Rosenthal 1931d

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		46	0.33	15	0.00	54	0.04	53	0.04	79	0.03	72	0.03
Anderszewski 2003		32	0.37	42	0.00	28	0.08	28	0.19	47	0.04	29	0.09
Ashkenazy 1981		37	0.36	43	0.00	40	0.05	40	0.10	88	0.02	59	0.04
Bacha 2000		30	0.38	34	0.00	57	0.04	67	0.04	76	0.03	61	0.03
Badura 1965		72	0.21	50	0.00	63	0.04	62	0.04	82	0.03	74	0.03
Barbosa 1983		78	0.18	51	0.00	81	0.03	76	0.03	84	0.02	83	0.02
Biret 1990		51	0.33	16	0.00	59	0.04	58	0.04	72	0.04	60	0.04
Blet 2003		70	0.24	67	0.00	74	0.02	81	0.02	87	0.02	85	0.02
Block 1995		15	0.44	52	0.00	19	0.10	22	0.29	42	0.10	11	0.17
Blumental 1952		77	0.19	53	0.00	70	0.04	66	0.04	83	0.02	75	0.03
Boshniakovich 1969		33	0.37	54	0.00	29	0.05	31	0.16	77	0.03	37	0.07
Brailowsky 1960		6	0.56	68	0.00	5	0.19	6	0.55	6	0.51	5	0.53
Bunin 1987		24	0.40	69	0.00	38	0.04	37	0.13	73	0.03	43	0.06
Bunin 1987b		23	0.40	55	0.00	37	0.05	34	0.14	72	0.03	40	0.06
Chiu 1999		71	0.22	44	0.00	51	0.04	55	0.04	59	0.04	52	0.04
Cohen 1997		40	0.36	30	0.00	25	0.08	21	0.29	13	0.41	7	0.34
Cortot 1951		58	0.30	13	0.00	69	0.03	73	0.03	66	0.04	78	0.03
Csalog 1996		76	0.19	70	0.00	88	0.02	89	0.02	82	0.02	84	0.02
Czerny 1949		55	0.31	20	0.00	33	0.05	43	0.08	69	0.03	47	0.05
Czerny 1990		64	0.28	71	0.00	76	0.02	80	0.02	85	0.03	90	0.02
Duchoud 2007		67	0.26	35	0.00	80	0.03	77	0.03	84	0.03	73	0.03
Ezaki 2006		13	0.45	7	0.00	17	0.09	13	0.40	47	0.06	13	0.15
Falvay 1989		17	0.43	36	0.00	12	0.09	18	0.36	61	0.04	19	0.12
Farrell 1958		35	0.36	9	0.00	58	0.05	47	0.05	80	0.03	54	0.04
Ferenczy 1958		60	0.29	8	0.00	71	0.03	78	0.03	62	0.04	71	0.03
Fliere 1977		29	0.39	26	0.00	35	0.06	30	0.18	82	0.03	34	0.07
Fou 1978		14	0.44	37	0.00	13	0.08	9	0.43	51	0.06	12	0.16
Francois 1956		21	0.42	6	0.00	22	0.11	14	0.38	59	0.04	25	0.12
Friedman 1923		86	0.09	72	0.00	73	0.03	70	0.03	46	0.07	49	0.05
Friedman 1923b		85	0.10	73	0.00	72	0.02	79	0.02	70	0.04	76	0.03
Friedman 1930		80	0.16	74	0.00	55	0.04	65	0.04	79	0.03	70	0.03
Garcia 2007		73	0.20	24	0.00	68	0.03	75	0.03	85	0.02	88	0.02
Garcia 2007b		83	0.14	38	0.00	36	0.05	42	0.09	46	0.05	38	0.07
Gierzod 1998		16	0.44	56	0.00	27	0.07	24	0.27	57	0.05	22	0.12
Gornostaeva 1994		7	0.49	4	0.00	14	0.06	15	0.38	52	0.04	23	0.12
Groot 1988		10	0.46	75	0.00	11	0.14	8	0.44	45	0.05	14	0.15
Harasiewicz 1955		45	0.33	57	0.00	16	0.11	17	0.36	51	0.04	24	0.12
Hatto 1993		75	0.19	27	0.00	77	0.03	72	0.03	77	0.03	77	0.03
Hatto 1997		68	0.25	21	0.00	31	0.04	39	0.10	55	0.05	36	0.07
Horowitz 1949		19	0.43	76	0.00	10	0.10	12	0.40	34	0.16	10	0.25
Indjic 1988		74	0.19	58	0.00	78	0.04	68	0.04	79	0.03	69	0.03
Kapell 1951		63	0.28	45	0.00	79	0.03	71	0.03	84	0.02	81	0.02
Kissin 1993		31	0.38	59	0.00	42	0.06	35	0.14	77	0.03	42	0.06
Kushner 1989		12	0.45	77	0.00	20	0.09	23	0.27	76	0.03	28	0.09
Luisada 1991		36	0.36	39	0.00	53	0.04	61	0.04	70	0.04	51	0.04
Lushtak 2004		62	0.28	60	0.00	32	0.05	41	0.09	76	0.03	48	0.05
