Lushtak 2004

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		35	0.50	82	0.00	46	0.05	53	0.05	59	0.04	80	0.04
Anderszewski 2003		56	0.43	8	0.03	11	0.09	31	0.27	17	0.47	25	0.36
Ashkenazy 1981		7	0.61	25	0.00	12	0.12	8	0.54	22	0.36	16	0.44
Bacha 2000		67	0.40	57	0.00	74	0.03	82	0.03	36	0.23	58	0.08
Badura 1965		58	0.42	65	0.00	41	0.06	40	0.14	14	0.40	35	0.24
Barbosa 1983		11	0.59	30	0.00	17	0.09	10	0.52	4	0.58	6	0.55
Biret 1990		37	0.50	24	0.00	30	0.09	28	0.33	12	0.50	20	0.41
Blet 2003		24	0.55	48	0.00	29	0.07	21	0.40	13	0.43	19	0.41
Block 1995		72	0.38	67	0.00	68	0.04	69	0.04	53	0.04	81	0.04
Blumental 1952		71	0.38	51	0.00	44	0.04	44	0.08	39	0.16	53	0.11
Boshniakovich 1969		17	0.57	6	0.06	19	0.09	26	0.35	18	0.50	18	0.42
Brailowsky 1960		52	0.45	83	0.00	69	0.04	63	0.04	41	0.10	65	0.06
Bunin 1987		1	0.65	1	0.14	1	0.13	1	0.62	2	0.61	3	0.61
Bunin 1987b		2	0.65	34	0.00	2	0.13	2	0.62	2	0.61	2	0.61
Chiu 1999		33	0.52	37	0.00	45	0.05	58	0.05	31	0.29	51	0.12
Cohen 1997		62	0.40	41	0.00	67	0.04	60	0.04	11	0.47	47	0.14
Cortot 1951		48	0.46	49	0.00	43	0.05	42	0.10	26	0.31	41	0.18
Csalog 1996		65	0.40	18	0.01	63	0.05	51	0.05	20	0.43	44	0.15
Czerny 1949		59	0.41	84	0.00	64	0.04	59	0.04	39	0.15	60	0.08
Czerny 1990		53	0.45	78	0.00	52	0.05	57	0.05	58	0.05	73	0.05
Duchoud 2007		26	0.55	10	0.03	9	0.09	15	0.48	15	0.47	13	0.47
Ezaki 2006		3	0.63	12	0.03	7	0.10	6	0.56	10	0.49	8	0.52
Falvay 1989		20	0.56	46	0.00	27	0.15	23	0.36	16	0.34	28	0.35
Farrell 1958		36	0.50	13	0.02	48	0.05	54	0.05	4	0.54	43	0.16
Ferenczy 1958		38	0.49	40	0.00	49	0.05	55	0.05	14	0.46	45	0.15
Fliere 1977		19	0.56	61	0.00	33	0.08	27	0.33	32	0.21	32	0.26
Fou 1978		6	0.61	5	0.08	15	0.13	17	0.46	13	0.47	14	0.46
Francois 1956		49	0.46	39	0.00	32	0.07	35	0.18	30	0.25	38	0.21
Friedman 1923		85	0.24	60	0.00	81	0.03	79	0.03	41	0.12	71	0.06
Friedman 1923b		84	0.24	45	0.00	80	0.02	87	0.02	43	0.10	83	0.04
Friedman 1930		70	0.39	29	0.00	53	0.04	61	0.04	22	0.40	50	0.13
Garcia 2007		80	0.29	85	0.00	78	0.03	80	0.03	37	0.17	63	0.07
Garcia 2007b		86	0.23	73	0.00	87	0.03	72	0.03	45	0.06	86	0.04
Gierzod 1998		25	0.55	21	0.01	28	0.11	24	0.36	12	0.40	23	0.38
Gornostaeva 1994		51	0.45	54	0.00	61	0.04	67	0.04	56	0.04	84	0.04
Groot 1988		44	0.48	58	0.00	56	0.05	48	0.05	71	0.03	85	0.04
Harasiewicz 1955		23	0.55	32	0.00	22	0.08	19	0.43	22	0.31	24	0.37
Hatto 1993		68	0.39	86	0.00	62	0.04	68	0.04	37	0.17	61	0.08
Hatto 1997		45	0.48	31	0.00	20	0.09	29	0.30	17	0.43	26	0.36
Horowitz 1949		57	0.42	33	0.00	66	0.05	49	0.05	43	0.08	66	0.06
Indjic 1988		61	0.41	79	0.00	54	0.04	64	0.04	32	0.22	57	0.09
Kapell 1951		18	0.56	59	0.00	21	0.09	16	0.48	15	0.46	12	0.47
Kissin 1993		21	0.56	35	0.00	34	0.08	30	0.30	29	0.31	31	0.30
Kushner 1989		40	0.49	47	0.00	42	0.04	43	0.10	39	0.16	48	0.13
Luisada 1991		50	0.46	76	0.00	60	0.04	65	0.04	56	0.05	75	0.04
Lushtak 2004		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Malcuzynski 1961		13	0.59	15	0.02	24	0.09	12	0.50	29	0.29	22	0.38
