Neighaus 1950

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		19	0.61	29	0.00	21	0.09	21	0.42	11	0.47	25	0.44
Anderszewski 2003		69	0.42	86	0.00	63	0.04	68	0.04	31	0.23	66	0.10
Ashkenazy 1981		22	0.60	32	0.00	26	0.07	29	0.28	23	0.35	34	0.31
Bacha 2000		58	0.49	38	0.00	72	0.04	67	0.04	22	0.40	57	0.13
Badura 1965		78	0.36	87	0.00	77	0.04	70	0.04	64	0.04	87	0.04
Barbosa 1983		54	0.51	50	0.00	32	0.07	28	0.28	6	0.56	27	0.40
Biret 1990		16	0.62	33	0.00	24	0.11	27	0.36	6	0.56	24	0.45
Blet 2003		26	0.59	62	0.00	28	0.08	18	0.46	3	0.55	21	0.50
Block 1995		46	0.55	11	0.03	29	0.07	33	0.21	6	0.54	30	0.34
Blumental 1952		79	0.36	44	0.00	74	0.04	74	0.04	41	0.11	80	0.07
Boshniakovich 1969		12	0.65	20	0.01	22	0.09	15	0.50	3	0.69	11	0.59
Brailowsky 1960		56	0.50	74	0.00	71	0.04	76	0.04	33	0.17	73	0.08
Bunin 1987		30	0.58	88	0.00	48	0.05	57	0.05	23	0.36	58	0.13
Bunin 1987b		29	0.58	61	0.00	49	0.08	45	0.08	23	0.35	47	0.17
Chiu 1999		40	0.55	13	0.02	20	0.11	17	0.46	8	0.62	17	0.53
Cohen 1997		81	0.34	51	0.00	79	0.02	85	0.02	42	0.11	83	0.05
Cortot 1951		55	0.51	23	0.01	42	0.05	37	0.16	24	0.33	37	0.23
Csalog 1996		73	0.40	58	0.00	86	0.04	64	0.04	61	0.05	86	0.04
Czerny 1949		41	0.55	64	0.00	35	0.06	32	0.21	14	0.56	29	0.34
Czerny 1990		42	0.55	75	0.00	38	0.06	44	0.11	32	0.22	50	0.16
Duchoud 2007		32	0.58	65	0.00	40	0.05	42	0.13	13	0.47	36	0.25
Ezaki 2006		4	0.69	5	0.06	4	0.11	13	0.55	3	0.66	8	0.60
Falvay 1989		31	0.58	49	0.00	31	0.08	30	0.25	13	0.39	32	0.31
Farrell 1958		20	0.61	10	0.04	16	0.11	22	0.41	1	0.70	15	0.54
Ferenczy 1958		76	0.38	71	0.00	85	0.04	75	0.04	50	0.06	82	0.05
Fliere 1977		7	0.68	18	0.01	12	0.12	12	0.55	5	0.63	10	0.59
Fou 1978		18	0.62	14	0.02	18	0.10	20	0.42	6	0.52	22	0.47
Francois 1956		15	0.63	8	0.04	7	0.12	11	0.56	2	0.66	7	0.61
Friedman 1923		84	0.33	80	0.00	67	0.03	80	0.03	8	0.46	63	0.12
Friedman 1923b		80	0.35	77	0.00	66	0.04	72	0.04	6	0.51	56	0.14
Friedman 1930		66	0.45	70	0.00	54	0.05	60	0.05	13	0.50	49	0.16
Garcia 2007		82	0.34	63	0.00	81	0.02	86	0.02	17	0.43	71	0.09
Garcia 2007b		85	0.32	84	0.00	84	0.03	82	0.03	19	0.36	69	0.10
Gierzod 1998		25	0.60	78	0.00	33	0.08	31	0.24	8	0.42	31	0.32
Gornostaeva 1994		3	0.69	12	0.02	5	0.12	4	0.60	4	0.66	5	0.63
Groot 1988		8	0.67	22	0.01	14	0.16	8	0.57	4	0.59	12	0.58
Harasiewicz 1955		33	0.58	2	0.13	2	0.15	2	0.65	1	0.56	9	0.60
Hatto 1993		70	0.42	68	0.00	69	0.04	65	0.04	35	0.18	76	0.08
Hatto 1997		65	0.46	24	0.01	53	0.06	53	0.06	30	0.22	64	0.11
Horowitz 1949		34	0.58	34	0.00	45	0.05	59	0.05	12	0.39	53	0.14
Indjic 1988		71	0.42	59	0.00	68	0.03	81	0.03	38	0.15	79	0.07
Kapell 1951		49	0.54	55	0.00	61	0.05	58	0.05	45	0.09	78	0.07
Kissin 1993		36	0.57	52	0.00	37	0.06	40	0.13	24	0.32	42	0.20
Kushner 1989		39	0.56	89	0.00	56	0.06	54	0.06	28	0.25	59	0.12
Luisada 1991		43	0.55	28	0.00	34	0.06	39	0.14	19	0.34	38	0.22
Lushtak 2004		17	0.62	15	0.01	19	0.10	19	0.45	5	0.58	19	0.51
