Badura 1965

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		2	0.65	1	0.27	1	0.27	1	0.63	11	0.37	1	0.48
Anderszewski 2003		68	0.35	22	0.01	73	0.03	70	0.03	74	0.03	77	0.03
Ashkenazy 1981		31	0.53	69	0.00	19	0.11	19	0.37	43	0.11	28	0.20
Bacha 2000		84	0.14	32	0.00	85	0.02	86	0.02	82	0.02	85	0.02
Badura 1965		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Barbosa 1983		24	0.55	83	0.00	30	0.07	24	0.31	30	0.29	15	0.30
Biret 1990		58	0.41	57	0.00	56	0.04	68	0.04	77	0.03	82	0.03
Blet 2003		7	0.61	8	0.03	4	0.15	3	0.60	19	0.34	3	0.45
Block 1995		69	0.35	47	0.00	78	0.03	69	0.03	73	0.03	80	0.03
Blumental 1952		65	0.37	46	0.00	64	0.04	61	0.04	58	0.04	64	0.04
Boshniakovich 1969		18	0.57	15	0.02	31	0.07	30	0.28	27	0.21	20	0.24
Brailowsky 1960		70	0.33	67	0.00	81	0.02	83	0.02	79	0.04	71	0.03
Bunin 1987		36	0.51	59	0.00	36	0.07	37	0.21	55	0.05	41	0.10
Bunin 1987b		35	0.51	65	0.00	37	0.07	36	0.21	54	0.05	38	0.10
Chiu 1999		61	0.40	26	0.01	57	0.05	50	0.05	64	0.04	55	0.04
Cohen 1997		83	0.17	48	0.00	79	0.03	77	0.03	65	0.03	81	0.03
Cortot 1951		17	0.57	4	0.04	20	0.10	20	0.36	22	0.32	12	0.34
Csalog 1996		67	0.36	62	0.00	58	0.04	55	0.04	33	0.25	39	0.10
Czerny 1949		5	0.61	84	0.00	23	0.08	22	0.32	40	0.13	27	0.20
Czerny 1990		3	0.64	74	0.00	11	0.08	8	0.50	43	0.09	24	0.21
Duchoud 2007		23	0.55	30	0.00	9	0.09	9	0.49	32	0.25	10	0.35
Ezaki 2006		1	0.66	7	0.03	3	0.16	4	0.59	29	0.18	13	0.33
Falvay 1989		45	0.49	43	0.00	53	0.04	58	0.04	56	0.04	56	0.04
Farrell 1958		74	0.28	66	0.00	82	0.02	80	0.02	84	0.03	88	0.02
Ferenczy 1958		66	0.37	38	0.00	62	0.04	65	0.04	47	0.05	63	0.04
Fliere 1977		6	0.61	37	0.00	10	0.08	7	0.53	42	0.12	18	0.25
Fou 1978		52	0.44	54	0.00	28	0.06	33	0.22	43	0.12	31	0.16
Francois 1956		33	0.52	58	0.00	46	0.04	52	0.04	62	0.04	69	0.04
Friedman 1923		80	0.20	50	0.00	68	0.04	66	0.04	22	0.34	35	0.12
Friedman 1923b		82	0.20	85	0.00	69	0.04	63	0.04	25	0.32	37	0.11
Friedman 1930		64	0.39	29	0.00	55	0.04	57	0.04	43	0.08	49	0.06
Garcia 2007		85	0.13	75	0.00	83	0.02	85	0.02	74	0.03	89	0.02
Garcia 2007b		88	0.05	76	0.00	89	0.01	89	0.01	87	0.01	90	0.01
Gierzod 1998		47	0.47	36	0.00	51	0.04	56	0.04	69	0.03	79	0.03
Gornostaeva 1994		26	0.54	64	0.00	26	0.06	23	0.32	42	0.10	30	0.18
Groot 1988		32	0.52	34	0.00	42	0.06	43	0.11	50	0.05	47	0.07
Harasiewicz 1955		19	0.57	44	0.00	33	0.06	26	0.31	39	0.14	26	0.21
Hatto 1993		81	0.20	39	0.00	61	0.06	45	0.06	48	0.04	53	0.05
Hatto 1997		78	0.24	41	0.00	60	0.04	62	0.04	70	0.03	78	0.03
Horowitz 1949		56	0.42	63	0.00	65	0.04	67	0.04	71	0.03	76	0.03
Indjic 1988		79	0.21	68	0.00	59	0.05	51	0.05	46	0.05	51	0.05
Kapell 1951		55	0.43	86	0.00	63	0.04	53	0.04	53	0.05	57	0.04
Kissin 1993		22	0.55	31	0.00	27	0.06	25	0.31	42	0.14	22	0.21
Kushner 1989		12	0.60	16	0.02	8	0.08	2	0.60	16	0.36	2	0.46
Luisada 1991		72	0.32	70	0.00	70	0.03	72	0.03	73	0.03	70	0.03
Lushtak 2004		20	0.56	9	0.03	7	0.08	16	0.41	42	0.11	23	0.21
