Rosenthal 1930

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		38	0.55	11	0.01	37	0.06	36	0.19	56	0.04	36	0.09
Anderszewski 2003		34	0.56	21	0.00	45	0.05	50	0.05	45	0.04	58	0.04
Ashkenazy 1981		27	0.58	30	0.00	31	0.05	28	0.26	62	0.03	38	0.09
Bacha 2000		78	0.31	65	0.00	89	0.01	88	0.01	85	0.02	90	0.01
Badura 1965		37	0.55	15	0.01	5	0.13	17	0.43	15	0.41	6	0.42
Barbosa 1983		74	0.37	57	0.00	59	0.03	71	0.03	68	0.03	71	0.03
Biret 1990		33	0.56	24	0.00	47	0.04	51	0.04	69	0.03	81	0.03
Blet 2003		51	0.51	83	0.00	58	0.04	54	0.04	76	0.03	72	0.03
Block 1995		65	0.45	49	0.00	61	0.04	60	0.04	50	0.04	60	0.04
Blumental 1952		76	0.33	16	0.01	73	0.04	58	0.04	67	0.03	77	0.03
Boshniakovich 1969		57	0.48	84	0.00	71	0.04	53	0.04	56	0.04	61	0.04
Brailowsky 1960		58	0.48	44	0.00	64	0.03	67	0.03	50	0.05	51	0.04
Bunin 1987		18	0.63	32	0.00	10	0.09	12	0.46	28	0.30	11	0.37
Bunin 1987b		19	0.63	46	0.00	11	0.12	13	0.46	28	0.30	9	0.37
Chiu 1999		85	0.22	38	0.00	81	0.03	69	0.03	82	0.03	65	0.03
Cohen 1997		80	0.28	40	0.00	79	0.03	78	0.03	63	0.03	79	0.03
Cortot 1951		20	0.63	42	0.00	27	0.09	23	0.37	31	0.25	15	0.30
Csalog 1996		77	0.33	79	0.00	85	0.02	85	0.02	80	0.03	86	0.02
Czerny 1949		11	0.66	8	0.02	14	0.12	3	0.56	31	0.24	10	0.37
Czerny 1990		12	0.66	41	0.00	22	0.07	20	0.40	75	0.03	34	0.11
Duchoud 2007		23	0.60	71	0.00	39	0.06	38	0.17	48	0.05	37	0.09
Ezaki 2006		15	0.65	59	0.00	18	0.07	14	0.45	46	0.06	24	0.16
Falvay 1989		45	0.52	26	0.00	43	0.05	42	0.10	81	0.03	45	0.05
Farrell 1958		39	0.55	54	0.00	51	0.05	47	0.05	65	0.04	53	0.04
Ferenczy 1958		48	0.52	31	0.00	65	0.03	77	0.03	44	0.08	48	0.05
Fliere 1977		8	0.68	60	0.00	23	0.10	22	0.38	60	0.04	30	0.12
Fou 1978		67	0.42	35	0.00	57	0.03	72	0.03	51	0.06	54	0.04
Francois 1956		14	0.65	88	0.00	19	0.07	24	0.36	41	0.10	23	0.19
Friedman 1923		83	0.26	43	0.00	41	0.09	39	0.16	20	0.39	19	0.25
Friedman 1923b		82	0.26	74	0.00	40	0.05	40	0.15	21	0.35	20	0.23
Friedman 1930		50	0.51	3	0.05	6	0.14	7	0.54	6	0.48	4	0.51
Garcia 2007		79	0.31	72	0.00	66	0.03	70	0.03	73	0.03	75	0.03
Garcia 2007b		87	0.08	80	0.00	83	0.02	83	0.02	68	0.03	89	0.02
Gierzod 1998		13	0.66	33	0.00	26	0.08	27	0.28	50	0.04	33	0.11
Gornostaeva 1994		7	0.69	6	0.02	13	0.11	10	0.48	27	0.23	13	0.33
Groot 1988		16	0.64	2	0.14	2	0.14	11	0.48	29	0.23	14	0.33
Harasiewicz 1955		64	0.46	5	0.03	9	0.10	18	0.42	34	0.16	18	0.26
Hatto 1993		73	0.37	62	0.00	67	0.03	79	0.03	52	0.04	82	0.03
Hatto 1997		68	0.42	28	0.00	60	0.03	64	0.03	54	0.04	73	0.03
Horowitz 1949		31	0.56	13	0.01	36	0.06	30	0.25	32	0.18	21	0.21
Indjic 1988		71	0.38	63	0.00	68	0.03	74	0.03	51	0.04	70	0.03
Kapell 1951		24	0.59	85	0.00	50	0.04	55	0.04	58	0.04	55	0.04
Kissin 1993		52	0.50	58	0.00	52	0.04	62	0.04	56	0.04	57	0.04
Kushner 1989		5	0.70	37	0.00	17	0.08	16	0.43	37	0.19	16	0.29
Luisada 1991		70	0.39	52	0.00	80	0.03	81	0.03	86	0.02	83	0.02
Lushtak 2004		62	0.46	89	0.00	28	0.06	32	0.24	54	0.04	35	0.10
