Indjic 1988

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		50	0.32	58	0.00	32	0.09	35	0.27	30	0.35	35	0.31
Anderszewski 2003		63	0.23	59	0.00	61	0.06	67	0.06	37	0.18	50	0.10
Ashkenazy 1981		3	0.68	14	0.00	3	0.40	3	0.88	3	0.87	3	0.87
Bacha 2000		25	0.41	3	0.00	30	0.09	27	0.37	5	0.65	24	0.49
Badura 1965		65	0.21	28	0.00	68	0.05	68	0.05	74	0.03	73	0.04
Barbosa 1983		19	0.47	17	0.00	12	0.11	11	0.63	2	0.73	12	0.68
Biret 1990		58	0.25	60	0.00	67	0.05	69	0.05	45	0.09	58	0.07
Blet 2003		18	0.47	61	0.00	14	0.11	23	0.54	14	0.60	21	0.57
Block 1995		53	0.29	62	0.00	51	0.09	47	0.09	47	0.06	55	0.07
Blumental 1952		22	0.46	29	0.00	23	0.11	21	0.56	4	0.72	17	0.63
Boshniakovich 1969		56	0.26	11	0.00	48	0.08	50	0.08	58	0.06	57	0.07
Brailowsky 1960		87	0.00	15	0.00	87	0.02	88	0.02	85	0.03	86	0.02
Bunin 1987		48	0.33	42	0.00	24	0.10	29	0.35	17	0.53	28	0.43
Bunin 1987b		47	0.33	43	0.00	27	0.11	31	0.34	17	0.51	29	0.42
Chiu 1999		11	0.50	63	0.00	15	0.12	10	0.64	17	0.63	16	0.63
Cohen 1997		71	0.16	64	0.00	78	0.04	76	0.04	76	0.02	82	0.03
Cortot 1951		78	0.09	65	0.00	84	0.03	83	0.03	85	0.02	88	0.02
Csalog 1996		64	0.22	30	0.00	66	0.08	52	0.08	75	0.04	61	0.06
Czerny 1949		82	0.07	66	0.00	86	0.03	82	0.03	69	0.04	80	0.03
Czerny 1990		16	0.48	44	0.00	19	0.11	16	0.59	14	0.75	14	0.67
Duchoud 2007		26	0.41	18	0.00	28	0.10	32	0.32	27	0.39	33	0.35
Ezaki 2006		73	0.15	67	0.00	74	0.06	61	0.06	67	0.04	64	0.05
Falvay 1989		33	0.40	4	0.00	41	0.07	41	0.20	15	0.43	37	0.29
Farrell 1958		80	0.08	45	0.00	79	0.04	77	0.04	83	0.02	77	0.03
Ferenczy 1958		88	-0.01	19	0.00	88	0.02	86	0.02	68	0.04	79	0.03
Fliere 1977		31	0.40	31	0.00	36	0.07	33	0.31	46	0.10	44	0.18
Fou 1978		40	0.35	68	0.00	50	0.08	51	0.08	57	0.05	60	0.06
Francois 1956		69	0.19	46	0.00	69	0.05	70	0.05	48	0.06	69	0.05
Friedman 1923		51	0.30	69	0.00	57	0.07	55	0.07	49	0.09	54	0.08
Friedman 1923b		52	0.30	32	0.00	56	0.06	63	0.06	47	0.11	53	0.08
Friedman 1930		20	0.46	70	0.00	21	0.11	22	0.55	15	0.62	20	0.58
Garcia 2007		49	0.33	22	0.00	35	0.07	36	0.26	29	0.38	36	0.31
Garcia 2007b		17	0.48	33	0.00	7	0.22	9	0.65	3	0.79	8	0.72
Gierzod 1998		72	0.16	71	0.00	55	0.06	60	0.06	63	0.05	67	0.05
Gornostaeva 1994		77	0.13	72	0.00	76	0.04	75	0.04	72	0.03	83	0.03
Groot 1988		8	0.52	34	0.00	10	0.16	7	0.71	8	0.69	9	0.70
Harasiewicz 1955		34	0.39	73	0.00	46	0.07	56	0.07	53	0.06	63	0.06
Hatto 1993		1	0.96	1	0.99	1	0.98	1	0.99	1	0.99	1	0.99
Hatto 1997		2	0.83	2	0.00	2	0.87	2	0.96	1	0.96	2	0.96
Horowitz 1949		30	0.40	74	0.00	29	0.07	28	0.36	20	0.55	27	0.44
Indjic 1988		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Kapell 1951		7	0.56	75	0.00	8	0.20	8	0.70	2	0.75	7	0.72
Kissin 1993		12	0.49	47	0.00	18	0.15	12	0.63	11	0.75	11	0.69
Kushner 1989		24	0.42	76	0.00	40	0.07	42	0.20	26	0.42	38	0.29
Luisada 1991		5	0.58	48	0.00	4	0.37	5	0.78	3	0.80	5	0.79
Lushtak 2004		76	0.13	23	0.00	75	0.04	78	0.04	84	0.02	81	0.03
