Indjic 1988

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		74	0.25	63	0.00	43	0.05	41	0.09	73	0.03	56	0.05
Anderszewski 2003		4	0.67	55	0.00	3	0.27	5	0.54	5	0.55	4	0.54
Ashkenazy 1981		3	0.69	27	0.00	4	0.26	3	0.66	3	0.56	3	0.61
Bacha 2000		20	0.47	3	0.00	37	0.04	38	0.12	21	0.32	24	0.20
Badura 1965		82	0.21	29	0.00	52	0.05	46	0.05	51	0.05	57	0.05
Barbosa 1983		52	0.33	40	0.00	17	0.07	24	0.26	38	0.23	20	0.24
Biret 1990		8	0.54	16	0.00	8	0.11	8	0.46	23	0.26	9	0.35
Blet 2003		15	0.49	56	0.00	21	0.08	12	0.40	30	0.18	16	0.27
Block 1995		88	0.04	30	0.00	88	0.02	88	0.02	84	0.02	84	0.02
Blumental 1952		26	0.42	41	0.00	34	0.05	37	0.13	29	0.17	33	0.15
Boshniakovich 1969		76	0.23	42	0.00	85	0.02	85	0.02	83	0.03	86	0.02
Brailowsky 1960		36	0.38	57	0.00	49	0.04	49	0.04	36	0.14	45	0.07
Bunin 1987		13	0.50	9	0.00	20	0.07	18	0.37	43	0.11	27	0.20
Bunin 1987b		12	0.51	10	0.00	19	0.07	17	0.37	43	0.11	25	0.20
Chiu 1999		41	0.36	25	0.00	30	0.08	28	0.23	29	0.22	23	0.22
Cohen 1997		61	0.30	58	0.00	78	0.03	64	0.03	31	0.23	41	0.08
Cortot 1951		56	0.32	64	0.00	55	0.03	60	0.03	62	0.04	79	0.03
Csalog 1996		63	0.29	59	0.00	42	0.05	39	0.11	29	0.27	30	0.17
Czerny 1949		81	0.22	65	0.00	68	0.03	68	0.03	77	0.03	73	0.03
Czerny 1990		48	0.33	21	0.00	39	0.04	33	0.16	60	0.04	42	0.08
Duchoud 2007		6	0.63	22	0.00	5	0.24	6	0.52	16	0.43	6	0.47
Ezaki 2006		24	0.43	11	0.00	24	0.08	14	0.40	38	0.12	22	0.22
Falvay 1989		57	0.32	4	0.00	38	0.04	42	0.09	43	0.07	40	0.08
Farrell 1958		23	0.43	66	0.00	58	0.03	61	0.03	56	0.04	67	0.03
Ferenczy 1958		31	0.39	67	0.00	27	0.06	31	0.16	36	0.18	31	0.17
Fliere 1977		22	0.45	43	0.00	32	0.06	25	0.26	59	0.04	34	0.10
Fou 1978		39	0.37	68	0.00	63	0.03	69	0.03	69	0.04	68	0.03
Francois 1956		86	0.19	44	0.00	77	0.03	72	0.03	75	0.03	80	0.03
Friedman 1923		71	0.26	31	0.00	71	0.03	62	0.03	54	0.06	64	0.04
Friedman 1923b		69	0.27	69	0.00	70	0.02	78	0.02	52	0.06	77	0.03
Friedman 1930		67	0.27	23	0.00	44	0.04	44	0.07	46	0.06	51	0.06
Garcia 2007		53	0.32	17	0.00	53	0.04	52	0.04	69	0.03	74	0.03
Garcia 2007b		68	0.27	14	0.00	45	0.04	53	0.04	29	0.15	44	0.08
Gierzod 1998		17	0.49	32	0.00	14	0.07	19	0.36	36	0.17	18	0.25
Gornostaeva 1994		78	0.22	24	0.00	84	0.02	81	0.02	74	0.03	87	0.02
Groot 1988		73	0.26	70	0.00	74	0.02	82	0.02	80	0.03	88	0.02
Harasiewicz 1955		77	0.23	12	0.00	35	0.05	34	0.15	47	0.05	39	0.09
Hatto 1993		1	0.99	1	0.96	1	0.95	1	0.99	1	0.99	1	0.99
Hatto 1997		2	0.98	2	0.03	2	0.88	2	0.94	1	0.91	2	0.92
Horowitz 1949		42	0.36	71	0.00	50	0.05	48	0.05	44	0.08	50	0.06
Indjic 1988		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Kapell 1951		19	0.48	6	0.00	18	0.07	9	0.44	35	0.23	12	0.32
Kissin 1993		72	0.26	72	0.00	64	0.03	70	0.03	47	0.06	60	0.04
Kushner 1989		40	0.37	60	0.00	40	0.05	40	0.10	75	0.03	53	0.05
Luisada 1991		7	0.59	45	0.00	7	0.18	7	0.49	9	0.43	7	0.46
Lushtak 2004		11	0.53	73	0.00	12	0.12	13	0.40	29	0.20	14	0.28
