Biret 1990

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		15	0.70	24	0.01	30	0.06	26	0.25	27	0.24	28	0.24
Anderszewski 2003		49	0.59	49	0.00	36	0.05	40	0.14	21	0.32	32	0.21
Ashkenazy 1981		21	0.68	39	0.00	10	0.08	7	0.45	13	0.39	9	0.42
Bacha 2000		19	0.69	19	0.01	26	0.08	30	0.19	2	0.56	16	0.33
Badura 1965		79	0.41	58	0.00	67	0.03	77	0.03	68	0.04	80	0.03
Barbosa 1983		53	0.57	62	0.00	13	0.08	15	0.31	8	0.44	12	0.37
Biret 1990		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Blet 2003		26	0.66	57	0.00	45	0.05	47	0.05	42	0.11	53	0.07
Block 1995		69	0.48	87	0.00	83	0.02	80	0.02	71	0.03	88	0.02
Blumental 1952		78	0.42	53	0.00	53	0.04	55	0.04	24	0.21	48	0.09
Boshniakovich 1969		54	0.57	74	0.00	79	0.03	70	0.03	73	0.03	81	0.03
Brailowsky 1960		29	0.64	20	0.01	49	0.04	52	0.04	43	0.10	57	0.06
Bunin 1987		45	0.61	66	0.00	52	0.05	48	0.05	63	0.04	70	0.04
Bunin 1987b		44	0.61	75	0.00	51	0.04	53	0.04	59	0.04	63	0.04
Chiu 1999		52	0.58	5	0.04	7	0.09	5	0.47	7	0.53	5	0.50
Cohen 1997		77	0.42	37	0.00	61	0.04	60	0.04	11	0.43	45	0.13
Cortot 1951		30	0.64	65	0.00	43	0.06	43	0.12	24	0.31	40	0.19
Csalog 1996		37	0.62	70	0.00	46	0.07	45	0.07	14	0.46	41	0.18
Czerny 1949		27	0.66	33	0.00	38	0.05	32	0.19	32	0.24	35	0.21
Czerny 1990		16	0.70	26	0.01	39	0.05	34	0.18	47	0.05	49	0.09
Duchoud 2007		2	0.79	10	0.02	2	0.20	2	0.59	2	0.52	3	0.55
Ezaki 2006		13	0.71	18	0.01	23	0.11	14	0.33	42	0.09	42	0.17
Falvay 1989		40	0.62	6	0.04	16	0.07	19	0.30	30	0.19	27	0.24
Farrell 1958		4	0.77	17	0.01	18	0.06	20	0.28	3	0.50	11	0.37
Ferenczy 1958		41	0.62	63	0.00	35	0.06	42	0.12	21	0.38	34	0.21
Fliere 1977		6	0.76	84	0.00	20	0.07	18	0.30	39	0.13	36	0.20
Fou 1978		63	0.53	42	0.00	48	0.05	46	0.05	48	0.06	58	0.05
Francois 1956		34	0.63	15	0.01	37	0.05	39	0.15	37	0.13	44	0.14
Friedman 1923		87	0.16	77	0.00	87	0.02	87	0.02	76	0.04	87	0.03
Friedman 1923b		86	0.17	78	0.00	86	0.02	79	0.02	76	0.04	82	0.03
Friedman 1930		84	0.31	68	0.00	68	0.03	73	0.03	47	0.05	66	0.04
Garcia 2007		66	0.51	31	0.00	66	0.04	57	0.04	24	0.29	46	0.11
Garcia 2007b		83	0.35	25	0.01	76	0.02	81	0.02	11	0.27	56	0.07
Gierzod 1998		12	0.72	21	0.01	15	0.07	13	0.34	12	0.33	17	0.33
Gornostaeva 1994		14	0.71	7	0.04	44	0.06	44	0.11	33	0.19	43	0.14
Groot 1988		46	0.61	71	0.00	70	0.03	76	0.03	86	0.02	90	0.02
Harasiewicz 1955		82	0.37	64	0.00	55	0.04	56	0.04	69	0.03	84	0.03
Hatto 1993		65	0.51	85	0.00	12	0.08	27	0.24	8	0.45	18	0.33
Hatto 1997		47	0.60	3	0.05	5	0.12	11	0.35	8	0.47	10	0.41
Horowitz 1949		61	0.53	79	0.00	71	0.02	84	0.02	58	0.04	75	0.03
Indjic 1988		60	0.54	59	0.00	9	0.08	23	0.26	8	0.46	14	0.35
Kapell 1951		7	0.75	72	0.00	14	0.07	9	0.43	20	0.42	8	0.42
Kissin 1993		58	0.55	46	0.00	58	0.04	54	0.04	51	0.05	65	0.04
Kushner 1989		8	0.73	54	0.00	41	0.07	35	0.16	35	0.22	39	0.19
Luisada 1991		17	0.70	2	0.08	6	0.08	10	0.39	4	0.46	7	0.42
Lushtak 2004		33	0.63	4	0.04	4	0.12	6	0.46	16	0.40	6	0.43