Malcuzynski 1961		2	0.70	60	0.00	11	0.08	9	0.57	9	0.51	16	0.54
Magaloff 1978		5	0.68	21	0.01	13	0.12	5	0.60	3	0.55	13	0.57
Magin 1975		62	0.48	46	0.00	64	0.04	66	0.04	31	0.21	70	0.09
Michalowski 1933		68	0.43	37	0.00	59	0.05	61	0.05	30	0.30	60	0.12
Milkina 1970		44	0.55	30	0.00	51	0.08	46	0.08	20	0.36	46	0.17
Mohovich 1999		6	0.68	17	0.01	9	0.12	7	0.57	1	0.74	2	0.65
Moravec 1969		64	0.47	48	0.00	65	0.04	71	0.04	40	0.11	77	0.07
Morozova 2008		45	0.55	19	0.01	25	0.08	24	0.37	11	0.40	28	0.38
Neighaus 1950		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Niedzielski 1931		75	0.40	53	0.00	80	0.02	87	0.02	56	0.04	88	0.03
Ohlsson 1999		10	0.66	4	0.07	17	0.12	23	0.38	12	0.44	26	0.41
Osinska 1989		24	0.60	16	0.01	23	0.10	25	0.37	7	0.56	23	0.46
Pachmann 1927		52	0.52	35	0.00	50	0.07	47	0.07	13	0.53	43	0.19
Paderewski 1930		53	0.51	66	0.00	44	0.07	41	0.13	19	0.34	40	0.21
Perlemuter 1992		37	0.57	9	0.04	10	0.09	16	0.49	6	0.61	14	0.55
Pierdomenico 2008		48	0.54	42	0.00	52	0.06	50	0.06	7	0.52	45	0.18
Poblocka 1999		38	0.56	69	0.00	39	0.05	36	0.17	34	0.20	44	0.18
Rabcewiczowa 1932		23	0.60	27	0.00	27	0.07	26	0.36	4	0.70	20	0.50
Rachmaninoff 1923		57	0.49	72	0.00	30	0.07	35	0.19	12	0.47	35	0.30
Rangell 2001		27	0.59	36	0.00	47	0.06	51	0.06	10	0.43	51	0.16
Richter 1976		72	0.40	43	0.00	82	0.03	84	0.03	50	0.05	85	0.04
Rosen 1989		1	0.73	1	0.20	1	0.20	1	0.71	1	0.77	1	0.74
Rosenthal 1930		67	0.45	73	0.00	70	0.04	77	0.04	30	0.35	62	0.12
Rosenthal 1931		83	0.34	67	0.00	78	0.04	69	0.04	35	0.18	74	0.08
Rosenthal 1931b		77	0.38	79	0.00	75	0.03	78	0.03	23	0.34	68	0.10
Rosenthal 1931c		51	0.52	41	0.00	58	0.06	55	0.06	14	0.49	48	0.17
Rosenthal 1931d		74	0.40	81	0.00	76	0.03	79	0.03	27	0.22	75	0.08
Rossi 2007		86	0.24	82	0.00	83	0.03	83	0.03	13	0.36	65	0.10
Rubinstein 1939		87	0.24	76	0.00	87	0.04	73	0.04	69	0.04	84	0.04
Rubinstein 1952		61	0.48	45	0.00	73	0.05	63	0.05	36	0.16	72	0.09
Rubinstein 1966		50	0.52	39	0.00	62	0.07	49	0.07	30	0.30	54	0.14
Schilhawsky 1960		60	0.49	83	0.00	60	0.05	62	0.05	33	0.22	67	0.10
Shebanova 2002		35	0.58	56	0.00	55	0.07	48	0.07	32	0.30	55	0.14
Smith 1975		14	0.64	3	0.07	3	0.11	3	0.64	3	0.61	6	0.62
Sokolov 2002		21	0.60	54	0.00	41	0.06	43	0.12	29	0.34	41	0.20
Sztompka 1959		28	0.58	47	0.00	46	0.05	56	0.05	14	0.45	52	0.15
Tomsic 1995		9	0.67	25	0.00	15	0.13	14	0.52	7	0.53	18	0.52
Uninsky 1932		59	0.49	31	0.00	57	0.06	52	0.06	22	0.26	61	0.12
Uninsky 1971		47	0.55	26	0.00	36	0.07	34	0.21	16	0.45	33	0.31
Wasowski 1980		63	0.48	40	0.00	43	0.06	38	0.15	25	0.30	39	0.21
Zak 1937		11	0.66	6	0.06	8	0.13	10	0.57	2	0.70	4	0.63
Zak 1951		13	0.65	7	0.05	6	0.11	6	0.58	2	0.70	3	0.64
Random 1		88	0.02	57	0.00	88	0.02	88	0.02	30	0.20	81	0.06
Random 2		90	-0.06	85	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	78	0.02	90	0.01
Random 3		89	0.01	90	0.00	89	0.01	89	0.01	73	0.03	89	0.02

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).