Malcuzynski 1961		37	0.37	74	0.00	59	0.03	63	0.03	84	0.03	69	0.03
Magaloff 1978		44	0.34	75	0.00	36	0.04	43	0.09	81	0.03	52	0.05
Magin 1975		9	0.53	76	0.00	9	0.12	20	0.36	10	0.34	8	0.35
Michalowski 1933		59	0.31	77	0.00	22	0.08	16	0.37	36	0.27	13	0.32
Milkina 1970		33	0.38	46	0.00	65	0.03	67	0.03	55	0.05	58	0.04
Mohovich 1999		50	0.33	33	0.00	60	0.03	57	0.03	74	0.03	76	0.03
Moravec 1969		60	0.31	34	0.00	41	0.04	36	0.14	30	0.20	28	0.17
Morozova 2008		21	0.45	5	0.00	11	0.13	22	0.34	37	0.12	26	0.20
Neighaus 1950		25	0.42	18	0.00	47	0.05	47	0.05	81	0.03	62	0.04
Niedzielski 1931		80	0.22	47	0.00	56	0.03	58	0.03	31	0.17	46	0.07
Ohlsson 1999		5	0.65	7	0.00	6	0.33	4	0.56	9	0.50	5	0.53
Osinska 1989		84	0.20	78	0.00	76	0.02	83	0.02	67	0.04	65	0.03
Pachmann 1927		70	0.26	15	0.00	72	0.02	86	0.02	39	0.14	54	0.05
Paderewski 1930		64	0.28	35	0.00	82	0.02	77	0.02	69	0.03	83	0.02
Perlemuter 1992		85	0.19	8	0.00	83	0.02	75	0.02	67	0.03	81	0.02
Pierdomenico 2008		75	0.24	79	0.00	67	0.03	66	0.03	83	0.02	82	0.02
Poblocka 1999		18	0.49	80	0.00	13	0.10	10	0.42	29	0.24	10	0.32
Rabcewiczowa 1932		79	0.22	81	0.00	69	0.03	71	0.03	59	0.04	66	0.03
Rachmaninoff 1923		43	0.34	13	0.00	33	0.06	35	0.14	79	0.03	49	0.06
Rangell 2001		51	0.33	82	0.00	66	0.03	56	0.03	28	0.21	43	0.08
Richter 1976		62	0.30	48	0.00	57	0.04	50	0.04	68	0.03	71	0.03
Rosen 1989		55	0.32	49	0.00	75	0.02	84	0.02	78	0.03	85	0.02
Rosenthal 1930		34	0.38	36	0.00	51	0.04	51	0.04	74	0.03	75	0.03
Rosenthal 1931		54	0.32	50	0.00	80	0.03	55	0.03	66	0.03	72	0.03
Rosenthal 1931b		45	0.33	83	0.00	79	0.03	74	0.03	56	0.05	63	0.04
Rosenthal 1931c		46	0.33	84	0.00	81	0.02	76	0.02	74	0.03	89	0.02
Rosenthal 1931d		66	0.28	61	0.00	73	0.02	80	0.02	58	0.04	78	0.03
Rossi 2007		90	-0.19	85	0.00	89	0.01	89	0.01	84	0.02	90	0.01
Rubinstein 1939		16	0.49	51	0.00	26	0.06	30	0.17	12	0.44	15	0.27
Rubinstein 1952		83	0.21	86	0.00	62	0.03	73	0.03	35	0.15	48	0.07
Rubinstein 1966		14	0.49	62	0.00	48	0.05	45	0.05	37	0.17	38	0.09
Schilhawsky 1960		27	0.41	28	0.00	16	0.07	21	0.35	36	0.20	17	0.26
Shebanova 2002		28	0.41	26	0.00	29	0.06	32	0.16	25	0.32	21	0.23
Smith 1975		32	0.38	37	0.00	23	0.08	15	0.39	83	0.02	37	0.09
Sokolov 2002		10	0.53	38	0.00	10	0.13	11	0.41	35	0.25	11	0.32
Sztompka 1959		49	0.33	87	0.00	61	0.03	65	0.03	58	0.05	59	0.04
Tomsic 1995		30	0.39	39	0.00	54	0.03	59	0.03	70	0.03	70	0.03
Uninsky 1932		58	0.31	19	0.00	46	0.04	54	0.04	47	0.06	55	0.05
Uninsky 1971		29	0.40	52	0.00	28	0.07	23	0.32	40	0.18	19	0.24
Wasowski 1980		38	0.37	53	0.00	25	0.08	26	0.26	38	0.11	29	0.17
Zak 1937		35	0.38	20	0.00	31	0.06	29	0.21	43	0.11	32	0.15
Zak 1951		47	0.33	54	0.00	15	0.10	27	0.25	62	0.04	35	0.10
Random 1		89	0.00	88	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	38	0.16	61	0.04
Random 2		87	0.05	89	0.00	86	0.02	87	0.02	3	0.48	36	0.10
Random 3		65	0.28	90	0.00	87	0.02	79	0.02	21	0.27	47	0.07

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).