Osinska 1989

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		21	0.57	60	0.00	35	0.05	29	0.21	40	0.11	33	0.15
Anderszewski 2003		74	0.35	52	0.00	73	0.04	65	0.04	66	0.03	82	0.03
Ashkenazy 1981		55	0.45	82	0.00	54	0.05	60	0.05	65	0.04	75	0.04
Bacha 2000		70	0.37	83	0.00	65	0.04	75	0.04	44	0.12	49	0.07
Badura 1965		65	0.42	73	0.00	59	0.04	71	0.04	44	0.09	52	0.06
Barbosa 1983		66	0.41	61	0.00	58	0.04	74	0.04	45	0.05	71	0.04
Biret 1990		3	0.69	1	0.31	1	0.31	3	0.77	1	0.78	1	0.77
Blet 2003		54	0.46	74	0.00	62	0.04	77	0.04	46	0.06	60	0.05
Block 1995		25	0.56	17	0.01	23	0.06	26	0.22	19	0.34	23	0.27
Blumental 1952		73	0.36	84	0.00	53	0.06	49	0.06	43	0.10	47	0.08
Boshniakovich 1969		16	0.58	29	0.00	24	0.07	21	0.28	22	0.43	14	0.35
Brailowsky 1960		48	0.48	69	0.00	64	0.04	66	0.04	72	0.04	66	0.04
Bunin 1987		68	0.39	58	0.00	78	0.03	83	0.03	76	0.03	85	0.03
Bunin 1987b		67	0.39	55	0.00	79	0.05	59	0.05	80	0.03	69	0.04
Chiu 1999		62	0.43	42	0.00	55	0.05	56	0.05	53	0.05	54	0.05
Cohen 1997		60	0.43	9	0.02	32	0.06	41	0.12	8	0.50	26	0.24
Cortot 1951		10	0.61	7	0.02	9	0.18	10	0.48	4	0.58	8	0.53
Csalog 1996		33	0.53	28	0.00	34	0.06	34	0.16	11	0.53	18	0.29
Czerny 1949		4	0.66	21	0.00	6	0.16	4	0.62	7	0.67	4	0.64
Czerny 1990		28	0.55	75	0.00	41	0.05	39	0.12	52	0.05	48	0.08
Duchoud 2007		45	0.48	53	0.00	44	0.07	37	0.13	68	0.04	51	0.07
Ezaki 2006		18	0.58	18	0.01	18	0.10	15	0.39	46	0.07	30	0.17
Falvay 1989		22	0.56	20	0.00	20	0.07	16	0.36	27	0.22	19	0.28
Farrell 1958		40	0.49	40	0.00	27	0.07	33	0.17	9	0.46	20	0.28
Ferenczy 1958		49	0.47	15	0.01	29	0.06	43	0.11	27	0.27	32	0.17
Fliere 1977		9	0.61	25	0.00	21	0.07	17	0.34	53	0.06	34	0.14
Fou 1978		52	0.46	65	0.00	39	0.05	38	0.12	52	0.06	43	0.08
Francois 1956		8	0.63	13	0.01	7	0.18	6	0.59	8	0.55	6	0.57
Friedman 1923		86	0.15	56	0.00	83	0.03	85	0.03	72	0.04	88	0.03
Friedman 1923b		85	0.16	46	0.00	82	0.03	84	0.03	59	0.05	76	0.04
Friedman 1930		79	0.29	49	0.00	70	0.03	82	0.03	67	0.04	83	0.03
Garcia 2007		82	0.24	70	0.00	81	0.03	81	0.03	78	0.03	84	0.03
Garcia 2007b		87	0.11	54	0.00	87	0.02	88	0.02	86	0.02	89	0.02
Gierzod 1998		42	0.49	57	0.00	51	0.06	46	0.06	53	0.05	62	0.05
Gornostaeva 1994		1	0.72	2	0.17	3	0.27	2	0.78	2	0.70	3	0.74
Groot 1988		24	0.56	59	0.00	47	0.06	47	0.06	55	0.04	64	0.05
Harasiewicz 1955		38	0.50	8	0.02	15	0.08	19	0.33	35	0.19	24	0.25
Hatto 1993		83	0.21	62	0.00	77	0.04	72	0.04	80	0.03	86	0.03
Hatto 1997		78	0.29	37	0.00	49	0.05	58	0.05	72	0.03	72	0.04
Horowitz 1949		61	0.43	32	0.00	68	0.06	48	0.06	68	0.04	57	0.05
Indjic 1988		84	0.20	66	0.00	76	0.04	79	0.04	75	0.03	80	0.03
Kapell 1951		27	0.56	85	0.00	43	0.06	36	0.14	44	0.11	36	0.12
Kissin 1993		32	0.53	76	0.00	46	0.05	54	0.05	53	0.05	59	0.05
Kushner 1989		19	0.57	44	0.00	36	0.06	30	0.21	35	0.18	28	0.19
Luisada 1991		47	0.48	35	0.00	28	0.06	25	0.23	59	0.05	38	0.11
Lushtak 2004		50	0.47	38	0.00	30	0.06	35	0.15	47	0.06	42	0.09
