Magin 1975

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		68	0.34	59	0.00	68	0.04	61	0.04	77	0.03	81	0.03
Anderszewski 2003		6	0.62	5	0.07	4	0.22	13	0.40	11	0.51	10	0.45
Ashkenazy 1981		2	0.66	1	0.21	1	0.21	1	0.72	9	0.53	1	0.62
Bacha 2000		66	0.35	81	0.00	66	0.03	80	0.03	42	0.13	55	0.06
Badura 1965		62	0.36	42	0.00	59	0.04	58	0.04	52	0.05	67	0.04
Barbosa 1983		80	0.23	77	0.00	76	0.03	66	0.03	70	0.04	78	0.03
Biret 1990		67	0.35	47	0.00	69	0.03	71	0.03	75	0.04	85	0.03
Blet 2003		32	0.46	19	0.01	44	0.06	43	0.12	55	0.05	46	0.08
Block 1995		21	0.50	53	0.00	23	0.05	17	0.28	25	0.29	18	0.28
Blumental 1952		42	0.43	7	0.05	17	0.11	32	0.21	21	0.28	20	0.24
Boshniakovich 1969		15	0.53	21	0.01	27	0.08	25	0.25	43	0.13	26	0.18
Brailowsky 1960		41	0.43	65	0.00	26	0.05	38	0.15	42	0.10	36	0.12
Bunin 1987		51	0.39	55	0.00	64	0.04	64	0.04	62	0.04	70	0.04
Bunin 1987b		50	0.39	69	0.00	63	0.03	75	0.03	65	0.04	76	0.03
Chiu 1999		53	0.39	78	0.00	41	0.05	42	0.12	41	0.15	34	0.13
Cohen 1997		86	0.18	36	0.00	87	0.03	77	0.03	79	0.03	84	0.03
Cortot 1951		78	0.27	57	0.00	83	0.03	84	0.03	75	0.03	86	0.03
Csalog 1996		85	0.20	45	0.00	77	0.03	83	0.03	55	0.06	64	0.04
Czerny 1949		73	0.30	41	0.00	61	0.04	57	0.04	82	0.02	80	0.03
Czerny 1990		16	0.53	16	0.01	16	0.12	14	0.40	30	0.23	16	0.30
Duchoud 2007		22	0.50	70	0.00	31	0.05	20	0.27	43	0.09	29	0.16
Ezaki 2006		28	0.48	54	0.00	40	0.07	36	0.17	68	0.04	44	0.08
Falvay 1989		35	0.44	66	0.00	47	0.06	45	0.06	59	0.05	58	0.05
Farrell 1958		77	0.27	38	0.00	85	0.02	86	0.02	83	0.03	88	0.02
Ferenczy 1958		87	0.14	82	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	89	0.01	90	0.01
Fliere 1977		10	0.57	29	0.00	18	0.08	15	0.37	50	0.06	30	0.15
Fou 1978		31	0.47	39	0.00	25	0.05	18	0.28	43	0.15	22	0.20
Francois 1956		72	0.32	24	0.00	55	0.05	53	0.05	69	0.03	72	0.04
Friedman 1923		81	0.22	56	0.00	73	0.03	78	0.03	35	0.15	54	0.07
Friedman 1923b		83	0.22	71	0.00	74	0.03	73	0.03	44	0.10	59	0.05
Friedman 1930		76	0.28	26	0.00	62	0.04	65	0.04	52	0.05	66	0.04
Garcia 2007		84	0.21	68	0.00	81	0.03	76	0.03	66	0.03	82	0.03
Garcia 2007b		74	0.30	30	0.00	39	0.05	44	0.11	23	0.29	27	0.18
Gierzod 1998		36	0.44	83	0.00	49	0.06	46	0.06	43	0.09	51	0.07
Gornostaeva 1994		17	0.53	63	0.00	34	0.06	24	0.25	42	0.14	23	0.19
Groot 1988		24	0.49	20	0.01	24	0.05	33	0.19	49	0.05	42	0.10
Harasiewicz 1955		18	0.51	72	0.00	11	0.16	12	0.41	23	0.29	14	0.34
Hatto 1993		11	0.56	9	0.03	6	0.15	4	0.58	6	0.54	3	0.56
Hatto 1997		26	0.48	60	0.00	15	0.13	16	0.36	21	0.34	13	0.35
Horowitz 1949		30	0.47	31	0.00	29	0.05	29	0.22	35	0.15	25	0.18
Indjic 1988		13	0.55	8	0.03	7	0.14	5	0.56	10	0.47	5	0.51
Kapell 1951		56	0.37	28	0.00	72	0.04	56	0.04	73	0.03	75	0.03
Kissin 1993		4	0.63	6	0.06	5	0.17	2	0.61	10	0.56	2	0.58
Kushner 1989		5	0.62	61	0.00	10	0.11	7	0.53	9	0.49	4	0.51
Luisada 1991		1	0.66	2	0.16	3	0.19	8	0.52	6	0.47	7	0.49
Lushtak 2004		55	0.38	84	0.00	50	0.06	48	0.06	73	0.03	68	0.04
