Kushner 1989

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		66	0.28	83	0.00	72	0.04	78	0.04	67	0.04	77	0.04
Anderszewski 2003		65	0.28	14	0.01	44	0.07	44	0.13	22	0.45	37	0.24
Ashkenazy 1981		2	0.64	3	0.09	2	0.49	2	0.83	6	0.82	2	0.82
Bacha 2000		12	0.46	12	0.01	15	0.11	9	0.59	3	0.68	9	0.63
Badura 1965		40	0.36	10	0.01	22	0.10	24	0.44	5	0.65	17	0.53
Barbosa 1983		54	0.31	89	0.00	57	0.05	57	0.05	50	0.06	69	0.05
Biret 1990		83	0.16	27	0.00	86	0.03	82	0.03	66	0.04	88	0.03
Blet 2003		74	0.23	61	0.00	73	0.04	79	0.04	66	0.04	75	0.04
Block 1995		17	0.44	22	0.00	7	0.14	8	0.62	16	0.57	12	0.59
Blumental 1952		11	0.46	8	0.01	12	0.10	11	0.58	3	0.72	8	0.65
Boshniakovich 1969		13	0.45	7	0.02	6	0.14	17	0.54	15	0.55	16	0.54
Brailowsky 1960		77	0.21	38	0.00	74	0.04	67	0.04	50	0.07	63	0.05
Bunin 1987		50	0.32	53	0.00	52	0.04	68	0.04	46	0.08	59	0.06
Bunin 1987b		49	0.32	78	0.00	53	0.08	47	0.08	45	0.09	49	0.08
Chiu 1999		7	0.50	31	0.00	13	0.10	21	0.45	30	0.38	24	0.41
Cohen 1997		51	0.31	62	0.00	61	0.04	74	0.04	44	0.11	56	0.07
Cortot 1951		73	0.23	40	0.00	78	0.05	64	0.05	66	0.04	81	0.04
Csalog 1996		67	0.27	13	0.01	32	0.06	43	0.14	37	0.20	43	0.17
Czerny 1949		85	0.11	66	0.00	87	0.02	87	0.02	59	0.05	86	0.03
Czerny 1990		16	0.45	39	0.00	23	0.09	22	0.45	23	0.62	18	0.53
Duchoud 2007		24	0.41	5	0.03	10	0.11	15	0.55	9	0.59	14	0.57
Ezaki 2006		68	0.25	54	0.00	76	0.04	73	0.04	56	0.06	61	0.05
Falvay 1989		28	0.40	60	0.00	29	0.07	30	0.36	16	0.41	26	0.38
Farrell 1958		82	0.16	43	0.00	80	0.05	62	0.05	66	0.04	73	0.04
Ferenczy 1958		87	0.07	84	0.00	85	0.02	84	0.02	48	0.07	76	0.04
Fliere 1977		6	0.52	19	0.01	8	0.19	6	0.70	25	0.60	6	0.65
Fou 1978		10	0.47	4	0.03	14	0.11	10	0.58	10	0.57	13	0.57
Francois 1956		84	0.15	74	0.00	84	0.02	85	0.02	77	0.02	90	0.02
Friedman 1923		38	0.36	23	0.00	48	0.09	46	0.09	53	0.08	52	0.08
Friedman 1923b		41	0.36	56	0.00	49	0.10	45	0.10	52	0.09	48	0.09
Friedman 1930		37	0.36	75	0.00	50	0.07	50	0.07	48	0.09	50	0.08
Garcia 2007		55	0.31	15	0.01	24	0.09	29	0.39	24	0.42	25	0.40
Garcia 2007b		22	0.42	29	0.00	18	0.11	13	0.58	12	0.65	11	0.61
Gierzod 1998		25	0.41	33	0.00	17	0.09	12	0.58	8	0.72	7	0.65
Gornostaeva 1994		62	0.28	35	0.00	60	0.04	76	0.04	53	0.05	79	0.04
Groot 1988		9	0.48	41	0.00	16	0.09	14	0.57	26	0.37	22	0.46
Harasiewicz 1955		56	0.30	51	0.00	69	0.05	56	0.05	87	0.03	82	0.04
Hatto 1993		21	0.43	32	0.00	34	0.08	27	0.41	54	0.08	42	0.18
Hatto 1997		59	0.29	90	0.00	70	0.06	52	0.06	71	0.04	70	0.05
Horowitz 1949		42	0.35	18	0.01	51	0.06	53	0.06	46	0.09	54	0.07
Indjic 1988		23	0.42	50	0.00	33	0.06	26	0.42	42	0.20	32	0.29
Kapell 1951		34	0.38	67	0.00	40	0.07	36	0.24	37	0.16	40	0.20
Kissin 1993		5	0.53	6	0.02	5	0.22	5	0.76	5	0.81	4	0.78
Kushner 1989		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Luisada 1991		36	0.37	71	0.00	36	0.07	35	0.26	44	0.20	39	0.23
Lushtak 2004		15	0.45	16	0.01	19	0.14	18	0.50	5	0.60	15	0.55