Malcuzynski 1961		4	0.71	51	0.00	12	0.10	5	0.54	35	0.16	17	0.29
Magaloff 1978		6	0.70	9	0.01	8	0.13	9	0.50	33	0.23	12	0.34
Magin 1975		55	0.49	22	0.00	62	0.03	66	0.03	73	0.03	67	0.03
Michalowski 1933		75	0.35	75	0.00	30	0.05	44	0.09	57	0.05	42	0.07
Milkina 1970		46	0.52	81	0.00	70	0.03	73	0.03	73	0.03	69	0.03
Mohovich 1999		28	0.57	69	0.00	34	0.05	35	0.20	68	0.03	40	0.08
Moravec 1969		29	0.56	19	0.00	56	0.06	45	0.06	60	0.04	44	0.05
Morozova 2008		42	0.53	17	0.01	21	0.07	21	0.38	67	0.04	31	0.12
Neighaus 1950		32	0.56	77	0.00	32	0.05	31	0.25	73	0.03	39	0.09
Niedzielski 1931		61	0.46	20	0.00	74	0.03	68	0.03	51	0.04	66	0.03
Ohlsson 1999		40	0.54	47	0.00	48	0.06	46	0.06	74	0.03	56	0.04
Osinska 1989		25	0.58	55	0.00	49	0.04	56	0.04	71	0.04	50	0.04
Pachmann 1927		86	0.22	90	0.00	82	0.02	82	0.02	69	0.03	85	0.02
Paderewski 1930		36	0.55	25	0.00	55	0.05	48	0.05	43	0.08	43	0.06
Perlemuter 1992		47	0.52	29	0.00	24	0.08	26	0.33	59	0.04	32	0.11
Pierdomenico 2008		41	0.54	27	0.00	42	0.05	41	0.14	54	0.04	41	0.07
Poblocka 1999		35	0.55	76	0.00	69	0.03	75	0.03	81	0.03	63	0.03
Rabcewiczowa 1932		49	0.52	36	0.00	53	0.04	59	0.04	58	0.04	52	0.04
Rachmaninoff 1923		22	0.60	7	0.02	7	0.13	8	0.51	18	0.32	8	0.40
Rangell 2001		63	0.46	50	0.00	76	0.04	63	0.04	79	0.02	80	0.03
Richter 1976		43	0.53	56	0.00	29	0.07	33	0.22	37	0.11	25	0.16
Rosen 1989		44	0.52	73	0.00	54	0.05	49	0.05	82	0.02	76	0.03
Rosenthal 1930		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Rosenthal 1931		3	0.71	4	0.04	4	0.14	2	0.62	4	0.63	2	0.62
Rosenthal 1931b		9	0.67	12	0.01	15	0.12	4	0.55	5	0.58	3	0.56
Rosenthal 1931c		1	0.86	1	0.51	1	0.51	1	0.74	4	0.72	1	0.73
Rosenthal 1931d		10	0.67	10	0.01	20	0.07	19	0.41	8	0.44	7	0.42
Rossi 2007		84	0.24	45	0.00	72	0.04	57	0.04	55	0.03	64	0.03
Rubinstein 1939		81	0.27	39	0.00	88	0.01	89	0.01	60	0.04	84	0.02
Rubinstein 1952		72	0.37	53	0.00	84	0.02	84	0.02	68	0.03	88	0.02
Rubinstein 1966		56	0.49	34	0.00	77	0.04	61	0.04	65	0.04	59	0.04
Schilhawsky 1960		21	0.61	64	0.00	25	0.08	25	0.33	46	0.07	26	0.15
Shebanova 2002		69	0.41	78	0.00	78	0.03	80	0.03	79	0.03	74	0.03
Smith 1975		17	0.64	18	0.01	16	0.08	15	0.44	59	0.04	28	0.13
Sokolov 2002		2	0.74	70	0.00	3	0.13	6	0.54	21	0.37	5	0.45
Sztompka 1959		30	0.56	14	0.01	38	0.06	29	0.26	37	0.16	22	0.20
Tomsic 1995		53	0.50	86	0.00	44	0.05	43	0.09	80	0.03	47	0.05
Uninsky 1932		54	0.49	87	0.00	35	0.05	37	0.18	42	0.12	27	0.15
Uninsky 1971		26	0.58	23	0.00	33	0.05	34	0.21	45	0.08	29	0.13
Wasowski 1980		66	0.43	48	0.00	75	0.03	76	0.03	77	0.03	62	0.03
Zak 1937		60	0.47	67	0.00	63	0.03	65	0.03	69	0.04	68	0.03
Zak 1951		59	0.47	82	0.00	46	0.04	52	0.04	46	0.06	46	0.05
Random 1		90	-0.06	68	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	70	0.03	87	0.02
Random 2		89	0.02	61	0.00	87	0.01	86	0.01	21	0.28	49	0.05
Random 3		88	0.06	66	0.00	86	0.01	87	0.01	42	0.11	78	0.03

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).