Cohen 1997

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		13	0.39	17	0.01	13	0.12	10	0.59	16	0.51	15	0.55
Anderszewski 2003		44	0.28	64	0.00	19	0.12	28	0.43	20	0.46	21	0.44
Ashkenazy 1981		59	0.22	70	0.00	68	0.03	67	0.03	70	0.05	66	0.04
Bacha 2000		55	0.25	73	0.00	39	0.09	40	0.20	49	0.06	41	0.11
Badura 1965		58	0.24	55	0.00	37	0.10	37	0.27	41	0.13	32	0.19
Barbosa 1983		53	0.25	74	0.00	50	0.06	55	0.06	54	0.05	58	0.05
Biret 1990		19	0.37	6	0.04	8	0.12	15	0.56	13	0.63	12	0.59
Blet 2003		77	0.15	56	0.00	87	0.02	85	0.02	82	0.02	87	0.02
Block 1995		27	0.33	82	0.00	40	0.07	39	0.22	60	0.05	44	0.10
Blumental 1952		61	0.22	65	0.00	43	0.05	45	0.11	63	0.05	51	0.07
Boshniakovich 1969		47	0.27	83	0.00	46	0.06	52	0.06	43	0.13	46	0.09
Brailowsky 1960		33	0.31	84	0.00	34	0.08	34	0.36	28	0.41	26	0.38
Bunin 1987		79	0.15	66	0.00	84	0.02	86	0.02	71	0.04	82	0.03
Bunin 1987b		78	0.15	50	0.00	85	0.02	84	0.02	74	0.04	72	0.03
Chiu 1999		32	0.31	57	0.00	60	0.05	59	0.05	82	0.03	64	0.04
Cohen 1997		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Cortot 1951		8	0.42	12	0.01	14	0.12	8	0.62	11	0.60	11	0.61
Csalog 1996		52	0.25	39	0.00	65	0.03	64	0.03	62	0.05	65	0.04
Czerny 1949		6	0.43	20	0.00	6	0.12	6	0.67	7	0.84	5	0.75
Czerny 1990		73	0.16	52	0.00	83	0.03	66	0.03	70	0.04	83	0.03
Duchoud 2007		48	0.27	22	0.00	49	0.06	54	0.06	60	0.05	60	0.05
Ezaki 2006		2	0.54	2	0.14	2	0.33	2	0.76	4	0.76	3	0.76
Falvay 1989		23	0.35	41	0.00	31	0.12	30	0.41	25	0.35	27	0.38
Farrell 1958		37	0.30	77	0.00	42	0.07	42	0.16	42	0.11	37	0.13
Ferenczy 1958		36	0.31	23	0.00	12	0.16	21	0.51	16	0.75	10	0.62
Fliere 1977		54	0.25	67	0.00	62	0.04	62	0.04	56	0.05	63	0.04
Fou 1978		45	0.28	68	0.00	41	0.07	41	0.17	77	0.03	49	0.07
Francois 1956		3	0.52	8	0.03	3	0.30	3	0.75	1	0.84	2	0.79
Friedman 1923		74	0.16	85	0.00	89	0.01	88	0.01	73	0.04	90	0.02
Friedman 1923b		76	0.16	86	0.00	88	0.01	89	0.01	73	0.04	89	0.02
Friedman 1930		60	0.22	36	0.00	74	0.02	77	0.02	72	0.04	80	0.03
Garcia 2007		63	0.20	62	0.00	45	0.05	57	0.05	46	0.06	61	0.05
Garcia 2007b		67	0.19	26	0.00	59	0.04	61	0.04	56	0.06	62	0.05
Gierzod 1998		64	0.20	71	0.00	29	0.09	36	0.34	61	0.05	39	0.13
Gornostaeva 1994		5	0.47	7	0.03	9	0.11	7	0.64	11	0.66	7	0.65
Groot 1988		40	0.30	72	0.00	44	0.06	43	0.11	68	0.05	52	0.07
Harasiewicz 1955		15	0.38	10	0.02	25	0.12	24	0.46	37	0.19	30	0.30
Hatto 1993		66	0.19	87	0.00	73	0.03	68	0.03	75	0.04	84	0.03
Hatto 1997		29	0.32	38	0.00	35	0.09	33	0.38	49	0.06	35	0.15
Horowitz 1949		83	0.14	46	0.00	66	0.03	70	0.03	77	0.04	74	0.03
Indjic 1988		75	0.16	69	0.00	81	0.02	76	0.02	76	0.04	78	0.03
Kapell 1951		82	0.14	88	0.00	76	0.02	82	0.02	78	0.04	70	0.03
Kissin 1993		88	0.08	35	0.00	78	0.02	81	0.02	81	0.03	86	0.02
Kushner 1989		30	0.31	42	0.00	54	0.11	44	0.11	74	0.04	50	0.07
Luisada 1991		65	0.20	63	0.00	80	0.02	79	0.02	81	0.04	67	0.03
Lushtak 2004		22	0.35	21	0.00	27	0.10	27	0.44	17	0.41	24	0.42
