Ohlsson 1999

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		24	0.66	83	0.00	29	0.06	28	0.21	37	0.11	40	0.15
Anderszewski 2003		20	0.67	47	0.00	28	0.08	23	0.25	18	0.38	18	0.31
Ashkenazy 1981		4	0.79	5	0.04	3	0.21	3	0.59	4	0.54	3	0.56
Bacha 2000		32	0.64	66	0.00	40	0.06	36	0.16	7	0.51	19	0.29
Badura 1965		65	0.53	67	0.00	48	0.08	45	0.08	31	0.24	41	0.14
Barbosa 1983		60	0.57	34	0.00	18	0.06	27	0.22	11	0.43	17	0.31
Biret 1990		2	0.83	12	0.01	2	0.25	2	0.62	1	0.60	2	0.61
Blet 2003		25	0.65	84	0.00	35	0.04	38	0.14	32	0.17	39	0.15
Block 1995		81	0.38	81	0.00	88	0.02	83	0.02	81	0.03	90	0.02
Blumental 1952		74	0.44	85	0.00	69	0.03	78	0.03	35	0.12	57	0.06
Boshniakovich 1969		63	0.56	29	0.00	77	0.03	76	0.03	70	0.03	80	0.03
Brailowsky 1960		49	0.59	43	0.00	64	0.03	63	0.03	74	0.04	76	0.03
Bunin 1987		40	0.61	35	0.00	54	0.05	55	0.05	57	0.04	73	0.04
Bunin 1987b		37	0.61	58	0.00	55	0.06	47	0.06	55	0.04	60	0.05
Chiu 1999		62	0.56	23	0.01	14	0.09	14	0.39	10	0.47	13	0.43
Cohen 1997		76	0.40	40	0.00	65	0.03	73	0.03	23	0.30	49	0.09
Cortot 1951		44	0.61	63	0.00	59	0.04	58	0.04	39	0.17	52	0.08
Csalog 1996		47	0.60	26	0.01	21	0.07	24	0.25	7	0.52	16	0.36
Czerny 1949		48	0.60	77	0.00	49	0.06	49	0.06	60	0.04	62	0.05
Czerny 1990		16	0.69	42	0.00	31	0.07	21	0.28	49	0.05	43	0.12
Duchoud 2007		1	0.86	1	0.39	1	0.38	1	0.66	1	0.60	1	0.63
Ezaki 2006		6	0.77	7	0.02	11	0.14	5	0.55	10	0.43	9	0.49
Falvay 1989		41	0.61	33	0.00	20	0.07	17	0.32	31	0.17	28	0.23
Farrell 1958		27	0.65	27	0.01	61	0.05	56	0.05	36	0.13	50	0.08
Ferenczy 1958		55	0.59	60	0.00	66	0.03	70	0.03	30	0.27	48	0.09
Fliere 1977		7	0.77	56	0.00	16	0.07	13	0.42	34	0.17	20	0.27
Fou 1978		68	0.52	32	0.00	34	0.05	35	0.17	49	0.06	45	0.10
Francois 1956		43	0.61	39	0.00	41	0.06	41	0.13	53	0.05	53	0.08
Friedman 1923		88	0.18	89	0.00	84	0.02	84	0.02	57	0.06	86	0.03
Friedman 1923b		86	0.20	82	0.00	83	0.02	85	0.02	70	0.05	81	0.03
Friedman 1930		83	0.36	75	0.00	72	0.03	66	0.03	58	0.05	69	0.04
Garcia 2007		80	0.38	69	0.00	78	0.03	81	0.03	62	0.04	79	0.03
Garcia 2007b		84	0.28	79	0.00	85	0.02	88	0.02	40	0.09	74	0.04
Gierzod 1998		5	0.78	16	0.01	8	0.10	10	0.49	2	0.45	12	0.47
Gornostaeva 1994		30	0.64	17	0.01	60	0.04	61	0.04	43	0.09	58	0.06
Groot 1988		56	0.58	51	0.00	63	0.03	75	0.03	59	0.04	83	0.03
Harasiewicz 1955		78	0.40	6	0.04	52	0.07	46	0.07	72	0.03	63	0.05
Hatto 1993		35	0.63	70	0.00	10	0.16	12	0.46	5	0.52	11	0.49
Hatto 1997		19	0.68	37	0.00	9	0.11	8	0.51	5	0.54	7	0.52
Horowitz 1949		67	0.52	36	0.00	73	0.03	79	0.03	64	0.04	77	0.03
Indjic 1988		29	0.65	4	0.04	6	0.13	9	0.50	4	0.56	5	0.53
Kapell 1951		9	0.74	24	0.01	19	0.06	16	0.32	23	0.40	15	0.36
Kissin 1993		53	0.59	19	0.01	22	0.06	25	0.24	29	0.25	25	0.24
Kushner 1989		17	0.69	59	0.00	25	0.05	26	0.23	38	0.18	32	0.20
Luisada 1991		13	0.70	2	0.12	7	0.13	11	0.48	2	0.50	10	0.49
Lushtak 2004		15	0.70	21	0.01	5	0.14	4	0.55	6	0.52	6	0.53
