Neighaus 1950

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		25	0.70	47	0.00	24	0.07	24	0.33	13	0.35	27	0.34
Anderszewski 2003		66	0.51	87	0.00	54	0.05	52	0.05	39	0.13	63	0.08
Ashkenazy 1981		26	0.70	57	0.00	22	0.09	29	0.31	18	0.35	30	0.33
Bacha 2000		47	0.62	39	0.00	61	0.04	62	0.04	18	0.37	52	0.12
Badura 1965		68	0.49	78	0.00	71	0.03	82	0.03	46	0.05	80	0.04
Barbosa 1983		61	0.55	54	0.00	36	0.06	41	0.16	20	0.38	37	0.25
Biret 1990		15	0.72	48	0.00	31	0.08	28	0.31	12	0.34	31	0.32
Blet 2003		30	0.67	38	0.00	35	0.06	31	0.27	11	0.41	29	0.33
Block 1995		55	0.58	31	0.00	37	0.06	44	0.10	13	0.33	42	0.18
Blumental 1952		80	0.41	66	0.00	67	0.04	63	0.04	38	0.11	71	0.07
Boshniakovich 1969		18	0.72	32	0.00	30	0.08	25	0.33	4	0.54	19	0.42
Brailowsky 1960		52	0.60	79	0.00	70	0.03	75	0.03	73	0.04	83	0.03
Bunin 1987		23	0.71	27	0.00	28	0.06	27	0.32	11	0.45	24	0.38
Bunin 1987b		22	0.71	30	0.00	29	0.08	26	0.32	11	0.45	22	0.38
Chiu 1999		50	0.60	20	0.01	25	0.07	30	0.27	11	0.47	25	0.36
Cohen 1997		85	0.28	59	0.00	85	0.03	80	0.03	69	0.03	88	0.03
Cortot 1951		59	0.56	19	0.01	66	0.03	72	0.03	53	0.06	81	0.04
Csalog 1996		79	0.41	73	0.00	86	0.03	71	0.03	67	0.03	86	0.03
Czerny 1949		39	0.65	14	0.02	27	0.08	22	0.34	15	0.42	23	0.38
Czerny 1990		24	0.70	12	0.03	14	0.12	14	0.46	14	0.38	20	0.42
Duchoud 2007		36	0.66	77	0.00	45	0.06	45	0.06	30	0.27	50	0.13
Ezaki 2006		4	0.80	6	0.05	3	0.13	6	0.54	5	0.54	6	0.54
Falvay 1989		20	0.71	44	0.00	20	0.07	23	0.33	17	0.33	28	0.33
Farrell 1958		11	0.75	9	0.05	4	0.11	17	0.43	1	0.63	9	0.52
Ferenczy 1958		69	0.49	63	0.00	83	0.03	78	0.03	46	0.05	79	0.04
Fliere 1977		2	0.81	3	0.08	2	0.14	10	0.52	3	0.53	8	0.52
Fou 1978		21	0.71	4	0.07	16	0.12	19	0.42	10	0.49	17	0.45
Francois 1956		17	0.72	2	0.09	7	0.11	13	0.49	4	0.55	10	0.52
Friedman 1923		84	0.30	58	0.00	79	0.03	74	0.03	19	0.40	55	0.11
Friedman 1923b		83	0.31	74	0.00	78	0.04	66	0.04	19	0.40	51	0.13
Friedman 1930		72	0.47	45	0.00	53	0.05	55	0.05	17	0.38	46	0.14
Garcia 2007		78	0.42	70	0.00	81	0.02	83	0.02	30	0.24	70	0.07
Garcia 2007b		82	0.36	84	0.00	77	0.03	76	0.03	12	0.27	62	0.09
Gierzod 1998		10	0.75	60	0.00	21	0.08	20	0.36	7	0.36	26	0.36
Gornostaeva 1994		7	0.77	22	0.01	5	0.12	5	0.54	3	0.52	7	0.53
Groot 1988		9	0.76	50	0.00	18	0.11	18	0.43	8	0.48	18	0.45
Harasiewicz 1955		53	0.60	11	0.03	10	0.09	12	0.49	9	0.44	16	0.46
Hatto 1993		81	0.41	85	0.00	74	0.03	77	0.03	40	0.09	75	0.05
Hatto 1997		70	0.48	61	0.00	59	0.04	61	0.04	39	0.11	69	0.07
Horowitz 1949		32	0.67	41	0.00	41	0.06	38	0.17	9	0.42	36	0.27
Indjic 1988		77	0.42	49	0.00	68	0.03	81	0.03	47	0.05	78	0.04
Kapell 1951		40	0.63	33	0.00	58	0.04	58	0.04	37	0.20	60	0.09
Kissin 1993		31	0.67	36	0.00	34	0.05	37	0.17	23	0.31	39	0.23
Kushner 1989		27	0.68	80	0.00	26	0.06	33	0.22	21	0.32	35	0.27
Luisada 1991		46	0.63	26	0.01	32	0.06	43	0.13	21	0.33	40	0.21
Lushtak 2004		14	0.74	10	0.05	13	0.13	8	0.52	7	0.51	11	0.51
