Groot 1988

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		38	0.41	11	0.02	15	0.10	24	0.39	7	0.60	24	0.48
Anderszewski 2003		81	0.16	72	0.00	81	0.03	81	0.03	60	0.04	85	0.03
Ashkenazy 1981		1	0.62	3	0.12	2	0.20	2	0.78	8	0.80	2	0.79
Bacha 2000		74	0.21	87	0.00	76	0.03	76	0.03	61	0.05	78	0.04
Badura 1965		67	0.26	49	0.00	72	0.04	72	0.04	54	0.04	81	0.04
Barbosa 1983		57	0.34	24	0.00	47	0.05	66	0.05	18	0.49	50	0.16
Biret 1990		71	0.24	88	0.00	79	0.03	79	0.03	47	0.08	77	0.05
Blet 2003		18	0.48	34	0.00	25	0.08	20	0.45	6	0.68	16	0.55
Block 1995		30	0.43	73	0.00	31	0.07	21	0.42	20	0.50	26	0.46
Blumental 1952		60	0.32	56	0.00	58	0.06	63	0.06	31	0.30	59	0.13
Boshniakovich 1969		43	0.40	42	0.00	52	0.07	54	0.07	38	0.24	60	0.13
Brailowsky 1960		82	0.16	83	0.00	83	0.03	84	0.03	79	0.03	82	0.03
Bunin 1987		45	0.40	27	0.00	16	0.08	32	0.25	28	0.41	38	0.32
Bunin 1987b		44	0.40	44	0.00	21	0.08	35	0.24	26	0.40	39	0.31
Chiu 1999		31	0.43	43	0.00	33	0.07	28	0.34	25	0.46	28	0.40
Cohen 1997		62	0.30	77	0.00	67	0.05	68	0.05	43	0.11	70	0.07
Cortot 1951		79	0.17	36	0.00	78	0.03	80	0.03	69	0.03	88	0.03
Csalog 1996		55	0.36	69	0.00	59	0.06	65	0.06	32	0.31	55	0.14
Czerny 1949		80	0.17	37	0.00	84	0.03	83	0.03	48	0.07	75	0.05
Czerny 1990		12	0.52	5	0.09	7	0.16	9	0.60	7	0.80	8	0.69
Duchoud 2007		29	0.43	80	0.00	37	0.06	34	0.24	17	0.52	34	0.35
Ezaki 2006		64	0.30	59	0.00	63	0.06	60	0.06	32	0.32	53	0.14
Falvay 1989		40	0.41	20	0.00	40	0.06	40	0.20	8	0.52	37	0.32
Farrell 1958		76	0.20	81	0.00	80	0.04	73	0.04	62	0.05	79	0.04
Ferenczy 1958		89	-0.03	89	0.00	89	0.02	89	0.02	74	0.03	89	0.02
Fliere 1977		2	0.61	4	0.11	3	0.25	4	0.77	11	0.77	3	0.77
Fou 1978		50	0.37	70	0.00	56	0.09	46	0.09	41	0.18	56	0.13
Francois 1956		61	0.31	39	0.00	68	0.07	55	0.07	30	0.41	49	0.17
Friedman 1923		34	0.42	62	0.00	39	0.08	39	0.20	32	0.44	40	0.30
Friedman 1923b		32	0.43	31	0.00	35	0.08	30	0.26	33	0.49	32	0.36
Friedman 1930		24	0.46	47	0.00	28	0.08	23	0.39	17	0.61	22	0.49
Garcia 2007		58	0.34	60	0.00	48	0.07	53	0.07	30	0.37	51	0.16
Garcia 2007b		14	0.49	21	0.00	26	0.08	27	0.36	10	0.68	23	0.49
Gierzod 1998		77	0.17	45	0.00	50	0.05	69	0.05	33	0.27	62	0.12
Gornostaeva 1994		52	0.36	16	0.01	24	0.08	38	0.20	19	0.59	35	0.34
Groot 1988		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Harasiewicz 1955		37	0.42	28	0.00	41	0.06	41	0.17	23	0.40	42	0.26
Hatto 1993		8	0.54	18	0.01	6	0.20	5	0.73	8	0.69	6	0.71
Hatto 1997		42	0.40	52	0.00	43	0.07	43	0.14	14	0.47	41	0.26
Horowitz 1949		23	0.47	38	0.00	29	0.10	33	0.25	22	0.54	30	0.37
Indjic 1988		9	0.52	22	0.00	9	0.15	8	0.69	7	0.71	7	0.70
Kapell 1951		54	0.36	84	0.00	57	0.06	62	0.06	58	0.06	72	0.06
Kissin 1993		15	0.48	25	0.00	18	0.09	14	0.53	15	0.68	13	0.60
Kushner 1989		17	0.48	32	0.00	27	0.08	26	0.37	14	0.57	25	0.46
Luisada 1991		3	0.61	1	0.19	1	0.19	1	0.80	1	0.83	1	0.81
Lushtak 2004		78	0.17	40	0.00	82	0.02	86	0.02	65	0.05	87	0.03