Malcuzynski 1961		3	0.63	3	0.11	2	0.21	3	0.58	13	0.43	6	0.50
Magaloff 1978		7	0.62	23	0.00	8	0.13	11	0.43	22	0.28	12	0.35
Magin 1975		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Michalowski 1933		52	0.39	11	0.02	22	0.05	30	0.22	50	0.06	38	0.11
Milkina 1970		20	0.50	58	0.00	35	0.06	28	0.23	36	0.20	21	0.21
Mohovich 1999		39	0.44	52	0.00	48	0.05	54	0.05	62	0.04	69	0.04
Moravec 1969		59	0.37	85	0.00	54	0.06	47	0.06	46	0.06	56	0.06
Morozova 2008		14	0.53	33	0.00	14	0.13	19	0.27	44	0.08	31	0.15
Neighaus 1950		29	0.48	79	0.00	37	0.07	31	0.21	66	0.04	43	0.09
Niedzielski 1931		54	0.38	22	0.00	45	0.05	52	0.05	15	0.35	35	0.13
Ohlsson 1999		9	0.58	13	0.02	13	0.17	6	0.54	15	0.37	9	0.45
Osinska 1989		58	0.37	44	0.00	71	0.03	67	0.03	62	0.05	61	0.04
Pachmann 1927		82	0.22	46	0.00	78	0.03	70	0.03	55	0.05	62	0.04
Paderewski 1930		43	0.43	14	0.02	57	0.04	63	0.04	76	0.03	77	0.03
Perlemuter 1992		25	0.49	27	0.00	33	0.05	26	0.25	40	0.13	24	0.18
Pierdomenico 2008		34	0.45	62	0.00	20	0.06	22	0.27	17	0.33	15	0.30
Poblocka 1999		45	0.41	37	0.00	70	0.03	68	0.03	85	0.03	73	0.03
Rabcewiczowa 1932		75	0.28	86	0.00	82	0.03	82	0.03	81	0.02	87	0.02
Rachmaninoff 1923		46	0.41	73	0.00	36	0.06	34	0.19	43	0.10	32	0.14
Rangell 2001		37	0.44	74	0.00	43	0.06	41	0.12	61	0.04	53	0.07
Richter 1976		12	0.55	4	0.09	9	0.11	9	0.48	5	0.43	8	0.45
Rosen 1989		38	0.44	67	0.00	42	0.06	39	0.15	83	0.03	52	0.07
Rosenthal 1930		70	0.33	80	0.00	79	0.03	81	0.03	80	0.03	83	0.03
Rosenthal 1931		60	0.36	87	0.00	52	0.05	49	0.05	31	0.21	40	0.10
Rosenthal 1931b		63	0.35	88	0.00	56	0.04	60	0.04	36	0.17	48	0.08
Rosenthal 1931c		44	0.42	89	0.00	58	0.04	62	0.04	55	0.05	71	0.04
Rosenthal 1931d		64	0.35	75	0.00	65	0.03	79	0.03	36	0.14	57	0.06
Rossi 2007		71	0.33	34	0.00	38	0.05	37	0.15	9	0.41	19	0.25
Rubinstein 1939		79	0.24	25	0.00	84	0.02	85	0.02	50	0.05	74	0.03
Rubinstein 1952		47	0.41	18	0.01	60	0.04	59	0.04	51	0.07	60	0.05
Rubinstein 1966		61	0.36	51	0.00	75	0.03	74	0.03	73	0.04	79	0.03
Schilhawsky 1960		65	0.35	90	0.00	67	0.03	72	0.03	57	0.05	65	0.04
Shebanova 2002		23	0.49	10	0.02	19	0.06	21	0.27	30	0.32	17	0.29
Smith 1975		19	0.50	43	0.00	21	0.06	23	0.25	75	0.04	39	0.10
Sokolov 2002		8	0.61	12	0.02	12	0.14	10	0.44	25	0.36	11	0.40
Sztompka 1959		69	0.34	40	0.00	80	0.03	69	0.03	59	0.05	63	0.04
Tomsic 1995		27	0.48	32	0.00	32	0.05	27	0.24	54	0.05	37	0.11
Uninsky 1932		48	0.40	15	0.01	51	0.05	50	0.05	43	0.10	50	0.07
Uninsky 1971		40	0.43	35	0.00	53	0.05	51	0.05	44	0.12	45	0.08
Wasowski 1980		33	0.46	17	0.01	30	0.05	35	0.19	41	0.15	28	0.17
Zak 1937		57	0.37	64	0.00	46	0.05	55	0.05	42	0.09	49	0.07
Zak 1951		49	0.39	48	0.00	28	0.05	40	0.14	42	0.15	33	0.14
Random 1		89	0.02	50	0.00	88	0.02	88	0.02	16	0.33	47	0.08
Random 2		90	-0.03	49	0.00	89	0.01	89	0.01	67	0.03	89	0.02
Random 3		88	0.12	76	0.00	86	0.02	87	0.02	2	0.51	41	0.10

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).