Rosenthal 1931

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		34	0.35	54	0.00	32	0.06	32	0.21	67	0.03	36	0.08
Anderszewski 2003		12	0.46	11	0.00	9	0.12	15	0.46	29	0.24	6	0.33
Ashkenazy 1981		35	0.34	33	0.00	42	0.04	42	0.12	62	0.04	42	0.07
Bacha 2000		47	0.32	34	0.00	58	0.04	56	0.04	46	0.06	47	0.05
Badura 1965		53	0.30	35	0.00	33	0.05	38	0.15	47	0.06	32	0.09
Barbosa 1983		70	0.22	4	0.00	76	0.02	82	0.02	83	0.02	80	0.02
Biret 1990		74	0.21	36	0.00	82	0.02	86	0.02	85	0.02	87	0.02
Blet 2003		68	0.23	55	0.00	73	0.03	77	0.03	84	0.02	81	0.02
Block 1995		24	0.37	56	0.00	34	0.05	33	0.20	71	0.03	37	0.08
Blumental 1952		75	0.20	26	0.00	69	0.04	55	0.04	63	0.04	58	0.04
Boshniakovich 1969		58	0.27	21	0.00	47	0.05	48	0.05	80	0.03	59	0.04
Brailowsky 1960		5	0.48	57	0.00	5	0.14	8	0.54	16	0.41	5	0.47
Bunin 1987		27	0.37	58	0.00	43	0.06	41	0.12	59	0.04	43	0.07
Bunin 1987b		26	0.37	59	0.00	41	0.05	39	0.13	60	0.04	41	0.07
Chiu 1999		67	0.24	37	0.00	55	0.04	59	0.04	57	0.04	51	0.04
Cohen 1997		37	0.34	27	0.00	27	0.06	24	0.28	17	0.37	8	0.32
Cortot 1951		46	0.32	38	0.00	65	0.04	60	0.04	65	0.04	60	0.04
Csalog 1996		85	0.09	60	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	80	0.02	90	0.01
Czerny 1949		49	0.31	22	0.00	26	0.06	26	0.23	77	0.03	35	0.08
Czerny 1990		63	0.25	28	0.00	78	0.03	61	0.03	79	0.03	74	0.03
Duchoud 2007		59	0.26	61	0.00	74	0.03	80	0.03	87	0.02	84	0.02
Ezaki 2006		7	0.47	9	0.00	10	0.18	5	0.63	41	0.10	12	0.25
Falvay 1989		21	0.38	39	0.00	24	0.10	22	0.36	82	0.03	26	0.10
Farrell 1958		38	0.34	62	0.00	49	0.06	46	0.06	66	0.03	53	0.04
Ferenczy 1958		45	0.32	6	0.00	44	0.05	44	0.09	43	0.11	29	0.10
Fliere 1977		30	0.36	16	0.00	39	0.08	37	0.17	87	0.02	44	0.06
Fou 1978		14	0.44	17	0.00	14	0.09	9	0.53	42	0.15	10	0.28
Francois 1956		25	0.37	63	0.00	25	0.08	20	0.36	85	0.02	40	0.08
Friedman 1923		82	0.13	40	0.00	70	0.03	70	0.03	64	0.05	61	0.04
Friedman 1923b		83	0.12	64	0.00	72	0.03	74	0.03	47	0.07	48	0.05
Friedman 1930		78	0.18	65	0.00	61	0.03	69	0.03	64	0.04	73	0.03
Garcia 2007		81	0.15	66	0.00	81	0.02	85	0.02	84	0.02	85	0.02
Garcia 2007b		84	0.11	67	0.00	68	0.03	68	0.03	80	0.02	88	0.02
Gierzod 1998		10	0.47	23	0.00	8	0.14	13	0.49	49	0.06	14	0.17
Gornostaeva 1994		11	0.46	41	0.00	15	0.12	11	0.53	40	0.14	11	0.27
Groot 1988		17	0.40	42	0.00	11	0.11	14	0.46	67	0.03	24	0.12
Harasiewicz 1955		20	0.39	68	0.00	17	0.09	18	0.44	69	0.03	25	0.11
Hatto 1993		62	0.25	69	0.00	67	0.03	73	0.03	74	0.03	75	0.03
Hatto 1997		55	0.28	43	0.00	56	0.03	62	0.03	54	0.05	57	0.04
Horowitz 1949		43	0.33	70	0.00	23	0.09	25	0.28	51	0.05	21	0.12
Indjic 1988		69	0.23	71	0.00	75	0.03	67	0.03	80	0.03	71	0.03
Kapell 1951		65	0.24	72	0.00	80	0.03	65	0.03	85	0.02	76	0.02
Kissin 1993		33	0.35	73	0.00	29	0.07	30	0.22	75	0.04	31	0.09
Kushner 1989		6	0.47	74	0.00	18	0.11	19	0.37	68	0.04	20	0.12
Luisada 1991		50	0.31	29	0.00	62	0.03	64	0.03	76	0.03	62	0.03
