Luisada 1991

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		45	0.37	19	0.00	35	0.07	36	0.28	29	0.36	35	0.32
Anderszewski 2003		78	0.14	85	0.00	74	0.05	61	0.05	55	0.05	69	0.05
Ashkenazy 1981		2	0.60	6	0.06	3	0.22	2	0.82	7	0.82	1	0.82
Bacha 2000		76	0.20	59	0.00	67	0.05	69	0.05	65	0.04	73	0.04
Badura 1965		65	0.26	47	0.00	69	0.04	78	0.04	49	0.05	78	0.04
Barbosa 1983		12	0.48	44	0.00	14	0.15	9	0.70	1	0.74	7	0.72
Biret 1990		42	0.38	56	0.00	46	0.07	50	0.07	11	0.65	44	0.21
Blet 2003		4	0.57	4	0.08	5	0.26	4	0.78	1	0.79	5	0.78
Block 1995		52	0.34	68	0.00	52	0.08	49	0.08	51	0.06	55	0.07
Blumental 1952		58	0.30	57	0.00	63	0.07	53	0.07	54	0.05	63	0.06
Boshniakovich 1969		33	0.41	35	0.00	27	0.09	26	0.47	25	0.46	26	0.46
Brailowsky 1960		77	0.15	18	0.00	80	0.04	75	0.04	68	0.04	74	0.04
Bunin 1987		19	0.46	26	0.00	19	0.10	15	0.60	7	0.65	15	0.62
Bunin 1987b		20	0.46	67	0.00	22	0.14	17	0.59	7	0.63	16	0.61
Chiu 1999		21	0.46	11	0.01	25	0.10	21	0.53	28	0.43	24	0.48
Cohen 1997		73	0.20	22	0.00	79	0.04	81	0.04	79	0.02	82	0.03
Cortot 1951		80	0.11	62	0.00	88	0.02	87	0.02	88	0.02	88	0.02
Csalog 1996		39	0.39	24	0.00	41	0.09	39	0.27	17	0.50	31	0.37
Czerny 1949		82	0.10	52	0.00	85	0.02	85	0.02	71	0.04	81	0.03
Czerny 1990		17	0.46	16	0.00	15	0.14	12	0.64	13	0.75	10	0.69
Duchoud 2007		34	0.40	46	0.00	43	0.11	42	0.23	31	0.33	39	0.28
Ezaki 2006		71	0.22	70	0.00	54	0.05	63	0.05	52	0.07	57	0.06
Falvay 1989		53	0.34	36	0.00	36	0.06	34	0.29	28	0.28	38	0.28
Farrell 1958		62	0.28	86	0.00	66	0.06	54	0.06	56	0.06	59	0.06
Ferenczy 1958		89	0.00	77	0.00	89	0.01	89	0.01	62	0.05	86	0.02
Fliere 1977		6	0.54	23	0.00	12	0.12	10	0.68	26	0.59	14	0.63
Fou 1978		50	0.35	20	0.00	40	0.07	43	0.22	39	0.21	43	0.21
Francois 1956		69	0.24	30	0.00	71	0.04	73	0.04	50	0.06	72	0.05
Friedman 1923		28	0.43	12	0.01	31	0.10	40	0.26	37	0.37	36	0.31
Friedman 1923b		23	0.44	63	0.00	29	0.10	31	0.34	34	0.45	30	0.39
Friedman 1930		38	0.39	33	0.00	47	0.10	46	0.10	41	0.28	47	0.17
Garcia 2007		44	0.37	39	0.00	45	0.14	45	0.14	32	0.37	42	0.23
Garcia 2007b		5	0.55	2	0.10	6	0.25	5	0.77	1	0.83	3	0.80
Gierzod 1998		83	0.09	38	0.00	75	0.05	66	0.05	73	0.03	76	0.04
Gornostaeva 1994		74	0.20	73	0.00	73	0.04	76	0.04	73	0.03	83	0.03
Groot 1988		1	0.61	3	0.10	4	0.26	1	0.83	1	0.80	2	0.81
Harasiewicz 1955		35	0.40	55	0.00	37	0.07	41	0.24	42	0.14	45	0.18
Hatto 1993		7	0.54	7	0.05	2	0.22	6	0.76	6	0.74	6	0.75
Hatto 1997		13	0.48	25	0.00	8	0.25	7	0.72	3	0.70	8	0.71
Horowitz 1949		18	0.46	8	0.02	23	0.13	28	0.41	28	0.45	28	0.43
Indjic 1988		3	0.58	1	0.41	1	0.40	3	0.80	5	0.78	4	0.79
Kapell 1951		30	0.42	31	0.00	26	0.11	24	0.51	17	0.45	25	0.48
Kissin 1993		22	0.45	17	0.00	9	0.12	19	0.57	19	0.61	18	0.59
Kushner 1989		43	0.37	49	0.00	44	0.10	44	0.20	35	0.26	41	0.23
Luisada 1991		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Lushtak 2004		72	0.21	78	0.00	72	0.04	80	0.04	71	0.04	79	0.04