Malcuzynski 1961		14	0.58	51	0.00	22	0.07	23	0.25	52	0.05	39	0.11
Magaloff 1978		6	0.64	11	0.02	12	0.10	8	0.52	34	0.18	17	0.31
Magin 1975		72	0.37	36	0.00	75	0.05	62	0.05	67	0.03	68	0.04
Michalowski 1933		59	0.43	23	0.00	45	0.07	45	0.07	43	0.14	40	0.10
Milkina 1970		30	0.55	6	0.03	10	0.10	12	0.47	12	0.43	11	0.45
Mohovich 1999		15	0.58	33	0.00	26	0.08	24	0.24	28	0.25	25	0.24
Moravec 1969		17	0.58	19	0.00	19	0.07	20	0.30	13	0.42	13	0.35
Morozova 2008		43	0.49	86	0.00	37	0.05	32	0.17	43	0.08	37	0.12
Neighaus 1950		12	0.60	14	0.01	5	0.18	7	0.56	25	0.37	10	0.46
Niedzielski 1931		71	0.37	63	0.00	84	0.03	86	0.03	59	0.04	78	0.03
Ohlsson 1999		23	0.56	41	0.00	33	0.06	22	0.27	40	0.12	29	0.18
Osinska 1989		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Pachmann 1927		69	0.38	43	0.00	67	0.05	61	0.05	60	0.04	70	0.04
Paderewski 1930		20	0.57	31	0.00	17	0.09	18	0.34	20	0.34	15	0.34
Perlemuter 1992		51	0.47	27	0.00	60	0.05	63	0.05	58	0.04	65	0.04
Pierdomenico 2008		36	0.51	67	0.00	56	0.05	57	0.05	39	0.18	41	0.09
Poblocka 1999		11	0.60	47	0.00	16	0.09	14	0.41	30	0.23	16	0.31
Rabcewiczowa 1932		5	0.65	12	0.01	8	0.16	9	0.50	2	0.72	5	0.60
Rachmaninoff 1923		75	0.33	77	0.00	72	0.04	73	0.04	61	0.04	67	0.04
Rangell 2001		34	0.53	16	0.01	25	0.06	28	0.22	34	0.20	27	0.21
Richter 1976		57	0.44	30	0.00	69	0.04	69	0.04	69	0.03	79	0.03
Rosen 1989		2	0.70	3	0.16	2	0.33	1	0.78	3	0.72	2	0.75
Rosenthal 1930		63	0.42	87	0.00	71	0.04	78	0.04	68	0.04	74	0.04
Rosenthal 1931		81	0.25	88	0.00	86	0.04	76	0.04	83	0.02	81	0.03
Rosenthal 1931b		80	0.25	89	0.00	85	0.04	80	0.04	73	0.03	87	0.03
Rosenthal 1931c		56	0.45	78	0.00	63	0.04	68	0.04	56	0.04	77	0.04
Rosenthal 1931d		76	0.32	79	0.00	80	0.04	70	0.04	45	0.06	63	0.05
Rossi 2007		53	0.46	22	0.00	42	0.04	40	0.12	2	0.61	22	0.27
Rubinstein 1939		77	0.30	68	0.00	74	0.04	64	0.04	22	0.36	35	0.12
Rubinstein 1952		13	0.58	10	0.02	11	0.09	13	0.43	11	0.51	9	0.47
Rubinstein 1966		31	0.55	39	0.00	13	0.10	11	0.47	14	0.44	12	0.45
Schilhawsky 1960		58	0.44	48	0.00	61	0.06	52	0.06	58	0.05	61	0.05
Shebanova 2002		35	0.52	64	0.00	48	0.06	51	0.06	46	0.08	50	0.07
Smith 1975		7	0.64	5	0.05	4	0.26	5	0.60	9	0.49	7	0.54
Sokolov 2002		26	0.56	4	0.05	14	0.09	27	0.22	43	0.13	31	0.17
Sztompka 1959		39	0.50	90	0.00	57	0.06	50	0.06	64	0.04	58	0.05
Tomsic 1995		41	0.49	71	0.00	52	0.05	55	0.05	48	0.05	56	0.05
Uninsky 1932		64	0.42	34	0.00	66	0.04	67	0.04	73	0.04	73	0.04
Uninsky 1971		37	0.50	26	0.00	31	0.06	44	0.10	51	0.06	45	0.08
Wasowski 1980		29	0.55	24	0.00	38	0.07	31	0.20	15	0.37	21	0.27
Zak 1937		46	0.48	80	0.00	50	0.06	53	0.06	52	0.05	55	0.05
Zak 1951		44	0.49	45	0.00	40	0.05	42	0.12	49	0.06	44	0.08
Random 1		90	-0.10	72	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	86	0.02	90	0.01
Random 2		89	0.01	81	0.00	88	0.02	87	0.02	20	0.31	46	0.08
Random 3		88	0.01	50	0.00	89	0.02	89	0.02	37	0.17	53	0.06

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).