Morozova 2008

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		9	0.45	68	0.00	17	0.09	15	0.47	11	0.58	14	0.52
Anderszewski 2003		71	0.27	40	0.00	79	0.03	79	0.03	65	0.04	87	0.03
Ashkenazy 1981		5	0.49	6	0.04	3	0.17	4	0.69	18	0.69	2	0.69
Bacha 2000		43	0.35	10	0.02	16	0.08	34	0.20	10	0.55	29	0.33
Badura 1965		47	0.34	75	0.00	57	0.05	55	0.05	21	0.48	49	0.15
Barbosa 1983		15	0.43	61	0.00	41	0.05	44	0.09	30	0.32	43	0.17
Biret 1990		83	0.21	85	0.00	83	0.03	80	0.03	56	0.05	84	0.04
Blet 2003		37	0.36	35	0.00	59	0.04	77	0.04	46	0.09	71	0.06
Block 1995		42	0.35	84	0.00	50	0.05	59	0.05	43	0.13	64	0.08
Blumental 1952		48	0.34	19	0.01	49	0.05	58	0.05	27	0.35	53	0.13
Boshniakovich 1969		55	0.32	52	0.00	46	0.05	53	0.05	33	0.32	54	0.13
Brailowsky 1960		46	0.34	63	0.00	43	0.05	38	0.13	12	0.60	33	0.28
Bunin 1987		39	0.36	50	0.00	26	0.15	23	0.35	21	0.47	24	0.41
Bunin 1987b		38	0.36	51	0.00	25	0.11	22	0.35	21	0.46	25	0.40
Chiu 1999		1	0.57	1	0.29	1	0.28	2	0.71	9	0.69	1	0.70
Cohen 1997		66	0.28	57	0.00	75	0.04	69	0.04	50	0.06	78	0.05
Cortot 1951		73	0.25	66	0.00	81	0.03	82	0.03	46	0.06	85	0.04
Csalog 1996		51	0.33	53	0.00	56	0.04	68	0.04	33	0.26	59	0.10
Czerny 1949		85	0.18	41	0.00	82	0.03	81	0.03	42	0.17	67	0.07
Czerny 1990		13	0.44	11	0.02	8	0.16	8	0.61	12	0.76	4	0.68
Duchoud 2007		25	0.40	29	0.00	28	0.09	21	0.38	16	0.52	22	0.44
Ezaki 2006		12	0.44	80	0.00	19	0.06	24	0.35	11	0.66	17	0.48
Falvay 1989		34	0.37	23	0.00	18	0.07	28	0.30	20	0.37	30	0.33
Farrell 1958		40	0.36	44	0.00	63	0.05	56	0.05	24	0.39	51	0.14
Ferenczy 1958		86	0.15	81	0.00	87	0.03	84	0.03	60	0.06	83	0.04
Fliere 1977		6	0.49	9	0.03	6	0.17	3	0.71	22	0.63	5	0.67
Fou 1978		3	0.52	5	0.05	7	0.19	6	0.64	2	0.69	6	0.66
Francois 1956		84	0.19	37	0.00	80	0.03	85	0.03	63	0.04	88	0.03
Friedman 1923		19	0.42	76	0.00	23	0.09	18	0.42	27	0.51	20	0.46
Friedman 1923b		23	0.41	16	0.01	22	0.07	19	0.42	32	0.50	19	0.46
Friedman 1930		20	0.42	42	0.00	24	0.10	20	0.41	28	0.53	18	0.47
Garcia 2007		74	0.25	18	0.01	51	0.05	54	0.05	38	0.24	57	0.11
Garcia 2007b		62	0.30	46	0.00	39	0.05	43	0.10	34	0.31	41	0.18
Gierzod 1998		59	0.31	39	0.00	47	0.06	48	0.06	23	0.44	45	0.16
Gornostaeva 1994		58	0.32	25	0.00	55	0.04	74	0.04	31	0.35	56	0.12
Groot 1988		10	0.44	4	0.06	5	0.14	5	0.65	11	0.56	9	0.60
Harasiewicz 1955		26	0.40	26	0.00	53	0.04	71	0.04	52	0.06	79	0.05
Hatto 1993		24	0.41	27	0.00	30	0.09	30	0.28	29	0.32	32	0.30
Hatto 1997		50	0.33	67	0.00	67	0.05	62	0.05	55	0.06	75	0.05
Horowitz 1949		53	0.33	17	0.01	42	0.05	40	0.13	31	0.40	38	0.23
Indjic 1988		33	0.37	56	0.00	36	0.06	35	0.20	30	0.35	36	0.26
Kapell 1951		54	0.32	62	0.00	45	0.07	46	0.07	44	0.09	62	0.08
Kissin 1993		41	0.35	72	0.00	37	0.06	39	0.13	36	0.41	39	0.23
Kushner 1989		4	0.50	30	0.00	12	0.14	9	0.59	7	0.66	8	0.62
Luisada 1991		11	0.44	45	0.00	14	0.14	11	0.53	16	0.59	11	0.56
Lushtak 2004		49	0.34	20	0.01	65	0.05	60	0.05	39	0.12	63	0.08