Malcuzynski 1961		41	0.41	35	0.00	55	0.08	47	0.08	31	0.22	57	0.13
Magaloff 1978		33	0.42	26	0.00	38	0.07	37	0.22	18	0.49	36	0.33
Magin 1975		4	0.60	2	0.15	4	0.27	6	0.71	5	0.84	4	0.77
Michalowski 1933		13	0.52	19	0.00	17	0.08	12	0.54	6	0.64	15	0.59
Milkina 1970		68	0.24	48	0.00	65	0.06	61	0.06	33	0.34	54	0.14
Mohovich 1999		59	0.33	23	0.00	51	0.08	48	0.08	25	0.35	48	0.17
Moravec 1969		47	0.39	54	0.00	36	0.06	31	0.25	13	0.52	31	0.36
Morozova 2008		26	0.44	10	0.02	8	0.13	11	0.56	5	0.65	14	0.60
Neighaus 1950		21	0.48	9	0.02	12	0.16	15	0.53	10	0.52	20	0.52
Niedzielski 1931		28	0.43	50	0.00	44	0.08	42	0.15	24	0.39	43	0.24
Ohlsson 1999		46	0.39	64	0.00	42	0.07	44	0.13	42	0.10	64	0.11
Osinska 1989		63	0.30	74	0.00	66	0.07	50	0.07	56	0.05	71	0.06
Pachmann 1927		35	0.42	29	0.00	54	0.07	51	0.07	31	0.46	46	0.18
Paderewski 1930		16	0.48	17	0.01	20	0.14	18	0.46	12	0.64	19	0.54
Perlemuter 1992		11	0.52	61	0.00	19	0.11	16	0.53	4	0.76	10	0.63
Pierdomenico 2008		49	0.37	68	0.00	62	0.06	56	0.06	32	0.25	61	0.12
Poblocka 1999		25	0.45	8	0.03	32	0.07	36	0.23	11	0.52	33	0.35
Rabcewiczowa 1932		69	0.24	46	0.00	73	0.04	75	0.04	43	0.14	68	0.07
Rachmaninoff 1923		36	0.42	33	0.00	45	0.10	45	0.10	20	0.55	44	0.23
Rangell 2001		73	0.22	85	0.00	70	0.05	67	0.05	67	0.05	76	0.05
Richter 1976		10	0.52	14	0.01	14	0.14	13	0.53	24	0.69	12	0.60
Rosen 1989		53	0.36	30	0.00	46	0.06	57	0.06	38	0.27	58	0.13
Rosenthal 1930		56	0.35	15	0.01	49	0.06	58	0.06	15	0.54	47	0.18
Rosenthal 1931		86	0.09	82	0.00	74	0.04	74	0.04	40	0.26	65	0.10
Rosenthal 1931b		85	0.09	86	0.00	77	0.03	82	0.03	44	0.12	73	0.06
Rosenthal 1931c		72	0.23	63	0.00	64	0.06	64	0.06	29	0.43	52	0.16
Rosenthal 1931d		83	0.13	90	0.00	69	0.04	71	0.04	29	0.38	63	0.12
Rossi 2007		84	0.11	71	0.00	86	0.03	85	0.03	65	0.04	83	0.03
Rubinstein 1939		65	0.28	75	0.00	60	0.06	59	0.06	42	0.12	66	0.08
Rubinstein 1952		20	0.48	51	0.00	23	0.08	19	0.45	3	0.68	17	0.55
Rubinstein 1966		51	0.37	55	0.00	53	0.07	49	0.07	44	0.07	69	0.07
Schilhawsky 1960		75	0.20	76	0.00	85	0.03	78	0.03	48	0.06	80	0.04
Shebanova 2002		6	0.56	13	0.01	10	0.22	7	0.70	18	0.66	9	0.68
Smith 1975		48	0.38	57	0.00	61	0.07	52	0.07	21	0.46	45	0.18
Sokolov 2002		27	0.44	53	0.00	22	0.08	25	0.37	5	0.67	21	0.50
Sztompka 1959		5	0.60	7	0.04	5	0.21	3	0.77	6	0.77	5	0.77
Tomsic 1995		22	0.47	6	0.07	11	0.14	17	0.50	5	0.58	18	0.54
Uninsky 1932		19	0.48	41	0.00	30	0.10	22	0.41	24	0.42	27	0.41
Uninsky 1971		39	0.41	65	0.00	34	0.07	29	0.33	11	0.47	29	0.39
Wasowski 1980		7	0.55	12	0.02	13	0.18	10	0.59	10	0.66	11	0.62
Zak 1937		66	0.27	58	0.00	71	0.04	70	0.04	61	0.06	74	0.05
Zak 1951		70	0.24	66	0.00	75	0.03	77	0.03	71	0.03	84	0.03
Random 1		87	0.01	67	0.00	87	0.02	87	0.02	15	0.35	67	0.08
Random 2		88	0.00	78	0.00	88	0.02	88	0.02	56	0.05	86	0.03
Random 3		90	-0.07	79	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	90	0.01	90	0.01

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).