Malcuzynski 1961		12	0.71	54	0.00	51	0.06	52	0.06	75	0.03	65	0.04
Magaloff 1978		21	0.67	9	0.02	45	0.05	54	0.05	70	0.03	64	0.04
Magin 1975		42	0.61	14	0.01	38	0.05	37	0.16	16	0.27	31	0.21
Michalowski 1933		70	0.49	71	0.00	32	0.07	40	0.13	21	0.40	29	0.23
Milkina 1970		22	0.66	87	0.00	39	0.05	33	0.18	39	0.17	36	0.17
Mohovich 1999		33	0.63	31	0.00	50	0.06	51	0.06	75	0.03	72	0.04
Moravec 1969		38	0.61	38	0.00	37	0.05	29	0.20	21	0.35	21	0.26
Morozova 2008		59	0.57	48	0.00	47	0.06	50	0.06	50	0.05	61	0.05
Neighaus 1950		11	0.72	18	0.01	30	0.06	34	0.17	42	0.16	37	0.16
Niedzielski 1931		52	0.59	65	0.00	62	0.03	64	0.03	8	0.39	44	0.11
Ohlsson 1999		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Osinska 1989		31	0.64	11	0.01	42	0.05	43	0.12	56	0.04	54	0.07
Pachmann 1927		77	0.40	49	0.00	75	0.03	67	0.03	55	0.05	67	0.04
Paderewski 1930		50	0.59	25	0.01	70	0.03	65	0.03	53	0.04	78	0.03
Perlemuter 1992		72	0.45	72	0.00	68	0.03	71	0.03	75	0.03	75	0.03
Pierdomenico 2008		51	0.59	68	0.00	44	0.05	44	0.11	31	0.20	38	0.15
Poblocka 1999		3	0.80	28	0.01	4	0.14	6	0.54	4	0.55	4	0.54
Rabcewiczowa 1932		36	0.62	45	0.00	56	0.05	53	0.05	36	0.16	47	0.09
Rachmaninoff 1923		66	0.53	41	0.00	53	0.06	48	0.06	53	0.04	59	0.05
Rangell 2001		14	0.70	30	0.00	33	0.06	30	0.19	15	0.30	26	0.24
Richter 1976		71	0.45	8	0.02	74	0.03	69	0.03	48	0.05	66	0.04
Rosen 1989		23	0.66	20	0.01	43	0.06	39	0.14	33	0.25	34	0.19
Rosenthal 1930		64	0.54	52	0.00	76	0.03	74	0.03	46	0.06	70	0.04
Rosenthal 1931		79	0.39	78	0.00	86	0.02	86	0.02	78	0.02	88	0.02
Rosenthal 1931b		82	0.38	88	0.00	87	0.03	80	0.03	59	0.04	84	0.03
Rosenthal 1931c		57	0.57	22	0.01	71	0.03	68	0.03	54	0.04	85	0.03
Rosenthal 1931d		73	0.44	76	0.00	80	0.03	72	0.03	69	0.03	82	0.03
Rossi 2007		87	0.19	61	0.00	82	0.02	87	0.02	60	0.03	87	0.02
Rubinstein 1939		75	0.42	57	0.00	79	0.03	82	0.03	32	0.29	46	0.09
Rubinstein 1952		61	0.56	3	0.08	13	0.10	32	0.18	26	0.31	27	0.24
Rubinstein 1966		46	0.60	62	0.00	57	0.04	59	0.04	42	0.13	56	0.07
Schilhawsky 1960		28	0.65	73	0.00	27	0.06	20	0.28	27	0.25	22	0.26
Shebanova 2002		10	0.72	10	0.01	12	0.12	7	0.51	5	0.53	8	0.52
Smith 1975		18	0.68	46	0.00	17	0.08	18	0.31	42	0.11	35	0.18
Sokolov 2002		8	0.75	13	0.01	15	0.09	15	0.39	16	0.42	14	0.40
Sztompka 1959		54	0.59	55	0.00	67	0.04	60	0.04	64	0.04	68	0.04
Tomsic 1995		26	0.65	44	0.00	46	0.05	57	0.05	39	0.11	55	0.07
Uninsky 1932		69	0.50	64	0.00	58	0.04	62	0.04	38	0.16	51	0.08
Uninsky 1971		45	0.60	15	0.01	24	0.06	42	0.13	32	0.27	33	0.19
Wasowski 1980		34	0.63	53	0.00	26	0.07	31	0.18	8	0.35	23	0.25
Zak 1937		39	0.61	80	0.00	36	0.05	22	0.26	31	0.23	24	0.24
Zak 1951		58	0.57	50	0.00	23	0.07	19	0.29	41	0.16	30	0.22
Random 1		89	-0.02	74	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	40	0.16	71	0.04
Random 2		90	-0.08	90	0.00	89	0.01	89	0.01	54	0.03	89	0.02
Random 3		85	0.26	86	0.00	81	0.03	77	0.03	3	0.52	42	0.12

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).