Duchoud 2007

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		13	0.70	48	0.00	20	0.09	20	0.41	16	0.34	21	0.37
Anderszewski 2003		14	0.70	14	0.01	12	0.08	12	0.45	8	0.52	9	0.48
Ashkenazy 1981		10	0.72	2	0.08	4	0.14	3	0.52	5	0.51	3	0.51
Bacha 2000		58	0.54	67	0.00	72	0.04	54	0.04	49	0.06	57	0.05
Badura 1965		55	0.55	40	0.00	30	0.07	32	0.25	9	0.49	24	0.35
Barbosa 1983		27	0.64	3	0.06	17	0.15	7	0.48	3	0.52	5	0.50
Biret 1990		3	0.79	17	0.01	5	0.14	2	0.52	2	0.59	2	0.55
Blet 2003		7	0.73	49	0.00	15	0.12	4	0.51	7	0.49	6	0.50
Block 1995		75	0.42	74	0.00	82	0.02	84	0.02	78	0.03	87	0.02
Blumental 1952		80	0.37	62	0.00	65	0.04	62	0.04	46	0.06	62	0.05
Boshniakovich 1969		70	0.44	42	0.00	80	0.03	77	0.03	76	0.03	82	0.03
Brailowsky 1960		68	0.46	89	0.00	83	0.02	87	0.02	75	0.04	73	0.03
Bunin 1987		19	0.67	51	0.00	27	0.10	23	0.40	22	0.36	20	0.38
Bunin 1987b		18	0.67	83	0.00	26	0.06	21	0.41	22	0.36	19	0.38
Chiu 1999		67	0.49	9	0.02	33	0.08	34	0.24	17	0.37	29	0.30
Cohen 1997		85	0.28	22	0.01	76	0.02	79	0.02	56	0.04	83	0.03
Cortot 1951		17	0.67	55	0.00	29	0.10	25	0.37	19	0.38	22	0.37
Csalog 1996		65	0.50	34	0.00	62	0.04	67	0.04	40	0.19	49	0.09
Czerny 1949		42	0.60	25	0.00	40	0.08	36	0.19	42	0.10	39	0.14
Czerny 1990		11	0.71	4	0.05	19	0.10	13	0.44	22	0.27	25	0.34
Duchoud 2007		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Ezaki 2006		6	0.74	10	0.02	16	0.16	6	0.49	14	0.38	15	0.43
Falvay 1989		63	0.52	46	0.00	60	0.03	70	0.03	55	0.04	74	0.03
Farrell 1958		35	0.62	54	0.00	67	0.04	56	0.04	50	0.04	66	0.04
Ferenczy 1958		34	0.62	87	0.00	28	0.09	37	0.19	17	0.40	33	0.28
Fliere 1977		8	0.73	5	0.04	21	0.09	22	0.40	30	0.19	32	0.28
Fou 1978		73	0.42	29	0.00	58	0.03	68	0.03	70	0.04	77	0.03
Francois 1956		31	0.63	79	0.00	43	0.05	41	0.12	51	0.05	53	0.08
Friedman 1923		83	0.33	36	0.00	64	0.04	57	0.04	18	0.41	43	0.13
Friedman 1923b		81	0.34	28	0.00	63	0.04	64	0.04	18	0.41	41	0.13
Friedman 1930		71	0.44	64	0.00	38	0.07	39	0.18	20	0.37	34	0.26
Garcia 2007		69	0.45	50	0.00	50	0.04	61	0.04	17	0.34	44	0.12
Garcia 2007b		86	0.22	84	0.00	78	0.02	81	0.02	54	0.04	85	0.03
Gierzod 1998		22	0.66	68	0.00	34	0.06	35	0.21	40	0.13	38	0.17
Gornostaeva 1994		30	0.63	30	0.00	46	0.05	46	0.05	54	0.04	71	0.04
Groot 1988		46	0.59	56	0.00	73	0.04	52	0.04	71	0.03	84	0.03
Harasiewicz 1955		72	0.42	43	0.00	45	0.06	45	0.06	49	0.05	63	0.05
Hatto 1993		39	0.61	59	0.00	7	0.15	18	0.42	6	0.52	11	0.47
Hatto 1997		20	0.67	6	0.04	2	0.15	9	0.46	6	0.52	7	0.49
Horowitz 1949		74	0.42	81	0.00	77	0.02	78	0.02	60	0.04	78	0.03
Indjic 1988		29	0.63	20	0.01	3	0.14	16	0.43	6	0.52	10	0.47
Kapell 1951		4	0.78	60	0.00	11	0.09	15	0.44	14	0.44	13	0.44
Kissin 1993		66	0.49	24	0.01	55	0.04	66	0.04	44	0.13	55	0.07
Kushner 1989		9	0.72	15	0.01	32	0.08	27	0.31	20	0.33	27	0.32
Luisada 1991		32	0.63	37	0.00	39	0.06	38	0.18	22	0.32	35	0.24
Lushtak 2004		25	0.65	19	0.01	8	0.16	8	0.47	14	0.44	12	0.45