Malcuzynski 1961		1	0.85	1	0.19	1	0.19	1	0.65	1	0.62	1	0.63
Magaloff 1978		8	0.77	16	0.01	19	0.13	11	0.49	4	0.47	13	0.48
Magin 1975		58	0.57	43	0.00	49	0.05	48	0.05	28	0.21	57	0.10
Michalowski 1933		76	0.44	35	0.00	46	0.05	54	0.05	32	0.29	54	0.12
Milkina 1970		35	0.66	81	0.00	51	0.05	51	0.05	35	0.20	58	0.10
Mohovich 1999		5	0.80	5	0.06	6	0.12	4	0.56	4	0.56	5	0.56
Moravec 1969		62	0.54	68	0.00	75	0.04	65	0.04	43	0.08	72	0.06
Morozova 2008		51	0.60	23	0.01	33	0.06	32	0.26	9	0.31	33	0.28
Neighaus 1950		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Niedzielski 1931		74	0.47	29	0.00	84	0.04	60	0.04	49	0.05	77	0.04
Ohlsson 1999		16	0.72	21	0.01	44	0.08	42	0.16	34	0.17	43	0.16
Osinska 1989		41	0.63	25	0.01	40	0.06	34	0.22	18	0.33	34	0.27
Pachmann 1927		57	0.57	64	0.00	52	0.04	56	0.04	20	0.42	48	0.13
Paderewski 1930		56	0.58	53	0.00	65	0.03	68	0.03	27	0.18	67	0.07
Perlemuter 1992		38	0.65	8	0.05	9	0.10	15	0.46	3	0.55	12	0.50
Pierdomenico 2008		42	0.63	18	0.01	39	0.06	36	0.18	15	0.33	38	0.24
Poblocka 1999		33	0.66	55	0.00	43	0.08	40	0.17	42	0.12	44	0.14
Rabcewiczowa 1932		28	0.67	46	0.00	38	0.05	35	0.18	7	0.48	32	0.29
Rachmaninoff 1923		48	0.61	71	0.00	23	0.09	21	0.35	5	0.44	21	0.39
Rangell 2001		37	0.66	67	0.00	57	0.05	47	0.05	40	0.14	65	0.08
Richter 1976		75	0.44	52	0.00	82	0.02	87	0.02	55	0.04	85	0.03
Rosen 1989		3	0.80	15	0.02	8	0.10	2	0.57	1	0.68	2	0.62
Rosenthal 1930		60	0.56	88	0.00	63	0.03	73	0.03	31	0.25	61	0.09
Rosenthal 1931		73	0.47	75	0.00	72	0.02	85	0.02	34	0.19	74	0.06
Rosenthal 1931b		67	0.50	89	0.00	64	0.04	64	0.04	25	0.26	59	0.10
Rosenthal 1931c		44	0.63	56	0.00	56	0.06	46	0.06	19	0.35	47	0.14
Rosenthal 1931d		64	0.53	90	0.00	73	0.03	79	0.03	28	0.19	66	0.08
Rossi 2007		86	0.24	62	0.00	80	0.03	69	0.03	34	0.12	73	0.06
Rubinstein 1939		87	0.24	86	0.00	87	0.02	86	0.02	55	0.05	84	0.03
Rubinstein 1952		65	0.53	76	0.00	76	0.03	70	0.03	45	0.08	76	0.05
Rubinstein 1966		54	0.59	37	0.00	69	0.02	84	0.02	30	0.22	68	0.07
Schilhawsky 1960		43	0.63	65	0.00	42	0.06	39	0.17	32	0.22	41	0.19
Shebanova 2002		45	0.63	72	0.00	60	0.04	57	0.04	35	0.17	64	0.08
Smith 1975		19	0.72	17	0.01	12	0.14	7	0.52	4	0.42	14	0.47
Sokolov 2002		29	0.67	42	0.00	47	0.05	50	0.05	39	0.20	56	0.10
Sztompka 1959		34	0.66	40	0.00	50	0.04	59	0.04	26	0.35	53	0.12
Tomsic 1995		6	0.78	34	0.00	17	0.11	16	0.45	10	0.49	15	0.47
Uninsky 1932		63	0.54	69	0.00	55	0.05	49	0.05	29	0.32	49	0.13
Uninsky 1971		49	0.60	28	0.00	48	0.05	53	0.05	25	0.37	45	0.14
Wasowski 1980		71	0.48	24	0.01	62	0.03	67	0.03	57	0.04	82	0.03
Zak 1937		12	0.74	13	0.02	15	0.11	9	0.52	2	0.61	4	0.56
Zak 1951		13	0.74	7	0.05	11	0.11	3	0.57	3	0.61	3	0.59
Random 1		89	-0.04	51	0.00	89	0.01	89	0.01	48	0.05	89	0.02
Random 2		90	-0.15	82	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	87	0.02	90	0.01
Random 3		88	0.09	83	0.00	88	0.02	88	0.02	56	0.04	87	0.03

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).