Malcuzynski 1961		28	0.40	49	0.00	31	0.08	25	0.41	21	0.47	26	0.44
Magaloff 1978		68	0.19	77	0.00	60	0.06	66	0.06	78	0.03	71	0.04
Magin 1975		4	0.58	8	0.00	5	0.34	4	0.81	2	0.87	4	0.84
Michalowski 1933		23	0.45	78	0.00	20	0.10	20	0.56	4	0.67	18	0.61
Milkina 1970		37	0.38	35	0.00	43	0.09	39	0.21	13	0.57	31	0.35
Mohovich 1999		59	0.24	12	0.00	49	0.09	48	0.09	43	0.16	48	0.12
Moravec 1969		43	0.34	50	0.00	45	0.06	59	0.06	28	0.28	47	0.13
Morozova 2008		39	0.37	6	0.00	34	0.10	30	0.35	35	0.20	39	0.26
Neighaus 1950		29	0.40	16	0.00	42	0.07	38	0.22	43	0.12	46	0.16
Niedzielski 1931		14	0.48	36	0.00	11	0.11	13	0.63	6	0.65	15	0.64
Ohlsson 1999		32	0.40	10	0.00	25	0.09	26	0.39	29	0.31	32	0.35
Osinska 1989		74	0.14	24	0.00	72	0.05	72	0.05	80	0.03	70	0.04
Pachmann 1927		54	0.28	51	0.00	52	0.10	46	0.10	52	0.07	52	0.08
Paderewski 1930		15	0.48	25	0.00	9	0.14	15	0.61	5	0.73	13	0.67
Perlemuter 1992		57	0.25	26	0.00	64	0.06	57	0.06	58	0.04	65	0.05
Pierdomenico 2008		41	0.35	79	0.00	38	0.07	43	0.19	18	0.49	34	0.31
Poblocka 1999		66	0.21	37	0.00	65	0.08	53	0.08	71	0.04	59	0.06
Rabcewiczowa 1932		79	0.09	80	0.00	83	0.03	84	0.03	68	0.04	76	0.03
Rachmaninoff 1923		55	0.27	9	0.00	58	0.06	65	0.06	49	0.05	66	0.05
Rangell 2001		75	0.14	81	0.00	70	0.05	71	0.05	78	0.03	75	0.04
Richter 1976		10	0.50	52	0.00	16	0.10	14	0.63	19	0.75	10	0.69
Rosen 1989		60	0.23	27	0.00	62	0.06	62	0.06	85	0.03	74	0.04
Rosenthal 1930		62	0.23	53	0.00	59	0.06	58	0.06	58	0.05	68	0.05
Rosenthal 1931		81	0.07	82	0.00	80	0.03	79	0.03	72	0.03	78	0.03
Rosenthal 1931b		83	0.07	83	0.00	81	0.03	80	0.03	81	0.02	89	0.02
Rosenthal 1931c		70	0.17	84	0.00	71	0.04	73	0.04	78	0.02	85	0.03
Rosenthal 1931d		85	0.05	85	0.00	77	0.03	81	0.03	76	0.03	84	0.03
Rossi 2007		90	-0.12	86	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	90	0.01	90	0.01
Rubinstein 1939		42	0.34	13	0.00	44	0.07	45	0.13	21	0.30	42	0.20
Rubinstein 1952		36	0.39	20	0.00	37	0.07	34	0.29	18	0.51	30	0.38
Rubinstein 1966		38	0.37	54	0.00	39	0.08	40	0.20	26	0.27	41	0.23
Schilhawsky 1960		61	0.23	55	0.00	63	0.06	64	0.06	40	0.17	51	0.10
Shebanova 2002		6	0.57	21	0.00	6	0.39	6	0.76	12	0.73	6	0.74
Smith 1975		67	0.20	87	0.00	73	0.04	74	0.04	60	0.05	72	0.04
Sokolov 2002		35	0.39	38	0.00	47	0.08	54	0.08	19	0.44	43	0.19
Sztompka 1959		27	0.40	88	0.00	26	0.09	24	0.50	26	0.41	25	0.45
Tomsic 1995		21	0.46	7	0.00	22	0.15	19	0.57	3	0.60	19	0.58
Uninsky 1932		9	0.52	39	0.00	17	0.11	17	0.58	14	0.54	23	0.56
Uninsky 1971		44	0.34	5	0.00	33	0.07	37	0.25	32	0.25	40	0.25
Wasowski 1980		13	0.49	40	0.00	13	0.10	18	0.58	21	0.55	22	0.56
Zak 1937		45	0.33	56	0.00	53	0.08	49	0.08	41	0.13	49	0.10
Zak 1951		46	0.33	57	0.00	54	0.13	44	0.13	36	0.25	45	0.18
Random 1		86	0.04	41	0.00	82	0.02	87	0.02	29	0.25	56	0.07
Random 2		84	0.06	89	0.00	85	0.03	85	0.03	38	0.14	62	0.06
Random 3		89	-0.05	90	0.00	89	0.01	89	0.01	70	0.03	87	0.02

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).