Farrell 1958

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		48	0.56	25	0.01	76	0.03	82	0.03	78	0.03	80	0.03
Anderszewski 2003		52	0.54	80	0.00	51	0.06	45	0.06	62	0.03	61	0.04
Ashkenazy 1981		39	0.58	66	0.00	58	0.03	73	0.03	81	0.03	81	0.03
Bacha 2000		8	0.68	79	0.00	54	0.04	66	0.04	29	0.22	33	0.09
Badura 1965		84	0.28	75	0.00	85	0.03	84	0.03	80	0.02	87	0.02
Barbosa 1983		72	0.45	30	0.00	53	0.04	64	0.04	71	0.03	77	0.03
Biret 1990		1	0.77	6	0.03	3	0.23	3	0.50	20	0.28	4	0.37
Blet 2003		38	0.58	76	0.00	62	0.04	54	0.04	63	0.04	62	0.04
Block 1995		50	0.55	4	0.04	6	0.13	8	0.31	23	0.28	7	0.29
Blumental 1952		74	0.43	17	0.01	37	0.05	42	0.11	26	0.18	17	0.14
Boshniakovich 1969		14	0.65	36	0.00	7	0.15	4	0.44	8	0.43	3	0.43
Brailowsky 1960		17	0.64	7	0.03	32	0.06	27	0.20	45	0.07	20	0.12
Bunin 1987		25	0.61	47	0.00	34	0.05	30	0.18	46	0.05	36	0.09
Bunin 1987b		23	0.62	38	0.00	35	0.06	29	0.18	48	0.05	34	0.09
Chiu 1999		71	0.47	62	0.00	25	0.05	25	0.21	47	0.06	24	0.11
Cohen 1997		79	0.39	77	0.00	55	0.04	68	0.04	30	0.24	31	0.10
Cortot 1951		19	0.63	48	0.00	30	0.06	19	0.23	32	0.23	10	0.23
Csalog 1996		68	0.48	34	0.00	87	0.03	72	0.03	71	0.03	78	0.03
Czerny 1949		57	0.53	59	0.00	59	0.04	55	0.04	45	0.07	56	0.05
Czerny 1990		44	0.57	81	0.00	70	0.03	74	0.03	72	0.03	82	0.03
Duchoud 2007		22	0.62	49	0.00	66	0.04	50	0.04	56	0.04	67	0.04
Ezaki 2006		47	0.56	29	0.01	67	0.03	71	0.03	82	0.02	85	0.02
Falvay 1989		29	0.61	15	0.01	13	0.06	15	0.27	45	0.06	18	0.13
Farrell 1958		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Ferenczy 1958		36	0.59	46	0.00	65	0.04	53	0.04	39	0.16	42	0.08
Fliere 1977		3	0.69	71	0.00	15	0.05	14	0.28	55	0.05	19	0.12
Fou 1978		56	0.53	27	0.01	44	0.05	44	0.09	66	0.05	47	0.07
Francois 1956		45	0.57	21	0.01	39	0.05	34	0.13	68	0.04	51	0.07
Friedman 1923		86	0.22	73	0.00	74	0.03	70	0.03	42	0.13	54	0.06
Friedman 1923b		85	0.24	87	0.00	73	0.03	69	0.03	41	0.16	49	0.07
Friedman 1930		83	0.28	82	0.00	60	0.04	60	0.04	49	0.05	64	0.04
Garcia 2007		66	0.49	74	0.00	47	0.06	46	0.06	8	0.46	15	0.17
Garcia 2007b		80	0.38	2	0.09	4	0.10	7	0.33	2	0.60	2	0.44
Gierzod 1998		5	0.69	14	0.01	20	0.05	28	0.18	54	0.04	43	0.08
Gornostaeva 1994		11	0.66	10	0.02	12	0.07	20	0.23	32	0.19	11	0.21
Groot 1988		6	0.68	72	0.00	24	0.05	17	0.26	66	0.03	37	0.09
Harasiewicz 1955		81	0.36	88	0.00	27	0.05	23	0.23	67	0.03	44	0.08
Hatto 1993		78	0.41	90	0.00	83	0.03	83	0.03	57	0.03	83	0.03
Hatto 1997		62	0.50	56	0.00	72	0.04	59	0.04	73	0.03	79	0.03
Horowitz 1949		28	0.61	20	0.01	26	0.05	11	0.29	35	0.14	12	0.20
Indjic 1988		73	0.43	89	0.00	84	0.04	56	0.04	61	0.03	76	0.03
Kapell 1951		10	0.67	43	0.00	36	0.05	26	0.21	42	0.14	14	0.17
Kissin 1993		70	0.47	33	0.00	78	0.02	87	0.02	76	0.03	86	0.02
Kushner 1989		24	0.61	69	0.00	68	0.04	61	0.04	72	0.03	73	0.03
Luisada 1991		27	0.61	22	0.01	38	0.05	33	0.13	51	0.05	38	0.08
Lushtak 2004		43	0.57	28	0.01	10	0.07	16	0.27	70	0.03	35	0.09
