Malcuzynski 1961

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		13	0.78	25	0.01	15	0.07	14	0.42	5	0.43	16	0.42
Anderszewski 2003		68	0.56	14	0.01	49	0.04	55	0.04	35	0.15	58	0.08
Ashkenazy 1981		35	0.69	5	0.06	14	0.07	28	0.26	24	0.32	30	0.29
Bacha 2000		64	0.60	79	0.00	81	0.04	54	0.04	55	0.05	69	0.04
Badura 1965		66	0.59	73	0.00	42	0.05	39	0.12	5	0.55	33	0.26
Barbosa 1983		72	0.48	82	0.00	60	0.03	80	0.03	54	0.04	80	0.03
Biret 1990		32	0.70	76	0.00	69	0.05	50	0.05	50	0.05	67	0.05
Blet 2003		43	0.68	37	0.00	50	0.04	51	0.04	34	0.16	59	0.08
Block 1995		31	0.70	51	0.00	43	0.05	42	0.10	12	0.34	42	0.18
Blumental 1952		80	0.37	46	0.00	75	0.03	69	0.03	47	0.06	74	0.04
Boshniakovich 1969		23	0.73	27	0.01	27	0.07	23	0.29	7	0.51	19	0.38
Brailowsky 1960		44	0.67	35	0.00	64	0.03	71	0.03	33	0.20	55	0.08
Bunin 1987		25	0.71	43	0.00	40	0.06	33	0.18	10	0.45	32	0.28
Bunin 1987b		24	0.71	45	0.00	39	0.05	31	0.18	10	0.45	31	0.28
Chiu 1999		74	0.46	71	0.00	68	0.04	61	0.04	52	0.05	71	0.04
Cohen 1997		82	0.30	63	0.00	85	0.02	86	0.02	73	0.03	90	0.02
Cortot 1951		54	0.64	55	0.00	72	0.04	62	0.04	44	0.12	64	0.07
Csalog 1996		73	0.48	83	0.00	86	0.03	77	0.03	69	0.03	81	0.03
Czerny 1949		27	0.71	9	0.03	11	0.09	10	0.46	5	0.57	7	0.51
Czerny 1990		8	0.83	2	0.08	5	0.12	2	0.62	2	0.58	3	0.60
Duchoud 2007		45	0.67	52	0.00	51	0.05	49	0.05	50	0.05	66	0.05
Ezaki 2006		7	0.84	3	0.07	4	0.16	3	0.61	2	0.59	2	0.60
Falvay 1989		20	0.74	53	0.00	21	0.06	20	0.30	18	0.31	26	0.30
Farrell 1958		33	0.69	64	0.00	73	0.04	52	0.04	39	0.11	62	0.07
Ferenczy 1958		70	0.53	85	0.00	82	0.03	78	0.03	64	0.03	83	0.03
Fliere 1977		2	0.85	17	0.01	7	0.13	7	0.50	6	0.45	12	0.47
Fou 1978		36	0.69	21	0.01	23	0.06	27	0.26	24	0.35	27	0.30
Francois 1956		17	0.76	12	0.02	9	0.09	9	0.47	7	0.49	11	0.48
Friedman 1923		86	0.23	80	0.00	78	0.04	58	0.04	23	0.34	45	0.12
Friedman 1923b		85	0.24	89	0.00	77	0.03	76	0.03	22	0.34	53	0.10
Friedman 1930		76	0.39	47	0.00	57	0.03	73	0.03	24	0.34	52	0.10
Garcia 2007		78	0.37	86	0.00	83	0.03	79	0.03	64	0.04	84	0.03
Garcia 2007b		87	0.21	67	0.00	84	0.03	85	0.03	47	0.05	75	0.04
Gierzod 1998		16	0.77	20	0.01	25	0.07	19	0.31	11	0.35	25	0.33
Gornostaeva 1994		5	0.84	6	0.05	2	0.14	5	0.56	1	0.59	4	0.57
Groot 1988		3	0.85	15	0.01	10	0.10	11	0.45	6	0.50	14	0.47
Harasiewicz 1955		58	0.63	1	0.27	1	0.27	4	0.57	1	0.56	5	0.56
Hatto 1993		81	0.35	75	0.00	66	0.04	63	0.04	60	0.03	86	0.03
Hatto 1997		75	0.42	36	0.00	59	0.04	66	0.04	67	0.03	82	0.03
Horowitz 1949		26	0.71	13	0.02	30	0.06	22	0.30	4	0.53	18	0.40
Indjic 1988		79	0.37	90	0.00	65	0.03	84	0.03	63	0.03	79	0.03
Kapell 1951		30	0.70	22	0.01	58	0.03	74	0.03	41	0.15	63	0.07
Kissin 1993		14	0.78	10	0.03	13	0.08	13	0.43	7	0.54	10	0.48
Kushner 1989		6	0.84	31	0.00	8	0.14	8	0.50	2	0.58	6	0.54
Luisada 1991		60	0.61	74	0.00	61	0.04	57	0.04	50	0.05	70	0.04
Lushtak 2004		55	0.63	23	0.01	44	0.05	43	0.10	48	0.06	61	0.08
