Garcia 2007

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		71	0.27	22	0.01	76	0.02	83	0.02	82	0.02	84	0.02
Anderszewski 2003		4	0.49	3	0.05	5	0.15	4	0.51	30	0.22	4	0.33
Ashkenazy 1981		8	0.48	5	0.05	7	0.12	6	0.48	42	0.11	6	0.23
Bacha 2000		21	0.43	54	0.00	40	0.07	35	0.20	59	0.04	30	0.09
Badura 1965		86	0.13	77	0.00	81	0.03	74	0.03	85	0.02	85	0.02
Barbosa 1983		74	0.24	25	0.01	49	0.05	49	0.05	80	0.02	68	0.03
Biret 1990		3	0.51	8	0.02	15	0.07	24	0.29	57	0.04	23	0.11
Blet 2003		29	0.39	9	0.02	34	0.06	39	0.16	73	0.03	40	0.07
Block 1995		7	0.48	4	0.05	3	0.17	3	0.52	32	0.21	5	0.33
Blumental 1952		49	0.35	21	0.01	22	0.07	31	0.22	45	0.06	22	0.11
Boshniakovich 1969		9	0.47	16	0.01	11	0.07	13	0.39	47	0.06	12	0.15
Brailowsky 1960		6	0.49	20	0.01	23	0.06	27	0.25	59	0.04	24	0.10
Bunin 1987		13	0.46	55	0.00	25	0.06	18	0.34	72	0.03	29	0.10
Bunin 1987b		12	0.46	63	0.00	26	0.07	19	0.34	72	0.03	26	0.10
Chiu 1999		56	0.32	23	0.01	42	0.06	42	0.12	53	0.05	35	0.08
Cohen 1997		84	0.15	34	0.00	83	0.03	76	0.03	81	0.02	87	0.02
Cortot 1951		41	0.37	29	0.00	24	0.06	34	0.21	45	0.08	15	0.13
Csalog 1996		87	0.12	53	0.00	86	0.01	88	0.01	65	0.03	82	0.02
Czerny 1949		75	0.23	74	0.00	74	0.03	77	0.03	79	0.03	70	0.03
Czerny 1990		45	0.36	81	0.00	56	0.04	53	0.04	65	0.04	56	0.04
Duchoud 2007		16	0.45	44	0.00	27	0.06	17	0.34	61	0.04	17	0.12
Ezaki 2006		34	0.38	45	0.00	61	0.04	57	0.04	79	0.03	59	0.03
Falvay 1989		70	0.27	13	0.01	58	0.04	52	0.04	77	0.03	60	0.03
Farrell 1958		5	0.49	75	0.00	14	0.07	8	0.46	46	0.06	8	0.17
Ferenczy 1958		28	0.40	14	0.01	44	0.05	44	0.11	45	0.06	37	0.08
Fliere 1977		18	0.44	48	0.00	45	0.05	46	0.05	66	0.04	49	0.04
Fou 1978		64	0.30	83	0.00	79	0.02	82	0.02	84	0.02	80	0.02
Francois 1956		82	0.16	78	0.00	77	0.03	79	0.03	85	0.02	88	0.02
Friedman 1923		79	0.20	49	0.00	71	0.04	59	0.04	70	0.05	58	0.04
Friedman 1923b		77	0.22	41	0.00	69	0.03	67	0.03	56	0.05	55	0.04
Friedman 1930		83	0.16	64	0.00	63	0.03	78	0.03	50	0.05	53	0.04
Garcia 2007		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Garcia 2007b		1	0.53	1	0.36	1	0.36	1	0.68	1	0.62	1	0.65
Gierzod 1998		48	0.36	82	0.00	54	0.04	60	0.04	67	0.03	71	0.03
Gornostaeva 1994		46	0.36	85	0.00	64	0.03	75	0.03	77	0.03	74	0.03
Groot 1988		53	0.33	27	0.00	55	0.04	55	0.04	62	0.04	57	0.04
Harasiewicz 1955		43	0.37	19	0.01	10	0.08	7	0.47	74	0.03	18	0.12
Hatto 1993		57	0.32	66	0.00	50	0.04	61	0.04	42	0.09	47	0.06
Hatto 1997		59	0.32	58	0.00	57	0.05	51	0.05	76	0.03	54	0.04
Horowitz 1949		60	0.31	67	0.00	38	0.06	33	0.21	66	0.04	32	0.09
Indjic 1988		58	0.32	50	0.00	51	0.03	69	0.03	52	0.04	67	0.03
Kapell 1951		33	0.38	47	0.00	35	0.05	28	0.25	61	0.04	25	0.10
Kissin 1993		67	0.28	79	0.00	80	0.03	72	0.03	72	0.03	66	0.03
Kushner 1989		20	0.43	10	0.02	9	0.10	32	0.21	68	0.03	36	0.08
Luisada 1991		2	0.52	15	0.01	12	0.08	14	0.38	44	0.11	7	0.20
Lushtak 2004		23	0.42	84	0.00	32	0.06	29	0.25	84	0.02	41	0.07