Malcuzynski 1961		38	0.30	27	0.00	36	0.10	35	0.34	57	0.05	38	0.13
Magaloff 1978		16	0.38	31	0.00	33	0.12	32	0.39	41	0.19	31	0.27
Magin 1975		86	0.12	25	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	75	0.04	85	0.02
Michalowski 1933		72	0.17	14	0.01	71	0.03	73	0.03	82	0.03	77	0.03
Milkina 1970		51	0.25	11	0.01	24	0.11	25	0.45	22	0.44	20	0.44
Mohovich 1999		24	0.34	30	0.00	23	0.09	18	0.54	24	0.35	22	0.43
Moravec 1969		43	0.28	47	0.00	38	0.07	38	0.25	56	0.04	42	0.10
Morozova 2008		42	0.28	59	0.00	55	0.06	50	0.06	69	0.04	59	0.05
Neighaus 1950		9	0.42	13	0.01	15	0.15	9	0.59	29	0.31	23	0.43
Niedzielski 1931		71	0.17	43	0.00	77	0.02	83	0.02	64	0.05	69	0.03
Ohlsson 1999		14	0.39	19	0.00	28	0.09	31	0.41	51	0.05	36	0.14
Osinska 1989		7	0.43	9	0.02	17	0.15	13	0.58	18	0.56	13	0.57
Pachmann 1927		34	0.31	51	0.00	48	0.06	51	0.06	64	0.06	55	0.06
Paderewski 1930		84	0.13	75	0.00	82	0.03	72	0.03	85	0.03	76	0.03
Perlemuter 1992		35	0.31	76	0.00	51	0.07	48	0.07	74	0.04	56	0.05
Pierdomenico 2008		50	0.25	58	0.00	52	0.08	47	0.08	43	0.10	45	0.09
Poblocka 1999		49	0.25	61	0.00	56	0.07	49	0.07	59	0.05	53	0.06
Rabcewiczowa 1932		4	0.49	3	0.05	4	0.29	4	0.71	3	0.81	4	0.76
Rachmaninoff 1923		68	0.19	44	0.00	61	0.04	60	0.04	85	0.03	68	0.03
Rangell 2001		41	0.30	18	0.01	22	0.10	22	0.49	25	0.33	25	0.40
Richter 1976		56	0.25	45	0.00	75	0.02	80	0.02	77	0.04	75	0.03
Rosen 1989		10	0.41	15	0.01	21	0.11	11	0.59	36	0.34	19	0.45
Rosenthal 1930		26	0.33	48	0.00	32	0.14	26	0.44	18	0.47	18	0.45
Rosenthal 1931		25	0.34	53	0.00	7	0.15	16	0.56	9	0.73	8	0.64
Rosenthal 1931b		31	0.31	16	0.01	10	0.13	12	0.58	10	0.71	9	0.64
Rosenthal 1931c		11	0.40	5	0.05	5	0.14	5	0.69	7	0.69	6	0.69
Rosenthal 1931d		46	0.27	28	0.00	18	0.10	20	0.52	9	0.62	14	0.57
Rossi 2007		70	0.18	40	0.00	70	0.03	74	0.03	39	0.12	54	0.06
Rubinstein 1939		21	0.35	33	0.00	30	0.09	29	0.42	24	0.27	29	0.34
Rubinstein 1952		20	0.36	4	0.05	16	0.13	17	0.54	20	0.47	16	0.50
Rubinstein 1966		18	0.37	29	0.00	20	0.10	14	0.56	28	0.26	28	0.38
Schilhawsky 1960		81	0.14	78	0.00	86	0.02	87	0.02	70	0.04	79	0.03
Shebanova 2002		57	0.24	79	0.00	72	0.03	71	0.03	73	0.04	81	0.03
Smith 1975		1	0.58	1	0.43	1	0.43	1	0.83	1	0.87	1	0.85
Sokolov 2002		62	0.21	54	0.00	57	0.06	53	0.06	37	0.23	40	0.12
Sztompka 1959		28	0.32	32	0.00	47	0.06	56	0.06	62	0.05	57	0.05
Tomsic 1995		12	0.39	34	0.00	11	0.17	19	0.52	12	0.45	17	0.48
Uninsky 1932		69	0.19	80	0.00	79	0.02	78	0.02	83	0.03	88	0.02
Uninsky 1971		17	0.38	37	0.00	26	0.10	23	0.47	47	0.07	33	0.18
Wasowski 1980		39	0.30	24	0.00	53	0.10	46	0.10	49	0.07	47	0.08
Zak 1937		85	0.12	89	0.00	67	0.03	69	0.03	72	0.03	71	0.03
Zak 1951		80	0.14	90	0.00	63	0.04	63	0.04	75	0.03	73	0.03
Random 1		90	0.00	81	0.00	69	0.03	75	0.03	35	0.21	48	0.08
Random 2		87	0.09	49	0.00	64	0.03	65	0.03	22	0.34	43	0.10
Random 3		89	0.06	60	0.00	58	0.05	58	0.05	4	0.63	34	0.18

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).