Ferenczy 1958

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		19	0.62	44	0.00	31	0.07	26	0.30	45	0.07	31	0.14
Anderszewski 2003		30	0.55	7	0.02	10	0.12	16	0.40	34	0.18	18	0.27
Ashkenazy 1981		33	0.55	56	0.00	25	0.09	20	0.38	35	0.16	21	0.25
Bacha 2000		45	0.48	35	0.00	68	0.03	69	0.03	53	0.05	50	0.04
Badura 1965		68	0.37	43	0.00	48	0.05	47	0.05	65	0.04	55	0.04
Barbosa 1983		35	0.54	71	0.00	26	0.08	33	0.26	34	0.25	19	0.25
Biret 1990		20	0.62	59	0.00	30	0.06	21	0.38	42	0.12	24	0.21
Blet 2003		5	0.69	75	0.00	18	0.09	14	0.41	25	0.25	13	0.32
Block 1995		56	0.42	57	0.00	67	0.03	70	0.03	76	0.03	72	0.03
Blumental 1952		69	0.37	29	0.00	12	0.09	31	0.26	19	0.24	20	0.25
Boshniakovich 1969		67	0.38	83	0.00	85	0.02	84	0.02	86	0.02	84	0.02
Brailowsky 1960		51	0.46	9	0.02	63	0.03	65	0.03	64	0.04	61	0.03
Bunin 1987		10	0.66	16	0.01	15	0.08	7	0.49	29	0.27	11	0.36
Bunin 1987b		11	0.66	40	0.00	17	0.08	8	0.49	31	0.27	10	0.36
Chiu 1999		84	0.20	78	0.00	86	0.02	82	0.02	83	0.03	75	0.02
Cohen 1997		71	0.36	13	0.01	46	0.04	55	0.04	48	0.05	56	0.04
Cortot 1951		4	0.71	3	0.07	4	0.29	6	0.51	5	0.50	4	0.50
Csalog 1996		50	0.47	23	0.01	61	0.03	66	0.03	48	0.06	51	0.04
Czerny 1949		21	0.61	53	0.00	20	0.10	18	0.40	37	0.19	16	0.28
Czerny 1990		16	0.63	32	0.00	22	0.09	19	0.38	40	0.11	25	0.20
Duchoud 2007		18	0.62	84	0.00	24	0.09	17	0.40	37	0.19	17	0.28
Ezaki 2006		7	0.68	8	0.02	16	0.08	11	0.44	45	0.06	28	0.16
Falvay 1989		31	0.55	21	0.01	43	0.04	43	0.09	66	0.04	44	0.06
Farrell 1958		27	0.59	26	0.01	40	0.05	39	0.16	53	0.04	38	0.08
Ferenczy 1958		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Fliere 1977		37	0.52	90	0.00	58	0.04	56	0.04	75	0.03	60	0.03
Fou 1978		70	0.36	28	0.00	82	0.02	83	0.02	83	0.02	77	0.02
Francois 1956		28	0.58	24	0.01	34	0.10	34	0.24	52	0.05	33	0.11
Friedman 1923		88	0.07	70	0.00	50	0.04	52	0.04	44	0.11	43	0.07
Friedman 1923b		87	0.08	54	0.00	49	0.05	49	0.05	44	0.11	42	0.07
Friedman 1930		79	0.28	50	0.00	36	0.06	38	0.17	55	0.05	37	0.09
Garcia 2007		65	0.40	30	0.00	51	0.06	45	0.06	44	0.11	39	0.08
Garcia 2007b		85	0.16	58	0.00	54	0.04	58	0.04	55	0.04	58	0.04
Gierzod 1998		32	0.55	66	0.00	42	0.04	40	0.12	65	0.03	45	0.06
Gornostaeva 1994		43	0.49	27	0.00	66	0.03	68	0.03	81	0.02	85	0.02
Groot 1988		23	0.61	22	0.01	29	0.06	35	0.23	65	0.03	40	0.08
Harasiewicz 1955		73	0.35	34	0.00	41	0.04	42	0.10	77	0.03	49	0.05
Hatto 1993		72	0.35	49	0.00	38	0.09	37	0.18	33	0.16	27	0.17
Hatto 1997		47	0.48	25	0.01	13	0.10	25	0.31	25	0.28	15	0.29
Horowitz 1949		76	0.31	36	0.00	78	0.02	80	0.02	78	0.03	79	0.02
Indjic 1988		66	0.39	76	0.00	37	0.06	36	0.18	31	0.16	26	0.17
Kapell 1951		1	0.85	1	0.48	1	0.47	1	0.65	4	0.55	2	0.60
Kissin 1993		59	0.41	79	0.00	79	0.02	88	0.02	77	0.03	81	0.02
Kushner 1989		41	0.50	85	0.00	71	0.04	54	0.04	78	0.03	67	0.03
Luisada 1991		49	0.47	52	0.00	56	0.04	50	0.04	79	0.03	59	0.03
Lushtak 2004		15	0.64	45	0.00	11	0.16	10	0.45	49	0.06	29	0.16
