Afanassiev 2001

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Anderszewski 2003		47	0.30	42	0.00	44	0.07	44	0.14	25	0.43	38	0.25
Ashkenazy 1981		37	0.33	73	0.00	50	0.07	46	0.07	47	0.08	56	0.07
Bacha 2000		40	0.32	22	0.01	47	0.05	52	0.05	31	0.27	44	0.12
Badura 1965		38	0.32	19	0.01	46	0.07	48	0.07	26	0.43	42	0.17
Barbosa 1983		15	0.39	10	0.02	23	0.07	28	0.37	21	0.43	27	0.40
Biret 1990		63	0.24	78	0.00	79	0.02	86	0.02	51	0.06	87	0.03
Blet 2003		17	0.39	23	0.00	29	0.07	33	0.34	33	0.39	32	0.36
Block 1995		81	0.19	63	0.00	68	0.03	74	0.03	79	0.04	85	0.03
Blumental 1952		32	0.34	40	0.00	34	0.09	27	0.38	20	0.50	23	0.44
Boshniakovich 1969		65	0.23	64	0.00	64	0.04	64	0.04	59	0.06	66	0.05
Brailowsky 1960		30	0.35	25	0.00	35	0.07	37	0.26	16	0.54	30	0.37
Bunin 1987		51	0.30	69	0.00	55	0.07	47	0.07	39	0.16	50	0.11
Bunin 1987b		50	0.30	46	0.00	54	0.04	66	0.04	41	0.14	55	0.07
Chiu 1999		10	0.41	56	0.00	36	0.06	36	0.27	52	0.07	43	0.14
Cohen 1997		18	0.39	28	0.00	20	0.09	16	0.51	10	0.59	15	0.55
Cortot 1951		85	0.16	80	0.00	80	0.02	88	0.02	68	0.04	88	0.03
Csalog 1996		68	0.22	70	0.00	78	0.03	81	0.03	48	0.07	65	0.05
Czerny 1949		33	0.34	65	0.00	38	0.08	38	0.26	17	0.70	25	0.43
Czerny 1990		56	0.27	57	0.00	48	0.05	53	0.05	39	0.27	47	0.12
Duchoud 2007		57	0.27	66	0.00	62	0.04	72	0.04	57	0.05	77	0.04
Ezaki 2006		1	0.52	1	0.20	1	0.20	1	0.71	3	0.76	1	0.73
Falvay 1989		14	0.40	20	0.01	32	0.07	32	0.34	14	0.43	29	0.38
Farrell 1958		26	0.36	8	0.03	24	0.09	35	0.28	18	0.48	31	0.37
Ferenczy 1958		24	0.36	17	0.01	17	0.08	21	0.47	6	0.83	6	0.62
Fliere 1977		44	0.31	59	0.00	57	0.04	63	0.04	78	0.04	70	0.04
Fou 1978		9	0.41	53	0.00	27	0.09	22	0.46	27	0.39	26	0.42
Francois 1956		60	0.25	58	0.00	53	0.04	62	0.04	32	0.38	48	0.12
Friedman 1923		59	0.26	31	0.00	59	0.04	73	0.04	60	0.06	68	0.05
Friedman 1923b		58	0.26	16	0.01	60	0.05	51	0.05	60	0.06	67	0.05
Friedman 1930		70	0.21	74	0.00	84	0.03	82	0.03	78	0.04	83	0.03
Garcia 2007		74	0.20	35	0.00	41	0.08	41	0.20	41	0.20	41	0.20
Garcia 2007b		71	0.21	67	0.00	71	0.04	58	0.04	47	0.08	57	0.06
Gierzod 1998		34	0.34	24	0.00	16	0.08	17	0.51	13	0.64	11	0.57
Gornostaeva 1994		46	0.30	51	0.00	42	0.07	43	0.16	29	0.39	39	0.25
Groot 1988		11	0.41	13	0.02	10	0.11	7	0.60	24	0.39	20	0.48
Harasiewicz 1955		16	0.39	50	0.00	25	0.07	20	0.49	26	0.32	28	0.40
Hatto 1993		31	0.34	43	0.00	22	0.08	24	0.45	33	0.28	33	0.35
Hatto 1997		5	0.43	11	0.02	8	0.15	9	0.59	7	0.56	10	0.57
Horowitz 1949		75	0.20	85	0.00	76	0.03	85	0.03	51	0.07	61	0.05
Indjic 1988		41	0.32	47	0.00	33	0.07	30	0.35	35	0.27	36	0.31
Kapell 1951		80	0.19	29	0.00	69	0.04	60	0.04	49	0.07	59	0.05
Kissin 1993		77	0.20	75	0.00	74	0.04	57	0.04	63	0.06	64	0.05
Kushner 1989		54	0.28	81	0.00	65	0.04	67	0.04	78	0.04	73	0.04
Luisada 1991		23	0.37	15	0.01	28	0.07	29	0.36	36	0.28	35	0.32
Lushtak 2004		72	0.21	86	0.00	82	0.03	84	0.03	73	0.04	84	0.03
