	0.00	41	0.10	41	0.26	49	0.06	46	0.12
Schilhawsky 1960		41	0.33	75	0.00	48	0.04	61	0.04	28	0.35	47	0.12
Shebanova 2002		9	0.49	8	0.01	8	0.10	13	0.64	36	0.41	21	0.51
Smith 1975		50	0.29	80	0.00	68	0.05	57	0.05	47	0.06	60	0.05
Sokolov 2002		33	0.39	25	0.00	29	0.11	38	0.33	24	0.40	34	0.36
Sztompka 1959		5	0.51	39	0.00	12	0.13	5	0.74	15	0.56	5	0.64
Tomsic 1995		53	0.28	32	0.00	44	0.05	44	0.10	68	0.04	57	0.06
Uninsky 1932		23	0.42	14	0.00	21	0.11	17	0.61	36	0.26	33	0.40
Uninsky 1971		30	0.40	12	0.01	23	0.11	22	0.57	13	0.43	23	0.50
Wasowski 1980		47	0.30	89	0.00	67	0.04	78	0.04	78	0.04	74	0.04
Zak 1937		67	0.24	71	0.00	70	0.05	51	0.05	64	0.05	61	0.05
Zak 1951		64	0.25	33	0.00	69	0.04	75	0.04	52	0.05	77	0.04
Random 1		86	0.01	41	0.00	85	0.02	86	0.02	27	0.26	54	0.07
Random 2		90	-0.08	90	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	84	0.02	90	0.01
Random 3		84	0.07	19	0.00	83	0.03	82	0.03	8	0.55	45	0.13

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).