Hatto 1997

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		58	0.34	5	0.01	31	0.05	38	0.11	48	0.05	51	0.07
Anderszewski 2003		4	0.69	17	0.00	3	0.27	4	0.57	1	0.61	3	0.59
Ashkenazy 1981		3	0.70	25	0.00	6	0.22	3	0.58	6	0.51	4	0.54
Bacha 2000		21	0.50	40	0.00	48	0.03	55	0.03	26	0.31	35	0.10
Badura 1965		83	0.24	44	0.00	61	0.03	70	0.03	62	0.04	80	0.03
Barbosa 1983		50	0.37	51	0.00	19	0.08	24	0.29	35	0.25	22	0.27
Biret 1990		8	0.60	13	0.00	7	0.11	8	0.47	11	0.35	9	0.41
Blet 2003		15	0.55	32	0.00	23	0.09	16	0.39	27	0.23	17	0.30
Block 1995		87	0.07	75	0.00	88	0.02	87	0.02	86	0.02	87	0.02
Blumental 1952		31	0.43	72	0.00	37	0.07	32	0.15	25	0.20	27	0.17
Boshniakovich 1969		82	0.25	45	0.00	85	0.02	86	0.02	78	0.03	89	0.02
Brailowsky 1960		34	0.41	60	0.00	47	0.04	53	0.04	37	0.13	50	0.07
Bunin 1987		11	0.57	27	0.00	15	0.12	15	0.39	31	0.26	15	0.32
Bunin 1987b		10	0.58	20	0.00	13	0.08	14	0.39	30	0.27	14	0.32
Chiu 1999		47	0.38	22	0.00	30	0.05	28	0.19	33	0.20	26	0.19
Cohen 1997		68	0.31	9	0.00	75	0.03	78	0.03	27	0.27	44	0.09
Cortot 1951		44	0.38	52	0.00	34	0.04	42	0.09	43	0.13	34	0.11
Csalog 1996		63	0.32	38	0.00	69	0.03	65	0.03	31	0.27	43	0.09
Czerny 1949		69	0.30	36	0.00	51	0.04	48	0.04	51	0.06	59	0.05
Czerny 1990		45	0.38	30	0.00	32	0.05	29	0.19	73	0.03	48	0.08
Duchoud 2007		6	0.67	47	0.00	4	0.23	6	0.52	9	0.46	6	0.49
Ezaki 2006		20	0.50	10	0.00	21	0.07	9	0.45	35	0.17	20	0.28
Falvay 1989		51	0.37	15	0.00	41	0.04	40	0.10	41	0.11	37	0.10
Farrell 1958		19	0.50	82	0.00	53	0.03	73	0.03	59	0.04	70	0.03
Ferenczy 1958		26	0.48	26	0.00	26	0.08	25	0.28	25	0.31	19	0.29
Fliere 1977		23	0.48	85	0.00	35	0.04	33	0.15	48	0.05	41	0.09
Fou 1978		42	0.39	19	0.00	45	0.04	46	0.04	68	0.04	64	0.04
Francois 1956		80	0.27	59	0.00	68	0.03	75	0.03	59	0.04	85	0.03
Friedman 1923		73	0.29	63	0.00	64	0.04	47	0.04	49	0.06	62	0.05
Friedman 1923b		71	0.30	39	0.00	63	0.03	74	0.03	50	0.06	67	0.04
Friedman 1930		61	0.33	41	0.00	36	0.05	36	0.12	62	0.05	46	0.08
Garcia 2007		66	0.32	90	0.00	54	0.03	76	0.03	51	0.05	66	0.04
Garcia 2007b		79	0.27	49	0.00	55	0.03	68	0.03	32	0.14	56	0.06
Gierzod 1998		17	0.53	83	0.00	20	0.08	21	0.35	27	0.21	23	0.27
Gornostaeva 1994		74	0.29	50	0.00	84	0.03	56	0.03	79	0.03	82	0.03
Groot 1988		65	0.32	48	0.00	74	0.03	71	0.03	54	0.04	83	0.03
Harasiewicz 1955		81	0.26	64	0.00	38	0.04	31	0.16	52	0.04	49	0.08
Hatto 1993		2	0.97	2	0.01	2	0.84	2	0.89	2	0.91	2	0.90
Hatto 1997		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Horowitz 1949		49	0.38	65	0.00	60	0.03	63	0.03	57	0.04	75	0.03
Indjic 1988		1	0.98	1	0.88	1	0.87	1	0.91	2	0.94	1	0.92
Kapell 1951		13	0.55	33	0.00	12	0.09	10	0.45	25	0.36	10	0.40
Kissin 1993		77	0.28	42	0.00	77	0.02	83	0.02	58	0.04	77	0.03
Kushner 1989		39	0.40	66	0.00	62	0.03	58	0.03	77	0.03	71	0.03
Luisada 1991		7	0.61	31	0.00	8	0.15	12	0.41	11	0.41	8	0.41
Lushtak 2004		9	0.58	57	0.00	9	0.15	7	0.51	22	0.35	7	0.42
