Kapell 1951

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		23	0.70	59	0.00	31	0.07	28	0.34	33	0.17	35	0.24
Anderszewski 2003		28	0.67	3	0.11	5	0.15	8	0.51	7	0.54	6	0.52
Ashkenazy 1981		31	0.66	41	0.00	21	0.08	17	0.43	14	0.39	20	0.41
Bacha 2000		60	0.52	47	0.00	68	0.04	62	0.04	46	0.06	51	0.05
Badura 1965		70	0.43	82	0.00	57	0.05	53	0.05	53	0.04	64	0.04
Barbosa 1983		43	0.58	54	0.00	37	0.08	39	0.18	29	0.31	34	0.24
Biret 1990		9	0.75	69	0.00	18	0.08	20	0.42	9	0.43	18	0.42
Blet 2003		14	0.73	30	0.01	24	0.08	18	0.43	16	0.38	21	0.40
Block 1995		68	0.45	83	0.00	78	0.02	80	0.02	72	0.03	84	0.02
Blumental 1952		76	0.38	19	0.01	20	0.09	30	0.29	11	0.34	31	0.31
Boshniakovich 1969		71	0.43	79	0.00	81	0.02	82	0.02	82	0.03	86	0.02
Brailowsky 1960		62	0.49	27	0.01	77	0.03	74	0.03	67	0.04	68	0.03
Bunin 1987		18	0.71	31	0.00	26	0.12	16	0.44	12	0.43	15	0.43
Bunin 1987b		17	0.71	49	0.00	27	0.16	15	0.44	12	0.43	14	0.43
Chiu 1999		81	0.34	63	0.00	67	0.04	64	0.04	76	0.03	70	0.03
Cohen 1997		80	0.35	9	0.03	72	0.03	66	0.03	37	0.14	50	0.06
Cortot 1951		8	0.76	12	0.01	6	0.11	10	0.50	3	0.53	7	0.51
Csalog 1996		57	0.53	57	0.00	71	0.04	65	0.04	41	0.18	45	0.08
Czerny 1949		11	0.74	38	0.00	9	0.16	5	0.53	6	0.54	4	0.53
Czerny 1990		6	0.77	13	0.01	12	0.18	6	0.52	10	0.41	11	0.46
Duchoud 2007		4	0.78	55	0.00	17	0.09	14	0.44	15	0.44	13	0.44
Ezaki 2006		19	0.71	32	0.00	29	0.08	24	0.38	50	0.06	39	0.15
Falvay 1989		40	0.59	36	0.00	52	0.06	47	0.06	49	0.05	52	0.05
Farrell 1958		27	0.67	48	0.00	41	0.06	42	0.14	26	0.21	37	0.17
Ferenczy 1958		1	0.85	2	0.14	2	0.32	4	0.55	1	0.65	2	0.60
Fliere 1977		26	0.68	28	0.01	43	0.06	43	0.11	67	0.04	47	0.07
Fou 1978		79	0.36	51	0.00	85	0.02	87	0.02	77	0.03	80	0.02
Francois 1956		12	0.73	10	0.02	25	0.09	22	0.40	15	0.33	25	0.36
Friedman 1923		85	0.17	52	0.00	45	0.05	50	0.05	29	0.25	42	0.11
Friedman 1923b		84	0.18	61	0.00	44	0.05	44	0.09	28	0.27	38	0.16
Friedman 1930		69	0.44	29	0.01	34	0.08	33	0.27	13	0.41	27	0.33
Garcia 2007		75	0.38	50	0.00	49	0.04	61	0.04	28	0.25	43	0.10
Garcia 2007b		87	0.16	76	0.00	70	0.03	72	0.03	50	0.05	66	0.04
Gierzod 1998		13	0.73	42	0.00	22	0.09	19	0.42	4	0.43	17	0.42
Gornostaeva 1994		39	0.60	64	0.00	62	0.03	76	0.03	71	0.03	77	0.03
Groot 1988		32	0.65	66	0.00	54	0.06	46	0.06	64	0.04	54	0.05
Harasiewicz 1955		65	0.47	7	0.03	16	0.09	27	0.35	57	0.04	41	0.12
Hatto 1993		67	0.45	34	0.00	33	0.08	36	0.22	10	0.42	32	0.30
Hatto 1997		49	0.55	24	0.01	13	0.10	25	0.36	10	0.45	22	0.40
Horowitz 1949		61	0.49	14	0.01	60	0.04	60	0.04	63	0.04	59	0.04
Indjic 1988		64	0.48	45	0.00	32	0.07	35	0.23	9	0.44	29	0.32
Kapell 1951		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Kissin 1993		66	0.46	25	0.01	79	0.03	78	0.03	84	0.02	81	0.02
Kushner 1989		35	0.63	77	0.00	56	0.05	49	0.05	71	0.03	57	0.04
Luisada 1991		54	0.54	39	0.00	51	0.05	48	0.05	64	0.04	55	0.04
Lushtak 2004		29	0.66	15	0.01	11	0.14	11	0.47	19	0.35	19	0.41
