Kapell 1951

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		69	0.19	35	0.00	68	0.07	49	0.07	60	0.04	66	0.05
Anderszewski 2003		67	0.21	72	0.00	63	0.05	64	0.05	40	0.14	51	0.08
Ashkenazy 1981		8	0.50	40	0.00	10	0.13	8	0.62	26	0.58	10	0.60
Bacha 2000		38	0.35	17	0.01	24	0.07	30	0.28	17	0.50	23	0.37
Badura 1965		73	0.16	73	0.00	71	0.06	61	0.06	80	0.03	77	0.04
Barbosa 1983		15	0.43	29	0.00	13	0.11	11	0.49	8	0.64	11	0.56
Biret 1990		48	0.31	39	0.00	56	0.05	73	0.05	26	0.50	43	0.16
Blet 2003		19	0.40	25	0.00	15	0.10	14	0.47	20	0.56	12	0.51
Block 1995		52	0.30	43	0.00	61	0.07	48	0.07	57	0.05	60	0.06
Blumental 1952		35	0.37	12	0.02	25	0.09	22	0.39	14	0.56	20	0.47
Boshniakovich 1969		40	0.34	10	0.02	18	0.08	24	0.34	32	0.33	28	0.33
Brailowsky 1960		76	0.14	54	0.00	73	0.05	67	0.05	61	0.05	63	0.05
Bunin 1987		21	0.40	22	0.01	22	0.09	18	0.44	12	0.56	15	0.50
Bunin 1987b		20	0.40	24	0.00	23	0.14	19	0.44	13	0.56	13	0.50
Chiu 1999		7	0.52	4	0.09	4	0.18	5	0.63	14	0.65	5	0.64
Cohen 1997		75	0.14	86	0.00	76	0.04	78	0.04	82	0.02	80	0.03
Cortot 1951		77	0.12	59	0.00	77	0.04	77	0.04	70	0.03	82	0.03
Csalog 1996		64	0.22	41	0.00	65	0.07	52	0.07	59	0.05	59	0.06
Czerny 1949		78	0.11	74	0.00	78	0.03	79	0.03	56	0.05	76	0.04
Czerny 1990		4	0.53	13	0.02	7	0.24	4	0.66	9	0.79	4	0.72
Duchoud 2007		14	0.43	15	0.01	17	0.10	15	0.46	12	0.55	14	0.50
Ezaki 2006		82	0.02	65	0.00	84	0.02	82	0.02	86	0.02	83	0.02
Falvay 1989		42	0.34	68	0.00	50	0.07	50	0.07	27	0.29	46	0.14
Farrell 1958		59	0.28	47	0.00	27	0.07	42	0.12	36	0.25	40	0.17
Ferenczy 1958		84	0.02	52	0.00	82	0.02	83	0.02	45	0.08	75	0.04
Fliere 1977		26	0.38	34	0.00	33	0.06	25	0.34	44	0.19	36	0.25
Fou 1978		31	0.37	20	0.01	26	0.09	23	0.36	26	0.39	24	0.37
Francois 1956		66	0.21	28	0.00	67	0.05	70	0.05	52	0.06	70	0.05
Friedman 1923		33	0.37	55	0.00	35	0.06	33	0.23	38	0.36	33	0.29
Friedman 1923b		29	0.38	60	0.00	32	0.06	31	0.27	38	0.41	29	0.33
Friedman 1930		10	0.48	30	0.00	9	0.12	7	0.63	11	0.66	6	0.64
Garcia 2007		22	0.40	27	0.00	19	0.09	27	0.32	31	0.37	27	0.34
Garcia 2007b		44	0.33	56	0.00	48	0.08	45	0.08	37	0.28	44	0.15
Gierzod 1998		86	0.00	87	0.00	79	0.04	76	0.04	85	0.02	79	0.03
Gornostaeva 1994		74	0.15	61	0.00	72	0.05	69	0.05	78	0.03	78	0.04
Groot 1988		37	0.36	88	0.00	49	0.06	58	0.06	62	0.06	61	0.06
Harasiewicz 1955		16	0.42	5	0.04	8	0.12	21	0.40	22	0.42	22	0.41
Hatto 1993		3	0.55	1	0.21	1	0.21	1	0.77	9	0.69	2	0.73
Hatto 1997		11	0.48	14	0.02	11	0.14	10	0.59	4	0.64	8	0.61
Horowitz 1949		1	0.56	2	0.17	3	0.20	3	0.71	1	0.79	1	0.75
Indjic 1988		2	0.56	3	0.12	2	0.26	2	0.75	8	0.70	3	0.72
Kapell 1951		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Kissin 1993		28	0.38	37	0.00	29	0.09	32	0.27	24	0.52	26	0.37
Kushner 1989		27	0.38	69	0.00	37	0.06	37	0.16	36	0.24	39	0.20
Luisada 1991		17	0.42	23	0.01	20	0.10	17	0.45	24	0.51	16	0.48
Lushtak 2004		57	0.28	80	0.00	58	0.06	63	0.06	59	0.05	68	0.05