Malcuzynski 1961		36	0.53	86	0.00	70	0.03	64	0.03	78	0.03	69	0.03
Magaloff 1978		54	0.45	65	0.00	75	0.03	76	0.03	80	0.03	63	0.03
Magin 1975		81	0.25	73	0.00	88	0.02	85	0.02	89	0.01	89	0.01
Michalowski 1933		53	0.46	19	0.01	8	0.15	12	0.44	15	0.43	6	0.43
Milkina 1970		46	0.48	48	0.00	76	0.02	81	0.02	82	0.03	78	0.02
Mohovich 1999		13	0.64	10	0.01	27	0.07	24	0.33	72	0.03	34	0.10
Moravec 1969		38	0.52	18	0.01	47	0.04	59	0.04	37	0.13	41	0.07
Morozova 2008		52	0.46	46	0.00	45	0.05	48	0.05	73	0.03	53	0.04
Neighaus 1950		44	0.49	61	0.00	52	0.05	46	0.05	78	0.03	57	0.04
Niedzielski 1931		62	0.40	72	0.00	65	0.03	73	0.03	77	0.02	76	0.02
Ohlsson 1999		26	0.59	69	0.00	35	0.07	30	0.27	70	0.03	36	0.09
Osinska 1989		24	0.60	11	0.01	32	0.10	29	0.28	36	0.16	23	0.21
Pachmann 1927		75	0.32	88	0.00	80	0.02	87	0.02	80	0.03	80	0.02
Paderewski 1930		8	0.67	87	0.00	21	0.13	23	0.36	10	0.39	9	0.37
Perlemuter 1992		34	0.54	63	0.00	33	0.07	32	0.26	64	0.03	35	0.09
Pierdomenico 2008		64	0.40	89	0.00	73	0.03	67	0.03	74	0.03	65	0.03
Poblocka 1999		2	0.81	4	0.04	2	0.31	2	0.64	3	0.57	1	0.60
Rabcewiczowa 1932		22	0.61	31	0.00	19	0.08	15	0.41	21	0.35	8	0.38
Rachmaninoff 1923		74	0.35	41	0.00	59	0.04	51	0.04	82	0.03	64	0.03
Rangell 2001		57	0.42	80	0.00	84	0.03	74	0.03	84	0.02	86	0.02
Richter 1976		25	0.59	2	0.07	5	0.18	13	0.41	24	0.21	14	0.29
Rosen 1989		58	0.42	77	0.00	77	0.02	79	0.02	75	0.03	83	0.02
Rosenthal 1930		39	0.52	37	0.00	44	0.04	44	0.08	77	0.03	47	0.05
Rosenthal 1931		78	0.31	38	0.00	60	0.04	62	0.04	82	0.02	71	0.03
Rosenthal 1931b		82	0.24	62	0.00	83	0.03	77	0.03	86	0.02	88	0.02
Rosenthal 1931c		42	0.49	33	0.00	53	0.04	60	0.04	72	0.03	73	0.03
Rosenthal 1931d		77	0.31	47	0.00	81	0.02	86	0.02	86	0.02	87	0.02
Rossi 2007		83	0.20	39	0.00	55	0.04	57	0.04	73	0.03	62	0.03
Rubinstein 1939		80	0.26	14	0.01	62	0.03	71	0.03	64	0.04	66	0.03
Rubinstein 1952		63	0.40	60	0.00	64	0.03	63	0.03	67	0.03	74	0.03
Rubinstein 1966		29	0.56	12	0.01	57	0.04	53	0.04	64	0.04	52	0.04
Schilhawsky 1960		9	0.66	74	0.00	7	0.17	5	0.52	13	0.38	5	0.44
Shebanova 2002		55	0.45	64	0.00	72	0.04	61	0.04	68	0.04	54	0.04
Smith 1975		6	0.68	5	0.03	6	0.19	4	0.56	35	0.19	12	0.33
Sokolov 2002		12	0.65	55	0.00	23	0.09	22	0.37	49	0.05	30	0.14
Sztompka 1959		3	0.77	6	0.02	3	0.23	3	0.60	11	0.46	3	0.53
Tomsic 1995		14	0.64	17	0.01	28	0.07	28	0.28	49	0.04	32	0.11
Uninsky 1932		48	0.47	67	0.00	14	0.09	27	0.30	35	0.20	22	0.24
Uninsky 1971		17	0.63	20	0.01	9	0.16	9	0.48	26	0.36	7	0.42
Wasowski 1980		40	0.51	51	0.00	39	0.05	41	0.10	76	0.03	46	0.05
Zak 1937		61	0.40	81	0.00	74	0.03	72	0.03	80	0.03	68	0.03
Zak 1951		60	0.41	15	0.01	69	0.03	75	0.03	81	0.03	70	0.03
Random 1		90	-0.21	68	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	84	0.02	90	0.01
Random 2		89	-0.17	82	0.00	89	0.02	89	0.02	61	0.03	82	0.02
Random 3		86	0.08	42	0.00	87	0.02	78	0.02	39	0.12	48	0.05

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).