Pachmann 1927

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		27	0.50	21	0.01	25	0.07	27	0.28	59	0.04	34	0.11
Anderszewski 2003		79	0.14	86	0.00	70	0.03	76	0.03	86	0.02	79	0.02
Ashkenazy 1981		62	0.32	61	0.00	66	0.03	70	0.03	75	0.03	70	0.03
Bacha 2000		25	0.51	13	0.02	47	0.05	47	0.05	36	0.14	42	0.08
Badura 1965		68	0.29	52	0.00	56	0.05	51	0.05	78	0.03	55	0.04
Barbosa 1983		10	0.62	7	0.03	5	0.17	2	0.61	9	0.44	4	0.52
Biret 1990		36	0.44	39	0.00	50	0.04	63	0.04	83	0.02	72	0.03
Blet 2003		20	0.54	62	0.00	34	0.06	26	0.28	53	0.04	32	0.11
Block 1995		48	0.38	40	0.00	55	0.04	60	0.04	68	0.03	69	0.03
Blumental 1952		81	0.03	83	0.00	87	0.02	88	0.02	89	0.01	88	0.01
Boshniakovich 1969		30	0.48	10	0.03	14	0.09	15	0.48	26	0.24	13	0.34
Brailowsky 1960		11	0.59	31	0.00	18	0.08	18	0.45	30	0.25	12	0.34
Bunin 1987		15	0.57	8	0.03	17	0.13	12	0.51	26	0.31	10	0.40
Bunin 1987b		14	0.58	6	0.04	16	0.10	11	0.51	26	0.31	8	0.40
Chiu 1999		5	0.65	3	0.08	3	0.25	4	0.59	4	0.57	1	0.58
Cohen 1997		40	0.43	44	0.00	33	0.08	33	0.22	12	0.42	19	0.30
Cortot 1951		80	0.12	66	0.00	86	0.02	86	0.02	88	0.01	90	0.01
Csalog 1996		19	0.56	12	0.02	22	0.10	21	0.39	18	0.44	7	0.41
Czerny 1949		70	0.25	69	0.00	76	0.04	61	0.04	87	0.02	66	0.03
Czerny 1990		54	0.35	48	0.00	60	0.05	54	0.05	85	0.02	71	0.03
Duchoud 2007		63	0.31	41	0.00	71	0.03	73	0.03	86	0.02	82	0.02
Ezaki 2006		33	0.47	87	0.00	46	0.05	49	0.05	52	0.05	46	0.05
Falvay 1989		3	0.66	22	0.01	7	0.16	8	0.52	28	0.21	14	0.33
Farrell 1958		28	0.49	35	0.00	44	0.05	43	0.10	37	0.12	31	0.11
Ferenczy 1958		61	0.32	82	0.00	77	0.03	80	0.03	87	0.02	80	0.02
Fliere 1977		12	0.59	5	0.05	4	0.16	6	0.57	35	0.17	15	0.31
Fou 1978		1	0.72	1	0.20	1	0.20	1	0.66	9	0.49	2	0.57
Francois 1956		35	0.47	70	0.00	39	0.06	41	0.13	78	0.03	45	0.06
Friedman 1923		88	-0.12	71	0.00	89	0.02	89	0.02	85	0.02	87	0.02
Friedman 1923b		87	-0.10	56	0.00	88	0.02	87	0.02	85	0.03	85	0.02
Friedman 1930		84	0.01	23	0.01	74	0.03	79	0.03	74	0.04	65	0.03
Garcia 2007		78	0.17	53	0.00	84	0.03	72	0.03	81	0.02	83	0.02
Garcia 2007b		82	0.02	84	0.00	73	0.03	84	0.03	81	0.02	86	0.02
Gierzod 1998		55	0.35	90	0.00	67	0.05	57	0.05	85	0.02	68	0.03
Gornostaeva 1994		37	0.44	72	0.00	41	0.06	38	0.14	78	0.03	43	0.06
Groot 1988		2	0.68	2	0.17	2	0.19	3	0.60	17	0.38	5	0.48
Harasiewicz 1955		45	0.39	50	0.00	28	0.06	24	0.32	60	0.04	36	0.11
Hatto 1993		75	0.22	59	0.00	43	0.05	42	0.11	73	0.03	44	0.06
Hatto 1997		66	0.30	16	0.01	20	0.09	36	0.19	44	0.07	30	0.12
Horowitz 1949		31	0.48	37	0.00	36	0.06	31	0.24	59	0.04	39	0.10
Indjic 1988		69	0.26	46	0.00	30	0.06	39	0.14	86	0.02	47	0.05
Kapell 1951		52	0.37	17	0.01	61	0.06	46	0.06	79	0.03	52	0.04
Kissin 1993		21	0.53	25	0.01	23	0.09	23	0.33	48	0.06	28	0.14
Kushner 1989		57	0.34	57	0.00	64	0.03	68	0.03	86	0.02	77	0.02
Luisada 1991		56	0.34	60	0.00	62	0.05	56	0.05	80	0.03	48	0.04
Lushtak 2004		17	0.57	4	0.07	15	0.08	16	0.47	31	0.19	18	0.30
