Magaloff 1978

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		52	0.59	83	0.00	63	0.04	52	0.04	67	0.03	83	0.03
Anderszewski 2003		54	0.58	54	0.00	57	0.03	58	0.03	28	0.24	53	0.08
Ashkenazy 1981		36	0.67	4	0.06	9	0.11	31	0.26	31	0.25	34	0.25
Bacha 2000		43	0.63	73	0.00	46	0.04	50	0.04	20	0.37	45	0.12
Badura 1965		73	0.47	55	0.00	62	0.03	68	0.03	61	0.04	84	0.03
Barbosa 1983		75	0.38	40	0.00	71	0.04	51	0.04	71	0.03	79	0.03
Biret 1990		41	0.64	82	0.00	58	0.03	70	0.03	50	0.05	72	0.04
Blet 2003		65	0.53	84	0.00	72	0.03	67	0.03	55	0.04	80	0.03
Block 1995		17	0.75	48	0.00	20	0.07	22	0.35	4	0.42	22	0.38
Blumental 1952		85	0.26	56	0.00	81	0.02	85	0.02	79	0.02	89	0.02
Boshniakovich 1969		19	0.73	2	0.13	2	0.12	7	0.47	6	0.52	8	0.49
Brailowsky 1960		13	0.77	9	0.04	6	0.08	12	0.43	2	0.54	9	0.48
Bunin 1987		47	0.62	68	0.00	55	0.03	73	0.03	34	0.24	54	0.08
Bunin 1987b		45	0.62	75	0.00	56	0.06	46	0.06	34	0.24	46	0.12
Chiu 1999		69	0.49	23	0.01	42	0.08	41	0.15	23	0.35	35	0.23
Cohen 1997		71	0.48	46	0.00	59	0.03	80	0.03	8	0.45	48	0.12
Cortot 1951		68	0.50	61	0.00	82	0.03	84	0.03	73	0.03	87	0.03
Csalog 1996		70	0.49	64	0.00	79	0.03	63	0.03	44	0.15	57	0.07
Czerny 1949		62	0.53	36	0.00	65	0.04	57	0.04	63	0.04	69	0.04
Czerny 1990		31	0.68	69	0.00	50	0.03	61	0.03	69	0.04	86	0.03
Duchoud 2007		51	0.60	45	0.00	64	0.05	47	0.05	59	0.04	70	0.04
Ezaki 2006		18	0.75	31	0.00	28	0.08	26	0.33	27	0.24	30	0.28
Falvay 1989		16	0.75	12	0.02	12	0.10	4	0.48	9	0.47	12	0.47
Farrell 1958		35	0.67	79	0.00	48	0.04	56	0.04	14	0.29	49	0.11
Ferenczy 1958		74	0.45	85	0.00	85	0.03	81	0.03	77	0.03	81	0.03
Fliere 1977		2	0.85	24	0.00	4	0.08	2	0.61	3	0.57	1	0.59
Fou 1978		26	0.70	19	0.01	16	0.09	10	0.44	12	0.47	16	0.45
Francois 1956		40	0.64	70	0.00	38	0.05	40	0.15	33	0.17	43	0.16
Friedman 1923		89	0.05	65	0.00	88	0.02	88	0.02	61	0.05	88	0.03
Friedman 1923b		88	0.06	71	0.00	87	0.02	87	0.02	70	0.05	85	0.03
Friedman 1930		79	0.35	16	0.01	45	0.05	45	0.09	31	0.29	41	0.16
Garcia 2007		78	0.37	86	0.00	80	0.04	55	0.04	49	0.05	71	0.04
Garcia 2007b		86	0.17	80	0.00	84	0.02	86	0.02	42	0.09	73	0.04
Gierzod 1998		22	0.71	10	0.04	8	0.07	32	0.25	19	0.25	33	0.25
Gornostaeva 1994		5	0.80	35	0.00	10	0.07	17	0.41	9	0.44	19	0.42
Groot 1988		4	0.81	5	0.06	11	0.08	9	0.46	4	0.51	10	0.48
Harasiewicz 1955		55	0.58	29	0.00	15	0.09	21	0.37	15	0.38	23	0.37
Hatto 1993		83	0.33	91	0.00	67	0.03	66	0.03	44	0.08	64	0.05
Hatto 1997		76	0.38	30	0.00	37	0.07	39	0.15	31	0.18	42	0.16
Horowitz 1949		28	0.69	7	0.04	22	0.08	24	0.33	8	0.45	21	0.39
Indjic 1988		82	0.34	89	0.00	66	0.03	82	0.03	44	0.09	63	0.05
Kapell 1951		53	0.59	77	0.00	70	0.03	64	0.03	74	0.03	77	0.03
Kissin 1993		8	0.78	11	0.02	13	0.07	6	0.47	11	0.48	13	0.47
Kushner 1989		14	0.76	87	0.00	26	0.10	23	0.35	19	0.33	25	0.34
Luisada 1991		44	0.62	57	0.00	49	0.03	72	0.03	32	0.24	50	0.08
Lushtak 2004		56	0.58	59	0.00	36	0.05	37	0.17	28	0.21	40	0.19