Malcuzynski 1961		38	0.37	80	0.00	66	0.04	64	0.04	79	0.03	63	0.03
Magaloff 1978		42	0.37	18	0.01	47	0.05	48	0.05	54	0.04	50	0.04
Magin 1975		26	0.40	90	0.00	46	0.08	45	0.08	48	0.05	43	0.06
Michalowski 1933		40	0.37	36	0.00	6	0.12	2	0.53	33	0.29	2	0.39
Milkina 1970		63	0.30	42	0.00	75	0.04	66	0.04	83	0.03	62	0.03
Mohovich 1999		17	0.44	33	0.00	31	0.05	36	0.19	87	0.02	46	0.06
Moravec 1969		78	0.21	89	0.00	52	0.03	71	0.03	89	0.02	77	0.02
Morozova 2008		25	0.41	46	0.00	30	0.06	21	0.30	69	0.03	33	0.09
Neighaus 1950		24	0.42	76	0.00	39	0.07	30	0.24	83	0.02	42	0.07
Niedzielski 1931		52	0.34	2	0.15	2	0.21	11	0.40	13	0.35	3	0.37
Ohlsson 1999		32	0.38	65	0.00	60	0.04	62	0.04	81	0.03	65	0.03
Osinska 1989		72	0.26	60	0.00	82	0.02	80	0.02	85	0.02	78	0.02
Pachmann 1927		81	0.17	56	0.00	78	0.02	81	0.02	72	0.03	81	0.02
Paderewski 1930		68	0.28	51	0.00	73	0.04	54	0.04	79	0.02	64	0.03
Perlemuter 1992		11	0.46	6	0.03	4	0.16	5	0.50	50	0.05	9	0.16
Pierdomenico 2008		47	0.36	31	0.00	62	0.05	50	0.05	76	0.03	51	0.04
Poblocka 1999		22	0.43	11	0.02	33	0.06	38	0.17	76	0.03	39	0.07
Rabcewiczowa 1932		66	0.29	72	0.00	72	0.04	58	0.04	67	0.03	61	0.03
Rachmaninoff 1923		44	0.37	26	0.00	28	0.06	23	0.29	57	0.04	19	0.11
Rangell 2001		35	0.38	43	0.00	65	0.03	70	0.03	77	0.03	75	0.03
Richter 1976		36	0.38	24	0.01	29	0.08	26	0.26	59	0.04	27	0.10
Rosen 1989		54	0.33	32	0.00	67	0.03	68	0.03	81	0.03	73	0.03
Rosenthal 1930		61	0.31	70	0.00	68	0.03	73	0.03	70	0.03	72	0.03
Rosenthal 1931		55	0.33	86	0.00	53	0.04	63	0.04	57	0.04	52	0.04
Rosenthal 1931b		31	0.39	59	0.00	37	0.05	37	0.18	47	0.05	34	0.09
Rosenthal 1931c		65	0.29	71	0.00	70	0.04	65	0.04	73	0.03	76	0.03
Rosenthal 1931d		37	0.38	38	0.00	48	0.05	47	0.05	53	0.05	48	0.05
Rossi 2007		76	0.23	69	0.00	17	0.08	40	0.13	36	0.12	16	0.12
Rubinstein 1939		85	0.14	37	0.00	85	0.02	85	0.02	76	0.03	79	0.02
Rubinstein 1952		80	0.19	39	0.00	87	0.01	87	0.01	84	0.02	90	0.01
Rubinstein 1966		73	0.25	17	0.01	84	0.02	84	0.02	85	0.02	83	0.02
Schilhawsky 1960		27	0.40	7	0.02	8	0.11	9	0.44	54	0.05	11	0.15
Shebanova 2002		51	0.34	12	0.01	59	0.04	56	0.04	81	0.03	69	0.03
Smith 1975		15	0.45	87	0.00	16	0.08	10	0.40	70	0.03	20	0.11
Sokolov 2002		10	0.47	68	0.00	13	0.07	12	0.40	54	0.04	13	0.13
Sztompka 1959		39	0.37	40	0.00	36	0.06	25	0.27	69	0.04	28	0.10
Tomsic 1995		30	0.39	35	0.00	41	0.06	41	0.13	82	0.03	44	0.06
Uninsky 1932		19	0.43	30	0.00	21	0.08	15	0.36	45	0.07	10	0.16
Uninsky 1971		14	0.45	28	0.00	20	0.06	16	0.35	48	0.05	14	0.13
Wasowski 1980		69	0.28	62	0.00	43	0.05	43	0.11	60	0.04	38	0.07
Zak 1937		50	0.34	73	0.00	18	0.06	20	0.31	67	0.04	21	0.11
Zak 1951		62	0.31	61	0.00	19	0.06	22	0.29	73	0.03	31	0.09
Random 1		88	0.02	88	0.00	88	0.01	86	0.01	19	0.32	45	0.06
Random 2		90	-0.20	57	0.00	89	0.01	89	0.01	80	0.02	89	0.01
Random 3		89	0.01	52	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	49	0.05	86	0.02

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).