Magaloff 1978		29	0.53	2	0.12	3	0.12	18	0.44	23	0.27	29	0.34
Magin 1975		74	0.38	87	0.00	73	0.03	73	0.03	48	0.06	78	0.04
Michalowski 1933		79	0.30	66	0.00	71	0.03	77	0.03	52	0.05	79	0.04
Milkina 1970		73	0.38	88	0.00	75	0.03	85	0.03	83	0.03	89	0.03
Mohovich 1999		15	0.58	23	0.00	26	0.11	22	0.38	18	0.43	21	0.40
Moravec 1969		75	0.35	42	0.00	79	0.03	78	0.03	68	0.04	87	0.03
Morozova 2008		22	0.55	19	0.01	35	0.08	32	0.23	33	0.14	39	0.18
Neighaus 1950		4	0.62	16	0.02	13	0.10	5	0.58	19	0.45	10	0.51
Niedzielski 1931		83	0.25	74	0.00	82	0.03	84	0.03	69	0.03	88	0.03
Ohlsson 1999		10	0.59	62	0.00	18	0.10	9	0.53	10	0.46	11	0.49
Osinska 1989		46	0.47	36	0.00	51	0.06	47	0.06	35	0.15	55	0.09
Pachmann 1927		41	0.49	14	0.02	16	0.10	33	0.23	17	0.47	30	0.33
Paderewski 1930		42	0.49	43	0.00	38	0.06	41	0.14	11	0.45	33	0.25
Perlemuter 1992		32	0.52	68	0.00	37	0.07	36	0.17	26	0.32	36	0.23
Pierdomenico 2008		60	0.41	52	0.00	70	0.03	70	0.03	48	0.06	76	0.04
Poblocka 1999		12	0.59	4	0.09	5	0.14	7	0.55	5	0.53	7	0.54
Rabcewiczowa 1932		64	0.40	80	0.00	65	0.06	46	0.06	27	0.32	46	0.14
Rachmaninoff 1923		66	0.40	77	0.00	59	0.05	52	0.05	42	0.11	62	0.07
Rangell 2001		54	0.44	26	0.00	57	0.04	62	0.04	28	0.26	54	0.10
Richter 1976		31	0.52	63	0.00	39	0.05	39	0.15	15	0.37	34	0.24
Rosen 1989		43	0.48	56	0.00	58	0.05	50	0.05	75	0.03	82	0.04
Rosenthal 1930		76	0.33	89	0.00	77	0.03	75	0.03	42	0.11	68	0.06
Rosenthal 1931		77	0.31	71	0.00	83	0.03	81	0.03	40	0.12	67	0.06
Rosenthal 1931b		78	0.30	81	0.00	84	0.03	71	0.03	40	0.15	64	0.07
Rosenthal 1931c		69	0.39	44	0.00	72	0.03	74	0.03	41	0.13	70	0.06
Rosenthal 1931d		81	0.28	69	0.00	85	0.03	76	0.03	41	0.09	74	0.05
Rossi 2007		82	0.26	38	0.00	76	0.03	83	0.03	23	0.27	56	0.09
Rubinstein 1939		87	0.22	53	0.00	86	0.03	86	0.03	49	0.05	77	0.04
Rubinstein 1952		55	0.44	11	0.03	25	0.08	38	0.16	32	0.19	42	0.17
Rubinstein 1966		39	0.49	27	0.00	55	0.05	56	0.05	25	0.33	49	0.13
Schilhawsky 1960		14	0.58	3	0.09	4	0.10	14	0.48	5	0.57	9	0.52
Shebanova 2002		27	0.55	22	0.00	36	0.07	34	0.19	41	0.18	40	0.18
Smith 1975		8	0.60	20	0.01	6	0.10	3	0.61	7	0.51	4	0.56
Sokolov 2002		28	0.54	90	0.00	31	0.06	25	0.35	26	0.35	27	0.35
Sztompka 1959		34	0.50	72	0.00	50	0.06	45	0.06	37	0.21	52	0.11
Tomsic 1995		5	0.61	7	0.04	14	0.10	13	0.49	12	0.40	15	0.44
Uninsky 1932		47	0.46	50	0.00	40	0.06	37	0.17	25	0.25	37	0.21
Uninsky 1971		30	0.53	9	0.03	8	0.13	20	0.43	22	0.42	17	0.42
Wasowski 1980		63	0.40	75	0.00	47	0.04	66	0.04	39	0.17	59	0.08
Zak 1937		16	0.58	28	0.00	23	0.09	11	0.52	5	0.58	5	0.55
Zak 1951		9	0.60	17	0.02	10	0.09	4	0.60	3	0.65	1	0.62
Random 1		90	-0.04	70	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	70	0.03	90	0.02
Random 2		89	-0.04	64	0.00	89	0.02	89	0.02	42	0.11	72	0.05
Random 3		88	0.04	55	0.00	88	0.02	88	0.02	33	0.21	69	0.06

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).