Sztompka 1959

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		12	0.72	69	0.00	18	0.11	17	0.39	12	0.37	20	0.38
Anderszewski 2003		48	0.51	71	0.00	42	0.06	41	0.14	58	0.04	46	0.07
Ashkenazy 1981		27	0.64	37	0.00	28	0.08	21	0.37	36	0.14	28	0.23
Bacha 2000		75	0.32	87	0.00	84	0.02	80	0.02	76	0.03	78	0.02
Badura 1965		38	0.57	30	0.01	30	0.09	30	0.30	21	0.33	25	0.31
Barbosa 1983		46	0.52	76	0.00	40	0.06	38	0.16	42	0.18	32	0.17
Biret 1990		33	0.60	47	0.00	43	0.06	42	0.14	62	0.04	47	0.07
Blet 2003		8	0.75	81	0.00	11	0.11	15	0.41	10	0.42	16	0.41
Block 1995		67	0.39	7	0.03	34	0.08	40	0.15	40	0.11	34	0.13
Blumental 1952		45	0.53	29	0.01	13	0.11	32	0.28	4	0.43	21	0.35
Boshniakovich 1969		50	0.50	33	0.00	58	0.04	70	0.04	74	0.03	76	0.03
Brailowsky 1960		79	0.29	88	0.00	85	0.02	87	0.02	88	0.02	79	0.02
Bunin 1987		14	0.69	16	0.01	20	0.12	18	0.39	16	0.41	19	0.40
Bunin 1987b		15	0.69	41	0.00	21	0.14	19	0.39	16	0.41	18	0.40
Chiu 1999		76	0.32	65	0.00	71	0.03	73	0.03	77	0.03	67	0.03
Cohen 1997		85	0.18	25	0.01	83	0.02	83	0.02	76	0.03	85	0.02
Cortot 1951		1	0.82	1	0.25	1	0.25	3	0.54	1	0.64	1	0.59
Csalog 1996		78	0.30	60	0.00	82	0.02	84	0.02	64	0.03	83	0.02
Czerny 1949		4	0.78	4	0.06	3	0.16	5	0.53	8	0.52	7	0.52
Czerny 1990		2	0.80	3	0.09	2	0.16	1	0.57	4	0.52	2	0.54
Duchoud 2007		22	0.66	45	0.00	25	0.08	29	0.33	26	0.33	23	0.33
Ezaki 2006		11	0.72	80	0.00	23	0.10	25	0.35	40	0.10	31	0.19
Falvay 1989		49	0.50	9	0.03	67	0.05	55	0.05	60	0.04	58	0.04
Farrell 1958		37	0.58	72	0.00	51	0.06	49	0.06	77	0.03	60	0.04
Ferenczy 1958		6	0.77	89	0.00	8	0.18	11	0.46	3	0.60	4	0.53
Fliere 1977		29	0.62	17	0.01	47	0.05	60	0.05	61	0.04	56	0.04
Fou 1978		71	0.34	77	0.00	76	0.03	77	0.03	75	0.03	69	0.03
Francois 1956		28	0.62	73	0.00	26	0.08	27	0.34	34	0.14	29	0.22
Friedman 1923		64	0.40	83	0.00	16	0.10	23	0.36	4	0.53	14	0.44
Friedman 1923b		66	0.40	64	0.00	15	0.10	24	0.36	5	0.52	15	0.43
Friedman 1930		42	0.56	53	0.00	14	0.11	12	0.45	3	0.54	9	0.49
Garcia 2007		69	0.37	50	0.00	57	0.04	69	0.04	25	0.27	39	0.10
Garcia 2007b		82	0.24	49	0.00	60	0.04	71	0.04	33	0.12	48	0.07
Gierzod 1998		25	0.64	36	0.00	29	0.08	20	0.37	28	0.20	26	0.27
Gornostaeva 1994		35	0.59	10	0.02	33	0.06	43	0.13	49	0.05	43	0.08
Groot 1988		39	0.57	38	0.00	46	0.06	51	0.06	74	0.03	66	0.04
Harasiewicz 1955		56	0.47	34	0.00	38	0.06	36	0.17	58	0.04	44	0.08
Hatto 1993		77	0.30	70	0.00	61	0.05	59	0.05	86	0.02	77	0.03
Hatto 1997		65	0.40	78	0.00	54	0.06	50	0.06	45	0.04	52	0.05
Horowitz 1949		70	0.34	55	0.00	73	0.03	74	0.03	81	0.03	72	0.03
Indjic 1988		73	0.33	86	0.00	59	0.05	58	0.05	65	0.03	64	0.04
Kapell 1951		3	0.79	8	0.03	5	0.21	9	0.50	3	0.55	5	0.52
Kissin 1993		60	0.45	27	0.01	72	0.04	66	0.04	82	0.02	74	0.03
Kushner 1989		32	0.61	48	0.00	48	0.07	47	0.07	74	0.03	51	0.05
Luisada 1991		59	0.45	39	0.00	68	0.05	54	0.05	76	0.03	55	0.04
Lushtak 2004		21	0.66	68	0.00	22	0.08	28	0.33	47	0.06	33	0.14