Malcuzynski 1961		21	0.42	15	0.01	20	0.07	25	0.34	22	0.43	27	0.38
Magaloff 1978		31	0.39	59	0.00	29	0.08	27	0.33	22	0.46	26	0.39
Magin 1975		69	0.27	43	0.00	73	0.06	50	0.06	50	0.08	65	0.07
Michalowski 1933		64	0.29	70	0.00	52	0.07	45	0.07	38	0.28	52	0.14
Milkina 1970		65	0.28	48	0.00	71	0.06	52	0.06	42	0.17	58	0.10
Mohovich 1999		67	0.28	86	0.00	66	0.04	67	0.04	53	0.06	76	0.05
Moravec 1969		44	0.35	38	0.00	33	0.06	36	0.18	25	0.33	37	0.24
Morozova 2008		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Neighaus 1950		30	0.39	24	0.00	27	0.13	16	0.45	28	0.32	28	0.38
Niedzielski 1931		35	0.37	13	0.01	35	0.07	32	0.25	28	0.32	34	0.28
Ohlsson 1999		29	0.39	14	0.01	34	0.05	33	0.22	39	0.11	44	0.16
Osinska 1989		78	0.23	82	0.00	72	0.05	61	0.05	45	0.08	69	0.06
Pachmann 1927		57	0.32	58	0.00	61	0.05	65	0.05	42	0.15	61	0.09
Paderewski 1930		75	0.25	60	0.00	76	0.04	73	0.04	55	0.06	74	0.05
Perlemuter 1992		32	0.38	28	0.00	21	0.07	26	0.33	21	0.58	21	0.44
Pierdomenico 2008		70	0.27	73	0.00	68	0.06	47	0.06	31	0.25	55	0.12
Poblocka 1999		18	0.42	7	0.04	13	0.13	13	0.52	4	0.63	10	0.57
Rabcewiczowa 1932		76	0.24	87	0.00	78	0.05	63	0.05	47	0.08	70	0.06
Rachmaninoff 1923		22	0.42	21	0.01	11	0.13	17	0.43	19	0.55	16	0.49
Rangell 2001		60	0.31	83	0.00	58	0.04	76	0.04	31	0.27	60	0.10
Richter 1976		7	0.48	33	0.00	9	0.11	7	0.62	25	0.68	7	0.65
Rosen 1989		17	0.42	8	0.03	10	0.12	14	0.52	17	0.57	12	0.54
Rosenthal 1930		28	0.40	49	0.00	32	0.13	29	0.30	13	0.60	23	0.42
Rosenthal 1931		45	0.34	64	0.00	54	0.04	70	0.04	22	0.57	48	0.15
Rosenthal 1931b		63	0.29	54	0.00	64	0.05	64	0.05	21	0.53	47	0.16
Rosenthal 1931c		52	0.33	12	0.01	38	0.05	37	0.15	25	0.47	35	0.27
Rosenthal 1931d		82	0.21	34	0.00	70	0.06	49	0.06	25	0.41	46	0.16
Rossi 2007		88	0.00	88	0.00	88	0.01	89	0.01	77	0.03	89	0.02
Rubinstein 1939		16	0.43	36	0.00	31	0.09	31	0.27	11	0.40	31	0.33
Rubinstein 1952		72	0.26	65	0.00	69	0.04	72	0.04	50	0.06	80	0.05
Rubinstein 1966		27	0.40	31	0.00	48	0.05	66	0.05	41	0.10	66	0.07
Schilhawsky 1960		77	0.24	77	0.00	84	0.03	83	0.03	63	0.05	82	0.04
Shebanova 2002		2	0.52	2	0.20	2	0.21	1	0.71	19	0.65	3	0.68
Smith 1975		79	0.22	55	0.00	85	0.02	87	0.02	59	0.05	86	0.03
Sokolov 2002		68	0.28	47	0.00	62	0.06	51	0.06	29	0.33	50	0.14
Sztompka 1959		8	0.47	3	0.08	4	0.13	12	0.52	19	0.52	13	0.52
Tomsic 1995		56	0.32	22	0.01	40	0.05	41	0.13	23	0.30	40	0.20
Uninsky 1932		14	0.43	32	0.00	15	0.10	10	0.54	19	0.46	15	0.50
Uninsky 1971		36	0.37	78	0.00	44	0.06	42	0.12	35	0.23	42	0.17
Wasowski 1980		61	0.30	69	0.00	60	0.04	78	0.04	56	0.06	72	0.05
Zak 1937		80	0.22	79	0.00	74	0.05	57	0.05	63	0.05	73	0.05
Zak 1951		81	0.22	89	0.00	77	0.04	75	0.04	53	0.05	81	0.04
Random 1		89	-0.01	71	0.00	89	0.01	88	0.01	64	0.04	90	0.02
Random 2		87	0.09	90	0.00	86	0.02	86	0.02	28	0.27	68	0.07
Random 3		90	-0.05	74	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	28	0.21	77	0.05

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).