Bacha 2000

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		37	0.51	55	0.00	64	0.05	52	0.05	77	0.03	60	0.04
Anderszewski 2003		62	0.41	56	0.00	44	0.05	43	0.11	71	0.03	43	0.06
Ashkenazy 1981		24	0.59	35	0.00	23	0.07	15	0.40	60	0.04	23	0.13
Bacha 2000		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Badura 1965		83	0.14	38	0.00	78	0.02	82	0.02	86	0.02	85	0.02
Barbosa 1983		64	0.40	22	0.01	37	0.05	34	0.18	67	0.04	40	0.08
Biret 1990		4	0.69	4	0.07	8	0.15	2	0.56	30	0.19	10	0.33
Blet 2003		47	0.46	75	0.00	76	0.03	77	0.03	80	0.03	72	0.03
Block 1995		26	0.56	53	0.00	17	0.07	28	0.27	24	0.26	15	0.26
Blumental 1952		74	0.31	28	0.01	59	0.04	63	0.04	55	0.04	61	0.04
Boshniakovich 1969		40	0.50	32	0.00	52	0.04	64	0.04	60	0.04	63	0.04
Brailowsky 1960		9	0.66	12	0.02	5	0.11	12	0.47	18	0.36	6	0.41
Bunin 1987		72	0.36	68	0.00	83	0.04	70	0.04	80	0.03	75	0.03
Bunin 1987b		71	0.36	40	0.00	82	0.03	79	0.03	80	0.03	69	0.03
Chiu 1999		41	0.50	17	0.02	6	0.12	6	0.52	16	0.39	4	0.45
Cohen 1997		31	0.53	45	0.00	19	0.09	23	0.31	10	0.43	9	0.37
Cortot 1951		70	0.36	62	0.00	81	0.02	80	0.02	82	0.02	87	0.02
Csalog 1996		5	0.69	20	0.01	20	0.10	9	0.48	12	0.47	3	0.47
Czerny 1949		78	0.28	49	0.00	74	0.03	71	0.03	72	0.03	74	0.03
Czerny 1990		60	0.41	63	0.00	70	0.04	69	0.04	84	0.02	77	0.03
Duchoud 2007		30	0.54	61	0.00	48	0.06	49	0.06	54	0.04	53	0.05
Ezaki 2006		38	0.51	23	0.01	34	0.05	39	0.12	83	0.02	48	0.05
Falvay 1989		11	0.66	8	0.03	9	0.16	3	0.55	34	0.16	11	0.30
Farrell 1958		7	0.68	57	0.00	31	0.06	29	0.22	66	0.04	35	0.09
Ferenczy 1958		44	0.48	21	0.01	62	0.05	53	0.05	69	0.03	59	0.04
Fliere 1977		27	0.56	87	0.00	46	0.07	45	0.07	80	0.03	49	0.05
Fou 1978		20	0.60	18	0.01	24	0.10	16	0.40	52	0.06	18	0.15
Francois 1956		59	0.42	81	0.00	65	0.06	47	0.06	80	0.03	66	0.04
Friedman 1923		88	0.00	76	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	81	0.03	89	0.02
Friedman 1923b		86	0.01	71	0.00	89	0.02	88	0.02	84	0.03	86	0.02
Friedman 1930		87	0.00	89	0.00	86	0.02	81	0.02	85	0.02	83	0.02
Garcia 2007		56	0.43	69	0.00	55	0.04	59	0.04	35	0.20	36	0.09
Garcia 2007b		82	0.18	24	0.01	50	0.04	60	0.04	37	0.10	47	0.06
Gierzod 1998		8	0.67	19	0.01	12	0.10	10	0.47	60	0.04	20	0.14
Gornostaeva 1994		32	0.53	51	0.00	57	0.05	50	0.05	84	0.02	76	0.03
Groot 1988		19	0.61	29	0.01	39	0.06	37	0.14	73	0.03	45	0.06
Harasiewicz 1955		80	0.21	41	0.00	41	0.06	41	0.11	86	0.03	46	0.06
Hatto 1993		50	0.44	64	0.00	15	0.11	27	0.30	44	0.07	21	0.14
Hatto 1997		39	0.50	47	0.00	22	0.07	26	0.31	55	0.03	29	0.10
Horowitz 1949		42	0.49	73	0.00	40	0.05	38	0.14	50	0.05	38	0.08
Indjic 1988		46	0.47	14	0.02	14	0.08	21	0.32	38	0.12	16	0.20
Kapell 1951		35	0.52	37	0.00	63	0.06	46	0.06	62	0.04	51	0.05
Kissin 1993		28	0.56	82	0.00	26	0.06	25	0.31	60	0.04	28	0.11
Kushner 1989		25	0.58	31	0.00	42	0.05	42	0.11	66	0.03	42	0.06
Luisada 1991		15	0.62	2	0.14	2	0.14	1	0.57	15	0.39	2	0.47
Lushtak 2004		48	0.46	58	0.00	29	0.06	32	0.21	75	0.03	41	0.08