Lushtak 2004		52	0.31	75	0.00	40	0.05	40	0.12	81	0.03	46	0.06
Malcuzynski 1961		8	0.47	76	0.00	13	0.09	7	0.57	58	0.04	16	0.15
Magaloff 1978		9	0.47	77	0.00	6	0.15	6	0.58	50	0.07	13	0.20
Magin 1975		29	0.36	78	0.00	36	0.06	31	0.21	49	0.05	27	0.10
Michalowski 1933		87	0.06	44	0.00	83	0.02	81	0.02	86	0.02	79	0.02
Milkina 1970		15	0.43	79	0.00	16	0.10	16	0.45	35	0.20	9	0.30
Mohovich 1999		18	0.39	80	0.00	12	0.09	17	0.45	82	0.03	23	0.12
Moravec 1969		40	0.33	14	0.00	52	0.04	54	0.04	58	0.04	50	0.04
Morozova 2008		16	0.42	45	0.00	19	0.14	10	0.53	62	0.04	17	0.15
Neighaus 1950		36	0.34	46	0.00	38	0.08	35	0.18	69	0.04	39	0.08
Niedzielski 1931		66	0.24	24	0.00	66	0.03	71	0.03	73	0.03	67	0.03
Ohlsson 1999		54	0.28	81	0.00	71	0.03	75	0.03	88	0.02	78	0.02
Osinska 1989		64	0.25	82	0.00	77	0.02	83	0.02	76	0.04	63	0.03
Pachmann 1927		72	0.22	47	0.00	51	0.05	47	0.05	72	0.03	56	0.04
Paderewski 1930		60	0.26	83	0.00	63	0.03	72	0.03	83	0.02	77	0.02
Perlemuter 1992		44	0.32	18	0.00	35	0.07	34	0.19	73	0.03	33	0.08
Pierdomenico 2008		61	0.26	84	0.00	48	0.05	49	0.05	67	0.03	52	0.04
Poblocka 1999		71	0.22	48	0.00	85	0.03	78	0.03	82	0.03	64	0.03
Rabcewiczowa 1932		73	0.22	30	0.00	57	0.04	58	0.04	76	0.03	68	0.03
Rachmaninoff 1923		31	0.36	12	0.00	21	0.09	21	0.36	46	0.05	18	0.13
Rangell 2001		22	0.38	19	0.00	22	0.12	23	0.34	50	0.05	19	0.13
Richter 1976		41	0.33	31	0.00	46	0.05	51	0.05	77	0.03	55	0.04
Rosen 1989		23	0.38	7	0.00	37	0.05	36	0.17	53	0.04	38	0.08
Rosenthal 1930		4	0.61	10	0.00	4	0.46	4	0.80	3	0.75	4	0.77
Rosenthal 1931		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Rosenthal 1931b		1	0.94	1	0.99	1	0.98	1	1.00	1	0.99	1	0.99
Rosenthal 1931c		3	0.75	2	0.00	3	0.86	3	0.95	2	0.92	3	0.93
Rosenthal 1931d		2	0.86	3	0.00	2	0.90	2	0.97	2	0.97	2	0.97
Rossi 2007		80	0.16	49	0.00	60	0.03	66	0.03	62	0.03	66	0.03
Rubinstein 1939		32	0.35	20	0.00	20	0.09	28	0.22	8	0.48	7	0.32
Rubinstein 1952		57	0.27	85	0.00	53	0.05	50	0.05	56	0.06	49	0.05
Rubinstein 1966		19	0.39	5	0.00	30	0.08	29	0.22	62	0.05	28	0.10
Schilhawsky 1960		42	0.33	50	0.00	59	0.04	57	0.04	82	0.03	72	0.03
Shebanova 2002		77	0.19	8	0.00	79	0.03	79	0.03	88	0.02	83	0.02
Smith 1975		13	0.45	15	0.00	7	0.12	12	0.51	48	0.05	15	0.16
Sokolov 2002		28	0.37	86	0.00	45	0.04	52	0.04	83	0.03	65	0.03
Sztompka 1959		76	0.19	32	0.00	64	0.03	63	0.03	77	0.04	70	0.03
Tomsic 1995		39	0.34	13	0.00	28	0.06	27	0.23	79	0.03	34	0.08
Uninsky 1932		79	0.17	87	0.00	84	0.02	84	0.02	80	0.03	82	0.02
Uninsky 1971		51	0.31	51	0.00	31	0.06	43	0.12	63	0.03	45	0.06
Wasowski 1980		86	0.09	52	0.00	88	0.01	88	0.01	86	0.02	89	0.01
Zak 1937		56	0.27	53	0.00	54	0.04	53	0.04	76	0.03	69	0.03
Zak 1951		48	0.32	88	0.00	50	0.06	45	0.06	78	0.03	54	0.04
Random 1		88	0.03	25	0.00	87	0.02	87	0.02	7	0.46	30	0.10
Random 2		89	0.03	89	0.00	86	0.03	76	0.03	2	0.45	22	0.12
Random 3		90	-0.03	90	0.00	89	0.01	89	0.01	55	0.03	86	0.02

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).