Malcuzynski 1961		21	0.67	32	0.00	47	0.05	50	0.05	49	0.05	59	0.05
Magaloff 1978		44	0.60	26	0.00	53	0.04	58	0.04	46	0.05	65	0.04
Magin 1975		51	0.57	35	0.00	49	0.05	49	0.05	30	0.21	47	0.10
Michalowski 1933		62	0.53	33	0.00	13	0.09	19	0.42	17	0.42	16	0.42
Milkina 1970		43	0.60	65	0.00	59	0.03	73	0.03	51	0.05	68	0.04
Mohovich 1999		45	0.60	44	0.00	54	0.04	55	0.04	60	0.04	70	0.04
Moravec 1969		41	0.60	69	0.00	56	0.04	60	0.04	33	0.18	51	0.08
Morozova 2008		49	0.59	77	0.00	24	0.06	28	0.29	30	0.15	36	0.21
Neighaus 1950		23	0.66	31	0.00	36	0.06	30	0.27	45	0.06	42	0.13
Niedzielski 1931		56	0.55	45	0.00	71	0.03	69	0.03	25	0.23	52	0.08
Ohlsson 1999		1	0.86	1	0.42	1	0.42	1	0.60	1	0.66	1	0.63
Osinska 1989		47	0.59	70	0.00	51	0.04	65	0.04	61	0.04	64	0.04
Pachmann 1927		84	0.31	38	0.00	81	0.02	86	0.02	73	0.03	86	0.02
Paderewski 1930		54	0.55	90	0.00	70	0.03	72	0.03	63	0.03	80	0.03
Perlemuter 1992		59	0.53	78	0.00	44	0.05	43	0.10	43	0.09	48	0.09
Pierdomenico 2008		61	0.53	47	0.00	69	0.03	75	0.03	52	0.04	75	0.03
Poblocka 1999		5	0.75	16	0.01	9	0.09	10	0.46	7	0.50	8	0.48
Rabcewiczowa 1932		33	0.62	82	0.00	37	0.07	33	0.25	18	0.37	30	0.30
Rachmaninoff 1923		28	0.64	11	0.02	25	0.08	29	0.29	16	0.34	28	0.31
Rangell 2001		26	0.64	8	0.03	52	0.04	63	0.04	17	0.29	46	0.11
Richter 1976		64	0.51	75	0.00	61	0.03	76	0.03	78	0.03	79	0.03
Rosen 1989		48	0.59	7	0.04	35	0.05	44	0.10	38	0.20	40	0.14
Rosenthal 1930		40	0.60	72	0.00	66	0.05	48	0.05	38	0.17	50	0.09
Rosenthal 1931		76	0.41	61	0.00	84	0.02	80	0.02	58	0.04	81	0.03
Rosenthal 1931b		79	0.38	63	0.00	85	0.02	82	0.02	69	0.03	89	0.02
Rosenthal 1931c		53	0.56	53	0.00	68	0.04	59	0.04	57	0.04	72	0.04
Rosenthal 1931d		77	0.40	58	0.00	86	0.02	83	0.02	80	0.02	88	0.02
Rossi 2007		87	0.20	88	0.00	74	0.03	71	0.03	40	0.08	58	0.05
Rubinstein 1939		82	0.34	52	0.00	88	0.02	88	0.02	61	0.04	76	0.03
Rubinstein 1952		78	0.39	41	0.00	87	0.02	85	0.02	70	0.03	90	0.02
Rubinstein 1966		52	0.57	23	0.01	75	0.04	53	0.04	69	0.04	69	0.04
Schilhawsky 1960		15	0.69	66	0.00	18	0.13	17	0.43	15	0.38	18	0.40
Shebanova 2002		50	0.58	13	0.01	41	0.05	40	0.13	28	0.28	37	0.19
Smith 1975		16	0.68	39	0.00	14	0.09	14	0.44	16	0.28	23	0.35
Sokolov 2002		2	0.82	21	0.01	6	0.14	5	0.50	4	0.51	4	0.50
Sztompka 1959		24	0.66	76	0.00	31	0.08	26	0.33	29	0.33	26	0.33
Tomsic 1995		37	0.61	86	0.00	42	0.05	42	0.11	48	0.05	54	0.07
Uninsky 1932		36	0.62	73	0.00	22	0.08	24	0.38	13	0.44	17	0.41
Uninsky 1971		12	0.71	12	0.02	10	0.11	11	0.45	13	0.44	14	0.44
Wasowski 1980		38	0.61	27	0.00	23	0.07	31	0.25	15	0.31	31	0.28
Zak 1937		57	0.55	85	0.00	57	0.04	51	0.04	58	0.05	67	0.04
Zak 1951		60	0.53	18	0.01	48	0.05	47	0.05	45	0.06	60	0.05
Random 1		89	0.02	57	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	16	0.35	56	0.06
Random 2		90	0.00	71	0.00	89	0.01	89	0.01	19	0.29	61	0.05
Random 3		88	0.19	80	0.00	79	0.03	74	0.03	9	0.45	45	0.12

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).