Malcuzynski 1961		4	0.54	2	0.11	4	0.27	4	0.78	1	0.76	5	0.77
Magaloff 1978		29	0.39	68	0.00	30	0.06	31	0.36	33	0.35	28	0.35
Magin 1975		27	0.40	52	0.00	42	0.10	40	0.19	34	0.39	34	0.27
Michalowski 1933		39	0.36	79	0.00	25	0.09	20	0.46	26	0.41	23	0.43
Milkina 1970		78	0.21	85	0.00	67	0.04	77	0.04	60	0.05	74	0.04
Mohovich 1999		44	0.34	20	0.01	38	0.07	37	0.22	32	0.26	38	0.24
Moravec 1969		31	0.39	36	0.00	35	0.07	33	0.28	22	0.36	30	0.32
Morozova 2008		8	0.50	25	0.00	9	0.12	7	0.66	9	0.59	10	0.62
Neighaus 1950		57	0.30	86	0.00	59	0.04	65	0.04	76	0.04	80	0.04
Niedzielski 1931		26	0.40	17	0.01	20	0.09	19	0.49	21	0.46	21	0.47
Ohlsson 1999		30	0.39	72	0.00	46	0.07	49	0.07	67	0.04	67	0.05
Osinska 1989		79	0.21	57	0.00	68	0.04	72	0.04	67	0.04	71	0.04
Pachmann 1927		43	0.34	28	0.00	45	0.07	48	0.07	41	0.19	46	0.12
Paderewski 1930		35	0.38	44	0.00	39	0.07	32	0.31	29	0.42	27	0.36
Perlemuter 1992		19	0.43	63	0.00	26	0.09	25	0.43	24	0.56	20	0.49
Pierdomenico 2008		45	0.34	9	0.01	31	0.05	41	0.19	27	0.32	35	0.25
Poblocka 1999		33	0.38	42	0.00	28	0.12	34	0.26	33	0.30	33	0.28
Rabcewiczowa 1932		80	0.18	69	0.00	83	0.02	86	0.02	69	0.04	85	0.03
Rachmaninoff 1923		60	0.29	37	0.00	56	0.05	60	0.05	55	0.05	64	0.05
Rangell 2001		63	0.28	47	0.00	63	0.04	71	0.04	41	0.12	57	0.07
Richter 1976		3	0.59	24	0.00	3	0.29	3	0.79	9	0.80	3	0.79
Rosen 1989		47	0.33	64	0.00	43	0.06	42	0.14	50	0.05	51	0.08
Rosenthal 1930		72	0.24	45	0.00	79	0.05	59	0.05	64	0.04	78	0.04
Rosenthal 1931		70	0.25	55	0.00	62	0.05	63	0.05	30	0.49	44	0.16
Rosenthal 1931b		75	0.23	58	0.00	64	0.05	58	0.05	33	0.42	45	0.14
Rosenthal 1931c		71	0.25	73	0.00	71	0.03	80	0.03	44	0.12	60	0.06
Rosenthal 1931d		81	0.17	59	0.00	75	0.04	75	0.04	38	0.25	47	0.10
Rossi 2007		86	0.11	87	0.00	82	0.03	83	0.03	60	0.05	72	0.04
Rubinstein 1939		64	0.28	80	0.00	54	0.06	55	0.06	49	0.08	53	0.07
Rubinstein 1952		53	0.31	81	0.00	55	0.04	66	0.04	59	0.05	83	0.04
Rubinstein 1966		18	0.44	11	0.01	11	0.10	16	0.55	14	0.46	19	0.50
Schilhawsky 1960		69	0.25	46	0.00	77	0.04	69	0.04	43	0.14	55	0.07
Shebanova 2002		1	0.66	1	0.54	1	0.54	1	0.86	5	0.82	1	0.84
Smith 1975		76	0.21	76	0.00	81	0.03	81	0.03	69	0.04	84	0.03
Sokolov 2002		52	0.31	26	0.00	37	0.08	39	0.20	42	0.16	41	0.18
Sztompka 1959		14	0.45	34	0.00	21	0.11	28	0.40	36	0.30	29	0.35
Tomsic 1995		32	0.38	82	0.00	41	0.09	38	0.21	24	0.29	36	0.25
Uninsky 1932		20	0.43	30	0.00	27	0.11	23	0.45	38	0.22	31	0.31
Uninsky 1971		48	0.32	21	0.00	47	0.07	51	0.07	66	0.04	68	0.05
Wasowski 1980		46	0.33	65	0.00	58	0.05	61	0.05	73	0.05	62	0.05
Zak 1937		61	0.29	49	0.00	65	0.04	70	0.04	47	0.07	65	0.05
Zak 1951		58	0.30	70	0.00	66	0.06	54	0.06	63	0.05	66	0.05
Random 1		90	0.00	48	0.00	88	0.02	88	0.02	36	0.19	58	0.06
Random 2		89	0.00	77	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	75	0.03	89	0.02
Random 3		88	0.01	88	0.00	89	0.01	89	0.01	40	0.12	87	0.03

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).