Malcuzynski 1961		18	0.70	43	0.00	54	0.05	50	0.05	50	0.05	59	0.05
Magaloff 1978		31	0.64	36	0.00	47	0.05	49	0.05	69	0.03	61	0.04
Magin 1975		71	0.47	60	0.00	72	0.03	72	0.03	58	0.04	73	0.03
Michalowski 1933		76	0.43	61	0.00	33	0.05	37	0.16	22	0.39	26	0.25
Milkina 1970		25	0.67	9	0.03	17	0.06	31	0.19	25	0.26	30	0.22
Mohovich 1999		28	0.65	80	0.00	59	0.04	51	0.04	48	0.04	69	0.04
Moravec 1969		36	0.63	69	0.00	31	0.05	36	0.16	16	0.39	25	0.25
Morozova 2008		51	0.58	82	0.00	28	0.06	25	0.25	22	0.18	33	0.21
Neighaus 1950		11	0.72	50	0.00	19	0.06	12	0.34	28	0.31	19	0.32
Niedzielski 1931		56	0.56	27	0.01	74	0.03	68	0.03	28	0.21	51	0.08
Ohlsson 1999		1	0.83	1	0.33	1	0.33	1	0.60	2	0.62	1	0.61
Osinska 1989		5	0.76	23	0.01	8	0.10	3	0.52	1	0.59	2	0.55
Pachmann 1927		73	0.44	45	0.00	69	0.02	83	0.02	63	0.04	77	0.03
Paderewski 1930		59	0.55	14	0.01	65	0.04	63	0.04	51	0.04	64	0.04
Perlemuter 1992		75	0.44	76	0.00	73	0.03	71	0.03	72	0.03	71	0.03
Pierdomenico 2008		32	0.63	40	0.00	42	0.06	41	0.13	16	0.32	37	0.20
Poblocka 1999		3	0.78	16	0.01	3	0.12	4	0.49	5	0.53	4	0.51
Rabcewiczowa 1932		23	0.68	12	0.02	21	0.08	17	0.30	12	0.44	13	0.36
Rachmaninoff 1923		64	0.52	35	0.00	56	0.04	59	0.04	61	0.04	62	0.04
Rangell 2001		24	0.67	22	0.01	50	0.04	58	0.04	41	0.12	55	0.07
Richter 1976		72	0.45	51	0.00	75	0.03	65	0.03	58	0.04	76	0.03
Rosen 1989		9	0.73	28	0.01	40	0.06	33	0.18	13	0.46	22	0.29
Rosenthal 1930		57	0.56	67	0.00	78	0.03	69	0.03	51	0.04	79	0.03
Rosenthal 1931		81	0.39	73	0.00	84	0.02	86	0.02	61	0.04	78	0.03
Rosenthal 1931b		80	0.41	83	0.00	82	0.02	85	0.02	62	0.04	85	0.03
Rosenthal 1931c		68	0.50	86	0.00	80	0.03	74	0.03	64	0.03	86	0.03
Rosenthal 1931d		70	0.47	47	0.00	81	0.02	82	0.02	49	0.05	83	0.03
Rossi 2007		85	0.22	55	0.00	85	0.03	75	0.03	70	0.03	72	0.03
Rubinstein 1939		74	0.44	52	0.00	77	0.03	78	0.03	24	0.36	47	0.10
Rubinstein 1952		62	0.53	32	0.00	62	0.04	61	0.04	32	0.20	50	0.09
Rubinstein 1966		39	0.62	81	0.00	63	0.03	66	0.03	39	0.15	54	0.07
Schilhawsky 1960		50	0.59	88	0.00	22	0.08	16	0.31	24	0.29	20	0.30
Shebanova 2002		20	0.69	29	0.01	29	0.07	21	0.27	21	0.42	15	0.34
Smith 1975		22	0.68	13	0.02	11	0.09	8	0.43	30	0.20	21	0.29
Sokolov 2002		10	0.72	34	0.00	32	0.05	28	0.22	34	0.25	29	0.23
Sztompka 1959		48	0.60	44	0.00	60	0.04	62	0.04	42	0.14	52	0.07
Tomsic 1995		38	0.62	56	0.00	57	0.03	64	0.03	69	0.03	74	0.03
Uninsky 1932		67	0.50	41	0.00	64	0.03	67	0.03	53	0.05	67	0.04
Uninsky 1971		42	0.62	30	0.00	34	0.05	38	0.15	30	0.29	31	0.21
Wasowski 1980		43	0.61	38	0.00	27	0.06	29	0.19	5	0.38	24	0.27
Zak 1937		35	0.63	11	0.02	25	0.08	24	0.25	22	0.31	23	0.28
Zak 1951		55	0.57	8	0.03	24	0.06	22	0.26	42	0.15	38	0.20
Random 1		89	-0.04	48	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	63	0.03	89	0.02
Random 2		90	-0.08	89	0.00	89	0.02	89	0.02	43	0.10	68	0.04
Random 3		88	0.13	90	0.00	88	0.02	88	0.02	43	0.11	60	0.05

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).