Malcuzynski 1961		32	0.42	3	0.01	52	0.03	67	0.03	66	0.04	73	0.03
Magaloff 1978		48	0.38	8	0.00	17	0.07	30	0.18	38	0.15	28	0.16
Magin 1975		18	0.52	76	0.00	16	0.10	22	0.32	13	0.28	16	0.30
Michalowski 1933		64	0.32	55	0.00	24	0.10	18	0.37	26	0.34	12	0.35
Milkina 1970		41	0.40	37	0.00	76	0.03	66	0.03	69	0.04	72	0.03
Mohovich 1999		40	0.40	67	0.00	42	0.05	35	0.12	37	0.11	33	0.11
Moravec 1969		56	0.34	23	0.00	50	0.04	50	0.04	31	0.19	40	0.09
Morozova 2008		22	0.49	28	0.00	14	0.08	23	0.31	35	0.13	25	0.20
Neighaus 1950		25	0.48	6	0.01	40	0.06	39	0.11	61	0.04	53	0.07
Niedzielski 1931		85	0.23	68	0.00	65	0.03	69	0.03	40	0.12	54	0.06
Ohlsson 1999		5	0.68	12	0.00	5	0.20	5	0.54	8	0.51	5	0.52
Osinska 1989		75	0.28	14	0.00	70	0.04	49	0.04	58	0.04	63	0.04
Pachmann 1927		72	0.30	58	0.00	43	0.04	44	0.07	36	0.19	30	0.12
Paderewski 1930		60	0.33	35	0.00	71	0.04	52	0.04	41	0.10	55	0.06
Perlemuter 1992		84	0.23	89	0.00	78	0.03	77	0.03	79	0.03	68	0.03
Pierdomenico 2008		78	0.28	79	0.00	67	0.03	59	0.03	69	0.03	69	0.03
Poblocka 1999		14	0.55	80	0.00	10	0.13	11	0.43	26	0.28	11	0.35
Rabcewiczowa 1932		67	0.31	34	0.00	56	0.03	60	0.03	45	0.07	57	0.05
Rachmaninoff 1923		43	0.39	53	0.00	28	0.08	27	0.20	51	0.04	42	0.09
Rangell 2001		54	0.35	69	0.00	73	0.02	80	0.02	25	0.22	52	0.07
Richter 1976		62	0.32	73	0.00	66	0.03	61	0.03	56	0.04	76	0.03
Rosen 1989		46	0.38	18	0.00	72	0.03	72	0.03	55	0.04	81	0.03
Rosenthal 1930		33	0.42	54	0.00	57	0.04	54	0.04	64	0.03	79	0.03
Rosenthal 1931		59	0.33	70	0.00	83	0.03	64	0.03	63	0.04	78	0.03
Rosenthal 1931b		57	0.34	84	0.00	82	0.02	82	0.02	65	0.04	84	0.03
Rosenthal 1931c		53	0.36	61	0.00	81	0.02	85	0.02	81	0.03	90	0.02
Rosenthal 1931d		70	0.30	81	0.00	79	0.02	79	0.02	34	0.14	60	0.05
Rossi 2007		90	-0.15	86	0.00	89	0.02	89	0.02	86	0.02	86	0.02
Rubinstein 1939		24	0.48	56	0.00	29	0.06	41	0.10	18	0.40	24	0.20
Rubinstein 1952		86	0.22	74	0.00	80	0.02	84	0.02	36	0.14	61	0.05
Rubinstein 1966		16	0.53	24	0.00	44	0.04	43	0.07	34	0.18	32	0.11
Schilhawsky 1960		27	0.46	29	0.00	18	0.07	17	0.38	33	0.21	21	0.28
Shebanova 2002		38	0.40	46	0.00	49	0.04	51	0.04	31	0.24	38	0.10
Smith 1975		29	0.45	71	0.00	22	0.08	13	0.40	51	0.05	29	0.14
Sokolov 2002		12	0.57	11	0.00	11	0.11	20	0.36	30	0.28	13	0.32
Sztompka 1959		37	0.40	43	0.00	58	0.04	45	0.04	50	0.06	58	0.05
Tomsic 1995		30	0.44	4	0.01	59	0.03	62	0.03	59	0.04	74	0.03
Uninsky 1932		55	0.34	87	0.00	39	0.05	34	0.13	43	0.12	31	0.12
Uninsky 1971		28	0.46	21	0.00	25	0.10	19	0.36	34	0.23	18	0.29
Wasowski 1980		36	0.40	7	0.00	27	0.08	26	0.23	64	0.04	36	0.10
Zak 1937		35	0.40	62	0.00	46	0.03	57	0.03	47	0.06	65	0.04
Zak 1951		52	0.36	77	0.00	33	0.05	37	0.12	53	0.05	45	0.08
Random 1		89	-0.05	78	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	69	0.03	88	0.02
Random 2		88	0.02	88	0.00	87	0.02	81	0.02	6	0.46	39	0.10
Random 3		76	0.28	16	0.00	86	0.02	88	0.02	20	0.29	47	0.08

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).