Malcuzynski 1961		28	0.35	34	0.00	40	0.08	39	0.23	52	0.06	45	0.12
Magaloff 1978		78	0.19	39	0.00	72	0.04	68	0.04	81	0.03	79	0.03
Magin 1975		84	0.17	76	0.00	83	0.03	78	0.03	74	0.04	80	0.03
Michalowski 1933		79	0.19	52	0.00	73	0.05	55	0.05	59	0.06	63	0.05
Milkina 1970		8	0.41	30	0.00	14	0.14	14	0.55	7	0.65	8	0.60
Mohovich 1999		13	0.40	6	0.04	9	0.16	8	0.60	11	0.60	9	0.60
Moravec 1969		36	0.33	12	0.02	21	0.10	19	0.49	18	0.46	21	0.47
Morozova 2008		3	0.45	61	0.00	12	0.10	11	0.58	15	0.47	17	0.52
Neighaus 1950		7	0.42	2	0.17	3	0.21	6	0.63	12	0.50	13	0.56
Niedzielski 1931		69	0.21	82	0.00	63	0.04	70	0.04	69	0.04	72	0.04
Ohlsson 1999		52	0.29	72	0.00	66	0.04	69	0.04	61	0.04	76	0.04
Osinska 1989		86	0.15	41	0.00	81	0.03	77	0.03	66	0.04	78	0.03
Pachmann 1927		64	0.24	45	0.00	75	0.03	80	0.03	51	0.07	62	0.05
Paderewski 1930		82	0.19	87	0.00	77	0.03	76	0.03	69	0.05	75	0.04
Perlemuter 1992		55	0.28	55	0.00	61	0.04	61	0.04	62	0.04	71	0.04
Pierdomenico 2008		76	0.20	77	0.00	70	0.04	65	0.04	47	0.07	58	0.05
Poblocka 1999		25	0.36	14	0.02	31	0.08	31	0.34	28	0.35	34	0.34
Rabcewiczowa 1932		27	0.35	26	0.00	15	0.10	18	0.49	19	0.65	12	0.56
Rachmaninoff 1923		22	0.37	38	0.00	30	0.08	26	0.41	23	0.46	24	0.43
Rangell 2001		35	0.34	36	0.00	19	0.08	23	0.45	10	0.49	22	0.47
Richter 1976		83	0.19	83	0.00	86	0.03	83	0.03	71	0.04	81	0.03
Rosen 1989		45	0.31	37	0.00	37	0.07	34	0.29	41	0.15	40	0.21
Rosenthal 1930		4	0.45	3	0.13	2	0.19	2	0.66	7	0.71	4	0.68
Rosenthal 1931		20	0.38	5	0.05	6	0.12	4	0.65	8	0.76	3	0.70
Rosenthal 1931b		19	0.38	27	0.00	7	0.15	5	0.65	7	0.80	2	0.72
Rosenthal 1931c		39	0.32	48	0.00	26	0.08	25	0.43	11	0.61	18	0.51
Rosenthal 1931d		43	0.32	9	0.03	11	0.10	13	0.55	7	0.70	7	0.62
Rossi 2007		89	-0.03	88	0.00	89	0.01	89	0.01	89	0.01	90	0.01
Rubinstein 1939		49	0.30	68	0.00	49	0.06	50	0.06	39	0.12	54	0.08
Rubinstein 1952		67	0.23	33	0.00	51	0.07	49	0.07	42	0.11	53	0.09
Rubinstein 1966		12	0.41	32	0.00	13	0.12	10	0.59	16	0.45	16	0.52
Schilhawsky 1960		73	0.20	89	0.00	87	0.03	75	0.03	72	0.04	82	0.03
Shebanova 2002		53	0.29	79	0.00	45	0.07	45	0.07	45	0.12	52	0.09
Smith 1975		21	0.38	84	0.00	43	0.08	42	0.17	17	0.50	37	0.29
Sokolov 2002		48	0.30	18	0.01	58	0.05	54	0.05	38	0.21	51	0.10
Sztompka 1959		6	0.43	4	0.08	4	0.26	12	0.57	17	0.53	14	0.55
Tomsic 1995		29	0.35	44	0.00	18	0.08	15	0.52	9	0.48	19	0.50
Uninsky 1932		42	0.32	49	0.00	39	0.07	40	0.22	55	0.06	49	0.11
Uninsky 1971		2	0.47	7	0.04	5	0.23	3	0.65	4	0.60	5	0.62
Wasowski 1980		66	0.23	90	0.00	67	0.04	71	0.04	67	0.05	69	0.04
Zak 1937		62	0.24	62	0.00	56	0.04	59	0.04	49	0.07	60	0.05
Zak 1951		61	0.24	21	0.01	52	0.04	56	0.04	56	0.05	74	0.04
Random 1		88	0.00	71	0.00	88	0.02	87	0.02	58	0.04	86	0.03
Random 2		87	0.10	54	0.00	85	0.03	79	0.03	9	0.48	46	0.12
Random 3		90	-0.11	60	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	65	0.03	89	0.02

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).