Mohovich 1999

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		9	0.65	16	0.01	13	0.13	11	0.54	3	0.56	9	0.55
Anderszewski 2003		54	0.48	33	0.00	22	0.07	27	0.27	19	0.35	28	0.31
Ashkenazy 1981		53	0.49	61	0.00	56	0.04	63	0.04	69	0.04	78	0.04
Bacha 2000		47	0.52	70	0.00	52	0.04	71	0.04	21	0.43	46	0.13
Badura 1965		73	0.39	49	0.00	72	0.05	51	0.05	56	0.04	77	0.04
Barbosa 1983		38	0.55	8	0.04	8	0.13	17	0.44	9	0.52	15	0.48
Biret 1990		60	0.45	88	0.00	75	0.03	79	0.03	65	0.04	86	0.03
Blet 2003		39	0.54	57	0.00	45	0.05	48	0.05	40	0.15	51	0.09
Block 1995		25	0.59	24	0.01	23	0.07	25	0.31	9	0.46	20	0.38
Blumental 1952		78	0.31	23	0.01	82	0.03	78	0.03	72	0.03	84	0.03
Boshniakovich 1969		15	0.63	12	0.02	17	0.13	16	0.46	5	0.61	11	0.53
Brailowsky 1960		16	0.63	13	0.02	26	0.08	26	0.29	2	0.55	16	0.40
Bunin 1987		34	0.56	84	0.00	39	0.06	39	0.15	26	0.33	36	0.22
Bunin 1987b		33	0.56	73	0.00	43	0.07	41	0.14	26	0.32	37	0.21
Chiu 1999		59	0.46	85	0.00	62	0.06	46	0.06	69	0.04	60	0.05
Cohen 1997		77	0.32	47	0.00	73	0.04	65	0.04	35	0.17	55	0.08
Cortot 1951		68	0.42	48	0.00	78	0.05	55	0.05	61	0.04	79	0.04
Csalog 1996		65	0.42	74	0.00	80	0.02	87	0.02	47	0.07	72	0.04
Czerny 1949		43	0.53	35	0.00	42	0.07	40	0.14	24	0.38	34	0.23
Czerny 1990		35	0.56	62	0.00	40	0.05	37	0.17	56	0.05	52	0.09
Duchoud 2007		62	0.45	75	0.00	71	0.04	58	0.04	67	0.04	76	0.04
Ezaki 2006		1	0.70	20	0.01	6	0.15	4	0.63	7	0.56	6	0.59
Falvay 1989		17	0.61	86	0.00	27	0.08	24	0.31	17	0.32	27	0.31
Farrell 1958		69	0.41	54	0.00	79	0.02	86	0.02	62	0.04	83	0.03
Ferenczy 1958		41	0.54	18	0.01	59	0.05	50	0.05	11	0.47	42	0.15
Fliere 1977		18	0.61	34	0.00	28	0.08	23	0.32	35	0.15	35	0.22
Fou 1978		24	0.59	56	0.00	25	0.08	20	0.37	29	0.35	23	0.36
Francois 1956		13	0.63	19	0.01	12	0.13	13	0.49	12	0.49	14	0.49
Friedman 1923		87	0.12	87	0.00	87	0.03	75	0.03	76	0.03	87	0.03
Friedman 1923b		86	0.12	81	0.00	86	0.02	85	0.02	64	0.05	85	0.03
Friedman 1930		84	0.23	76	0.00	68	0.03	80	0.03	51	0.05	74	0.04
Garcia 2007		74	0.39	29	0.00	48	0.04	60	0.04	4	0.67	40	0.16
Garcia 2007b		85	0.14	71	0.00	85	0.04	73	0.04	54	0.04	80	0.04
Gierzod 1998		21	0.59	30	0.00	21	0.10	19	0.42	13	0.39	17	0.40
Gornostaeva 1994		6	0.67	10	0.03	11	0.12	9	0.56	11	0.51	12	0.53
Groot 1988		2	0.70	4	0.13	3	0.15	3	0.65	3	0.60	4	0.62
Harasiewicz 1955		30	0.57	1	0.15	1	0.14	8	0.59	6	0.46	13	0.52
Hatto 1993		79	0.30	44	0.00	36	0.08	38	0.15	50	0.05	53	0.09
Hatto 1997		75	0.36	14	0.02	19	0.09	31	0.24	41	0.10	41	0.15
Horowitz 1949		46	0.53	51	0.00	29	0.07	36	0.18	20	0.33	33	0.24
Indjic 1988		80	0.30	36	0.00	35	0.06	42	0.14	57	0.05	54	0.08
Kapell 1951		42	0.54	82	0.00	57	0.04	64	0.04	63	0.04	69	0.04
Kissin 1993		29	0.57	45	0.00	33	0.06	34	0.22	38	0.19	38	0.20
Kushner 1989		36	0.56	89	0.00	54	0.04	70	0.04	54	0.04	68	0.04
Luisada 1991		44	0.53	90	0.00	44	0.05	44	0.11	62	0.05	56	0.07
Lushtak 2004		28	0.58	15	0.01	18	0.11	18	0.43	22	0.38	18	0.40