Malcuzynski 1961		47	0.36	64	0.00	50	0.06	58	0.06	50	0.07	60	0.06
Magaloff 1978		60	0.30	79	0.00	62	0.06	55	0.06	56	0.05	65	0.05
Magin 1975		15	0.47	28	0.00	16	0.14	14	0.62	10	0.76	9	0.69
Michalowski 1933		11	0.50	10	0.01	10	0.11	13	0.63	7	0.60	17	0.61
Milkina 1970		70	0.22	69	0.00	61	0.05	59	0.05	37	0.25	52	0.11
Mohovich 1999		68	0.24	74	0.00	65	0.08	48	0.08	56	0.06	56	0.07
Moravec 1969		49	0.35	58	0.00	51	0.07	52	0.07	34	0.21	49	0.12
Morozova 2008		24	0.44	13	0.01	11	0.11	16	0.59	11	0.53	20	0.56
Neighaus 1950		37	0.40	32	0.00	42	0.09	33	0.29	48	0.09	48	0.16
Niedzielski 1931		29	0.42	34	0.00	24	0.09	25	0.51	17	0.49	23	0.50
Ohlsson 1999		55	0.33	71	0.00	55	0.05	65	0.05	65	0.04	75	0.04
Osinska 1989		61	0.29	75	0.00	58	0.05	62	0.05	53	0.06	64	0.05
Pachmann 1927		48	0.36	80	0.00	57	0.06	57	0.06	48	0.07	61	0.06
Paderewski 1930		31	0.41	50	0.00	34	0.08	29	0.38	23	0.54	27	0.45
Perlemuter 1992		36	0.40	29	0.00	48	0.09	47	0.09	37	0.34	46	0.17
Pierdomenico 2008		51	0.34	42	0.00	56	0.04	70	0.04	52	0.06	67	0.05
Poblocka 1999		14	0.47	21	0.00	20	0.09	20	0.55	8	0.58	19	0.56
Rabcewiczowa 1932		75	0.20	87	0.00	77	0.04	71	0.04	53	0.06	68	0.05
Rachmaninoff 1923		26	0.43	37	0.00	30	0.08	38	0.27	25	0.46	32	0.35
Rangell 2001		67	0.25	43	0.00	68	0.05	68	0.05	50	0.06	71	0.05
Richter 1976		32	0.41	14	0.01	38	0.06	35	0.28	40	0.39	34	0.33
Rosen 1989		64	0.26	65	0.00	64	0.07	51	0.07	74	0.03	70	0.05
Rosenthal 1930		63	0.27	51	0.00	70	0.04	72	0.04	54	0.05	77	0.04
Rosenthal 1931		86	0.04	83	0.00	86	0.02	83	0.02	78	0.02	85	0.02
Rosenthal 1931b		84	0.07	84	0.00	83	0.02	84	0.02	70	0.03	89	0.02
Rosenthal 1931c		81	0.11	81	0.00	81	0.04	77	0.04	87	0.01	90	0.02
Rosenthal 1931d		79	0.12	66	0.00	78	0.04	79	0.04	58	0.04	80	0.04
Rossi 2007		88	0.01	88	0.00	87	0.02	88	0.02	75	0.03	84	0.02
Rubinstein 1939		59	0.30	82	0.00	60	0.05	67	0.05	55	0.07	58	0.06
Rubinstein 1952		46	0.37	60	0.00	39	0.06	37	0.27	22	0.43	33	0.34
Rubinstein 1966		41	0.38	15	0.00	32	0.08	32	0.32	32	0.23	40	0.27
Schilhawsky 1960		57	0.30	72	0.00	53	0.05	64	0.05	33	0.28	50	0.12
Shebanova 2002		8	0.53	5	0.07	7	0.30	8	0.72	21	0.63	11	0.67
Smith 1975		66	0.25	45	0.00	76	0.04	74	0.04	53	0.06	66	0.05
Sokolov 2002		54	0.33	53	0.00	49	0.06	56	0.06	39	0.20	51	0.11
Sztompka 1959		27	0.43	61	0.00	33	0.07	30	0.36	39	0.24	37	0.29
Tomsic 1995		40	0.39	27	0.00	17	0.15	23	0.51	7	0.55	22	0.53
Uninsky 1932		9	0.50	9	0.02	18	0.11	22	0.53	30	0.35	29	0.43
Uninsky 1971		56	0.31	54	0.00	59	0.05	60	0.05	51	0.07	62	0.06
Wasowski 1980		10	0.50	40	0.00	13	0.14	11	0.66	11	0.66	12	0.66
Zak 1937		16	0.47	41	0.00	21	0.10	18	0.58	5	0.73	13	0.65
Zak 1951		25	0.44	89	0.00	28	0.08	27	0.41	6	0.68	21	0.53
Random 1		85	0.07	48	0.00	84	0.02	86	0.02	22	0.30	54	0.08
Random 2		87	0.04	76	0.00	82	0.03	82	0.03	25	0.30	53	0.09
Random 3		90	-0.02	90	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	54	0.03	87	0.02

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).