Malcuzynski 1961		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Magaloff 1978		1	0.87	7	0.03	6	0.12	6	0.50	2	0.51	9	0.50
Magin 1975		41	0.68	8	0.03	16	0.07	26	0.26	4	0.43	24	0.33
Michalowski 1933		77	0.38	72	0.00	37	0.05	44	0.09	47	0.07	57	0.08
Milkina 1970		12	0.78	56	0.00	34	0.05	37	0.13	23	0.29	41	0.19
Mohovich 1999		11	0.81	68	0.00	17	0.07	17	0.37	11	0.45	17	0.41
Moravec 1969		40	0.68	50	0.00	56	0.03	81	0.03	26	0.24	54	0.08
Morozova 2008		61	0.60	49	0.00	46	0.06	47	0.06	41	0.11	60	0.08
Neighaus 1950		4	0.85	4	0.06	3	0.15	1	0.62	1	0.65	1	0.63
Niedzielski 1931		69	0.55	26	0.01	76	0.03	82	0.03	61	0.04	78	0.03
Ohlsson 1999		28	0.71	54	0.00	63	0.03	75	0.03	52	0.06	72	0.04
Osinska 1989		22	0.74	58	0.00	35	0.07	32	0.18	19	0.32	35	0.24
Pachmann 1927		71	0.52	57	0.00	70	0.04	59	0.04	30	0.24	50	0.10
Paderewski 1930		34	0.69	24	0.01	62	0.03	83	0.03	23	0.23	56	0.08
Perlemuter 1992		53	0.64	38	0.00	26	0.07	30	0.21	23	0.30	34	0.25
Pierdomenico 2008		38	0.68	62	0.00	28	0.07	29	0.21	8	0.40	28	0.29
Poblocka 1999		37	0.69	28	0.00	71	0.03	72	0.03	55	0.04	77	0.03
Rabcewiczowa 1932		50	0.65	78	0.00	54	0.04	60	0.04	26	0.26	48	0.10
Rachmaninoff 1923		52	0.64	29	0.00	20	0.08	25	0.28	7	0.40	23	0.33
Rangell 2001		18	0.75	32	0.00	31	0.06	34	0.17	23	0.23	40	0.20
Richter 1976		56	0.63	77	0.00	53	0.05	48	0.05	25	0.20	49	0.10
Rosen 1989		10	0.81	34	0.00	12	0.09	12	0.44	4	0.59	8	0.51
Rosenthal 1930		29	0.71	40	0.00	36	0.05	35	0.16	5	0.54	29	0.29
Rosenthal 1931		59	0.62	87	0.00	41	0.05	38	0.13	14	0.41	37	0.23
Rosenthal 1931b		62	0.60	59	0.00	47	0.07	45	0.07	14	0.40	43	0.17
Rosenthal 1931c		19	0.75	18	0.01	24	0.07	18	0.36	8	0.53	15	0.44
Rosenthal 1931d		51	0.64	66	0.00	48	0.04	65	0.04	21	0.32	46	0.11
Rossi 2007		83	0.30	88	0.00	52	0.04	53	0.04	17	0.24	47	0.10
Rubinstein 1939		84	0.25	81	0.00	87	0.02	88	0.02	82	0.03	87	0.02
Rubinstein 1952		63	0.60	44	0.00	80	0.04	56	0.04	49	0.07	68	0.05
Rubinstein 1966		57	0.63	70	0.00	74	0.04	64	0.04	51	0.05	73	0.04
Schilhawsky 1960		42	0.68	33	0.00	45	0.07	46	0.07	28	0.24	44	0.13
Shebanova 2002		49	0.66	61	0.00	67	0.04	67	0.04	45	0.09	65	0.06
Smith 1975		21	0.74	41	0.00	19	0.09	15	0.42	15	0.29	21	0.35
Sokolov 2002		15	0.77	11	0.03	29	0.09	24	0.28	14	0.44	20	0.35
Sztompka 1959		47	0.66	42	0.00	55	0.04	68	0.04	33	0.25	51	0.10
Tomsic 1995		9	0.82	69	0.00	18	0.11	16	0.41	8	0.53	13	0.47
Uninsky 1932		65	0.60	30	0.00	33	0.05	41	0.11	9	0.45	38	0.22
Uninsky 1971		48	0.66	16	0.01	32	0.06	36	0.14	23	0.40	36	0.24
Wasowski 1980		67	0.58	19	0.01	79	0.03	70	0.03	53	0.04	76	0.03
Zak 1937		46	0.67	65	0.00	38	0.05	40	0.12	18	0.33	39	0.20
Zak 1951		39	0.68	39	0.00	22	0.07	21	0.30	18	0.39	22	0.34
Random 1		89	-0.08	48	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	65	0.03	89	0.02
Random 2		90	-0.09	60	0.00	89	0.01	89	0.01	58	0.03	88	0.02
Random 3		88	0.09	84	0.00	88	0.02	87	0.02	60	0.04	85	0.03

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).