Malcuzynski 1961		7	0.66	63	0.00	16	0.12	15	0.46	31	0.27	24	0.35
Magaloff 1978		11	0.64	50	0.00	15	0.11	14	0.48	19	0.31	19	0.39
Magin 1975		64	0.44	68	0.00	70	0.04	62	0.04	54	0.05	67	0.04
Michalowski 1933		81	0.27	64	0.00	76	0.04	69	0.04	65	0.04	71	0.04
Milkina 1970		31	0.57	26	0.00	41	0.06	43	0.12	33	0.22	39	0.16
Mohovich 1999		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Moravec 1969		61	0.45	77	0.00	77	0.04	66	0.04	64	0.04	63	0.04
Morozova 2008		52	0.49	41	0.00	47	0.07	45	0.07	65	0.04	61	0.05
Neighaus 1950		5	0.68	2	0.14	2	0.22	1	0.74	7	0.57	2	0.65
Niedzielski 1931		67	0.42	52	0.00	74	0.04	67	0.04	52	0.05	66	0.04
Ohlsson 1999		49	0.52	83	0.00	58	0.04	61	0.04	61	0.04	70	0.04
Osinska 1989		27	0.58	42	0.00	34	0.08	28	0.25	24	0.24	32	0.24
Pachmann 1927		40	0.54	21	0.01	37	0.06	35	0.20	14	0.51	25	0.32
Paderewski 1930		48	0.52	25	0.00	53	0.04	74	0.04	25	0.22	50	0.09
Perlemuter 1992		8	0.65	6	0.04	7	0.17	5	0.62	3	0.66	3	0.64
Pierdomenico 2008		57	0.47	59	0.00	63	0.03	81	0.03	42	0.13	57	0.06
Poblocka 1999		20	0.60	22	0.01	31	0.07	29	0.25	26	0.26	31	0.25
Rabcewiczowa 1932		32	0.56	31	0.00	38	0.06	33	0.23	12	0.57	22	0.36
Rachmaninoff 1923		70	0.41	58	0.00	46	0.05	57	0.05	54	0.04	64	0.04
Rangell 2001		23	0.59	32	0.00	32	0.08	32	0.24	13	0.42	26	0.32
Richter 1976		45	0.53	40	0.00	51	0.05	54	0.05	29	0.25	48	0.11
Rosen 1989		10	0.65	9	0.03	14	0.13	10	0.55	7	0.59	8	0.57
Rosenthal 1930		63	0.44	43	0.00	69	0.03	76	0.03	31	0.32	49	0.10
Rosenthal 1931		72	0.39	78	0.00	65	0.03	82	0.03	17	0.45	47	0.12
Rosenthal 1931b		71	0.40	69	0.00	66	0.05	52	0.05	13	0.46	43	0.15
Rosenthal 1931c		55	0.48	27	0.00	49	0.04	59	0.04	15	0.48	45	0.14
Rosenthal 1931d		66	0.42	79	0.00	67	0.06	47	0.06	20	0.34	44	0.14
Rossi 2007		83	0.24	53	0.00	83	0.04	72	0.04	55	0.03	82	0.03
Rubinstein 1939		82	0.25	80	0.00	84	0.03	84	0.03	48	0.05	65	0.04
Rubinstein 1952		19	0.61	28	0.00	20	0.09	22	0.33	19	0.42	21	0.37
Rubinstein 1966		4	0.68	3	0.13	4	0.14	2	0.67	1	0.75	1	0.71
Schilhawsky 1960		58	0.46	72	0.00	64	0.03	77	0.03	51	0.05	73	0.04
Shebanova 2002		50	0.50	17	0.01	61	0.05	49	0.05	60	0.05	62	0.05
Smith 1975		22	0.59	60	0.00	24	0.08	21	0.35	34	0.23	30	0.28
Sokolov 2002		37	0.56	37	0.00	55	0.05	56	0.05	48	0.06	59	0.05
Sztompka 1959		51	0.50	55	0.00	60	0.05	53	0.05	46	0.07	58	0.06
Tomsic 1995		3	0.70	11	0.02	5	0.13	6	0.61	5	0.55	7	0.58
Uninsky 1932		56	0.48	39	0.00	50	0.04	68	0.04	65	0.05	75	0.04
Uninsky 1971		26	0.58	38	0.00	30	0.08	30	0.25	30	0.34	29	0.29
Wasowski 1980		76	0.34	65	0.00	81	0.03	83	0.03	66	0.04	81	0.03
Zak 1937		14	0.63	5	0.06	10	0.14	12	0.52	7	0.55	10	0.53
Zak 1951		12	0.64	7	0.04	9	0.15	7	0.60	5	0.60	5	0.60
Random 1		90	-0.10	66	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	88	0.02	90	0.01
Random 2		89	-0.07	46	0.00	89	0.02	88	0.02	72	0.03	88	0.02
Random 3		88	-0.01	67	0.00	88	0.02	89	0.02	69	0.03	89	0.02

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).