Malcuzynski 1961		24	0.52	49	0.00	37	0.08	30	0.24	59	0.04	38	0.10
Magaloff 1978		23	0.53	19	0.01	12	0.09	14	0.49	37	0.16	20	0.28
Magin 1975		77	0.20	65	0.00	68	0.03	78	0.03	84	0.02	76	0.02
Michalowski 1933		86	-0.03	54	0.00	82	0.03	77	0.03	84	0.02	78	0.02
Milkina 1970		18	0.56	64	0.00	21	0.07	19	0.42	41	0.16	22	0.26
Mohovich 1999		6	0.64	51	0.00	9	0.12	7	0.54	28	0.18	16	0.31
Moravec 1969		65	0.30	85	0.00	79	0.03	81	0.03	81	0.02	73	0.02
Morozova 2008		64	0.31	88	0.00	57	0.05	52	0.05	85	0.02	64	0.03
Neighaus 1950		16	0.57	28	0.00	19	0.10	20	0.42	56	0.04	29	0.13
Niedzielski 1931		71	0.25	24	0.01	78	0.03	82	0.03	87	0.02	75	0.02
Ohlsson 1999		42	0.40	27	0.00	54	0.05	55	0.05	67	0.03	53	0.04
Osinska 1989		46	0.39	78	0.00	48	0.04	58	0.04	74	0.03	58	0.03
Pachmann 1927		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Paderewski 1930		44	0.39	30	0.00	42	0.05	44	0.10	40	0.10	40	0.10
Perlemuter 1992		29	0.49	29	0.00	27	0.06	29	0.26	61	0.04	37	0.10
Pierdomenico 2008		50	0.37	26	0.00	49	0.04	67	0.04	58	0.04	51	0.04
Poblocka 1999		39	0.44	58	0.00	53	0.04	59	0.04	50	0.04	49	0.04
Rabcewiczowa 1932		72	0.25	34	0.00	72	0.03	71	0.03	79	0.03	61	0.03
Rachmaninoff 1923		67	0.29	79	0.00	63	0.04	65	0.04	78	0.03	60	0.03
Rangell 2001		32	0.48	73	0.00	24	0.08	22	0.35	26	0.22	21	0.28
Richter 1976		26	0.51	20	0.01	26	0.07	25	0.31	34	0.12	27	0.19
Rosen 1989		34	0.47	43	0.00	52	0.05	50	0.05	61	0.03	56	0.04
Rosenthal 1930		74	0.22	89	0.00	75	0.03	69	0.03	82	0.02	84	0.02
Rosenthal 1931		51	0.37	80	0.00	32	0.07	34	0.22	33	0.20	26	0.21
Rosenthal 1931b		47	0.39	74	0.00	31	0.05	32	0.23	29	0.21	25	0.22
Rosenthal 1931c		59	0.32	67	0.00	59	0.06	45	0.06	77	0.03	57	0.04
Rosenthal 1931d		38	0.44	76	0.00	29	0.06	28	0.27	26	0.26	23	0.26
Rossi 2007		83	0.02	75	0.00	83	0.02	85	0.02	85	0.02	74	0.02
Rubinstein 1939		53	0.36	9	0.03	40	0.06	40	0.14	10	0.46	24	0.25
Rubinstein 1952		4	0.65	18	0.01	6	0.13	5	0.58	12	0.51	3	0.54
Rubinstein 1966		13	0.58	38	0.00	13	0.10	17	0.46	17	0.44	6	0.45
Schilhawsky 1960		43	0.40	36	0.00	51	0.04	64	0.04	77	0.03	63	0.03
Shebanova 2002		22	0.53	63	0.00	35	0.07	35	0.22	52	0.06	33	0.11
Smith 1975		41	0.42	45	0.00	45	0.05	53	0.05	75	0.03	50	0.04
Sokolov 2002		58	0.34	81	0.00	65	0.04	62	0.04	73	0.03	59	0.03
Sztompka 1959		73	0.24	77	0.00	81	0.04	66	0.04	82	0.02	62	0.03
Tomsic 1995		7	0.64	15	0.01	11	0.10	9	0.52	33	0.17	17	0.30
Uninsky 1932		76	0.21	33	0.00	80	0.03	75	0.03	84	0.02	81	0.02
Uninsky 1971		49	0.38	47	0.00	58	0.05	48	0.05	67	0.04	54	0.04
Wasowski 1980		60	0.32	32	0.00	38	0.07	37	0.15	47	0.05	41	0.09
Zak 1937		8	0.63	11	0.02	10	0.17	13	0.49	26	0.27	11	0.36
Zak 1951		9	0.63	14	0.02	8	0.12	10	0.51	24	0.32	9	0.40
Random 1		85	0.00	42	0.00	69	0.03	74	0.03	6	0.43	35	0.11
Random 2		89	-0.13	68	0.00	85	0.03	83	0.03	46	0.04	67	0.03
Random 3		90	-0.14	55	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	90	0.01	89	0.01

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).