Malcuzynski 1961		22	0.60	36	0.00	53	0.05	55	0.05	54	0.04	56	0.04
Magaloff 1978		13	0.63	59	0.00	16	0.07	19	0.37	49	0.04	24	0.12
Magin 1975		49	0.44	83	0.00	43	0.05	44	0.10	59	0.03	50	0.05
Michalowski 1933		84	0.11	25	0.01	61	0.04	66	0.04	71	0.04	57	0.04
Milkina 1970		1	0.73	1	0.14	1	0.14	4	0.53	18	0.37	5	0.44
Mohovich 1999		16	0.62	44	0.00	27	0.06	24	0.31	71	0.03	30	0.10
Moravec 1969		29	0.55	48	0.00	35	0.04	35	0.16	34	0.15	17	0.15
Morozova 2008		77	0.29	26	0.01	36	0.06	40	0.11	77	0.03	44	0.06
Neighaus 1950		18	0.62	11	0.02	25	0.14	18	0.37	62	0.04	25	0.12
Niedzielski 1931		45	0.47	72	0.00	51	0.04	65	0.04	30	0.18	37	0.08
Ohlsson 1999		12	0.64	65	0.00	13	0.08	7	0.51	36	0.16	13	0.29
Osinska 1989		43	0.49	42	0.00	32	0.06	33	0.20	66	0.04	32	0.09
Pachmann 1927		36	0.51	13	0.02	30	0.07	36	0.14	47	0.05	39	0.08
Paderewski 1930		52	0.44	50	0.00	60	0.04	61	0.04	67	0.03	71	0.03
Perlemuter 1992		66	0.38	15	0.02	47	0.05	51	0.05	70	0.03	54	0.04
Pierdomenico 2008		51	0.44	74	0.00	38	0.05	30	0.22	62	0.04	33	0.09
Poblocka 1999		10	0.66	16	0.02	21	0.08	20	0.33	63	0.04	26	0.11
Rabcewiczowa 1932		67	0.38	33	0.00	58	0.06	48	0.06	70	0.03	55	0.04
Rachmaninoff 1923		81	0.21	43	0.00	75	0.03	72	0.03	77	0.03	67	0.03
Rangell 2001		6	0.68	7	0.05	3	0.10	17	0.38	31	0.21	14	0.28
Richter 1976		61	0.41	88	0.00	67	0.03	74	0.03	84	0.03	70	0.03
Rosen 1989		2	0.70	6	0.05	7	0.14	13	0.45	24	0.35	8	0.40
Rosenthal 1930		75	0.31	66	0.00	85	0.02	85	0.02	88	0.01	90	0.01
Rosenthal 1931		69	0.37	84	0.00	73	0.03	73	0.03	79	0.02	82	0.02
Rosenthal 1931b		57	0.43	77	0.00	66	0.05	57	0.05	60	0.04	65	0.04
Rosenthal 1931c		65	0.40	30	0.01	77	0.02	84	0.02	86	0.02	88	0.02
Rosenthal 1931d		34	0.53	85	0.00	54	0.04	62	0.04	57	0.05	64	0.04
Rossi 2007		89	-0.04	70	0.00	79	0.02	87	0.02	77	0.03	79	0.02
Rubinstein 1939		68	0.37	54	0.00	69	0.04	68	0.04	35	0.21	34	0.09
Rubinstein 1952		14	0.63	52	0.00	18	0.07	14	0.42	24	0.40	7	0.41
Rubinstein 1966		21	0.60	39	0.00	49	0.05	54	0.05	62	0.04	58	0.04
Schilhawsky 1960		54	0.43	67	0.00	56	0.05	56	0.05	85	0.02	73	0.03
Shebanova 2002		3	0.69	9	0.03	4	0.11	5	0.52	15	0.47	1	0.49
Smith 1975		55	0.43	78	0.00	45	0.04	58	0.04	67	0.03	68	0.03
Sokolov 2002		58	0.42	34	0.00	71	0.03	78	0.03	83	0.02	78	0.02
Sztompka 1959		73	0.32	90	0.00	84	0.03	76	0.03	80	0.02	80	0.02
Tomsic 1995		17	0.62	5	0.06	28	0.08	22	0.31	65	0.04	27	0.11
Uninsky 1932		79	0.24	27	0.01	80	0.02	86	0.02	81	0.03	84	0.02
Uninsky 1971		63	0.40	46	0.00	72	0.03	75	0.03	84	0.02	81	0.02
Wasowski 1980		53	0.43	60	0.00	33	0.06	31	0.21	58	0.04	31	0.09
Zak 1937		23	0.59	3	0.08	10	0.14	8	0.48	38	0.17	12	0.29
Zak 1951		33	0.53	10	0.02	11	0.14	11	0.47	52	0.05	19	0.15
Random 1		85	0.01	79	0.00	88	0.02	89	0.02	44	0.10	62	0.04
Random 2		90	-0.09	80	0.00	87	0.02	83	0.02	37	0.15	52	0.05
Random 3		76	0.30	86	0.00	68	0.04	67	0.04	10	0.44	22	0.13

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).