Malcuzynski 1961		63	0.24	48	0.00	66	0.06	60	0.06	74	0.04	64	0.05
Magaloff 1978		70	0.18	45	0.00	69	0.05	71	0.05	84	0.03	73	0.04
Magin 1975		43	0.33	42	0.00	36	0.06	38	0.15	28	0.48	34	0.27
Michalowski 1933		25	0.39	32	0.00	34	0.06	29	0.28	31	0.36	30	0.32
Milkina 1970		54	0.29	66	0.00	40	0.05	39	0.14	23	0.44	37	0.25
Mohovich 1999		60	0.27	46	0.00	60	0.06	55	0.06	48	0.08	55	0.07
Moravec 1969		45	0.33	75	0.00	55	0.05	66	0.05	50	0.05	62	0.05
Morozova 2008		46	0.32	70	0.00	44	0.05	44	0.09	46	0.07	52	0.08
Neighaus 1950		50	0.30	49	0.00	57	0.06	57	0.06	59	0.05	69	0.05
Niedzielski 1931		13	0.44	16	0.01	16	0.10	13	0.47	19	0.48	19	0.47
Ohlsson 1999		51	0.30	44	0.00	52	0.08	47	0.08	62	0.04	58	0.06
Osinska 1989		65	0.22	62	0.00	64	0.04	75	0.04	55	0.05	72	0.04
Pachmann 1927		56	0.28	76	0.00	62	0.06	54	0.06	53	0.07	57	0.06
Paderewski 1930		49	0.31	57	0.00	54	0.07	51	0.07	40	0.24	48	0.13
Perlemuter 1992		71	0.18	63	0.00	70	0.05	65	0.05	72	0.04	71	0.04
Pierdomenico 2008		36	0.36	81	0.00	46	0.05	72	0.05	30	0.26	49	0.11
Poblocka 1999		47	0.32	71	0.00	45	0.05	68	0.05	29	0.32	47	0.13
Rabcewiczowa 1932		72	0.17	82	0.00	75	0.05	74	0.05	65	0.04	74	0.04
Rachmaninoff 1923		30	0.37	26	0.00	43	0.05	41	0.12	29	0.36	38	0.21
Rangell 2001		24	0.40	36	0.00	38	0.07	34	0.20	15	0.43	32	0.29
Richter 1976		12	0.47	19	0.01	14	0.12	16	0.45	35	0.51	17	0.48
Rosen 1989		41	0.34	9	0.02	41	0.05	40	0.13	47	0.05	53	0.08
Rosenthal 1930		68	0.20	77	0.00	74	0.06	59	0.06	70	0.04	67	0.05
Rosenthal 1931		87	-0.02	78	0.00	86	0.02	88	0.02	74	0.03	86	0.02
Rosenthal 1931b		85	0.00	83	0.00	87	0.02	85	0.02	85	0.02	88	0.02
Rosenthal 1931c		80	0.05	64	0.00	88	0.02	81	0.02	90	0.01	90	0.01
Rosenthal 1931d		83	0.02	84	0.00	80	0.03	80	0.03	79	0.03	81	0.03
Rossi 2007		89	-0.06	89	0.00	81	0.02	86	0.02	85	0.02	84	0.02
Rubinstein 1939		61	0.26	31	0.00	59	0.06	62	0.06	44	0.10	50	0.08
Rubinstein 1952		32	0.37	7	0.03	21	0.12	20	0.43	15	0.53	18	0.48
Rubinstein 1966		23	0.40	38	0.00	30	0.06	26	0.33	23	0.32	31	0.32
Schilhawsky 1960		55	0.29	67	0.00	51	0.06	53	0.06	24	0.42	42	0.16
Shebanova 2002		5	0.53	6	0.04	5	0.16	6	0.63	22	0.62	7	0.62
Smith 1975		79	0.07	85	0.00	85	0.02	84	0.02	81	0.03	85	0.02
Sokolov 2002		58	0.28	53	0.00	42	0.05	43	0.10	40	0.20	45	0.14
Sztompka 1959		39	0.34	51	0.00	47	0.06	56	0.06	47	0.08	54	0.07
Tomsic 1995		62	0.25	79	0.00	53	0.08	46	0.08	59	0.05	56	0.06
Uninsky 1932		9	0.48	33	0.00	12	0.16	12	0.49	27	0.40	21	0.44
Uninsky 1971		53	0.30	11	0.02	28	0.09	36	0.17	39	0.16	41	0.16
Wasowski 1980		6	0.52	8	0.03	6	0.17	9	0.59	14	0.61	9	0.60
Zak 1937		18	0.40	21	0.01	31	0.07	28	0.31	24	0.44	25	0.37
Zak 1951		34	0.37	50	0.00	39	0.07	35	0.18	25	0.42	35	0.27
Random 1		90	-0.10	90	0.00	89	0.01	89	0.01	88	0.02	89	0.01
Random 2		81	0.04	18	0.01	83	0.02	87	0.02	39	0.14	65	0.05
Random 3		88	-0.05	58	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	69	0.03	87	0.02

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).