Malcuzynski 1961		20	0.66	21	0.01	36	0.08	33	0.25	68	0.04	36	0.10
Magaloff 1978		53	0.48	26	0.01	69	0.05	61	0.05	59	0.04	57	0.04
Magin 1975		72	0.34	57	0.00	77	0.03	72	0.03	79	0.02	81	0.02
Michalowski 1933		24	0.65	2	0.12	4	0.17	4	0.53	2	0.50	8	0.51
Milkina 1970		62	0.41	20	0.01	74	0.03	78	0.03	77	0.03	71	0.03
Mohovich 1999		31	0.62	75	0.00	39	0.07	39	0.16	61	0.04	42	0.08
Moravec 1969		41	0.56	31	0.00	50	0.06	52	0.06	38	0.12	41	0.08
Morozova 2008		34	0.60	19	0.01	37	0.09	34	0.24	55	0.04	38	0.10
Neighaus 1950		19	0.66	18	0.01	31	0.12	26	0.35	59	0.04	35	0.12
Niedzielski 1931		68	0.38	32	0.00	63	0.04	67	0.04	72	0.02	68	0.03
Ohlsson 1999		36	0.59	51	0.00	49	0.04	64	0.04	60	0.04	63	0.04
Osinska 1989		18	0.67	54	0.00	32	0.13	31	0.29	32	0.20	27	0.24
Pachmann 1927		81	0.24	58	0.00	81	0.02	82	0.02	66	0.04	73	0.03
Paderewski 1930		17	0.68	24	0.01	17	0.10	14	0.44	3	0.49	12	0.46
Perlemuter 1992		30	0.62	14	0.02	27	0.09	16	0.40	25	0.27	22	0.33
Pierdomenico 2008		57	0.46	61	0.00	70	0.05	57	0.05	78	0.03	59	0.04
Poblocka 1999		7	0.75	44	0.00	12	0.13	10	0.46	12	0.47	11	0.46
Rabcewiczowa 1932		5	0.77	5	0.05	6	0.19	6	0.51	2	0.56	3	0.53
Rachmaninoff 1923		54	0.48	22	0.01	44	0.07	44	0.13	60	0.04	45	0.07
Rangell 2001		63	0.41	43	0.00	75	0.03	76	0.03	80	0.02	86	0.02
Richter 1976		55	0.48	63	0.00	64	0.04	63	0.04	51	0.04	62	0.04
Rosen 1989		43	0.55	35	0.00	55	0.07	46	0.07	70	0.03	53	0.05
Rosenthal 1930		40	0.56	28	0.01	41	0.05	37	0.16	29	0.26	30	0.20
Rosenthal 1931		83	0.22	82	0.00	78	0.03	75	0.03	81	0.02	82	0.02
Rosenthal 1931b		86	0.18	42	0.00	80	0.02	81	0.02	83	0.02	87	0.02
Rosenthal 1931c		44	0.53	56	0.00	52	0.07	45	0.07	45	0.06	49	0.06
Rosenthal 1931d		84	0.19	90	0.00	87	0.02	85	0.02	89	0.01	90	0.01
Rossi 2007		74	0.32	52	0.00	45	0.05	53	0.05	30	0.15	40	0.09
Rubinstein 1939		87	0.11	46	0.00	89	0.01	89	0.01	81	0.03	80	0.02
Rubinstein 1952		80	0.27	66	0.00	86	0.02	86	0.02	86	0.02	88	0.02
Rubinstein 1966		51	0.49	79	0.00	66	0.05	56	0.05	61	0.04	65	0.04
Schilhawsky 1960		26	0.64	67	0.00	24	0.09	22	0.36	21	0.29	24	0.32
Shebanova 2002		52	0.49	13	0.02	56	0.04	65	0.04	72	0.03	75	0.03
Smith 1975		9	0.73	6	0.03	9	0.13	2	0.54	5	0.38	13	0.45
Sokolov 2002		10	0.73	23	0.01	19	0.12	13	0.44	22	0.37	17	0.40
Sztompka 1959		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Tomsic 1995		23	0.65	40	0.00	35	0.06	35	0.22	45	0.05	37	0.10
Uninsky 1932		16	0.68	12	0.02	7	0.18	7	0.51	2	0.54	6	0.52
Uninsky 1971		13	0.71	11	0.02	10	0.09	8	0.50	7	0.47	10	0.48
Wasowski 1980		47	0.52	15	0.01	53	0.06	48	0.06	62	0.04	50	0.05
Zak 1937		61	0.44	62	0.00	65	0.04	62	0.04	83	0.03	70	0.03
Zak 1951		58	0.45	74	0.00	62	0.04	68	0.04	67	0.04	61	0.04
Random 1		90	-0.14	59	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	81	0.02	89	0.01
Random 2		89	-0.11	84	0.00	88	0.02	88	0.02	76	0.02	84	0.02
Random 3		88	0.08	85	0.00	79	0.03	79	0.03	44	0.10	54	0.05

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).