Malcuzynski 1961		8	0.49	40	0.00	15	0.08	16	0.38	70	0.04	21	0.12
Magaloff 1978		5	0.56	31	0.00	6	0.25	5	0.60	31	0.20	6	0.35
Magin 1975		42	0.35	78	0.00	39	0.04	36	0.14	79	0.03	39	0.06
Michalowski 1933		87	0.06	79	0.00	84	0.03	74	0.03	84	0.03	68	0.03
Milkina 1970		11	0.46	10	0.00	9	0.10	10	0.43	34	0.21	8	0.30
Mohovich 1999		20	0.42	80	0.00	21	0.08	20	0.34	47	0.06	15	0.14
Moravec 1969		27	0.40	22	0.00	47	0.04	52	0.04	59	0.04	50	0.04
Morozova 2008		48	0.33	81	0.00	26	0.07	26	0.26	78	0.03	30	0.09
Neighaus 1950		25	0.40	61	0.00	30	0.05	27	0.22	79	0.03	33	0.08
Niedzielski 1931		59	0.30	41	0.00	62	0.04	63	0.04	70	0.03	65	0.03
Ohlsson 1999		52	0.32	46	0.00	66	0.05	49	0.05	78	0.03	56	0.04
Osinska 1989		53	0.32	47	0.00	64	0.06	45	0.06	70	0.04	44	0.05
Pachmann 1927		65	0.27	62	0.00	45	0.05	46	0.05	54	0.05	45	0.05
Paderewski 1930		47	0.33	63	0.00	65	0.04	59	0.04	80	0.03	67	0.03
Perlemuter 1992		56	0.31	17	0.00	50	0.04	54	0.04	76	0.03	62	0.03
Pierdomenico 2008		50	0.33	82	0.00	34	0.04	29	0.18	61	0.04	32	0.08
Poblocka 1999		61	0.29	83	0.00	82	0.02	82	0.02	84	0.03	80	0.02
Rabcewiczowa 1932		66	0.26	18	0.00	48	0.04	60	0.04	64	0.04	53	0.04
Rachmaninoff 1923		26	0.40	32	0.00	18	0.11	11	0.40	55	0.04	17	0.13
Rangell 2001		9	0.47	12	0.00	8	0.11	19	0.35	46	0.06	16	0.14
Richter 1976		57	0.30	28	0.00	61	0.03	69	0.03	74	0.03	66	0.03
Rosen 1989		18	0.43	25	0.00	24	0.07	25	0.27	56	0.04	26	0.10
Rosenthal 1930		4	0.60	5	0.00	4	0.30	4	0.75	4	0.72	4	0.73
Rosenthal 1931		2	0.86	2	0.00	2	0.90	2	0.97	2	0.97	2	0.97
Rosenthal 1931b		1	0.93	1	0.97	1	0.96	1	0.99	2	0.99	1	0.99
Rosenthal 1931c		3	0.76	3	0.00	3	0.84	3	0.93	3	0.91	3	0.92
Rosenthal 1931d		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Rossi 2007		82	0.15	14	0.00	67	0.04	51	0.04	71	0.03	64	0.03
Rubinstein 1939		49	0.33	33	0.00	23	0.07	33	0.15	9	0.46	9	0.26
Rubinstein 1952		28	0.39	23	0.00	41	0.05	32	0.16	44	0.11	18	0.13
Rubinstein 1966		39	0.36	64	0.00	49	0.05	48	0.05	53	0.06	46	0.05
Schilhawsky 1960		44	0.34	48	0.00	46	0.05	50	0.05	65	0.03	58	0.04
Shebanova 2002		69	0.25	65	0.00	75	0.02	83	0.02	80	0.03	87	0.02
Smith 1975		22	0.41	19	0.00	7	0.20	7	0.50	79	0.03	20	0.12
Sokolov 2002		41	0.36	66	0.00	60	0.04	64	0.04	75	0.03	63	0.03
Sztompka 1959		79	0.17	29	0.00	83	0.02	84	0.02	86	0.02	82	0.02
Tomsic 1995		38	0.36	84	0.00	44	0.04	44	0.08	64	0.04	41	0.06
Uninsky 1932		81	0.15	85	0.00	85	0.02	85	0.02	85	0.02	86	0.02
Uninsky 1971		54	0.31	11	0.00	56	0.04	57	0.04	58	0.04	57	0.04
Wasowski 1980		84	0.14	86	0.00	89	0.02	88	0.02	84	0.03	79	0.02
Zak 1937		43	0.35	87	0.00	52	0.04	56	0.04	74	0.04	55	0.04
Zak 1951		34	0.37	88	0.00	43	0.05	38	0.11	69	0.04	35	0.07
Random 1		88	0.04	89	0.00	87	0.02	86	0.02	5	0.50	27	0.10
Random 2		89	0.04	90	0.00	86	0.02	87	0.02	5	0.42	31	0.09
Random 3		90	-0.03	49	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	65	0.03	89	0.02

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).