Malcuzynski 1961		4	0.69	64	0.00	42	0.06	39	0.11	52	0.04	48	0.07
Magaloff 1978		9	0.67	83	0.00	19	0.06	13	0.29	55	0.04	25	0.11
Magin 1975		76	0.42	67	0.00	86	0.03	79	0.03	70	0.03	72	0.03
Michalowski 1933		82	0.32	50	0.00	50	0.05	49	0.05	46	0.07	53	0.06
Milkina 1970		7	0.68	65	0.00	43	0.05	41	0.11	48	0.06	40	0.08
Mohovich 1999		16	0.64	19	0.01	48	0.05	47	0.05	49	0.04	69	0.04
Moravec 1969		42	0.58	37	0.00	64	0.04	62	0.04	54	0.04	57	0.04
Morozova 2008		59	0.53	58	0.00	11	0.08	10	0.29	64	0.04	29	0.11
Neighaus 1950		2	0.75	1	0.35	1	0.34	1	0.63	17	0.43	1	0.52
Niedzielski 1931		33	0.60	53	0.00	45	0.04	57	0.04	12	0.36	21	0.12
Ohlsson 1999		15	0.65	8	0.03	14	0.05	36	0.13	56	0.05	41	0.08
Osinska 1989		18	0.63	9	0.03	8	0.12	6	0.37	27	0.24	6	0.30
Pachmann 1927		64	0.49	18	0.01	40	0.05	37	0.12	43	0.10	28	0.11
Paderewski 1930		26	0.61	26	0.01	9	0.09	9	0.30	15	0.34	5	0.32
Perlemuter 1992		63	0.50	3	0.07	5	0.12	5	0.43	38	0.12	8	0.23
Pierdomenico 2008		53	0.54	31	0.00	49	0.05	48	0.05	45	0.05	55	0.05
Poblocka 1999		12	0.66	35	0.00	41	0.05	38	0.11	49	0.04	45	0.07
Rabcewiczowa 1932		41	0.58	42	0.00	18	0.06	21	0.23	27	0.23	9	0.23
Rachmaninoff 1923		65	0.49	24	0.01	31	0.06	24	0.23	75	0.03	39	0.08
Rangell 2001		31	0.61	51	0.00	17	0.05	43	0.10	52	0.05	50	0.07
Richter 1976		77	0.42	84	0.00	82	0.03	81	0.03	62	0.04	75	0.03
Rosen 1989		20	0.63	16	0.01	16	0.05	35	0.13	37	0.20	16	0.16
Rosenthal 1930		51	0.55	55	0.00	63	0.04	65	0.04	47	0.05	68	0.04
Rosenthal 1931		69	0.48	68	0.00	52	0.04	52	0.04	51	0.05	60	0.04
Rosenthal 1931b		61	0.51	23	0.01	23	0.05	32	0.14	44	0.08	30	0.11
Rosenthal 1931c		46	0.57	45	0.00	56	0.03	76	0.03	59	0.04	84	0.03
Rosenthal 1931d		49	0.55	54	0.00	33	0.05	40	0.11	42	0.10	32	0.10
Rossi 2007		87	0.10	70	0.00	79	0.03	85	0.03	57	0.03	71	0.03
Rubinstein 1939		67	0.49	60	0.00	81	0.03	75	0.03	21	0.37	26	0.11
Rubinstein 1952		58	0.53	61	0.00	80	0.02	86	0.02	48	0.07	70	0.04
Rubinstein 1966		21	0.62	39	0.00	71	0.04	58	0.04	63	0.04	63	0.04
Schilhawsky 1960		34	0.59	13	0.02	21	0.04	12	0.29	59	0.05	23	0.12
Shebanova 2002		54	0.54	44	0.00	77	0.03	80	0.03	59	0.05	66	0.04
Smith 1975		13	0.66	5	0.04	2	0.20	2	0.58	52	0.05	13	0.17
Sokolov 2002		35	0.59	12	0.02	22	0.06	31	0.15	75	0.03	46	0.07
Sztompka 1959		37	0.58	78	0.00	57	0.03	77	0.03	49	0.06	58	0.04
Tomsic 1995		30	0.61	57	0.00	61	0.04	63	0.04	79	0.03	74	0.03
Uninsky 1932		75	0.42	41	0.00	75	0.03	78	0.03	48	0.05	65	0.04
Uninsky 1971		60	0.52	52	0.00	69	0.04	67	0.04	66	0.04	59	0.04
Wasowski 1980		40	0.58	40	0.00	46	0.04	51	0.04	40	0.10	52	0.06
Zak 1937		32	0.61	32	0.00	28	0.05	18	0.24	50	0.06	22	0.12
Zak 1951		55	0.54	11	0.02	29	0.07	22	0.23	58	0.05	27	0.11
Random 1		89	-0.02	63	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	68	0.03	88	0.02
Random 2		90	-0.13	85	0.00	89	0.01	89	0.01	70	0.02	89	0.01
Random 3		88	0.09	86	0.00	88	0.01	88	0.01	75	0.02	90	0.01

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).