Malcuzynski 1961		22	0.70	43	0.00	40	0.06	41	0.15	74	0.03	48	0.07
Magaloff 1978		41	0.59	58	0.00	63	0.03	73	0.03	63	0.03	71	0.03
Magin 1975		74	0.38	18	0.01	73	0.03	70	0.03	76	0.02	79	0.02
Michalowski 1933		46	0.56	11	0.02	8	0.14	9	0.51	7	0.46	8	0.48
Milkina 1970		44	0.57	67	0.00	74	0.03	68	0.03	68	0.04	75	0.03
Mohovich 1999		30	0.66	75	0.00	42	0.06	40	0.16	50	0.04	46	0.08
Moravec 1969		20	0.70	53	0.00	38	0.11	31	0.29	20	0.35	28	0.32
Morozova 2008		63	0.48	35	0.00	50	0.05	52	0.05	65	0.04	61	0.04
Neighaus 1950		34	0.63	44	0.00	39	0.07	37	0.20	58	0.04	44	0.09
Niedzielski 1931		38	0.60	37	0.00	48	0.04	55	0.04	9	0.39	40	0.12
Ohlsson 1999		10	0.74	33	0.00	28	0.10	23	0.40	16	0.32	24	0.36
Osinska 1989		24	0.69	71	0.00	35	0.08	32	0.27	30	0.21	33	0.24
Pachmann 1927		78	0.37	26	0.01	80	0.03	79	0.03	46	0.06	60	0.04
Paderewski 1930		16	0.72	21	0.01	30	0.11	26	0.36	2	0.50	16	0.42
Perlemuter 1992		58	0.52	68	0.00	47	0.04	57	0.04	66	0.03	67	0.03
Pierdomenico 2008		59	0.52	87	0.00	64	0.03	69	0.03	68	0.03	72	0.03
Poblocka 1999		2	0.84	1	0.23	1	0.22	1	0.58	1	0.64	1	0.61
Rabcewiczowa 1932		21	0.70	72	0.00	23	0.08	21	0.41	9	0.47	12	0.44
Rachmaninoff 1923		56	0.53	65	0.00	46	0.04	54	0.04	65	0.04	56	0.04
Rangell 2001		47	0.56	20	0.01	69	0.04	59	0.04	67	0.03	78	0.03
Richter 1976		37	0.62	6	0.04	15	0.10	34	0.26	13	0.36	30	0.31
Rosen 1989		48	0.56	73	0.00	65	0.03	71	0.03	83	0.02	85	0.02
Rosenthal 1930		42	0.59	62	0.00	58	0.04	58	0.04	55	0.04	63	0.04
Rosenthal 1931		77	0.37	88	0.00	83	0.02	89	0.02	74	0.03	82	0.02
Rosenthal 1931b		82	0.33	89	0.00	84	0.02	86	0.02	75	0.03	88	0.02
Rosenthal 1931c		45	0.56	84	0.00	66	0.04	63	0.04	53	0.04	65	0.04
Rosenthal 1931d		73	0.39	90	0.00	86	0.02	83	0.02	78	0.02	87	0.02
Rossi 2007		86	0.17	80	0.00	75	0.03	75	0.03	69	0.03	69	0.03
Rubinstein 1939		83	0.30	8	0.03	88	0.02	84	0.02	45	0.06	73	0.03
Rubinstein 1952		72	0.42	40	0.00	87	0.02	88	0.02	73	0.03	89	0.02
Rubinstein 1966		53	0.54	70	0.00	76	0.02	81	0.02	52	0.05	76	0.03
Schilhawsky 1960		5	0.78	23	0.01	3	0.16	2	0.56	1	0.59	3	0.57
Shebanova 2002		55	0.54	78	0.00	61	0.03	67	0.03	54	0.05	62	0.04
Smith 1975		15	0.73	22	0.01	10	0.12	7	0.52	14	0.29	23	0.39
Sokolov 2002		7	0.77	5	0.04	14	0.08	13	0.47	10	0.46	9	0.46
Sztompka 1959		3	0.79	4	0.06	4	0.20	3	0.55	9	0.50	5	0.52
Tomsic 1995		33	0.64	74	0.00	53	0.06	45	0.06	62	0.04	53	0.05
Uninsky 1932		50	0.55	17	0.01	19	0.08	29	0.31	22	0.37	26	0.34
Uninsky 1971		25	0.68	16	0.01	7	0.13	12	0.47	9	0.46	10	0.46
Wasowski 1980		36	0.63	46	0.00	36	0.07	38	0.19	19	0.25	36	0.22
Zak 1937		51	0.55	81	0.00	59	0.04	56	0.04	74	0.03	74	0.03
Zak 1951		52	0.54	56	0.00	55	0.05	51	0.05	66	0.04	58	0.04
Random 1		90	-0.26	85	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	89	0.01	90	0.01
Random 2		89	-0.09	86	0.00	89	0.02	85	0.02	56	0.03	83	0.02
Random 3		88	0.08	60	0.00	82	0.03	77	0.03	33	0.15	49	0.07

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).