Malcuzynski 1961		1	0.87	3	0.09	3	0.11	3	0.51	7	0.50	6	0.50
Magaloff 1978		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Magin 1975		23	0.71	43	0.00	29	0.08	27	0.31	6	0.39	24	0.35
Michalowski 1933		81	0.34	25	0.00	68	0.03	75	0.03	63	0.04	78	0.03
Milkina 1970		7	0.79	66	0.00	24	0.09	20	0.38	13	0.42	20	0.40
Mohovich 1999		12	0.77	32	0.00	23	0.09	19	0.39	9	0.46	18	0.42
Moravec 1969		58	0.57	67	0.00	74	0.03	69	0.03	65	0.04	74	0.03
Morozova 2008		60	0.54	18	0.01	35	0.05	42	0.14	40	0.11	47	0.12
Neighaus 1950		11	0.77	22	0.01	21	0.07	5	0.47	12	0.49	11	0.48
Niedzielski 1931		64	0.53	52	0.00	76	0.03	76	0.03	43	0.10	62	0.05
Ohlsson 1999		38	0.67	33	0.00	60	0.03	71	0.03	55	0.05	66	0.04
Osinska 1989		29	0.69	26	0.00	47	0.04	49	0.04	35	0.16	51	0.08
Pachmann 1927		66	0.53	44	0.00	41	0.06	38	0.16	14	0.49	31	0.28
Paderewski 1930		30	0.68	15	0.01	53	0.03	59	0.03	26	0.23	52	0.08
Perlemuter 1992		48	0.61	51	0.00	33	0.07	33	0.24	25	0.27	32	0.25
Pierdomenico 2008		20	0.72	17	0.01	18	0.07	16	0.41	3	0.51	15	0.46
Poblocka 1999		33	0.68	60	0.00	61	0.04	54	0.04	45	0.11	55	0.07
Rabcewiczowa 1932		59	0.56	37	0.00	69	0.03	77	0.03	53	0.04	76	0.03
Rachmaninoff 1923		61	0.54	62	0.00	39	0.05	36	0.17	28	0.22	39	0.19
Rangell 2001		6	0.80	6	0.04	5	0.08	11	0.44	2	0.50	14	0.47
Richter 1976		37	0.67	21	0.01	32	0.06	29	0.27	17	0.32	29	0.29
Rosen 1989		9	0.78	13	0.02	19	0.06	15	0.41	6	0.59	7	0.49
Rosenthal 1930		27	0.70	49	0.00	34	0.06	34	0.23	10	0.50	26	0.34
Rosenthal 1931		34	0.68	78	0.00	17	0.06	25	0.33	5	0.58	17	0.44
Rosenthal 1931b		25	0.70	20	0.01	14	0.07	13	0.42	4	0.67	4	0.53
Rosenthal 1931c		10	0.77	41	0.00	25	0.10	14	0.41	5	0.66	5	0.52
Rosenthal 1931d		15	0.76	8	0.04	7	0.08	8	0.46	4	0.66	3	0.55
Rossi 2007		80	0.35	27	0.00	44	0.05	44	0.09	12	0.26	44	0.15
Rubinstein 1939		84	0.29	74	0.00	86	0.03	65	0.03	40	0.13	58	0.06
Rubinstein 1952		39	0.66	14	0.02	43	0.05	43	0.10	13	0.50	37	0.22
Rubinstein 1966		57	0.57	72	0.00	73	0.03	62	0.03	50	0.05	68	0.04
Schilhawsky 1960		49	0.61	53	0.00	52	0.03	78	0.03	41	0.12	59	0.06
Shebanova 2002		42	0.64	50	0.00	51	0.03	74	0.03	43	0.11	60	0.06
Smith 1975		24	0.71	39	0.00	27	0.08	18	0.40	25	0.26	27	0.32
Sokolov 2002		32	0.68	28	0.00	54	0.05	48	0.05	45	0.10	56	0.07
Sztompka 1959		72	0.48	38	0.00	75	0.03	60	0.03	62	0.05	65	0.04
Tomsic 1995		21	0.72	42	0.00	31	0.07	30	0.26	31	0.21	36	0.23
Uninsky 1932		77	0.37	76	0.00	83	0.03	83	0.03	70	0.04	82	0.03
Uninsky 1971		67	0.50	88	0.00	78	0.04	53	0.04	64	0.04	67	0.04
Wasowski 1980		63	0.53	47	0.00	77	0.03	79	0.03	60	0.04	75	0.03
Zak 1937		50	0.60	58	0.00	40	0.06	35	0.18	33	0.23	38	0.20
Zak 1951		46	0.62	34	0.00	30	0.06	28	0.29	27	0.31	28	0.30
Average		3	0.84	1	0.21	1	0.21	1	0.69	10	0.44	2	0.55
Random 1		91	-0.04	90	0.00	91	0.01	91	0.01	76	0.03	90	0.02
Random 2		90	0.00	81	0.00	90	0.02	89	0.02	33	0.18	61	0.06
Random 3		87	0.07	63	0.00	89	0.01	90	0.01	62	0.04	91	0.02

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).