Malcuzynski 1961		13	0.59	35	0.00	12	0.11	5	0.55	39	0.12	17	0.26
Magaloff 1978		48	0.47	52	0.00	52	0.04	60	0.04	67	0.03	73	0.03
Magin 1975		59	0.41	27	0.01	43	0.06	42	0.12	62	0.03	48	0.06
Michalowski 1933		63	0.39	90	0.00	67	0.04	64	0.04	60	0.05	61	0.04
Milkina 1970		51	0.45	82	0.00	49	0.04	54	0.04	65	0.04	58	0.04
Mohovich 1999		38	0.50	89	0.00	48	0.05	48	0.05	63	0.03	66	0.04
Moravec 1969		39	0.50	23	0.01	47	0.05	47	0.05	48	0.04	54	0.04
Morozova 2008		10	0.60	3	0.07	5	0.10	10	0.47	31	0.15	16	0.27
Neighaus 1950		44	0.49	81	0.00	45	0.05	46	0.05	82	0.03	67	0.04
Niedzielski 1931		77	0.26	72	0.00	84	0.02	81	0.02	82	0.02	87	0.02
Ohlsson 1999		30	0.53	51	0.00	39	0.08	31	0.24	45	0.08	33	0.14
Osinska 1989		8	0.60	40	0.00	21	0.08	18	0.38	35	0.16	19	0.25
Pachmann 1927		73	0.29	42	0.00	74	0.03	78	0.03	51	0.05	60	0.04
Paderewski 1930		42	0.49	21	0.01	50	0.04	59	0.04	55	0.04	59	0.04
Perlemuter 1992		21	0.56	55	0.00	34	0.07	27	0.31	33	0.16	21	0.22
Pierdomenico 2008		60	0.41	71	0.00	76	0.03	75	0.03	85	0.02	86	0.02
Poblocka 1999		40	0.49	25	0.01	38	0.08	34	0.22	52	0.04	42	0.09
Rabcewiczowa 1932		43	0.49	79	0.00	66	0.03	71	0.03	55	0.04	75	0.03
Rachmaninoff 1923		37	0.51	19	0.01	32	0.10	32	0.22	50	0.04	43	0.09
Rangell 2001		46	0.48	12	0.02	13	0.08	35	0.22	32	0.20	25	0.21
Richter 1976		54	0.44	5	0.04	24	0.07	38	0.16	35	0.11	34	0.13
Rosen 1989		53	0.44	14	0.02	25	0.06	39	0.15	59	0.04	45	0.08
Rosenthal 1930		25	0.55	10	0.03	6	0.07	15	0.41	17	0.43	6	0.42
Rosenthal 1931		71	0.33	56	0.00	72	0.03	76	0.03	48	0.05	62	0.04
Rosenthal 1931b		76	0.26	61	0.00	77	0.03	73	0.03	57	0.04	84	0.03
Rosenthal 1931c		28	0.53	28	0.00	15	0.07	17	0.40	15	0.39	8	0.39
Rosenthal 1931d		75	0.26	87	0.00	80	0.02	82	0.02	51	0.05	83	0.03
Rossi 2007		62	0.39	80	0.00	75	0.03	79	0.03	65	0.03	72	0.03
Rubinstein 1939		86	0.12	33	0.00	88	0.02	88	0.02	62	0.04	74	0.03
Rubinstein 1952		57	0.41	49	0.00	71	0.03	74	0.03	62	0.05	68	0.04
Rubinstein 1966		50	0.46	20	0.01	29	0.06	29	0.28	23	0.41	11	0.34
Schilhawsky 1960		27	0.54	45	0.00	35	0.08	28	0.29	60	0.04	36	0.11
Shebanova 2002		41	0.49	53	0.00	40	0.06	41	0.13	50	0.06	44	0.09
Smith 1975		9	0.60	18	0.01	16	0.08	13	0.41	48	0.05	32	0.14
Sokolov 2002		14	0.58	6	0.04	17	0.08	14	0.41	28	0.33	9	0.37
Sztompka 1959		15	0.57	13	0.02	22	0.09	21	0.33	30	0.30	14	0.31
Tomsic 1995		16	0.57	2	0.08	2	0.12	6	0.54	21	0.33	5	0.42
Uninsky 1932		4	0.63	24	0.01	14	0.07	11	0.44	19	0.42	4	0.43
Uninsky 1971		11	0.60	11	0.03	18	0.10	12	0.42	27	0.36	7	0.39
Wasowski 1980		29	0.53	17	0.01	41	0.06	40	0.15	22	0.24	29	0.19
Zak 1937		49	0.46	60	0.00	54	0.05	49	0.05	49	0.06	50	0.05
Zak 1951		34	0.51	73	0.00	44	0.05	44	0.09	59	0.05	46	0.07
Random 1		90	-0.06	77	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	32	0.18	65	0.04
Random 2		87	0.06	88	0.00	86	0.02	84	0.02	2	0.49	40	0.10
Random 3		89	-0.01	78	0.00	87	0.02	87	0.02	35	0.14	52	0.05

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).